5:29 PM on 04.03.2015
So a section of the internet lost its collective Spaghetti over a joke from Pillars of Eternity. So I decided it would be worth me compiling a list on one had for those who really do want to see quite how far video games have gone and on the other hand for those twee little oversensitive twats about to show you what really offensive games look like. And no I'm not going to include the two most commonly known ones that are actually offensive and were made by hate groups (no I'm not talking about the NRA video game). There are games offensive enough to cause Mary Whitehouse to raise from the dead only to die all over again in horror that such offensive content can exist. Oh and just the be more clear the games aren't going to be purely porn games either.
10. Power Mad. This one gets it's place on the list because it places its sights purely at offending world leaders (or at least they were at the time). The game itself is a very basic turn based management sim. You have to try and swell your population and kill the enemies and balance construction of your army, your nuclear stock pile and your supply of hippie peace circles. Yes I said Hippie peace circles as once you dedicate enough population to make one, you and throw the hippies at incoming nukes to block them. Oh and it's a game where if you wish you can play as a representation of Osama Bin Laden and nuke the United States
9. Conkers Bad Furday. Take a cute kids patformer and mix it with a drunken night out and a copy of playboy and you get Conker, a money and sex obsessed squirrel who loves the sauce. This is a game where one bosses is a giant pile of human shit that sings Opera.
Other bosses include having to piss out fire demons and attacking a giant pair of balls. Packed from start to finish with swearing, sexual references and of course a bit of the old ultraviolence Conker is truly a game to behold.
8) My Ex Boyfriend the Space Tyrant. A Gay Adventure game featured in many publications aime at gay men and made by a presumably gay male developer. This game offended so many people seemingly in the Steam greenlight comments that people wanted it prevented from being on Steam for two main reasons. The first being religious objection esc arseholes, the second more surprisingly were people offended it was "too gay" or "Not the right kind of gay". Honestly if people were claiming that this was a representation of the entire gay community then the next game really doesn't show straight White Males in a great light.
7) Leisure Suit Larry Magna Cum Laude. Oh this is a good one where do I start? How about the sex pest style antics of Larry himself in his quest to get on a dating show, to do this rather bizarrely he must sleep with women round the campus. This game upset people, it upset everyone seemingly from the monkey masturbation mini game to the drunken sorority to the stereotyping and the now rather infamous Summer Nights parody song.
There's plenty more to be offended by but yes enjoy playing and a quite unattractive straight white guy and he tries every possible trick to sleep with women showing all us unattractive straight white guys a lying little toads with no moral standards and values. Go enjoy.
6) Killing Floor, What you don't think killing floor is offensive eh? Ok so maybe popping the heads of mutants etc doesn't sound too offensive until you realise the mad scientist who designed them actually designed them in the images of people. The stalker a naked female monster that can make itself near invisible before striking it's suggested in the games lore was inspire by the lead scientists impression of his Ex wife.
5) Splatterhouse (the remake) - So low on this list because one publication described it as
Almost cute to see a game try so hard to offend people, as though people in this day and age are so backwards to be up in arms over a piece of media.
Splatterhouse (the remake) pumps the gore up to 11 and has collectable sexy revealing pictures complete with boobs showing in some. This is a game where you can rip off an enemies arm and beat them to death with it and vs one of the boss monsters you reach into it's ass an pull out it's intestines.
4) Postal 2 - This would be higher on the list if it didn't manage to offend everyone. From depictions of terrorists to anti video game protestors. This is a game where protestors burst into a library and set it on fire because the books aren't teaching the right ideas. I mean what kind of crazy monsters would hold mass book burnings of books who's ideas they dislike in this day and age.
Oh wait, that actually happened. Hhhhhhmmmmmm
3) NPPD Rush the Milk of Ultraviolent - You play a former addict whom has had her arms cut off and been turned into a police rush unit (a cybernetic sentient police bike). It's up to you to clear up the streets but taking out strange monsters and finding addicts to take back the NPPD whom will most likely be turned into rush units. It doesn't sound too offensive until you happen to run into the final boss, Ultraviolent a bio mechanical computer being used to try and help expand the NPPD rush department by being used and a living womb to grow children to be used in future rush units. Now this last bit is from the developers mouth the final boss throws aborted foetuses at you. Rather than let NPPD use her unborn children as weapons she throws them at you. For those with a morbid curiosity here's the developer on a recorded stream talking about the game, the boss bit happens at about the 35 minute mark.
2) Deer Avenger 3D, Dear Avenger 2 might have stereotypes people in general but Deer Avenger 3D set out to offend. Oh and boy would it to offensive to any Cabella loving redneck. The game is a hunting game but are Bambo the deer your job is to lure in the hunters and then kill them. To do this you have your calls which include "Hey look someone's rather attractive cousin naked in the woods" and "Who left the their pick up truck lights on". With Hunters including the huge fat redneck, the ex military gun nut, the drunk idiot and of course the fur obsessed female hunter. Don't think the game is done though as it has NPC hippie characters whom it takes the piss out of too. This one gets the number 3 spot because while it doesn't seem as offensive as others on this list. You gotta say it has balls to insult people with enough fire arms and beer to do something more than just write an angry email or start a hashtag.
1) Armed and Dangerous. Ok I wanted to do this as a "Can I have some more" but you know what? It is one of the most offensive games ever. How can this be that offensive well how a about a blind man giving a mentally disabled prince a vasectomy. No that's not me taking the piss that's an actual part of one of the games scenes. The game is just insanely over the top and can best be described as Mighty Boosh but in video game form. Insanely random humour and it manages to take the term low brown and wipes it's arse with it as just when you think it's done as it dips into low brow, it then fully jumps in to a large degree.
Oh and to those of you already writing angry comments about how much this blog offended you and how offensive it was. Please don't bother email Destructoid asking for mre to be fired (as I'm sure some people have done) I'm not a member of Dtoid staff alright. Oh and also this.
5:34 AM on 04.01.2015
Wow who on earth saw that one coming but I woke up to find my PS4 had updated as had the store and well it's there. Half Life 3 is up for pre-order on the playstation store hinting that the partnership between Valve and Sony will once again pay off for Playstation Gamers.
Having done a bit more digging into this it appears this may have been an accidental leak of the information on Sony's end. Having contacted Sony's press enquiry email for a response I got the following.
Dear Sir, Madam,
Thank you for your enquiry relating to upcoming exclusive Playstation 4 titles. We cannot confirm or deny that the title Half Life 3 will be coming to Playstation 4, until such a time as the title is officially announced. Thank you for informing us about this error that has seemingly occurred with our system putting titles up for pre-order early we have technicians working to rectify this oversight now. We Will be announcing all forthcoming unannounced titles at the coming E3 press conference.
