Quantcast
Destructoid - sickNasty's Community Blog




About Me
I was raised on the Commodore and 386 computers, and then Sega Genesis. Thus my gaming identity was formed by a steady diet of Shareware(one word: Apogee), floppy disks, and rented Genesis games.

From there I went into the pupae stage with the Saturn and Nintendo 64, emerging from my cocoon with an Xbox.

These days, my time is spent on my 360 and Dreamcast. My PSP mostly finds use as an awkward mp3 player.

I work in advertising in NYC. As a graduate of PSU, when I'm not playing games or murdering vagrants, I'm following college football(JoePa is my religion)


Currently in rotation:
Halo 3
ODST
Far Cry 2
Turok
Indiana Jones and the Emperor's Tomb
Marvel vs. Capcom 2


Gamer Profile
3DS friend code:
Steam:
Battle:
PSN:
Mii:
Gamertag: sickNasty inc
Following (11)
casualweaponry
Colette Bennett
Dale North
iconsam
Jordan Devore
Nick Chester
Niero
Samit Sarkar
Senisan
Topher Cantler
vexed alex
F@$k you, Capcom.
sickNasty | 5:50 PM on 03.14.2009 26 comments


Capcom, you’re pissing me off. I don’t like the crap you’re pulling with Resident Evil 5. No, I’m not talking about the controls this time.

I’m talking about this versus mode bullshit you’re trying to pull.

For years games have had multiplayer and single player together as one product. Because that makes sense. Even crappy tacked on multiplayer in budget games gets included in the retail release.

But I guess you guys thought you were too cool for that. You actually have the balls to charge for a basic multiplayer game mode.

And it is basic multiplayer. This stuff is not going to blow anyone away. I mean it only supports 4 players total. What is this Goldeneye? And the way it was described in the PR release is even more insultingly stupid:

“In Survivor's Rule, players hunt the most dangerous game, each other!"

Players hunt…. each other???!?! Wow, thanks for the deathmatch, Capcom. You are certainly bringing us some revolutionary shit. If this was 1995, I might be impressed.


OMFG playing against real people!!!


Look, plenty of developers make the choice to not include multiplayer, or even to not have any form of single player. That’s fine, whatever suits the game.

But your decision to charge for multiplayer so soon after the game is released is a slap in the faces of your fans. Even more so because of your lame excuses.

First of all, the fact that you even had to come out and defend your choice should show you how retarded this is. When most companies announce a multiplayer mode in a game, they don’t have to defend it, because they don’t have the audacity to charge separately for it.

Anyway, your reasoning is that:

“the functionality is not currently in the game and is above and beyond the initial scope of Resident Evil 5.”

The game has been in the works for over 4 years and you're trying to convince us that this DLC that comes out a few weeks after release was beyond the initial scope? Hmmm. And who cares if something was in the initial scope of a game? Things are added or taken away all the time throughout the course of game development.

I guess the “initial scope” of the game included more vital things that had to be worked on in lieu of multiplayer. Yes very important things. Like a whore costume for one of your main characters.

“This is essential to the RE5 experience” – Capcom


Then you went on to say:

“We have never included a versus mode in Resident Evil before, and as well as the costs of development of the feature, there's also additional bandwidth costs associated with it."

Bullshit. RE5 will sell millions of copies, so I have no doubt you can cover your development costs with the $60 game. I’ll even go out on a limb here and guess that you will (gasp!) make a profit.

And it doesn’t matter that Resident Evil never had competitive multiplayer. Sequels always introduce new game modes. Because that is expected. The original Splinter Cell didn’t have multiplayer. Then Ubisoft threw it in there for the sequels.

Vampire Rain was a game no one asked for, yet it had online multiplayer included at retail. And if Vampire Rain is doing something better than your game, you’ve got problems.


Why does this game exist?


You are sending us down a slippery slope, Capcom. This isn’t about the price of your versus mode, this is about the precedent you are setting.

If this plan succeeds, what will the incentive be for companies to include interesting and new modes of gameplay in their releases? Would a company like Epic be inclined to include co-op, competitive multiplayer, and horde mode again in Gears of War 3? They would have no reason to, if they can charge extra for access to each of those game modes.

It’s only a matter of time before other companies start holding game modes back for future DLC. It may be limited to multiplayer modes, but who knows. I could see it getting to the point where consumers only buy a portion of the single player levels on a disc, and then have to shell out for DLC to finish the story.

And your plan will unfortunately succeed, because lots of people love Resident Evil. People can say we vote with our dollars, and that’s true, but I have a hard time blaming the people who buy this. As much as I’d like to tell people not to download this versus mode, why shouldn’t Resident Evil fans get to check out something they might be interested in? It would be admirable for them not to buy it, but RE5 fans shouldn’t have to miss out on fun just to send a message. No, the blame lies squarely on you, Capcom. You’ve put these fans in this position.

So Capcom, this one’s for you:

Jesus says: “Greed is one of the seven deadly sins, bitches.”



PS: I would consider boycotting your products, but unfortunately I’m way too excited for Dark Void and Lost Planet 2. You assholes.



Is this post awesome? Vote it up!

