My first console was an Atari 2600. My mother routinely kicked my ass at Pac Man. When my cousin gave me his NES, my grandfather would play Super Mario Bros. with us. When I got a SNES, my mother stayed up until the dark hours before she had to work playing Vegas Stakes. My father's logging buddies playing the NES, and in fact is where I got my copy of Super Mario Bros. 3 from. I remember watching on the news once, where an old lady in her 70s or 80s called a Nintendo hotline to help her get through A Link to the Past. Nobody derided this. Everyone thought it was cool back then.
But then once games started to go 3D, and the console wars began to seriously flare up, something began to happen. My mother showed no interest in playing video games. Everyone I knew and worked around looked down on video game in a derogatory sense. Gaming was no longer cool to the mainstream. It was no longer entertaining.
Of course, as an old-school gamer, as a fan I continued to buy game consoles, but eventually even I began to become disenchanted with the direction the game industry was going, and how it was treating fans such as myself with their lousy attitude towards their customers. If it wasn't for Monster Hunter, I would have been done with gaming altogether.
But then came the Wii. I was still very much disenchanted with the game industry, and I continued to rope in Nintendo with the rest of them. I saw the Wii controls as a merely a "gimmick" that wouldn't catch on. But then something very interesting began to happen.
People that I never thought would have played a game in their lives were talking to me about the Wii with a look of elated glee on their faces. Then they would tell me about the old days when they played an NES or an Atari. People I would have never pegged as gamers were talking to me about games, not derisively, but from the perspective that they were cool.
My friends' parents were talking about playing Cooking Mama on their Dual Screens. They were in their 40s, and I live in Tennessee, mind you. My mother and stepfather showed interest in playing the Wii! Whenever my young nephew comes down, he wants to watch me play Monster Hunter Tri Super Metroid. He'll play Secret of Mana with me. Up until recently, I worked in a nursing home, washing dishes, and every week or so the manager would bring in his Wii to let the residents play. I'd look out the door while clearing off the carts, and I'd see them playing Wii Sports, or some other game. And I would think "My god, they did it. They finally made gaming fun again, and not looked upon as a social stigma."
And viewed from that perspective, I can find nothing wrong with Nintendo's business strategy to expand gaming. Gaming has once more become mainstream, which carries with it a great many benefits to the game industry and to gaming at large. Such as not as easily becoming the target of media and political criticism, since the stigma and mystery of what games are to people that normally don't play them is beginning to ebb away with the Wii and DS's success.
In my youth, I played many games that I could associate with on the Wii. Trauma Center reminds me of M.A.S.H., which I played for the 2600. Most of the Wii's games are in fact arcade games that are being played in a different context. Most people have played pinball at least once in their lives. A lot of people have been to arcades and played Pac Man and Donkey Kong. It's easy to see the correlation between DDR and Guitar Hero. In fact, I remember all sorts of people coming into the arcades to watch other people play DDR.
"Casual" gaming is a derogatory term for old-school gamers who were left out in the cold by the game industry's self-aggrandizing. Everyone on Earth is a potential gamer. It's that simple. The key thing to understand, however, is that all the people I mentioned, they want to play games not play movies. The game industry has gotten to have this line of thinking that games have to be cinematic, and having storytelling, and be like "art".
You know what? As someone who has played games since they were blips on a black and white TV screen, I don't give a shit about that, and nor does most other people. We give a shit about our games being fun. We want arcade-like games that don't require any time sinks to get enjoyment out of. We want games we can play forever, games that we can go back to years from now and still be entertained by. We'll play actual games for years and years, but we'll perhaps play our movie-games once or twice, and never look at them again. For most people, the Wii and DS fulfills those aforementioned criteria, while the rest of the game industry continues to push those old-school gamers away.