So the big question has to be why would they have a pre-order page up and built for a game that's not coming to the system? I've heard of blind hope from a company but would it be just that.
Either way the coming of Half Life 3 to console will be a huge burst to any console it's released on and the idea of it being only on PS4 and PC could put a huge dent into Microsoft's sales. Not least as the Playstation 4 will be the first of the consoles running a game on the source 2 engine set to try to push the boundaries of gaming.
The initial screenshots of Half Life 3 look extremely impressive if veering close to uncanny valley levels of realistic just take a look at the detail on Eli and Alyx
The High quality texture work is clearly on show and hopefully these aren't merely bullshots as it would be impressive to think of this on consoles especially following on from The Order 1886 (except obviously Half Life 3 will have far better gameplay). It also looks like Valve might have implement something similar to Tres FX (if not Tres FX itself) giving the illusion of far more realistic hair.
While no plot details have yet to emerge it does appear (and surprising no-one) that a screenshot even shows the shadowy figure known only as G-Man will be making a return. The eagle eyed amongst you might even recognise his location, possibly suggesting the game will see Gordon Freeman return back to the Black Mesa facility where this all began.
It can't be denied the game looks stunning really and with the suggested streaming technology to be used to load more textures in situ it could also mean lower load times on consoles. This console release should come as a shock to no-one really though as Half Life saw a successful release on PS2 and on the Sega Dreamcast so such a move from Valve isn't without precedent.
I'd just like to close off by saying, before you leave a comment below please scroll back up and read the date this was posted on. Yeh. For those of you who saw through this, hopefully you won't blame a guy for trying and will enjoy this as the bit of fun it was intended to be. Oh and if this appears on Kotaku you know the person posting it was too lazy to read down to this point.
9:34 PM on 03.26.2015
Ok this one I want to see become a remake or reboot or just something for a very specific reason. I never finished it because the controls were arse. It felt very much like resident evil Tank controls and that just killed the game for more plain and simple. So you might be thinking why on earth would I want this remade?
It's quite simple really. The concept, setting characters and ideas behind the game are just stunning. You play Jennifer Tate 21 years old and in search of her boyfriend whom was kidnapped by a demon. Sounds like a very simple story as you play Jen traversing the 4 demonic dimensions. The Twist being that Jen herself may not truly be of earth and learns she can take on the forms of the 4 main demonic races. Suddenly you have less Buffy and more of it's own unique thing as Jen transforms into demonic forms and really take on the occupants of the realms on head on.
With Bloodborne recently released as a Playstation exclusive and the near constant calls for strong female protagonists this is a game that time seemingly forgot and it's owned by Sony. It would be so easy to reboot this and fix the problems it had and just watch as the series explodes. I mean the world alone in the games, the idea of 4 demonic realms etc is ripe to explore and if the remake does well there's a clear opportunity to expand the scope and make it into more of a franchise than a single outing. Hell the game could even go further into elements of the Lovecraft Mythos at some point if it became a franchise. This is quite a dark game from a time when games really weren't being that dark and with modern gaming and standards this could really be made into a game for adults able to be dark and brutal.
11:18 AM on 03.25.2015
So there's been a lot of sentiment going round that having to actually learn to read books is too hard. I mean this is a form of entertainment where it can literally take people years to be competent and fluent in being able to read. Without the ability to read however the medium really does nothing for a person. They cannot appreciate the product. Asking people to dedicate so much time for something that to many is a hobby is astounding in this world.
Just think about it. Reading as a hobby is highly exclusionary too in its present state. If you're blind or partially sighted most of this joy can be lost to you from conventional books. It's time readers of the world to make a change. We should force everyone to abandon this toxic ink based system of oppressions that promotes ableism. Everyone should be forced to learn and read books only in braille. It's ok Harry Potter has been converted into braille too.
Oh, that's not the entire series all those files etc are the equivalent of a single Harry Potter Book when combined. So I implore you fellow readers, help to stop the oppressive litriarchy by petitioning your local libraries to stop stocking the toxic and exclusionary print books. After all you wouldn't want people to feel excluded and help promote such an exclusionary culture right ?
And if anyone hadn't realised this was me taking the piss then I'd feel slightly concerned. I decided to write this in response to EA suggesting their games were too hard for people to learn and many others suggesting games were too hard. I mean you have to learn how to hold and use a controller. It's not like people have managed to do that successfully in other forms of media for years.
Ok maybe a bad example and some people still struggle to program their VCR (or whatever the modern version of one people use is). The recent pushes for inclusion of everyone in video gaming while noble to an extent seems to be getting slightly misguided and extreme now. The push has been to claim games can seemingly only be inclusive if they also cater to peoples personal politics and socio political beliefs, the big problem with that is there are so many social and political beliefs out there many at odds with others than trying to cater to everyone is going to be impossible. If people feel excluded from a game due to it not fitting their politics perfectly then so fucking what, it's not the games fault for not bending over backwards. Here's a radical idea, maybe you're not the target audience for the game? If it offends you that a game is allowed to not appeal specifically to your politics then maybe it's worth asking yourself why? Why can't you accept a game with different standards and ideas.
You want to know the most inclusive game so far on the market?
Yeh it's Flappy Bird and even then it could impact those with a phobia of birds. Or those who are blind. Unfortunately it's not possible to include everyone especially those unwilling to make sacrifices or compromises themselves. Art can and should be allowed to offend you and while people will also claim "But it's consumer product so I the consumer am always right and it should always appeal to me and whatever I want" I say fuck you, you whiny smeghead, you can criticise the product and see if people find the criticism to be a valid one when you explain it but it's extremely entitled to call for people to listen and believe and not ask for you to actually validate your reasoning.
The idea that games are somehow too hard to learn is almost a joke considering two of the most popular E-sports games at present are League of Legends and Dota 2. Games which are considered to have a 100 hour period where you're still learning the basics. Heck 1,000 hours is still considered to be learning the games if you've not played a Moba before. The idea that all games need to be simplified down to the level of say Gone Home to appeal to people then the question becomes what next? To go back to the reading example all books aren't Spot the Dog. So why should all games be asked to remove any and all complexity or be called exclusionary I mean are we going to start claiming sports are exclusionary because people aren't all super great at them all automatically too? If you want to define something as exclusionary simply because not every single person is catered to then there is no such thing as an inclusive product because somehow, some way someone will be excluded.
