Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by manasteel88 | Jim Sterling, Opinions and MetacriticDestructoid
Jim Sterling, Opinions and Metacritic - Destructoid

DestructoidJapanatorTomopopFlixist





click to hide banner header
About


Front Paged:
E for Effort: Mass Effect 1+2
E3 2010 Recap
Changes: Fatherhood
Technical Difficulties: What A Difference Time Makes
A True Opponent Stands Before Me
P2 Press Start: Chip n' Dale Rescue Rangers
10 Games Captain America Would Play
Looking Out for the Little Guy

Front Paged on Flixist:
The Dichotomy of a Dark Knight
Not Understanding Your Audience
A True Classic: Superman Returns

Articles I wrote that I liked:
That One Mook: Gafgarion
My first playthrough of Resident Evil 2
Love/Hate: Operation Darkness
EVO 2010
Recettear Preview
Teh Bias: Nippon Ichi Software, Dood!
More Than Just Noise: Haunted by Final Fantasy
2010: Year in review and some other musings
Obligatory Destructoid Community Rocks Post
Groundhog Day: Stuck in a Book
A story from the Wasteland
PowerUp 2011
E3 2011: MS, Sony, Ninty, and AWARDS
Freedom: Jetpacks
Handhelds: East vs West
Labor Day: Player 2
Online Passes: Nickles and Dimes
2011: Year in Review and Top 10 XBL Indies



Twinfinite stuff I wrote that I liked:
Comics:
Before Watchmen: It's Not the End of the World
Retrospection: The X-Men vs The Avengers
DC Kills Again
Lists:
10 Reliable XBLIG Devs You Should Know
10 Disney Classics that Need Remastering
5 Best Moments from EVO 2013
5 Reasons Why the PS2 Was So Successful
5 Ways to Add Flavor to PS Allstars
Editorials:
Did We Really Need to Break Lara Croft?
Father's Day: Bass Armstrong
Why Do We Need Final Fantasy 7 HD?
Wormlight: A Group of No Name Losers
You Can't Fix Bad Parenting
You Don't Deserve Forgiveness
A Forgotten Hero
Future Diary: The Trial of the Father
Silver Haired Devils: Sephiroth, Magneto, Griffith
Sony Made Art Out of Ads
Celebrate the Ridiculousness of Games
The Graying of Gaming
What is Your Deserted Island Game?
An Opinion on How Value is Underappreciated in Gaming
Lazy Brain Games Legacy
Arkham Knight's Knightfall
Next-Gen Gamers: Kinect Party
Interviews:
An Interview with Adam Spragg
An Interview with Miguel Sternberg
An Interview with Nekros Lead Designer
An Interview with Divekick's Adam Heart
An Interview with The Behemoth's Ian Moreno
An Interview with Firebase Studios
An Interview with Lazy Brain Games: Part 1 / Part 2
An Interview with Fun Infused Games
Nonsense:
Should I Be Happy Sonic is Selling Me Insurance
Is the $99 Xbox Worth It?
These Games Don't Belong on Steam?
Quest for Sexy Seaside Beachball: Part 1 / Part 2


Comics in Games
Comics in Games: Games in Comics
Comics in Games: The Original Batman
Comics in Games: Fantastic Four
Comics in Games: Fantastic Four Deleted Scenes
Comics in Games: Superman
Comics in Games: The Best of Marvel 1994

Comics in Crossover Games
- Spider-man and Captain America in Dr. Doom's Revenge!
- Spider-man the Video Game
- Spider-man and the X-men in Arcade's Revenge
- Marvel Super Heroes: War of the Gems
- Iron Man and X-O Manowar in Heavy Metal
- Marvel Brothel
- Mortal Kombat vs DC Universe
- Batman: The Brave and the Bold


It Came From The Quarter Bin

- 1st Edition
- Promised Vengeance
- Sarah's Story Remembered
- First Strike! Extra!
- Fluffie Kiss
- 2112
- The Holiday Spirit
- Days of GLX-Mas Past



Games Created:
Dariaia
Twinfinite Pirate Kart


I was on a podcast! Listen to me!
NJ EP 01: Neo Geo Pocket Color
NJ EP 04: Mega Man Legends


Episode 92: E3 09
Episode 73: Intro
Episode 71: Intro
Episode 70: Intro
Episode 68: Sonic the Hedgehog
Episode 67: Intro
Episode 66: Intro
Episode 65: Reader Questions
Episode 64: Intro
Episode 63: Neo Geo
Episode 62: Intro
Episode 61: Beat 'em Ups
Episode 60: Rhythm Games
Episode 36: Couples
Episode 34: TurboGrafx 16
Episode 32: SHMUPS
Episode 27: SNES



My Greatest Failure

"We constantly have to revisit 'Why would Donkey Kong do this?' or 'Why would this environment be like this?' And then we start thinking: 'We're making a game about a gorilla wearing a tie.'"
-Michael Kelbaugh of Retro Studios on Donkey Kong Country Returns



"I have to say it's kinda scary how much you know about this game."
-Nicolau Chaud creator of Marvel Brothel
Player Profile
Follow me:
manasteel88's sites
Badges
Following (24)  




I am writing all of this, because I'm tired of seeing Jim get ragged on. Not because I personally have any issue with him being ragged on, I really don't mind that. I mind when people seem to demean me as a reader because they have some issue with Jim Sterling's persona on Destructoid.

