In terms of marketing, I fully agree that the original ads were terrible, but Sony seemed to hit their stride with the Kevin Butler ads. I do think that they need to be more inclusive though, and not alienate the female market with ads like the girlfriend who wanted to "watch" Uncharted.
Online.. I totally disagree. This is Sony's best feature. I have an Xbox and rarely use it because I don't want to pay for Live. Yes, party chat is nice, and so is the ability to use voice messages... but not $60.00/year nice. I hate that even if I pay for Netflix, I can't watch it on my Xbox unless I also pay for Live (it's free on the PS3). I buy mostly online games... and paying an additional fee to play online feels like I'm getting blackmailed... I can't play the game I bought, on the console I bought... unless I pay an additional fee. It would be nice if Sony added party chat... but only if it's free. Otherwise you end up with the split where half the people you play with have the service and half don't.
Sony has the right idea with PS+ - charge a fee for "extras". These people are first in line for betas, early releases, special deals and the occasional free game.
Developer Relations... I agree with this one. Most of the ports were of poor quality. Even big names like Bethesda got it wrong and we ended up with memory issues making it difficult to play the game. I do think they need a better dev kit, though their first party and second party devs mostly did a pretty good job.
What does Sony need to do? I think they need to push the free online aspect and add party chat - then they can compete quite well with Microsoft. They need to keep pumping out the first party games... many of which were excellent. They need to keep bringing things like MAG and Dust 514 to the console - games that try something different - something that can't be done on the Xbox's closed system. Personally I think that instead of trying to appeal to Wii gamers with motion controls, Sony should be looking at all those PC gamers and try to bring them over to the Playstation by having more games with keyboard/mouse support (like Dust 514 which will apparently allow this). They might even look at using the Playstation's open system to somehow allow for cloud based gaming systems that would allow for the play of some PC games through the PS4 - games like WoW, or Eve Online or some of the PC RPG's that are being released. The current PS3 does allow for mouse/keyboard support and has an open internet... it would just be a matter of updating the browser to support PC games - and possibly charging for the client download of the actual game (where both Sony and the dev would profit).
It'll be interesting to see what Sony and Microsoft do with their next gen consoles...
Online.. I totally disagree. This is Sony's best feature. I have an Xbox and rarely use it because I don't want to pay for Live. Yes, party chat is nice, and so is the ability to use voice messages... but not $60.00/year nice. I hate that even if I pay for Netflix, I can't watch it on my Xbox unless I also pay for Live (it's free on the PS3). I buy mostly online games... and paying an additional fee to play online feels like I'm getting blackmailed... I can't play the game I bought, on the console I bought... unless I pay an additional fee. It would be nice if Sony added party chat... but only if it's free. Otherwise you end up with the split where half the people you play with have the service and half don't.
Sony has the right idea with PS+ - charge a fee for "extras". These people are first in line for betas, early releases, special deals and the occasional free game.
Developer Relations... I agree with this one. Most of the ports were of poor quality. Even big names like Bethesda got it wrong and we ended up with memory issues making it difficult to play the game. I do think they need a better dev kit, though their first party and second party devs mostly did a pretty good job.
What does Sony need to do? I think they need to push the free online aspect and add party chat - then they can compete quite well with Microsoft. They need to keep pumping out the first party games... many of which were excellent. They need to keep bringing things like MAG and Dust 514 to the console - games that try something different - something that can't be done on the Xbox's closed system. Personally I think that instead of trying to appeal to Wii gamers with motion controls, Sony should be looking at all those PC gamers and try to bring them over to the Playstation by having more games with keyboard/mouse support (like Dust 514 which will apparently allow this). They might even look at using the Playstation's open system to somehow allow for cloud based gaming systems that would allow for the play of some PC games through the PS4 - games like WoW, or Eve Online or some of the PC RPG's that are being released. The current PS3 does allow for mouse/keyboard support and has an open internet... it would just be a matter of updating the browser to support PC games - and possibly charging for the client download of the actual game (where both Sony and the dev would profit).
It'll be interesting to see what Sony and Microsoft do with their next gen consoles...
To me, it doesn't matter HOW much the PS4 is an improvement over the PS3 -- If they don't let you play used games, or if you have to be online all the time, then I'm not buying it. Period.
As of right now, it's a Wii U and PC for me next generation. Microsoft and Sony are going to have to shoot down the rumors that are going around about their next consoles if they want any business.
As of right now, it's a Wii U and PC for me next generation. Microsoft and Sony are going to have to shoot down the rumors that are going around about their next consoles if they want any business.
I think it would be very interesting if Sony released a console that ONLY played games. Single player games, multiplayer games, and downloadable games. That's it. No movie downloads. No Netflix/Hulu/whatever integration. No web browser. Just a console that plays games when you put the disc in the drive.
That'd be so crazy that it JUST might make people turn their heads. I, for one, would welcome a dedicated gaming machine without all the fluff, and since I'm sure MS isn't going to do it, why not Sony?
That'd be so crazy that it JUST might make people turn their heads. I, for one, would welcome a dedicated gaming machine without all the fluff, and since I'm sure MS isn't going to do it, why not Sony?

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow













send message
follow
followers