Just to be clear this isn't me arguing against easy to make changes which can help inclusivity but it's me pointing out that there is a limit to how far inclusivity can reasonably go. As for the claims about diversity. Diversity should be a macro scale thing, asking for each game to try and make some quota is insane.
8:52 AM on 03.21.2015
Black Sails is an Amazon original series following the exploits of the inhabitants of a small Island living outside of the control of states and standard governments. The Island is run by the governor Guthrie the Guthrie trading corporation essentially a fencing network used by pirates to shift their plunder. While Governor Guthrie mostly stays out of it the day to day running is done by his daughter Elanor who is mostly responsible for building up the islands town and facilities. Disputes between captains and the threat of a possible approaching English fleet are just some of the problems on the Island. With a cast of almost entirely relatively unknown directed by Michael Bay it sounds like a wasted concept. It's not and hopefully I can explain why it's worth at least a look at it.
Michael Bay........... it's hard to really say just how much Ire there is towards him for the abomination he turned transformers into in the end.
I think that picture goes a long way to saying it though. So honestly I expected Black Sails to be pretty terrible. However what I found is somehow the restrictions of the setting somehow roped in the master of explosion into making something actually worth watching. Somehow Black Sails lets Bay showcase that he has some actual skill under all those explosions able to film a variety of other scenes and tones from Romance to scenes on intrigue.
Black Sails manages to take the pirate and high seas adventure genre and take it beyond Jack Sparrow into something that can best be described as Game Of Thrones on the high seas.Love, agendas, Betrayals and power struggles are a regular part of the Black Sails world as the idea of honour among thieves is put to the test against those trying to make big scores to avoid the "Civilised" society that would see them dead. Of course this is the age of pirates so expect you can expect plenty of sex and violence too as is befitting such a series.
Ah!!!! a wild social justice warrior. Don't worry it would be hard for all but the most determined oversensitive Ideologue to find much to object to. From its diverse to diverse characters Black Sails really does show you can do diversity without preaching about it with its strong female characters like Anne "Cuthroat" Bonnie (referred to as the most dangerous pirate to cross on the island) and the bisexual Elanor Guthrie running the town.
The true genius of Black Sails is managing to take a way of life seen as for the brutal and uncivilised and shine new light on it. Showing those who essentially live on murdering and theft as sympathetic characters for whom being a pirate is just a job to maintain their way of life. The series poses the question who really are the uncivilised? Those who try to force their will and rule onto others or those who merely wish to live their lives and not have people interfering. Black Sails shows pirates in a whole new light rather than rum soaked cutthroats it portrays them as an organised band with their own rules and society a place so civilised injury pay is a thing.
So with Season 2 out soon to buy and Season 1 on Amazon (you don't need prime you can buy an individual episode to test the waters). Honestly if you're looking for a series to try while you wait for Game of Thrones to come back, I'd day give Black Sails a try, if nothing else you know the explosions will look good.
8:50 PM on 03.17.2015
So I wanted to come up with another article series just so I could talk about some older titles that I really enjoyed and were a bit weird or different. Titles that honestly I'd love to see more of or ideas from them used in future titles.
Gungrave. A £20 budget PS2 game that most people probably haven't heard much about.
What makes Gungrave stand out is just how well it holds up and how different it is. Rather than allowing both being a budget title and being in that awkward PS2 era, where 3D character models still looked very jagged, it managed to create something that holds up even quite well today. The art direction of the game really does make it seem like a comic book has sprung to life using the limitations to its advantage and hiding any problems from the era with it's artwork. In fact the game is so much like an anime or comic book that it was actually made into an anime series. That's right I said anime series based off the game not the other way round. What other small budget PS2 release that had little to no fanfare at release could ever claim to have then had an anime series based upon it.
Gameplay wise Gungrave also does things a little different by being a spectacle shooter, and no not in the Bulletstorm way. The best way I can describe the gunplay in Gungrave is to say it's like playing a cleric from the film Equlibrium. Grave while in combat is extremely animated and stylised really making you feel like a killing machine as you mow down waves of enemies. Rather than feeling like guns the weapons feel like more a extension of the character much like the melee weapons in spectacle fighter games. This is juxtaposed against Grave while out of combat where his movement feels slower and more sluggish more inkeeping with the idea that Grave is a walking dead man, especially as Grave carries with him a large coffin chained to his back.
The game also encourages players to keep the action and mayhem going with the beat system, as you shoot enemies or destructible objects you build up beats, if you fail to keep the chain going then your beats are collected and added to your special meter. In essence beats are your combo multiplier and the higher you get it the more you gain on your special meter.
At any point in the game you can unleash a special attack be it a whirling dance of gunfire good for taking out groups of smaller enemies or firing large highly damaging rockets, good for taking out tougher enemies.
As you progress in the game you learn more about your capabilities as and the cool tricks you can pull off. For example it's possible to melee swing your coffin to hit enemy rockets back at their sender , or at other enemies. Another example being learning how to improve your level score as the game rates both combat abilities, time etc but also how stylishly you did it. That's right Gungrave gives you a combat style rating and to help improve it there's a pose button....... no I'm not joking there's actually a button in game to strike a stylish hero pose, imagine that today with modern consoles capture ability.
Every level almost has its own enemies based round the levels theme and how it fits into the games story. One level might see you fighting street thugs, another has you fighting the police and in yet another you're fighting scientists. It sounds as though this huge enemy variety would be a problem but in reality each settings has enemies with the same kind of traits from foot soldiers to huge hulking tougher units.
What truly sets Gungrave apart are the bosses each feeling like a major threat be it due to their mutated forms or in one case the lack of such a form. Rather than feeling like bigger tanker monsters each boss feels refreshingly unique. Part of the unique feeling is generated by allowing you to finish each boss off with a unique special finishing move in true anime style. These finishing moves can vary from turning the coffin into a huge high calibre machine gun or even a back mounted rocket launcher, each played out with its own cutscene sequence showing the impact.
^Yes that is one of the bosses and yes it is a giant arm attached to a wheel.
Now I mentioned before Grave is dead and I said it got turned into an anime series, this alludes to the games rather impressive story which is a bit of a twist of the revenge motivation. You are Grave taking down the crime organisation that took everything from you by trying to kill you. As you soon find out though not everything about Grave is quite as you'd think as he may not have just been some unlucky person who go in the way of the local gangsters.
