Just for you guys I am going to combine my Answers to your Answers from gamespot with a bran new one. Read carefuly!!
Answers to your Answers 1
Hello, today I am going tell you why youshould buy the Nintedo 3DS, by Answering yourresponses to the Nintendo 3DS.
1:"I think the3D will damage my eyes, soI am not buying It."
The 3D will not damage your eyes, It has actualy been tested and proovenbuy science that 3D will not damage your eyes. To tell you the truth, science is quite anoyed that random people ceap sending out warnings about3D EYE damage.
2:" Ithink the price is too exspensive."
Well thats too bad, life is exspensive man. Ihad topay $120 just to buy a LEGO castle! Not to consider the fact that the 3DS comes and does a lotmore than a couple thousand pieces of plastic.
3:" I am waiting forthe 3DS lite."
News flash! There will be no3DSlite. Look, there is nothingNintendo can upgrade except for the battery life on the 3DS. Its as small as the lite,(or smaller)so there will be no need to make itany smaller. The cameras could be improoved, but since they didn`t realy improove them much on the 3DS, I doutNintendo will make a new system just to improove the cameras now. It seems thevideocamera will be downlodable and nothing else can be improoved or added to the 3DS without It being a new system, so there will be nolite.
4:" I am going to get the PSP2 insted, because it will have the graphical power of the PS3."
If what you said Is true, the batery life could end up being 1-3 Hours with the price of$500-$900 US. Why do I think this will be the price and batery life you ask? Well I put this together buy the fact that Nintendo`s 3DS has only 3-5 hour batery life with a $250 price tag. IfNintendois all about saveings and baterylife, and the price is expensive and the hours are small, the PSP2 must be terrible at both. And welllets all faceit,3rd party develepers and producers can only make one great game per system at a time. If Nintedo has terrible 3rd party suport, we will still get great 1st party games, but if Sony gets Bad3rd party games we will be stuck with playing bad games, so I think Nintendo is the best bet.
5: "I dont know what the lanch lineup of games are, I am scared to buy the 3DS."
This Is for you:
Dead or Alive Dimensions $49.99
Samurai Warriors Chronicles $49.99
Lego Star Wars III: The Clone Wars $39.99
Madden NFL Football $39.99
Sims 3 $39.99
Nintendogs & Cats $39.99
Steel Diver $39.99
Pilotwings Resort $39.99
Super Street Fighter IV $39.99
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Shadow $39.99
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell $39.99
Combat of Giants: Dinosaurs $39.99
Rabbids Travel in Time $39.99
Cartoon Network SuperToon Rumble $39.99
Animal Crossing 3D $39.99
Mario Kart 3D $39.99
Paper Mario 3D $39.99
Dream Trigger $39.99
Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time 3D $39.99
Kid Icarus: Uprising $39.99
Star Fox 64 3D $39.99
Super Monkey Ball $39.99
Resident Evil: Mercenaries $39.99
Face Kart: Photo Finish $39.99
Pet Zombies in 3D $39.99
I found This info at http://kotaku.com/5740777/gamestop-listings-peg-3ds-titles-at-40-to-50-in-us
Well that is the end of todays Answers to your Answers. See you next time
Answers to your Answers 2
i really see nothing worthwhile about this new ds that merits a purchase... the only thing that i'm even remotely interested in is the AR. other than that putting a '3' in front of 'ds' isn't gonna cut it for me.
and i swear to jeebus if i see one of you fanboys that knock the ngp for having console games on the go playing oot i'm gonna slap the thing out of your hands lol:
Answer: Hey reesespiecesftw, shut your mouth; you have no idea what you are talking about, I bet you didn`t even look into the games or improoved graphics of the 3DS! I hate people who shoot there mouth off before they look into things... did you even see that graphics look beter than the PSP or Wii, or how thatNintendois fixing every problem that waswrong with the original ds...I thought so!
WolfGrey: Sony may have power and it may have a great backing but if the beginning lineup and support isnt enough for frontal sales then it wont do that well.However it has great many bigtime Developers working on games for it and im sure many more to come.So i think it has a decent chance at a fairly good share of the market.
The 3DS however has great charm as always and a wonderful beginning lineup(very strong).So of course it will sell and do well but not for the 3D.It will do well for its gaming, not the 3D.Most people i know or have seen(even on here) intend to turn off the 3D as soon as they get it with the 3D slider.
Anyway i wish good luck to both.So stop being fanboys and appreciate every system for that they are:
Answer: I loved WolfGrey said here, he new what he was talking about and had a good atitude about it without saying Jesus` name in vain.
longjohndevine @WolfGrey. wise up.
Sony's handheld strategy at the moment is completly crazy, they are trying to swamp the market with so many different devices that fall under the Playstation label. Sony's NGP may be the most powerful of the handhelds. But I really dont think Sony will have one distinct product with their new strategy that will "defeat" the DS, they will have a large market share, simply because of the range they are offering.
NONE OF WHICH WILL HAVE AS GOOD A SOFTWARE AS THE DS.
There is also a great point here, Sony is sending out so many devices that they are literaly fighting themselves. If Sony wants to stay in this war they will have to realese all functions on oneplatform for under $200.
warhawk-geeby: Actually I'd like to predict that 3D will be a passing phase.. I honestly think it will. It's already known that cinema showings for 2D & 3D films are starting to sway towards the 2D again, but then this could be due to the extortionate prices that come with 3D? Who knows:
Answer: In one of your older coments you said that youwhere blind in your left eye, which means you havent seen3D properly, so please dont wright things like these foryour sake.
See you next time on Answers to your Answers.
Answers to your Answers 3
If there was only one videogame company:
Instead of posing a question to the community and expecting Dtoiders to answer said question, I would recommend that you answer your own question and expand upon this idea. It's an interesting idea and one that would benefit from a well-written analysis.
Answer: I would love to do that, but unfortunatly I don`t have an answer...
Yeah, because a monopoly is always a good idea.
Competition breeds excellence. If business executives could be trusted to give us a good console, I'd be fine with it. However as they can't be trusted to give us anything but a big "fuck you" if they think they can get away with it (or more correctly, if we allow them to give it to us), I'll pass.
Answer: your right in some ways, but Nintendo says there not in a compatition with anyone and they dont give us crap.
The only thing is with no competition, they could charge whatever they wanted too
Answer: Get ready to spend $2,000 on WiiU54 come 2045.
That would be nice. I think they could make slightly more expensive consoles, which wouldn't matter because there'd only be one company. Also, there would still be the sae number of teams.
It would hurt the indies though, if they had to join the big company and get their games greenligthed. At best the big company could take more chances because it earns a lot on many of their games anyway, and can tackle losses on a few games. At worst they would take few chances and there'd be little innovation.
Answer: It could hurt the indies, but the said company could then buy them all....
Well thats all the time we have today folkes, see you next time on Answers to your Answers. read