Quantcast
Destructoid - dronkmunk's Community Blog




About Me


Hated by many. pwned by none.
tehlush.blogspot.com
Gamer Profile
3DS friend code:
Steam:
Battle:
PSN:
Mii: dronkmunk@gmail.com
Gamertag:
Following (12)
AgentMOO
BahamutZero
blaow85 - Avatar setup pending
Colette Bennett
Darkknight37
Jack Thompson
Jim Sterling
MuRRaY
Sadie G
soul3150
tsunamikitsune
xper
GTA IV Radio Stations and "Special Someone" Revealed
dronkmunk | 7:53 AM on 04.16.2008 21 comments




Chalk up another 10/10 review score for Grand Theft Auto 4. Unfortunately it doesn't really mean anything since it is from Playstation Magazine. However, once again, there is some new information revealed within. Check it:

# One of the reasons Niko goes to Liberty City is to track down the man who betrayed his old army unit.
# Cars don't catch fire after a bit of damage any more.
# There are several points at which you need to make life or death decisions between prominent characters.
# Comedy clubs feature real comedians.
# "Michelle" is the first girl that Niko hooks up with.
# Dimitiri Rascalov is Mikhail Faustin's right hand man.
# Another use of the phone include "calling a target to make him come to the window and into Niko's sniper sight."
# There is a museum called the Libertonian museum, which features dinosaur fossils and exploding vases. Environments such as these have been created specifically for shootouts.
# OPM say that GTA4 is influenced by the movie 'Eastern Promises', Fast Food, Celebrity Culture, Fox News and the TV show 'Brotherhood'.
# OPM also state that the game is not perfect, and that there are sometimes problems with the aiming system occasionally locking onto incapacitated enemies rather than those who are shooting at you, but that it's a massive improvement over the previous aiming systems.
# Helicopters are said to be very difficult to fly, and bikes are very fragile meaning you'll most likely be flying off it every few seconds.

ALSO, all of the radio stations have been revealed:

* The name of every radio station is revealed:
o Electro Choc (dance)
o Fusion FM
o IF99 - International Funk (funk)
o Integrity 2.0 (speech, hosted by Lazlow)
o Jazz Nation Radio 108.5 (jazz)
o K109 The Studio (disco)
o Liberty City Hardcore (punk/hardcore)
o Liberty Rock Radio 97.8 (classic rock)
o Massive B Soundsystem 96.9 (dance hall)
o PLR - Public Liberty Radio (call-in speech)
o Radio Broker (rock)
o San Juan Sounds (latin)
o The Beat 102.7 (contemporary hip-hop)
o The Classics 104.1 (old-skool hip-hop)
o The Journey (Ambient)
o The Vibe 98.8 (soul)
o Tuff Gong Radio (reggae/dub)
o Vladivostok FM (eastern european)
o WKTT - We Know The Truth (right wing talk radio)

Courtesy of The GTA Place and GTA4.TV



Attached photos:

Photo

Is this post awesome? Vote it up!

0



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

19 comments | showing # 1 to 19
prev next

Justice's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 08:25
Justice
No KJAH!
:O
razerangel's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 08:57
razerangel
LOLZ OPM IS TEH GAYZZ, grow up dude. OPM UK is one of the better mags on the market these days.
Samit Sarkar's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 09:07
Samit Sarkar
Damn, dronkmunk, you are just a treasure trove of GTA IV-related info today!
dronkmunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 09:12
dronkmunk
Who said I trashed OPM? Their review doesn't count because its fucking Playstation magazine. Ever heard of bias?
MaxVest's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 10:02
MaxVest
I'm simultaneously delighted and terrified by the potential of WKTT.
YONKE's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 10:10
YONKE
special guest in comedy shows Jerry Seinfeld FTL
dronkmunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 10:33
dronkmunk
I hear Ricky Gervais will be in there too.
hpv's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 11:04
hpv
LAZLOW! They'd better have some free DLC to update the radio stations down the line.
Trev's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 14:13
Trev
Their review doesn't count because its fucking Playstation magazine. Ever heard of bias?