One major thing Gungrave brings to the table which I really think modern games could benefit from is rewarding replaying the game. Not just with better scores but with more stuff. Each time you complete the game you're awarded a set of smash bros esc figures from a level in the game. Each completion gives you more figures to look at one full levels worth at a time. This idea of rewarding the player with in game assets just shows such promise and reward for those who want to look deeper into the game. I mean think about it, the models are already in the game and essentially what is presented is a very stylised character viewer but because of that extra work it makes such a simple thing feel rewarding. Additionally after you first playthrough you unlock cheats and the ability to activate bullet time at will. I can only imagine playing a modern Version of Gungrave and combining modern game capture with slow motion gun fighting.
In the end I'd love to see more Gungrave because it's got what plenty of games seem to miss these days, good simple fun, the same kind of simple fun in the same vein as Dynasty Warriors. A game that honestly wasn't meant to hit it big but did so because it did something different.
Now before someone in the comments says "But what about Gungrave Overdose that was the sequel?" Yes it was and while it's not a bad game it does have its issues with trying to keep some level of sanity. I mean overdose is a game where you can play and ghost who fights using an electric guitar and one of the bosses is all the bosses of Gungrave sewed together into one giant boss monster........... yes really.
12:14 AM on 03.08.2015
So I can't seem to avoid controversy even when I try to avoid it directly, so I thought what's the oldest most controversial video games debate going I can do something on. Well I haven't fired any shots in the present console war so I think it's time to correct that. Oh and this is also remembering I'm not simple someone who only plays on console. I'm am however, someone who does make choices as to which console he wants to own and doesn't generally buy all the consoles simple to get the exclusives. So to all two of the Xbone fans still left, get your pitch forks ready
Also let's get this out the way. This is what will make me buy a Wii U
Or Maybe this
But Nintendo is weird in that their first party stuff always provides a reason to buy the console eventually.
So I've chosen Sony this generation as my first next gen machine. I was a big Xbox fan last generation but I noticed things turning after the PSN hack incident and Sony vowing to make things up to people as they did with PSN+ and the free games there. This forced Microsoft into playing a game of catch up.
It wasn't initially so much that Sony won me as a customer as Microsoft lost me as one through the decisions it made. The idea of an always online console and my previously stated dislike for Kinect were two of the bigger factors. Add to that the general discontent from indie developers and incidents where not once but twice Microsoft was significantly late on payments. Even suggestions from slightly better known indie developers that Microsoft was going downhill. With their rather bizarre release parity rules for indie developers Microsoft seemed intent on shooting themselves in the foot.
So having got a PS4 I'm actually rather glad I got it, as it's really the little touches I appreciate for example:
For those who didn't know Microsoft actually made that product and it's required to use stereo headsets on the Xbox One. That's right you have to pay extra to be able to use a stereo headset, mean while the PS4 is letting me plug even headsets designed for use with mobile phones in.
Remember how people were constantly talking about how Kinect and the software / firmware being what allowed the Xbox one to interpret speech ? Well I can do similar things on the Ps4 and I'm doing it with a cheap headset and nothing else. You know what else though, the console UI hasn't been designed to be better with Kinect on PS4 meaning I can navigate the thing far easier.
This one was a big one for me. The release parity system is one of the biggest annoying hurdles on the Xbox one for indie developers. The parity system means that if you want to release a game on the Xbone it has to release on the Xbone either first or at the same time as any other platform including PC. What this means is indie developers have to put in more work to make sure they have a console version being released either first or at the same time as any other platform. Oh and this is with Microsoft getting rid of the XNA system and introducing a baffling web for developers to climb through.
One of the big things that has always annoyed me with Games with Gold is how it works. One title comes in at the start of the month and the next replaces it on the 15th of each month. With PSN the games are all at once from the 5th of each month and on top of that all the titles are there for the full month. This means there's less time to miss out on the games. Oh and the PSN+ free games often include cross buy games meaning on PS4 I get 3 different games each month.
While the PSN+ games aren't all full release boxed titles I have to say they're often titles I've either not got on console but do have on PC or other platforms meaning I now get the console version of a game. Or in many cases get a game or two I don't own but is actually good.
Redirecting Audio to your headset.
Of all the features to become a thing this one is truly something I've been waiting on. There have always been ways to do this with more expensive headsets or you can plug into the TV directly however with the PS4 and Xbone they've finally integrated a feature present in a only a couple of last gen games.
That's right those games last gen let you redirect some of the audio into the headset to help with immersion. Now you can direct that audio through the controller Headphone jack to your headset. This is feature that's so unknown by people it seems almost criminal.
This is one I really like and I'm glad has made it. On the Xbone you can adjust the power settings etc. On the PS4 you can similarly customise the power settings allowing the console in sleep mode to download game updates or digital downloads. Also you can customise if the USB ports are powered to allow you to charge items such as controllers from them.
In the end I'm glad I got the PS4, the more powerful of the consoles out there. A platform allowing more games to release onto it and not trying to constantly shaft consumers and developers alike. An actual games console not something trying to be more about TV and apps than games. In this console war, in the end we know there can only be one true winner.
9:35 PM on 02.27.2015
So Venture beat released a new piece recently about how the console and "core" gaming industry needs to be destroyed for the good of gaming, how core gaming things like consoles are exclusionary and keeping people out of the medium. Even Polygon previously got in on the act saying controllers themselves are keeping people from playing games. I mean the absurdity of a medium where you have to I dunno recognise and learn something to read a book play a game.
Ok Ok voice of the reader I'm not going to do this as a piece bashing stupidity in the SJWs again yet. I'm actually going to address a argument that keeps being brought up recently. The idea that smartphones and tablets will replace "core" gaming.
Did TV kill the movies ?
Serious question did TV kill the movies ?
What do you mean it didn't do it? Well TV and film are very similar you can even play films on the TV yet films haven't died out. People still go to the cinema, people still sit their feet stuck to the floor by some unknown substance in a dark room with loads of strangers with overpriced cinema food.
Ok then do digital cameras still exist ?
No really do digital cameras still exist?
Well they shouldn't you know you have to learn all that stuff to work them and I mean we've all got cameras on our Smartphones and tablets so why on earth should digital cameras still exist?
The answer is quite simple. Hardware designed for a specific purpose allows it to excel in that area. It's the reason that PC gaming requires specialised hardware to do it. It's the reason consoles exist to allow access to higher end games without needing to own a PC, it's accessibility plain and simple. The idea that a console let alone a gaming PC is going to be a thing of the past replaced by smartphones and tablets is plainly absurd so let's look into it a bit.
