Quantcast
Destructoid - dgenerate's Community Blog




About Me
Be warned, I do not excel with the words, but I'll do my best. I have favorites, but I try and keep an open, unbiased mind. Just because I love my XBox, doesn't mean I hate my PS3. Also just because I love my shiny new current-gen games, doesn't mean I can't appreciate old games with technically inferior graphics.

About me
Name: Mike
Residence: Burlington, Ontario

Cry Liquor and Bleed Pixels

Favorites
Current Console: XBox 360
Old Console: Nintendo NES
Games: Chrono Trigger
Gears of War
Amplitude
Guitar Hero
Contra
Mega Man
Drink: Wiser's Rye Whisky
Rye + Coke
Cranberry Vodka + 7up
Jose Cuervo
Cherry Bomb (1 part fireball, 1 part cherry brandy)
Book: JPod
Music I Am Ghost
Himsa
Bleed The Dream
Cursive
Creatures of Habit
Mocheeba
Jay-Z
The Matches

I love current-gen, but I will never abandon my roots.
8-bit for life, baby!

Here is my rating scale:
5: Must Try
4: Delicious
3: Mediocre to the Max
2: Kind of Shitty
1: Why does this exist?

To see what games I own, what I'm currently playing, or what I've recently completed:
Check out my MobyGames profile


Gamer Profile
3DS friend code:
Steam:
Battle:
PSN:
Mii:
Gamertag: degenerat3
Following (8)
-D-
bhive01
BluDesign
Bob Muir
galagabug
JesusXP
Justin Villasenor
Tristero
Why Are Games So Easy? Pt.1
dgenerate | 10:14 AM on 09.06.2007 19 comments




I hear plenty of people talking about how much easier games are these days. Is it true? Well, it's not really that simple of a question. Games have changed so much since they first popped up, it's hard to even compare their difficulty. I think there are many different topics and questions related to the change in difficulty of games.

How have games evolved?
What makes a game difficult?
The state of the video games industry
Casual vs. Hardcore (don't worry, what I mean here is accessibility, and it is tied in with the state of the industry)
Can a game be difficult, yet accessible?
Why aren't there any new retro games?
...maybe more will come to mind as I write

I may or may not come back and write about each of these topics, but for now I'm going to talk about how video games have evolved, and how that has affected the difficulty in games.

When video games first emerged, they were small, skill-based games. There was usually very few game mechanics, and each level simply added something to the same base 'level', whether it be more enemies, upgraded enemies, new movement patterns, 'environmental' obstacles, or any combination of these (and others). I'll use Tetris as example, simly because it's a pretty universally known game. The game barely changes at all from when you first start at level 1. The only change that happens when you get to the next level, from a gamelpay perspective, is that the blocks now fall faster. Often times, games didn't even have an 'end', theu just kept getting harder. The whole point of these games wasn't to 'beat the game' or to play through the story, it was simply to get the highest score you could, and if you were really good, to get on the high scores list.

If you look back at early games, if they even had a backstory it was generally one or two sentences long, just to give the player some sort of context. A shift seemed to take place during the 8-bit era, fewer and fewer games had a score, and more and more games started to take on a more modern approach: You play as the protagonist in a story, and have to fight your way to the final boss to beat the game. As technology improved, video games became more and more viable as a form of storytelling then they had ever been. Today, with the power of the XBox 360 and the PS3, developers are able to create huge, immersive worlds, with lifelike characters. This really allows us a much more in-depth and immersive, and sometimes even emotional experience. Games like Half-Life and Bioshock really set the bar in this regard.

So now we aren't aiming for scores, we want to play through a story and that's all well and good. But just because a game is story-based, it doesn't necessarily mean it must be easy, right? No, it doesn't have to be. This discussion leads to even more questions and topics, specifically accessibility in games, and the state of the video games industry. Will I come back and write about that on another day? Maybe, maybe not. You'll have to wait and see.

Whether you agree or disagree, or have something extra to add that I have completely overlooked, leave a comment!



Is this post awesome? Vote it up!

0



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

17 comments | showing # 1 to 17
prev next

Neonie's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:18
Neonie
Total proof:

Have you eve finished the original Super Mario Bro's.?

No? You say? neither have I. The shit's hard.

Have you beaten most of the 3 dimension games you've played? Yeah.. you probably have. I know I have. I mean Star Fox 64 was kind of hard when it came out. Was it as hard as Star Fox on the super Nintendo? Fuck no.
BahamutZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:23
BahamutZero
you know, I have actually been thinking about this, and not all recent games are easy, but definitely VERY few have been as hard as the arcade classics.

The difference is all about budget.

