Since when are your opinions better than the man next to you? Are you the end all, be all, of all that is right? I only ask these questions because for whatever reason, if you happen to have an opinion different from the majority you magically are labeled a troll, a fanboy or a fucking idiot. Heaven forbid that for whatever reason, you don't like a game ( or whatever applies ), that someone else or the cool kids love and express it for out comes the personal attacks and accusations you've lost your faculties.

A good example of what I'm talking about can be found right here. Poor Phantom Spaceman. He's not impressed with Left for Dead and all of a sudden his Public Enemy Number One. I mean I know everybody and their grandma has dibs on a character ( lol ), but this is ridiculous. There's a reason why we have a comment section in our blogs and that's to express our opinions on whatever the topic at hand.

Is it really that hard to disagree with someone and not turn it into a personal attack? Here's another example, please scroll through the comments till you find mine then scroll down further for Dtoiders telling me that they knew I would have a long winded review hating on the Dtoid reviewers or how I need to fuck myself. All because I didn't agree with a review. Really? It's like that? Let me just reiterate that I have been the BIGGEST defender of Dtoid reviews and their reviewers, but there will be times when you'll just plain disagree.

Guess what? It will probably happen again too. We all aren't clones of one another, so feeling different about a game or anything else is only natural. Brad's latest review concerning SOCOM, I don't agree with. That doesn't mean I hate Brad, or think Brad is a douche bag. I just think he got it wrong. Period. That's not me hating on his review, that's me stating my OPINION, just as he stated his in the review.

Just because Phantom Spaceman doesn't like Left for Dead and isn't impressed with it enough to write a "Dibs Blog" doesn't make him a bad person either. I love Metal Gear, he thinks its shit. We disagree but the last thing I'm going to do is tell him how much of a moron he is because I know better. I don't. Different strokes for different folks. Sure we can site different facts to accompany our opinion, that's what we should be doing. Yet it doesn't change the fact that it's still an opinion. While the comments section is there for expressing and sharing them, to debate, shouldn't we be above the personal attacks because we disagree? Aren't we supposed to be above the name calling and retardedness of other sites. Or is that civility only shared with someone who only agrees with you?