I can manage an hour maybe two out of my tablet if I play Evolve Hunters Quest on it. That's one of the more high end games I've played on a tablet in terms of graphics (and requiring an internet connection). The idea that tablet devices will be able to compete with units drawing on mains power is laughable with modern battery technology. I can't get my smartphone to last a day on standby and people are suggesting they will be the device of choice for Assassins Creed 15 or whatever number we're on in a few years. There are polymer / hydrogen fuel cells batteries being looked at for the future but with even the present level of gaming most smartphones / tablet batteries would die before the introduction is out.
To play higher end games the only way it will work is if the tablet is plugged into the mains which means a nice long mains cord on them running across the room.
This is a big problem with many devices and I can attest my Galaxy 3 tab gets pretty toasty playing Evolve Hunter's quest. One of the big reason companies suggest using laptop coolers etc is the heat given off by the devices. I mean have people so easily forgotten the red light of death on the 360 ?
Now imagine it's not a 360 with a cooling system but a small slim tablet with next to no cooling system at all on it and that amount of heat from the work being done by the system. The system would be frying itself trying to run things and compute them itself.
This is seemingly something people have been rallying against for a while. The claims that video game controllers and having to learn to use them is the problem remember what we've had so far, we've had the Wii, the PS Move and the NSA spy camera Kinect. The Wii was a success but can we really call the Kinect or Move such a huge success in terms of revolutionising gaming.
I have a touch screen laptop and I still use a mouse rather than the touch screen controls. What control methods give you is context sensitive actions and with a tablet you have to find methods to implement controls for the game. There's a reason most mobile and tablet games go for simplicity and that's because with the control options there's not a lot of complexity you can do without getting very creative with the game or adding virtual buttons onto the thing.
There's two problems with the tablet / phone screen:
Firstly it's small so all that fine texture work and effort is going to waste as you can't see the difference too well on such a small device.
Secondly as part of the control method you'll be covering it with your hands thus missing some of the action and requiring designers to work round the idea of losing a lot of screen space.
The only way to get round this would either be having to plug it into a second screen. So that's another wire coming off it meaning you've now got the HDMI and power leads coming off this device and still using it as the controller.
This is a big one and it's one f the main problems. Consoles and tablet / smartphone games fill different functions and have very different designs. console gaming allows a longer more in depth story to be told while mobile and tablet gaming are designed round being able to play in short bursts if a few free minutes. Mobile games are designed so you can play a quick 5 minute burst and them stop having achieved something in each short spell. It's the difference between a 5 minute youtube video and watching a full film.
Are all games going to be reduced down to some super simplified thing with no depth designed round 5 minutes / short periods of play , games not able to use narrative build up techniques as so well. Or is there going to be some weird kind of two tiered market with long play and shortplay games ?
That's even without looking at how terrible the market is flooded with games and the number of anti-consumer practices. The Mobile market is a toxic place for consumers and developers rife with exploitative micro transactions and popular games constantly cloned and resold. The Mobile market is polluted with so much junk It's very hard to find much of worth residing there.
I highly doubt that gaming's future will come in the form of phones / tablets even though they are producing enough revenue to able to get advertising time during the Superbowl.
Tablets might play a part in future console maybe with some kind of integration or connection to them. In terms of tablets and mobile phones replacing the need for core gaming hardware though it's plainly absurd such as claiming that cinemas should be shut down because you can watch films on your smartphone. As video gaming grows and technology pushes forwards the technology used to make gaming systems will also move forward no doubt and the requirements for more modern games will simply grow meaning that tablet devices won't stand a huge chance of overtaking the console technology itself. The only part of gaming that tablets pose any real threat to is portable gaming with devices such as the 3DS and Vita and even then due to their controls and being dedicated gaming systems they are still holding on in there. More likely is we'll see the rise of micro PCs like the suggested Steam Box and other devices coming out.
3:53 PM on 02.22.2015
So no sooner do I write a piece on how trigger warning culture and how wanting a utopian media is a bad idea than I get a story slid across my digital desk.
So apparently a patch to the Dying Light has removed a small line of dialogue from the game. Doesn't seem too big right ? Well the line of dialogue was about how Troy one of the main characters had acid thrown in her face by her brother when she asked about going to school.
That's the line that's been removed. A line about a very real problem still happening in some parts of the world. An issue very few places will cover. An issue brought to the forefront in recent years when Malala Yousafzai was shot by members of the Taliban while on her school bus.
This is the true danger to gaming that is posed by those claiming context doesn't matter and the mere inclusion of this kind of content shouldn't happen.
You may wonder why I've been so very anti Anita well this kind of thing is the reason why. This is why I've said again and again video games need to be allowed to grow up. This kind of thing is the reason I've been so staunchly against people claiming games shouldn't even try to tackle certain issues.
Someone in reddit summed my feelings on this up perfectly.
This is the kind of stupid crap and feeling the need to "self censor" that I'm really concerned about. Considering the incident with GTA V and considering Anita laid into Dying Light because of it using the damsel in distress trope (completely ignoring the context that the "damsel" starts the game by saving your characters damn life without you having any real agency).
I can just see the claims now "Dying Light promotes violence against women" totally ignoring the context that it actually shows the horrific consequences of such acts.
In a world where context is unimportant everything is offensive. So here's to context and those who actually give two shits about it. Because the true thing people should find offensive is not actions being shown as clearly negative. It's people claiming said content shouldn't be in games to begin with "because um um patriarchy um um normalisation" or claiming that these issus shouldn't be discussed by items of media in some claim it trivialises what is a major and quite taboo thing.
You know rather than makes said subjects less taboo and allows discussion of these kind of things to take place rather than a single person be seen worthy to dictate right and wrong on these things.
If peoeple ever wanted to see the harm out of context claims can and cherry picking can do you can now look at Dying Light a game. That felt the need to self censor to avoid anyone making out of context claims about its content. You know like Anita did about Hitman Absolution and Watch Dogs and has done about many other games.
You want to see the harm, you're seeing it now and the kind of twee person who demands nothing should ever have the power to offend them is the kind of person who is holding video games back. Reducing it to a mere childs toy and refusing to let it progress until creator such up to them (See Towerfall adding a killable Anita Sarkeesian character to the game).
9:08 PM on 02.20.2015
Disclosure: I was given an Evolve T-shirt from the Evolve booth nearly a year ago.
So I wanted to do a review of Evolve but this is a multiplayer game with quite a bit of progression and while I have unlocked and played as every hunter and the first 3 monsters (number 4 coming soon) I still don't feel up to doing a full review not least because it's rather clear the community are still learning the game (as to an extent am I).
