Much has been said about how much
Uncharted 2 does right.
The Destructoid review offers a ton of praise for the game, especially its ability to offer thrilling moment after thrilling moment, keeping your adrenaline pumping and your controller gripped tightly in your hands. These moments are truly excellent.
Yet this excellence, for me, proves to also be one of the more disappointing things about
Uncharted 2; not the excellence itself, but the moments in which the game doesn’t offer the same level of quality as its high points. Indeed,
Uncharted 2 seems torn between the incredible scripted thrills that it offers a couple of times per level, and the same tired, poorly done shooting that leaves the player feeling unsatisfied.
I’m not here to review
Uncharted 2 for you, but rather to look at a specific issue that the game brings up—how excellence ends up making something “good” feel simply mediocre. I’ll be discussing specific scenes from the game, just to warn you.
It’s my feeling that the majority of the incredible moments in
Uncharted 2 are made so excellent largely due to how they look; they’re visual wonders, taking our breath away much like the view from a snowy mountaintop does.
Take the example of the opening train sequence: one that contains so many incredible scripted events that, as Nick suggest in his review, it instantly propels itself above the somewhat lacking “adventure” films of recent memory. You instantly feel as if you’re participating in a truly grand adventure.
Much of this feeling is due to the visuals, both technically, artistically, and what I’ll call “situationally” for lack of a better word. It’s fairly apparent that
Uncharted 2 is an incredible game visually, and these three elements combine to make it leaps and bounds above other recent games.
First off, the screenshots of this game show of just what the team was able to pull of technically. Whether the characters are inside or outside, everything looks incredible. Textures are fantastic, characters move fluidly (for the most part), and environments look impressive.
Similarly, the artistic side of the game is quite extraordinary. Dilapidated cities have the look and feel of real dwellings, and old temples, despite having seemingly been built with Drake and his jumping ability in mind, have some incredible designs. But perhaps the most effective artistic choices are related to camera angles and movements, giving the game a far more cinematic feel than any game before it.
When you’re in control of your character, the camera is in constant movement, especially during those heavily scripted events I’ve referred to before. But let’s take a simple example of squeezing through a crack in the landscape. This is necessary a few times during the game, and while it’s an incredibly basic and, frankly, meaningless action, Naughty Dog has managed to make it look exciting simply through the use of camera movement. As Drake approaches the crack, the camera sweeps extremely close to Drake, showing both him and the crevice itself in extreme detail. You can see every body movement required of Drake as he squeezes through, and you even share in the feeling of contorting your body to pass through the crack.
But what’s most important to the overall quality of
Uncharted 2 are the situational visuals that pop up in scripted events, and they’re the things that make an event like the opening train climb so thrilling. To offer an example, the struggle of climbing the hanging train car ends just as the rest of the train is falling off of the cliff, and Drake must make a last-second jump from the falling car to the cliff. If the scene sounds incredible, you’d be right, and the best part is that you’re in full control throughout, from rushing past the seats as the angle of the car rapidly approaches vertical to the last-second jump.
The visual details here are the main source of excitement. Chunks of rock and snow fall as the car slips closer and closer to its inevitable plummet, sparks fly as metal grinds on metal, and the camera remains in constant motion, getting closer to, getting farther away from, and sweeping around Drake. Even as Drake’s grip on the cliff slips, and control is finally taken from the player, the sequence remains completely gripping. The camera lags behind Drake’s movement, making it appear that he has fallen from the cliff.
These are the moments that define
Uncharted 2, yet they are, for the most part, moments that last for no more than, well, a moment. Put together, their sum provides one of the most compelling experiences this year, but not all is well in Naughty Dog’s well-crafted world.
The core mechanics of the game—what remains when all of the incredible visual qualities are stripped away—are far less compelling. In essence, the game mixes jumping and climbing with cover-based gun battles, very similarly to the way that the previous entry in the series did. Is there anything inherently wrong with this? No.
But the fact of the matter is that those levels in which you’re simply progressing from point A to point B, jumping over and shooting anything in your path, pale in comparison to those heavily scripted events like the one described above. Your average firefight against the game’s bullet-sponge enemies simply doesn’t elicit the same excitement.