Those old-school gamers have always been there, waiting for someone to start making games for them again. That company happened to be Nintendo. The funny thing is, these latent gamers aren't on forums talking derisively about the hardcore and core gamers, yet more often than not whenever Nintendo gets mentioned, they and their mainstream audience of old-school gamers get mocked and derided. Of course, I know that's not everyone, that'd be rather asinine of me to paint with such broad strokes on a community of gamers. But it's not just fans. The rest of the game industry has shown utter contempt and disdain for Nintendo and their audience.
Perhaps this is because they aren't susceptible to the industry's hype machine and marketing? Maybe it's because they aren't going for their overwrought Hollywood Blockbuster games with bloated budgets? Maybe it's because most of these game developers that talk about "art" and business models and demographics are only interested in making games for themselves and not for the enjoyment of many? Maybe it's because with Nintendo's Wii it's impossible for third parties to shove digital distribution down the mainstream audience's throats?
Maybe the truth of the matter is that the game industry has lost touch with gamers. Don't laugh. Trent Reznor remarked that the same people that were running the game companies were the same kind of people running the music industry. The music industry now only markets to "demographics". Nobody makes music for older people anymore. The elderly still have to listen to Johnny Cash and Elvis and Bob Seger and John Fogerty. But what about now? The industry isn't interested in them. They are not only out of touch, they have attacked their customers, their fans, and now they are being marginalized to the point that they will eventually vanish from the cultural landscape. And the game industry seems perfectly fine with following right in their footsteps. Except for Nintendo, who still wants to stay in business and entertain people, hence the Wii and DS.
The mainstream are happy with their "casual" games. Yet, core gamers and the game industry are happy to put them and Nintendo in their sights to make mockery of them. Until it comes time to talk about all this wonderful "growth" the industry is seeing, when in fact it's all coming from Nintendo. Their revenue growth is only them trying to find more ways to fleece their core gamers for more money. Something that is impossible for them to do with the Expanded Market. I guess that means they'll have to start treating them respect and making games that they'll wanna play, like any other sane, rational industry that wants to stay in business. Or they'll go the way of the music industry.
My question is, why do you mock Nintendo and its audience of old-school, arcade gamers? What did they ever do to you? Maybe it's not what they are doing, but what they represent: Gaming going back to its roots, where games were simply games, not movies. I must say, as an old-school gamer myself, I really couldn't be happier.
|
Based on your last blog, it seems like you're completely ignoring perfectly competent non-Nintendo based games, which is a crying shame. Uncharted 2 and Grand Theft Auto IV are excellent examples of games that are scoring higher than the "Cooking Mamas" of the world (critically and "user scores"): do you know why? Because people LIKE them.
I also grew up with a Nintendo and Atari 2600: however, when the console era entered a new renaissance (the casual era, with the dawn of the Wii), you know what I did? I Experienced everything, not one experience. While it's a terrible thing to pigeonhole the Wii due to the fact that it has tons of good core games, it's also terrible to say that "Microsoft and Sony suck because they are wholly focusing on the casual market".
I think the phase you're going through now is you bought a Wii, and saw locally what I call the "community effect" of your nephew and parents liking a few casual games when they otherwise would have never shown interest. Well guess what? Outside of your community, my nephew, and all my friend's nephews play Call of Duty on Xbox Live, where they can engage in a group based activity using the Xbox Live Headset. While it's not as well known (because Big Boxes don't showcase it enough), guess what?! The PSN has exclusive experiences (not on a Nintendo based system) that your nephew would LOVE. Show him a video for Critter Crunch and tell me he won't be asking to buy it minutes later.
My suggestion to you would be to pony up the cash and buy a PS3: don't fear it! Buying a PS3 is not the end of the world! Your nephew will love Critter Crunch: his brain will be teased by Echochrome: he can enjoy a few Popcap games on the PSN as well that you cannot find on the Wii marketplace. If you looked deep enough, you'd see that ALL platforms have excellent simplistic and childlike games for us all to enjoy: and what's wrong with those types of games? NOTHING! I love Plants vs. Zombies: but I'm only going to find the full version on the XBLA in the near future, not the Wii Shop.