I went in blind with Evolve having played the game at a show almost a year ago. I've been playing the PS4 version and so far I'm enjoying it. However before I go into more detail this comes with the plenty of buts.
The best way I can describe Evolve at present or more correctly it's community is the result of a lot of Call Of Duty Players trying to play a MOBA. Evolve's problem is not entirely in the gameplay but in the audience and to an extent the community. I've written about my dislike of Call Of Duty previously and Evolve stands as a testament to everything wrong with Call Of Duty and what the series has taught players. A big problem with Evolve is people not really understanding that they have to play their respective roles or everyone dies. Call of Duty has aimed to let everyone play Rambo. Evolve requires people to want to play as the A Team, everyone doing their role.
My present feelings on the community or at least the matchmaking I summed up in a little image I made.
It's clear plenty of effort has been put into Evolve with lots of little touches. Player characters often talk to one another with a variety of conversation before missions (and these change depending on the characters present) even sometimes in mission such conversations occur.
Ok so let's tackle the elephant in the room first. The DLC. OK firstly all the day 1 DLC at present is purely cosmetic. This means the DLC was made after the game went gold and it's not some huge problem for me. Add to this the idea that new maps and modes are going to be coming and will be free to all users it means the community won't be split. The day 1 DLC is cosmetic made after the game went gold by the art team and does not impact gameplay. The idea of the Monster costing $15 if true is bad and I'm a little iffy over the hunter pricing but I'm waiting to see what comes of them and then I'll buy the season pass later on if it seems worth it. In this sense Evolve continues the Moba feel by having more playable character being released post launch.
At present I've played about 30 hours of the game and reached just over rank 35 with all the creatures and hunters so far unlocked. I am still unlocking more items though and trying to rank up the characters to gain additional benefit from them. This is however where I have to object to the game and it's design. As you play as a hunter or monster more you rank up its abilities over time. Each time you rank up the skills gain more power one way or another be it slightly more ammo or range on a gun or slightly lower cooldowns. Essentially the game punishes new players for having not ranked up their hunters more by forcing them to play a slightly weaker version. Oh and as someone who regularly plays Moba games and can notice the difference even subtle changes make to play I have to say it's is a noticeable change.
Also the progression system for each character rank really needs changing as while some of it is based round encouraging people use their full kit and not simply go full call of duty in every role, it reaches a point where to reach the next rank you often need to play sub optimally. To get the required damage amount done with most of the weapons requires you often ignore your normal abilities and focus on gaining that damage.
In short the character rank progression system while designed to promote good play actually could end up hindering it for some matches as players try to grind out requirements as you need all 3 of the rank requirements to be met to even start on the progress for the next rank even if said requirements change the focus from your role in the team.
I will give the game some credit in trying to teach players with both introduction and advanced tutorials in game for each character and monster (not just each role but each individual character). the game even tries to incentivise the player to view the material with the reward of an achievement or Trophy (depending on what format you play on).
So onto the actual game itself. The standard Skirmish mode is kind of forgettable junk, it's ok if you just want a quick go but it's far from the meat of the game. In the standard Skirmish Hunt mode it's a very simple case of try to track down and find the monster and kill it before it reaches level 3. If it reaches level 3 the monster can win by either killing all the hunters or destroying the power node for the area and the hunters win if the monster takes too long or they kill it. Hunt is more honestly a little dull on it's own as without a good balance of monster and hunters either the monster will hide most of the game or the Hunters will easily trap and kill the monster early on.
Hunt mode is really not what Evolve is about. When evolve truly comes alive is in Evacuation mode which gives a rough storyline to you exploits and adds more reason and motivation to the game. The premise of evacuation is simple. Monsters are taking over the colony and you have 5 days to evacuate the colonists. Each day presents a scenario and the results impact the next day with the hunter team and monster able to switch characters and loadouts between days. Day 1 always starts with a hunt mission and day 5 is always a defence mission. Evacuation also has a balancing system so even with the most incompetent of team vs an amazing monster or as an incompetent monster you'll win at least 1 day or more.
In evacuation on the rest of the days you vote on and select a mission from the two available each day either Hunt, Rescue or Nest. Hunt I've previously talked about as a simple case of track and kill the monster / reach level 3 and kill the hunters or the power node. Rescue revolves around locating survivors from a monster attack and getting them to the evacuation ship before the monster finishes them off. Nest revolves around destroying the monster eggs before the monster kills you or time runs out and the eggs hatch. In next mode the creature can also prematurely hatch an egg to gain an minnion monster which will attack and delay the team however it also means the enemy team doesn't have to travel to destroy that egg it's contents will come to them. On the Final day defence mode sees the hunters defending generators against the Alpha creature and waves of minions, lose 3 generators and it's game over.
The twist in Evacuation are the changes that could occur based on the map choices. Lose at the "Entrepreneur" (Bootlegger) Distillery and their produce infects the water making all wildlife aggressive towards the hunters. However win at this location and the next round your ship will spray "Stank" over the area which prevents the monster using its radar like smell ability. This is one of many different options which include but aren't limited to: Electric force fields to limit the area size and make hinting easier; more dead bodies so more monster food, a permanent minnion with the monster; level shortcuts, extra ways to regain health; more firepower as extra NPCs hunt with you; turrets and plenty more. The only day the advantages are fixed is day 5 where if the monster won day 4 it's minnions do more damage to generators, if the monster lost the turrets do more damage minnions.
Evacuation gives a big EXP payout for completing it and this isn't dependent on winning. While winning does give you some extra EXP compared to playing through the full evacuation campaign a match win or loss is negligible. I seriously applaud Turtle Rock for this as it helps foster a community were playing the game is more important than winning or losing.
The different maps are quite varied with each having different quirks to it such as the swamp with acid water or the more jungle like maps with monster that can temporarily poison hunters. Different maps have slight variations on wildlife to content with. Speaking of Wildlife the variety and nuances of them is quite amazing. For example there are the non violent creatures such as the striders the non aggressive creature that will defend themselves like mammoth birds then the always hostile variety including giant sloths and megamouths (an ambush predator that disguises itself as rocks), and this is but a small portion of the wildlife variety.