But in my disappointment over the regular jumping and shooting, I realized something: there’s nothing bad about them. Plenty of other games, like
Borderlands, have bullet-sponge enemies.
Prince of Persia made nearly an entire game out of jumping, and I thought it was great. So what’s the problem here?
The excellence of parts of the game was making much of it feel quite a bit worse to me. It’s something, as the title suggests, that I started to think of as the burden of excellence. If you’re going to make some sections of your game so unforgettably awesome, you must also be prepared for how it will affect the rest of your game. Here, unfortunately, I feel that it’s a negative effect. Parts of the game that are simply good seem mediocre or even poor simply because our expectations are raised so high.
Of course, I don’t want to suggest that
Uncharted 2 fucked up by being so damn awesome. I still consider it to be a fantastic game, and among the best this year. But it does show us the danger of putting so much into a certain part, section, or aspect of a game. In this case, impressing the player with visuals—whether they’re technical, artistic, or situational—takes precedence over the actual gameplay mechanics, and if you ask me, the game suffers somewhat because of it, even if the game doesn’t necessarily do anything “bad.” Good enough isn’t good enough when it’s paired with pure excellence.
I only read as far as the third paragraph as I have zero interest in this game, but if those first three blocks of text are any indication, this is just another blog in the archive of epic win you've slowly built up since the start of this year.
Those screenshots sure are pretty.
Why don't you two cut the tension and make out already?
Only if you agree to join in, Ving. I've always, you know, sort of had a thing for you.
I appreciate the concept of the "Burden of Excellence" and I think you've given me an idea for an entirely seperate blog that I won't go into here.
For the most part, I agree with you, but I'm not sure Uncharted 2 is necessarily the best example to use. I think the "holy shit" moments are perfectly balanced with the catch-your-breath gameplay segments. I think Dead Space would probably fit the bill here. The game sort of used up all its good scares in the beginning, and just never reached those heights again, unfortunately.
Thought provoking post, thanks.
I haven't played the game... but the burden of those excellent graphics also extend to other games. I've been spoiled by playing Ratchet and Clank, COD, Killzone 2, Burnout Paradise - crisp clear visuals... really outstanding.
I've just started Dragon Age: Origins... and while I already love the story so far... but the the visuals! Oh, they're terrible. They seem very PS2ish to me. Yeah, I'm a graphics whore. I've just started the game, and I guess even if they don't get better, hopefully the gameplay still remains Baldur's Gate/NeverWinter Nights ish... because the graphics certainly are.
Great blog! But the same can be said about any other form of entertainment.. Some songs you Love on an album? The rest.. Meh. But i felt the exact same way playing uncharted 2. The mediocre bits seemed so much Worse compared to the rest, even though they were awesome compared to any other games standard..
Taken out of context, the title of this blog could be construed as incredibly self-masturbatory.
Actually, Krow, that's going to be my next blog: "Dragon Age and why I'm a fucking golden god of awesome." :P
Well I don't want too much of Uncharted 2 spoiled for me, so I just skimmed this. But I do understand what you're saying, but can't really fully grasp it. Guess I have to play the game then I'll see perfectly.
I can't quite agree with you. For the most part, the actual gameplay is laced with dialog from the characters and many of the encounters are still fast-paced and exciting. I never found myself thinking "Hurry up, let's get to the next big scene."
Still, a very good point.
This reminds me of my experience playing MGS. So much you can do, it's disappointing when you figure out the things you CAN'T do... like, jump.
No, Kauza! You promised you would save yourself for me! You treacherous dog, you!
Good article. You definitely raise some interesting ideas.
I, for one, will deal with the "lows" if it means I can experience the incredible "highs" of this game. I think you can liken it to people with bi-polar disorder or depression. A lot of time when you hear them discuss their medication, it comes back to a description of them feeling "dead" inside, or as having no emotional highs or lows in their daily life. Those same people also say they'd rather not be on the meds so that they can experience life as they once knew it, even if it means they must deal with the extreme lows.
You cannot have peaks without valleys. In the case of Uncharted 2, it's a good thing the valleys aren't too deep.
Good article :)