Say your company spends a couple mil on a game. You are going to (hopefully) put an extra proportional amount into the ending of the game, throw in some expensive cg cutscenes, unleash your most expensive/time-consuming effects, etc. Now why make that game so hard (like the classics) that it is nearly impossible to beat? It is a waste of all that money they spent. Now in a good game there are always goals or achievements that are much more difficult to unlock, and hopefully that keeps the hardcore motivated.

there are a few "next gen" exception to this, and one of them is burnout. there are a couple of races that are fucking impossible, where you have to boost the entire race without crashing or touching the walls
BahamutZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:25
BahamutZero
usually for like five minutes straight. its the only game I ever want to smash
Simon's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:25
Simon
Really I just put it down to two things 1) Games are getting easier so more people are not put off a game but it's difficultly and 2) Older gamers are at a higher skill level anyway so newer games present less of a challenge.
Tempus's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:28
Tempus
Duke3D and original Quake I shall reference. Both had HP - both had stupidly easy 'Easy' modes but the medium/normal and hard settings were ridiculous.

Fast forward to Halo and you've got to hide behind a rock for 20seconds to recharge health? GAY!
Bob Muir's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:32
Bob Muir
I was in total agreement with Nintendo's old philosophy from a few years ago: make simple games that are easy to get into but have surprising amounts of depth and room for mastery. Puzzle League and Smash Bros. are great examples of these games: my sister was able to pick up the mechanics easily enough, but she can't master the games the same way a hardcore gamer can. However, we both enjoy the games.
dgenerate's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:34
dgenerate
There are plenty of things not touched in this article. This one was simply about pointing out how games are very different than they used to be, overall.

Some thoughts I had were:
Devs dont wanna infuriate you and have you get stuck partway through the story

Games are big money these days. Publishers want a game that will be played by as many people as possible. If a game is too hard, the more casual market may not be able to get though it.

There have always been easy games: Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers, Kirby's Adventure . . .

Early games were often hard simply because of poor programming/design. Games were a smaller market and tons of shitty games were churned out back then, it didnt take a team of 200 people to make a game.

Difficulty settings can be a godsend these days. Halo on Legendary comes to mind.
JACK of No Trades's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:37
JACK of No Trades
Talk to some one that hasn't played games untill now! They will say 3D is hard as hell. The controls are confusing and the gameplay is far more advanced.

MAYBE GAMES ARE EASY FOR US BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN PLAYING THEM FOR OVER 12 YEARS!?!?!?
BahamutZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:38
BahamutZero
god of war on insane is pretty ridiculous.. especially the part where you first get to the theron guards on that platform. those motherfuckers. I hear the torque bow at night when I am alone sometimes
BahamutZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:41
BahamutZero
oh shit I meant gears, not god. all this betrayal bs...
SlayerVin's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:42
SlayerVin
Another big reason for this is that a lot of the games from "back in my day" were arcade ports.

Way back when, arcade games were designed to devour quarters from unsuspecting kids. A more difficult game meant more money for whoever owned the arcade machine. When these games were ported to home consoles the difficulty was actually decreased or at least selectable.

In addition, the shift of gaming from a niche hobby to a mainstream phenomenon has also changed the expectations most people have for games. Similar to what Bahamut said but from the perspective of a gamer, if someone's going to devote 15-20 hours of their free time to a game, I think they tend to enjoy closure at the end of it rather than being emasculated by being unable to finish it.

Also, one reason can be attributed to game length. Due to limited storage media in the past, games were either ridiculously short, or repetitive. In order to partly get around the first workaround to the size limit, games were absurdly difficult. I believe this was done to extend play time.

Example:

I finished Super Ghouls and Ghosts on "normal" over the weekend. It took me about 2 hours. Now I didn't finish the whole game (fucking capcom...), which requires you to go through the whole game AGAIN, on the hardest difficulty level.

From my perspective, if I spent $50-60 on a video game and was able to finish it in 2 hours, those two hours had better be the best fucking 2 hours of my life, or I better want to play that game again. Granted it's taken me a long time to get to the point where I can beat the game in that amount of time, which is part of the charm of those older games, but still, 2 hours of total play time is pretty short.

BioShock on the other hand took me about 20-22 hours to complete on Hard. That game was absurdly easy, but I've probably got about as much play time in BioShock as all my combined hours of playing Super Ghouls and Ghosts. So there's an interesting balance.

If you want to play a game that's both long and difficult, play Odin Sphere. I don't think I've smashed a controller into the floor more times over that game than any other game combined...
ShawnKelfonne's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:55
ShawnKelfonne
Need a hard game? Try God Hand.
Justice's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 10:59
Justice
Great article dude
dgenerate's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 11:21
dgenerate
Heh, I actually just read the 'review' for God Hand over on actionbutton.net yesterday. I'm interested in checking it out now.

Thanks for the comments guys, you just might have motivated me to follow up with a part 2 sometime ;)
PsychoSoldier's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 11:25
PsychoSoldier
@neonie

Hell yea Super Mario Brothers is hard. I find it it that classic games are harder then games today.
BahamutZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 11:47
BahamutZero
^ thank you pvt. obvious
BahamutZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/06/2007 11:48
BahamutZero
you don't deserve the rank of "captain"

:P
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!