My biggest complaint in game is in the standard hunt mode it feels like there's very little the hunters can do besides track the monster, and a with a good monster this can be very hard. It feels like there's very little the hunters can do bar for example one hunter having a UAV. All that can be done is try to chase the monster and if you can't, wait for the game to employ one of its many balancing elements. The Monster can accidentally set off carrion birds which give away where it is but many sneaky monsters will dodge these however randomly after the monster kills an animal sometimes carrion birds will flock the location revealing it. Additionally if the monster kills too many creatures there's a chance for the game to spawn rather nasty Trapjaws which cause a fair bit of damage and will fight the monster for its kill. While each Trapper has methods to track the monster each is very specific. Maggie has Daisy who will sniff out the monster, Griffin has sound spike that register when the monster makes a noise (such as even merely walking but this is countered by sneaking monsters) and Abe who can place tracer darks on the monster and the wildlife (which the monster can eat and end up being tracked for a short while by those darts).
Each monster feels quite unique with the Goliath being a hulking brute able to take fights better due to higher armour. The Kraken being an aerial menace flying round the hunter and the Wraith being a more stealth and ambush based monster. A level 3 Goliath will be far easier to spot and find in game but harder to kill while the wraith is hard to track but even at level 3 a well co-ordinated team can take one down.
A game with depth to it
Doesn't push winning as the only acceptable outcome as you can gain significant EXP and progress without a win.
Very well designed environments.
Tries to teach it's mechanics to players and incentivise learning to play.
Nice character to the world and personalities to the hunters beyond them being blank slates.
You need a team really as one bad person not doing their job can turn a match into a long slow loss.
Some possible balance issues with certain hunters and certain monsters on certain maps.
Some bugs and not just silly Ragdoll stuff there's about two crash bugs related somehow to the servers.
Does need a couple more maps to fill it out more.
Definitely needs at least 1 more game mode maybe some kind of defence mode with hunters trying to stop the monster destroying multiple satellite uplinks round the map which could give a 3rd defend bonus with the ship needing the hunters to defend the generators for a longer period.
You have to set aside about 1 hour for play sessions so you can play through the evacuation mode to get the most from the game.
Some match making issues which caused me to rant after being placed as the monster in 5 sessions running despite having monster as my least favourite role because match making
I stand by my claim that Evolve feels very much like a Moba game in terms of learning and complexity despite being an FPS game. Like most Moba games it lives and dies on your team as the hunters and can provide some of the most enjoyable games when you work as a finely tuned machine or the worst experiences as you r team makes run round like headless chickens.
Evolve requires you to put in the work before it really gives back to you rather than providing instant gratification but less feeling of skill progression. It's not a hard game to learn but it does ask you to learn. In the case of teaching the monster it does lack a small amount such that a visit to youtube will vastly improve your monster play.
So the big question.
Can I recommend you buy Evolve at present ?
Yes and No.
Yes if you are willing to put in the time or have played MOBA games before or more in depth class based shooters such as Wolfenstein Enemy Territory or Tribes 2 / similar.
No if you're after COD or Battlefield but with monsters. Or wish to wait for the competence level to rise to avoid really poor matches with incompetent team mates and or wish to prevent your sodium levels from rising as your fucking medic refuses to fucking heal you and tries to fucking 360 no scope the monster as you die.
Unless you're absolutely determined to play it you can wait a month and come to a game with more content, a better community and the last bits of spit and polish applied.
6:05 PM on 02.17.2015
warning the following blog contains capital letters
Problematic, offensive, toxic, harmful. All words that recently have been seeing regular use to describe certain aspects in video games recently. I've been looking into this for a while and I finally realised something weird. Something that turns oh so much of recent events on their side and quite honestly answers a number of questions.
"Video games cause Violence" it's an old thing that keeps being thrown around and I've talk about this nonsense in part before in not one but two posts here. Similar versions of this are being repeated now. The idea of the media teaching people things. People pushing the idea of monkey see monkey do as something that holds eternally through life. Now almost anyone who has even a very basic versing in developmental psychology will be able to point out the formative years are called that for a reason. It's not to say people can't learn new things but our general "Us" our basic functionality and "self" and many ideas about the world are formed by 11 ad only being tested and expanded beyond that point. As such to change this requires said ideas to be challenge. In essence people aren't blank slates that the media constantly writes and re-writes onto. Our entire concept of value doesn't suddenly change every time we partake in media.
Initially this left me trying to understand where certain people were coming from. If even a moron like me can point out how foolish the idea of monkey see monkey do is then why are people laying on academic credentials and claiming to be intellectuals spouting this garbage or similar? I mean do they truly believe it? Well I chose not the write them off as fools and start looking deeper into it. The answer came when I realised many were claiming context didn't matter.
When Anita talks about The Witcher or in her videos where she highlights a sequence as sexist where the protagonist is breaking up a sex trafficking ring I finally realised quite what I'd been missing. It also handily explains the claims that games could teach people etc etc etc.
What is being witnessed is two parts. Firstly it's a fundamental misunderstanding of media. Secondly it's something I'd refer to as protectionism. What all this insanity goes back to is the idea of protecting people and right back to the idea of the trigger warning. For those unfamiliar with the term these are content warnings for people who have suffered traumatic experiences warning them that some of the content may cause them to "re-live" painful memories of have such memories re-surface. Consider it like a car backfiring causing a war veteran to dive for cover in fear. Now while there is a school of psychology that suggests facing said fears and memories and allowing yourself to confront them and move on is a good idea, not everyone is prepared to go through the steps or can go through the steps to deal with said issue hence trigger warnings. Now in recent years the idea of being triggered has been taken up by people for things that really don't seem like they're actually huge traumatic events. For example some-one claiming they got PTSD from twitter. The idea of being triggered changed from actual traumatic experiences and memories coming back that impact lives and debilitate people or cause problems with their day to day functionality to making someone feel a bit bad.
Now because trigger warnings have previously been established as a method of protecting people being exposed to something that would cause trauma. People hearing someone claiming their being triggered automatically assume it relate to some deeply personal trauma that they don't wish to pry into and also will want to avoid doing something to trigger them. What many people don't think of is someone misusing the terms to describe feeling something negative / that they don't want to, that's not triggering that's being human as much as it would be nice to life isn't all roses all the time. In fact some people have claimed the mere existence of something is triggering to them, the idea of merely knowing something exists and thinking about it is triggering even if they don't have to be exposed to it. To give an idea of how crazy this idea is I'll give you a an anecdote: When I was young I got chased round a playground and almost bitten by a dog. Unsurprisingly having almost been bitten I developed a fear of dogs having almost been bitten and having had to run in fear from one. However here in the UK there's a dog show called Crufts. To use the line of thinking that something that could potentially trigger someone shouldn't exist it would be Crufts shouldn't exist because it could trigger me. Now I personally had no problem with Crufts existing I simply didn't go there and avoided going there but the logic being put forwards is stopping or censoring things because of the mere potential for someone to be triggered and as such expecting people to take no personal responsibility for themselves.