Are you not aware that nearly every major Popcap release is on the Xbox Live Arcade? What about the hundreds of IPs that are brought over to the XBLA and PSN every year, that are winning awards for simplistic gameplay?
"For most people, the Wii and DS fulfills those aforementioned criteria, while the rest of the game industry continues to push those old-school gamers away."
This quotation sums up your closed minded thought process. If you're not going to bother to look for casual, simplistic games on the XBLA or PSN, then you aren't going to find them.
If you gloss over my rebuttal just like you did for my last one in your previous blog, at LEAST respond to this statement.
I have NO problem that you're championing Nintendo amidst a sea of haters: you're right about Nintendo's success, no doubt. But WHY are you dumping on Microsoft and Sony, when they have just as much to offer?
Your argument is "Nintendo is doing everything right, but I won't mention the advantages of having Xbox Live (for example)". That's a very weak argument. If you want to start writing argumentative pieces in the future, you need to also at least mention your competition's strengths. My recommendation to you would be to do some research on the amount of simplistic games released on the XBLA/PSN platforms every year: I think you'll be surprised.
Have you ever tried to play video games with a non-gamer?? You'll be surprised at the amount of games that they'll enjoy. They're not morons. Platformers, puzzle games, racing, fighting and even some sports games I had no trouble getting my non-gaming friends and family to play. But it doesn't matter if we're talking about the Wii or any other console, casual gamers really don't buy many games.
Also, Magnalon hits the bullseye again!!
The major weakness here, and the reason you're getting so much negative feedback, is that you are attacking the opinion of other gamers. If you removed the parts of your piece that shout angrily at PS3 and 360 gamers for either enjoying their games, or allegedly hate on the Wii, you would be presenting an interesting, engaging and largely factual argument for why the Wii appeals to oldschool gamers. It's important to understand that there are people who are as wholly devoted to the modern, blockbuster gaming experience as you are to the oldschool. Additionally, as a gaming community that is both hardcore and largely light-hearted, it's silly to expect that people won't use the Wii as the butt end of their jokes in the same way someone might make fun of their least-liked sports team.
"If you removed the parts of your piece that shout angrily at PS3 and 360 gamers for either enjoying their games, or allegedly hate on the Wii, you would be presenting an interesting, engaging and largely factual argument for why the Wii appeals to oldschool gamers."
This. It's ok to be angry at ignorant gamers for hating the Wii, but it's not ok to attack two entire corporations (and their fans!!) that also cater to casual gamers unbeknownst to you. My suggestion to you would be to spend some time exploring your other options.
Now, I will gladly concede the author's point about the Wii bringing back a ton of "potential gamers" to their consoles, including people of all ages, not just children and the elderly. However, I believe this new audience invading the market had a huge effect on marketing interests.
Where is the money at in 2009? Making games that anyone can enjoy, simple enough. As a company, why would you invest in games with new and interesting concepts, like Mirror's Edge or Demon's Souls, if only some niche players are going to buy it? I can understand the company's viewpoint ($$$), but that makes me sad, because since a publisher can "print money" with games for casual players, they don't have to pay the extra effort to be creative. Lack of creativity in new games lead to a stale market, where those rare gems niche players enjoy so much are released once or twice a year on their chosen console.
Bottom word, I'm not saying that casual players aren't enjoying their favourite games as much as I enjoy mine, I'm just saying I'd like more games that I really like and that it's not possible with the current market conditions caused by their recent arrival.
I'm not attacking gamers per se, but rather attacking the mindset that just because businesses are in it for "money" somehow that makes them evil. If Nintendo wanted to be "evil" then they would have replicated Sony and Microsoft's business strategy...which would have led them right into decline along with the rest of the game industry.
Like I said, everybody can be a potential gamer, but the "industry" is only interested in milking its current customers, because they seem to think that the industry was supposed to continue to grow exponentially over time, but they're now finding out that assumption was incorrect.
