Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by Videogamecharactername | Videogamecharactername's ProfileDestructoid
Videogamecharactername's Profile - Destructoid




Game database:   #ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ         ALL     Xbox One     PS4     360     PS3     WiiU     Wii     PC     3DS     DS     PS Vita     PSP     iOS     Android




About
Badges
Following  


It seems like most of the games that come out these days are sequels . Sometimes they are more of the same , never adding anything new . Now , I don't have any problems with that model , but if you are going to make more of the same , make it better , polish it to perfection . And thats when most sequels fail , they make more of the same , but without any polish to it , just copying the original . Let's run through some examples

While the game is still good , it feels tired . Its almost insulting how the AC2 sequels just add one or two new weapons and calling that a new chapter . The whole game feels as old , as it's protagonist , once a fresh face of the new generation is now an ancient antique of times , not so long ago , but still forgotten in our minds .The metaphor suits AC:Revelations perfectly ! Well , maybe thats a bit mean . At least the game concluded the stories of it's two main protagonists , so we'll have to see new faces and stories in future instalments .

Now these two are fine examples of the worst , most half-hearted sequel school . They don't add anything , never improve on anything and don't even get what made the old parts great . Both the crazy fun of Ssaints 2 and the great action moments of COD4 were raped to the max , overused in some weird line of thought , that thats what made the originals great . Its like when you work a normal job and you go to the circus .It would be a great way make that event different from the other part of your life , but would it be so unique if you worked there every day ?

Maybe not the worst kind of sequel , but definitely the laziest .It's the same game as the old one . Mind you , a good game , but the same , so the variety is lost and everything stagnates .
Now , with all the nastiness being said , let's look at some good sequels

Now thats the magic formula ! Polish everything good about the original , then remove the bad things , and after that , add a bunch of new stuff and repaint the whole thing .The climbing was better , the combat was improved , the setting felt fresh . Now thats evolution ! AC3 is forming out to be on the same page , but it's still unknown .


Sometimes , its easier to come up with something new , rather than to fix something broken .The predecessors of these two are so unpopular , that many people don't even know about them . Only the name sticks , that way it's easier for the developers , companies are more willing to finance something old and proven (to some point) rather than to start a whole new and unfamiliar projects . And I'm alright with that , if something feels fresh and original , the what does it matter how its named ?







Videogamecharactername
4:55 PM on 10.07.2012


Death. The most common thing in games .Live , ripped out of the body , the end of one's world . Also the unspoken blood in the veins of video games , the thing that gives them life and makes them art .
There's no other media that uses death as much as games , and thats why no other media evokes such strong emotions in it .
Let's start here . Why do we kill ? Most of the time is when he decide , that another man's life is less valuable than something else , be it our own life , treasure , ideals or even our own entertainment .This is the whole moral dilemma in games . When I mention the phrase "moral choice system " which game pops up in your mind ? The closest example would be The Walking Dead , that one made a big deal out of it , whenever I chose one thing over another , a sign appeared and reminded me that Guy A would never forget that I told him that I had ten wieners , when in fact I had eleven , and at the end , the game called me a tosser , while flashing some stupid stats . But thats just a gimmick , some pointless mechanic that is created just to add replay value .There are finer examples of this system , so subtle,that even the people who made the game never thought of them .And by that I mean game like Call Of Duty and Uncharted . In such games , the player constantly makes moral choices , taking the NPC's lives just to reach the final goal . You might say that their lives don't mean anything , that this is just a programed code that looks like life , but it really isn't , and you would be right , but I ask you - to what goal do their live program command gets destroyed ?Their artificial life is taken , just so the hero can have his equally artificial reward .Maybe to us , the prize becomes more important then their lives , so we take them to get to her .Maybe thats more like real conflict then we care to admit .While playing Spec Ops : The Line , I felt bad , even if the evil deeds I did only hurt the same artificial code . Its all too real in our souls .
Don't let that sadden you , though , the world has it's live and death , you have to live for the life .
At the end , we shouldn't wonder if our enemies deserve to die , but do we deserve to kill them ?









For some , one of the big problems in modern gaming is the portraying of female characters , that many consider to be sexist . For now , the biggest complain is Team Ninja's way of making female fighters in Dead or Alive (mostly teenage girls with skimpy clothes , tightly nailed to their nipples ) . The studio tried to make itself look like a protector of some tradition by stating that they stick to their way just for the sake of their fans , that apparently wanted even bigger breasts (if they respect the fans so much , then why didn't they sized up the tits ? ) .

However , we all know , that tits are not pointed at the people , who criticize them , the target audience has always been the pervy thirteen year old boy inside us , that just wants to see tits bounce . And why haven't we showed this to him ? We can gut a man and see his insides , but when it comes to the outsides of a woman , suddenly we get all take some imaginative moral high ground . Why are the developers and the audience afraid to go all the way ? If we could look at naked tits immediately , then whats the point at playing Team Ninja's half hearted games ? This might be a way to stop all these cheap tricks that make people buy this shit , again , what would be the point ? That way it would all become uninteresting to the awful , disgusting perverts that like this sort of stuff . You can criticize an action movie to be exploitative of women , but how can you blame a porn movie , when that the point ? When I play a fighting game , I want a fighting game , when I want to see tits , I don't want anything else .Its the same issue with game , attaching pointless action to themselves , and becoming bland and uninteresting .
So , AAA developers , don't put sex as a side thing , embrace it , get it in the spotlight