First and foremost, I personally don't like Jim Sterling's in your face persona and informal review style. This opinion doesn't affect a single thing I do on this website as a member. I respect him as a journalist and a gamer, even if he doesn't actually think the first title should be placed on him.

Sidenote just because I have to get this out. Jim types about news, which is journalism. Even though he tiptoes around it, he's a journalist. Just because somebody entertains you while giving you news doesn't change the journalism of it all.



Now to the fact that somebody in this industry had the balls to ask another person to remove articles from Metacritic. This is BULLSHIT. I could care less if it was Jim Sterling's review or Jeremy Parish's. To even suggest such censorship as a writer is simply rude.

Let me explain something. If Jim Sterling gives Duke Nukem Forever a 2/10, there must be something in this game that potentially could offend somebody. After reading about the rape joke, who am I to disagree that somebody might find this to be terrible. If the man puts that much effort in to making the review readable, there has to be content behind the words. To not have a review that scores this game properly on those grounds is criminal.

That's what Metacritic does well. It makes sure that the good and the bad offset each other. I'm sure a PR personality would love for a 9.4 and above for every game they make. That is a critics job to see if they should deserve this. Do I disagree with Sterling's review scores? Constantly. However, everybody who can write intelligently deserves to have their story told about a game.

At the end of the day, there will be something gained from his tale.



Do I agree that there is any issue with Metacritic? Absolutely not. Metacritic takes a group of professionals opinions and posts short snippets and scores from each review to weave a story of what this game may be. In effect, it helps consumers decide if a game is good or not. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think a lot of people in the games industry click the link to open the game's page up.

You'd be surprised, but there are words on Metacritic. I rarely hear people say this in conversations about the website, but it isn't just a listing of numbers. These words are then paired with links to where the words come from that let you see what else they had to say. In effect, it creates a system of finding out for yourself where you will attach your opinion to. This might seem like common sense to you or I, but for many that talk about Metacritic it seems foreign.

That is what I don't think anybody inside the PR departments (and I guess review industry) seems to understand. I as a consumer form my opinion on games based on reviews. However, I base them on the reviews I trust. I'll admit, if I see a 2.0, I'm more curious to know why. If the reviewer fails in his case to persuade me, then I don't rely on that review for my purchase.



Sorry, maybe there are those among us that are too lazy to research our purchases. That we scroll down the page, see 2.0 and think "clearly that means it sucks and I can't be assed to find out why." Actually, I'm sure there are people like that. However, as a reviewer, it isn't your job to cater to the lazy. Your job is of consumer advocacy.

For that I think Jim has done a decent job in his career at Destructoid. Much like Adam Sessler, I don't agree with many of his opinions, his preferences, or his comedy. However he has the right to present it in the manner he sees fit.

It can't just be me seeing things or is Dtoid just becoming a magnet for people to attack? First, HG101 attacks Darren Nakamura's review of Y's 1 and 2 in the most childish way I've seen from people in the industry. I still can't believe they had the nerve to call him a charlatan and a boy and then attempt to back it up with a second post (both links have subsequently been taken down). Then Leigh runs off and types an article to her followers stating that Jim should remove his reviews from a review aggregate? Really? Because he's a bit of a wanker at times?

I just hate having what I read on a daily basis be questioned by people who call themselves professionals without a lick of support behind them. While there are a lot of words between these three articles, of which only one can unfortunately be seen, they have no content to back it up. I'll agree that Darren's Y's review was pretty bad and I called out Brad Nicholson on his shoddy Street Fighter AE review. I did that all on this site to them.

The fact that Leigh Alexander who most likely does have a Destructoid account still, trolled for hits on her own blog by calling out Jim Sterling is completely unprofessional. Don't tell him he needs to reign in his review just because it's harsh. Explain why his reviews shouldn't be considered professional. Something more than people like Jim and Jim is controversial.

If anybody has an issue with a review, counter the argument. Don't sit back and break down a person, the company that hires them and the community that reads their articles. Use those balls you've grown and showcase why these reviews need to be stricken from the record. I fucking hate having to call out "professional" game journalists and writers on fucking writing quality posts.

If you think Metacritic is stacking the cards wrong, counter the point by actually countering the reviews in the way you feel is needed. It might be amoral, but it's change. Otherwise Metacritic is doing its job pretty well by getting a large number of people's opinions on games.



Darren as a person picking up Y's 1 and 2 for the first time wrote a review of a game that came out in 2011. You can't fault him for that. He wrote a review that should reflect anybody fresh to the series.

Jim as a controversial guy writes lines in a review that are controversial and he has to back that shit up. If you read the Duke review, you can form your own opinion of if he does that. For something that long, with that many different points outlined, and with an opinion that's not even outrageous in the aggregate, how can you fault him.

If they write piss poor reviews call them on it. Explain why. Don't call them entertainers or swindlers. Really explain why they are often wrong.

I'm tired of lazy writers calling themselves professionals and then posting bullshit articles like these. There isn't one thing wrong about any review on this website that deserves to be taken down from Metacritic. Including that god awful Fire Emblem review by Leigh Alexander.



Is this blog awesome? Vote it up!




Those who have come:



Comments not appearing? Anti-virus apps like Avast or some browser extensions can cause this.
Easy fix: Add   [*].disqus.com   to your software's white list. Tada! Happy comments time again.

Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.


Back to Top




All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more