Nintendo understands that to survive the coming turmoil the game industry faces, it has to reach out and appeal to potential gamers that have been neglected by the rest of the game industry, hence the Wii and DS.
Bottom line: Smart businesses stay in business by putting their customers first. Not themselves. Want evidence of this? Look at every company that has asked the US government for a bailout. They made shit that nobody wanted, ignored the changes that the digital revolution brought about, and now they are asking for a handout even though their own ineptitude in doing business brought about their downfall.
Nintendo has been around for over a hundred years. The reason they are still in business is because they put the customer first. All the things Sony and Microsoft and the third parties have done lately: Digital distribution, DRM, making you use their proprietary crap, limited installations of PC games, download content you pay for, are these things what the customer wants?
According to Nintendo's success this gen, I think that would be a resounding "no".
At this point I no longer think you're a troll, but I do sincerely doubt your ability to use reason. This will be my last comment on one of your blogs, but you should consider looking at it from another perspective and realizing all three companies have experienced success this generation and will continue to do so.
http://www.destructoid.com/elephant/profile.phtml?un=Hoborg
How are Sony and Microsoft in decline? You keep acting like those two are dying and will surely drop out of the game business just because their consoles don't sell as much as the Wii. The company with the most console sales isn't the only one that stays in business.
So you're saying that the PS2, for example, didn't draw in new gamers? It wasn't like Sony or Microsoft was in danger of falling out of the console race if they didn't crater to a market beyond core gamers. The thing is, when it comes to business, especially entertainment, there will always be a target market. The PS3 and 360 doesn’t need everyone to play them for those two to be a success. There are just certain things that won't appeal to certain people. Not even the Wii will get everyone into gaming.
You still have yet to offer proof that the gaming industry would have died without the Wii or DS. While it may be nice to see more people get into gaming, even if a little bit (Wii Sports every now and then), gaming doesn't need to appeal to everyone to survive like you seem to make it sound like.
While Nintendo has been around for quite a long time, they were quite different compare to what they're like today. As for much of the stuff you mention, time to debunk all that. Nintendo has done digital distribution as well or are you just blissfully ignorant of that? DRM is mostly tied to PC gaming, which is outside of Sony’s and if I’m not mistaken, Microsoft’s control. As for "making you use their proprietary crap", what would you call the Wii Board? What do limited installations of PC games have to do with Sony or Microsoft? Although I'm not sure about this and could be wrong, I believe there are some WiiWare games with DLC that you pay for.
Funny how you ask that is what the customer wants. According to people that brought games on XBLA, PSN, WiiWare, Steam, and other online download services on the PC, yes. DRM does tend to not be something that customers want since it can screw them over. Games like Guitar Hero and Rock Band prove that people are willing to play games without a standard controller. Limited installations aren’t exactly that well liked in PC gaming either, but again, this isn't quite tied to Sony or Microsoft. A lot of people have brought DLC and was glad to get additional content into their games.
According to Sony's and Microsoft's success this gen, I think that would be a resounding "yes".
While I personally fall into this category and agree with most of what you've described, I think you are generalizing the majority of gamers. I think we, my friend, are the minority and that most gamers today do want cinematics and not simple arcade fun.
I'm very curious to see what Nintendo's next move will be after the Wii because I think its going to be almost impossible to keep the market share they have. Like you said they've recaptured a lost demographic as my mom owns a Wii and hasn't played videogames since the 8-bit NES, but I'm hard pressed to believe she'll still be interested next generation.
Why do you insist that the measure of a console's worth is represented by the amount of non-gamers it ropes in? Why do you even care about those people?
Actually, all three consoles have great games to suit all tastes.
Console war over, everybody wins.
Quoted for emphasis, truth and pwnage.
I think the main problem with that blog post is that you are litteraly arguing with the reader, putting them unwillingly in a position where they are wrong for not choosing your console. Also, it's quite silly to state things like "Sony and Microsoft use insidious marketing schemes!" when ANY company, Nintendo included, uses marketing techniques to target audiences and make money... that's how companies work!