Yet the OXM review is the "real" one, right?
dronkmunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 15:05
dronkmunk
^ *Clearly did not read my post on the OXM review.*
Trev's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 15:19
Trev
I did, and just did again to be sure. You at no point say it "doesn't really mean anything" or "doesn't count" because it's OXM. In fact, you went out of your way to link to it calling it the "Real Review, from OXM" in a comment.

One counts, one doesn't, both from "Official" publications, both awesome scores; if you're going to play the "just a messenger" angle to separate yourself from potential bias in a magazine article, why lace the message with bias?
Trev's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 15:41
Trev
I guess my question was vague. Why the bias towards one publication? Is there a reason that the PSM score and review are shit, but the SAME score from OXM is reliable?

I don't doubt for a second that both the PSM and OXM reviews are biased in some way. I want to know what the difference is.
blaow85's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 15:44
blaow85
Trev you are off here. He looked at both these magazines in the same light as something like Nintendo Power and I got his point that either one might hype a game to help sell a console. Obviously their "real review" was a link to the one that was published by them, as opposed to the not-real-review recap here.

They both "count" as the first official reviews. The 10's are what may not count. Dronkmunk can correct me if I'm wrong.
dronkmunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 15:55
dronkmunk
Pretty much the entire post that I did on the OXM review, aside from where I basically say "Yes, this [score] is biased," is a copy-pasta job from GTAgaming, which I also explain.

Reading comprehension wins again.
dronkmunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 16:00
dronkmunk
And I when I said "Real Review" I meant a review that was done by an actual reviewer/publication, and not one that was written by some jack-off that lives with his parents that you bought into on your blog. At this point, the only reason I would recommend that you buy an xbox if you don't already have one is so that I can personally run you over with my car in Liberty City.
Trev's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 16:16
Trev
Wow, touchy.

The question I asked was entirely related to your additions to the article. From one it was "Before the justified outcry at this review being biased since it is from an Xbox magazine, I hear you and I am just the messenger. I am here to share information." and from the other it was "Unfortunately it doesn't really mean anything since it is from Playstation Magazine." and "Their review doesn't count because its fucking Playstation magazine. Ever heard of bias?"

I was asking if there was something in the text of the PSM review that made it especially untrustworthy. Since the actual text of that review doesn't seem to be available, you must be denouncing it as worthless barely a sentence in for some other reason. And yes, I linked to a third party that had no reason to be biased which I thought was a better review source.
dronkmunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 16:26
dronkmunk
Well, I didn't mean to say it was worthless, even though that is exactly what I said. I meant the [b]score[b] was worthless. The review was fine, PSM is fine, etc. It was not a slam against the magazine, it was more of a caveat of "Don't get your hopes up." You appear to be the only one struggling with that concept and I am happy to sort it for you. So, are we about done here?
Trev's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 16:54
Trev
If you're going to write exactly what you don't mean, there's no need to be an asshole about it when someone asks a question. I don't pay for, read or even like PSM, I just wanted to know what the deal with it was. It turns out, after wading through bullshit, the answer is 'nothing'. That's very anticlimactic. I suppose that means we are, in fact, done here.
dronkmunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2008 18:48
dronkmunk
You know what? I was an asshole, and I do get touchy. It's not that I am think skinned, but every single time I post something here I have to deal with unjustified criticism and bullshit from folks who don't even read the posts. And since you apparently have a troll for an avatar, i couldn't help myself.

However, even if I did or at anytime do have bias in my posts, guess what? I can do that if I want. This is a blog on the internet, not USA today. And I am not Brian Williams, I'm the dronkmunk. And anyone who wants to question the dronkmunk on his blog better be ready to rumble with me.

NOW we're done here. Ya'll gonna fuck around and miss me when I'm gone...
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!