0



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

23 comments | showing # 1 to 23
prev next

FalconReaper's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 18:53
FalconReaper
That was an interesting read.RE 5 doesn't need a versus mode, instead , they should have added online leaderboards for Mercenaries.
pedrovay2003's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:01
pedrovay2003
If they wanted to do something useful, they could have patched the entire save system. The multiplayer is really unnecessary.
Zombie Pirate's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:06
Zombie Pirate
They should of done A "Tower Defense" Gameplay mode where you hold off endless hordes of Las Plagas with friends.
Tubatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:11
Tubatic
Shoot, I don't know man. Something like a multiplayer mode for angular-as-sin RE controls really doesn't look like something I'd want to put resources on if I'm thinking about what I need to have when I send my game to be content reviewed, certified, approved and then sent to Gold Master for pressing and distribution.

As much as one would want to think everything is supposed to fit into the planning, development and fine tuning process of a game, I'm certain lots of things in past generations have just found their way to "the cutting room floor". Kind of like how Metroid Prime didn't have a multiplayer or co-op feature at release, and never has.

DLC's a nice way to add content to a game without 1) delaying the main game 2) having to pay for additional packaging and pressing fees for said content 3) Not having to delay payment to developers for their extra time.

Meh, maybe I get all humanistic on this stuff because I'm "in the industry" in the most technical sense. But I think the scratch they make off of extra content goes a long way to keeping a team together now-a-days.
TheCleaningGuy's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:12
TheCleaningGuy
Resident Evil is not designed for competitive multiplayer.
Capcom is trying to appease those who wanted it. They're also charging 5 bucks for server upkeep.
Also, why the comparison to vampire rain having multiplayer? Versus is not a necessary component of a game, the Vampire Rain developers just thought it would be a good idea. This is like complaining that Mega Man 3 doesn't have co-op when Contra does.
sickNasty's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:15
sickNasty
@Tubatic:

True, certain kinds of DLC are fine. But do you really think Capcom needs this financially? RE5 will sell millions of copies.

And yes, things make the cutting room floor. But this game was in development for over 4 years. Think of all the other games that include tons of new modes (Like Gears 2) and they are developed in a much shorter time frame.
sickNasty's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:16
sickNasty
@Thecleaningguy:

No your comparison is completely false. You didn't have to buy Contra's co-op separately from the main game.
Jesus H Christ's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:25
Jesus H Christ
Greed is one of the seven deadly sins, bitches.
Tubatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:27
Tubatic
@SickNasty

"But do you really think Capcom needs this financially?" Well, yeah, good point. Considering how many top notch franchises they have, they've got to be drippin' bills. But, I guess you don't get to be top dog by giving away freebies. :/

While I can't attest to what all they put their time into, there's plenty that could be said for what makes Gears or some other games a shorter production cycle. Pre-made engine, re-used assets, prior experience on the console for the dev team and only needing to focus on a single console, at least.
covah's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:27
covah
@Zombie pirate

That actually sounds like a good idea. Basically horde in Gears 2, but still... good idea for RE
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:35
mix
I think I'm more pissed with that stupid save system they have. Totally not shelling out $5 for an online 4 player shoot fest.
DonHonk's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 19:47
DonHonk
I agree with you so much.
Dv8thwonder's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 20:10
Dv8thwonder
Resident Gears an Evil War 5/4.Improper fractions for improper game.I'm actually looking forward to Wii' Darkside Chronicles after this debacle.
BlackFreefall's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 20:13
BlackFreefall
In other words, Capcom should release this 6 months after and everyone would be a happy camper.
Crumpet Lips's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 21:11
Crumpet Lips
I agree, I don't know why they didn't already have it in the game or even as a free download. It's just bullshit, thankfully I wont be buying this garbage. Resident Evil is crap anyway.
de BLOO's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 22:28
de BLOO
I never got into Resident Evil anyway...

I'll play the waiting game and see how this turns out.
fetusmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/14/2009 23:53
fetusmilk
mmmmm dark void
tallica710's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/16/2009 16:13
tallica710
this gayyyyyyyme....is gay
Tino's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/16/2009 18:34
Tino
The only justification I can really think of for this is to combat used prices. It's no secret that the industry is losing money to the used market and through DLC is the only way a company can "truly" make money off a used sale.

HOWEVER -

This would also rely on this content coming with a new copy of the game via in-package scratch off code. Think Gears Of War 2. They included a $10 map pack (that included achievements) in the package for everyone who bought it new while everyone who purchased it used that wants the maps has to pay their $10 to access the same content. Hence Epic still makes a little money off their used sale.

Capcom ALMOST did the right thing with Street Fighter 4 with a DLC code for free outfits BUT they once again blundered and only did it for collectors edition copies and only 1 costume pack.

I almost have faith they will figure out how to release something like this and not make the masses angry.



That being said I'll probably end up buying this DLC. (Ruins the whole point of being angry at it.)
sickNasty's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/16/2009 22:08
sickNasty
Tino, my man.

See that's the thing, I don't have a problem with you buying the DLC. Because why should you or any RE5 fan not get something that you're interested in? I'm a huge Halo fan, if multiplayer was a separate cost, of course I'd pay for it. But of course Bungie doesn't pull that kind of crap.

I'm pissed at Capcom because they are making this a decision that must be made. They should be like every other developer and put all the game modes in one package. Or at least not charge separately for it.
Jidai Geki's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2009 00:17
Jidai Geki
The whole DLC thing has been getting way out of control for a while now (Bethsoft being one of the worst perpetrators of making gamers pay for lame additions). It's a sad state of affairs that will continue to get worse. At least Valve are doing the decent thing and releasing material for free.
fetusmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2009 23:39
fetusmilk
jidai geki:
fetusmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2009 23:40
fetusmilk
damnit i hate not being able to resize bbcode images
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!