Just to be clear no I'm not comparing me having a phobia of dogs due to an unpleasant event to the scale or magnitude of trauma someone with actual PTSD will have experienced. Also to stop people posting loads of dogs in the comments as a joke I'm no longer phobic of dogs, long story short my ex girlfriend really really wanted to go to Crufts and guess who ended up going with her if nothing else it shows how effective overloading a person's fear response can be to get them over it. Oh and mark my words if I hadn't loved her as much as I did there's no way in hell I'd have stepped within 10 miles of the Crufts show.
So onto the media aspect and how all this relates to media and in particular video games. So I'd like to tell you a little story.
Ashley went to the shops. Squee had a good time there, nothing happened to 's there really. After that Squee went home. The End.
Not exactly the most compelling story is it? Now what if the story ended with "Game Over You Win"? It would be pretty disappointing right? Well this is where suddenly so much makes sense. You see many people see media as the black mirror. The black mirror analogy is that media reflects society and media often highlights and plays on the darker aspects of society, showing not only societies good points but also often reflecting the ills of society.
What is being pushed is the idea media should be some idealistic utopian vision for what society can or should be like in some people's eyes. The simple truth is sexism, racism and many other forms of discrimination exist in reality. In most media it's portrayed as a bad thing: it's the villains in Double Dragon that punch the women; it's one of the villains in Red Dead Redemption that kicks a woman. It's the bad guys the people portrayed as evil that you don't want to be like and you spend the game trying to kill / defeat. In short video games show quite literally show people fighting against societies problem or at least people very visibly displaying them. So what possible problem could certain moral authoritarians and SJWs have with this idea? Why would an SJW want media to be like my little story above? It's simple, it's the reason people truly tried to have GTA V stopped from sale in Australia and Canda. It's the same reason Media Watch in the UK tried to have Madworld banned on the Wii. To create a safe space.
It sounds all well and good doesn't it, the idea of creating a safe space? I mean you don't want to hurt people right? You don't want to trigger them right? This is where the problem comes in regarding the SJW mindset and one of their ideas of empathy. However this isn't merely empathy as in trying to understand and feel bad for said person this is Hyper empathy to the extent they are spurred to action. This is protectionism. Rather than have people take some level of personal responsibility SJWs want the rest of the world to take responsibility. Rather than a person choosing to experience something potentially triggering the claim is that said triggering content shouldn't be there.
So the issues with the mentality of having video games and their stories as some safe place or utopia are two fold. Firstly they deny people's right to choose, even those who could be triggered . Secondly and most importantly though they deny a key part of what makes stories work. Stories need obstacles, they need adversity which the protagonist overcomes and progresses. The idea of games being required to be some utopian idea requires them to have no aspects truly reflecting reality in them. With games you explore different worlds you don't explore perfect worlds without fault. These faults are what SJWs have a problem with because games will trigger people because people can be triggered regardless of context. Just because Saving Private Ryan shows war as hell doesn't mean it couldn't trigger people. So this finally explains this. So an elf being discriminated against in Dragon Age could trigger someone's own memories of discrimination they suffered.
The idea coming from people claiming to be triggered merely due to something existing even if they won't be exposed to it. This is the reason Anita regularly brings up rape and domestic abuse statistics in real life. It's not the idea that games cause this somehow that Anita is seemingly attempting to show. It's attempting to suggest the content shouldn't exist because it could trigger these people.
So I say that maybe we're better off with the imperfect fantasy worlds of video games. As was said in the film "The Matrix" Humanity has a problem with perfection, with worlds created without flaws as without adversity there is nothing to overcome. Without odds there is nothing to beat. Without something to fight against or work towards there is no challenge. Because in the end Utopia wouldn't be no fun and would welcome a trigger man to provide adversity. If you delve into the dark waters of Tumblr you can find people who claim almost anything triggers them even capital letters.
At some point you have to turn round and say you can't protect everyone for everything and at some point people have to take some responsibility for their own well being art of any kind isn't and shouldn't be about making you feel comfortable and safe all the time. In the end there's a big difference between understanding someones problems and helping with them and expecting the entire world to be responsible for it and to change to remove any level of responsibility.
In the end this is the same old "Won't someone think of the children" except now those children are not children but adults. So maybe it's about time we stop chastising games for "trivialising serius issues" because maybe rather than trivialising it they're allowing discussions to be had about these aspects which previously were considered taboo subjects.
Next blog hopefully something a little less deep or controversial. Maybe talking about how Evolve shows the flaws in the Call of Duty age of gaming.
7:55 PM on 02.11.2015
Minecraft. A hugely successful extremely popular sandbox video game. Also one of the most exclusionary and toxic games there is.
Don't believe me ?
Well let's stat off with the basic problematic elements and work from there. The default player character is male. The game gives you no initial choice and requires you to go into the menu and change your skin and even then on the console versions unless you pay there are not female skins by default. In fact even in the skin packs less than 50% of the skins are female.
So as if that level of sexism wasn't enough players are encouraged to kill female characters in game to gain items. It's this violence against Women that is potentially going to lead to Minecraft being banned in Turkey for normalising such behaviours. As this totally legitimate piece of research conclusively proves people gain their ideas of normalcy from media they consume.
Add to that how Minecraft promotes violence offering no peaceful solution to conflict resolution. It normalises violent acts and a violent mindset being presented in this way. At no point does Minecraft actively promote co-operation and friendship. With the game also promoting players to kill endangered animals simply for trinkets in the form of the ender dragon.
Lets also not forget how exclusionary Minecraft is forcing people to learn how to play. Not only must people learn how to control the game either using a controller or keyboard and mouse but they must also learn to play the game. As Polygon have previously pointed out this kind of exclusionary attitude is damaging to the media. What other media forces people to learn, I mean it's not like you have to learn to read books we're all magically able to do that from birth as everyone knows.
Then there's how Minecraft Promotes Satanism by having players brew "magical potions" or use enchanting tables to gain supernatural powers. Even at times harvesting demons and monsters to add to the players own power.
Oh and it should go without saying Minecraft is also hugely Racist. I mean what other game would have you viciously attacked by an angry black person simply for looking at them the wrong way.
We must all take a stand and push for games not to promote such harmful toxic values and these or we might never seen society progress. So people I ask you to stand with me.
OK if you couldn't tell already I'm at that stage where I start to take the piss out of certain rather prevalent aspects of the gaming press now. Be it asking why there isn't 50% women in Evolve, I mean why isn't there a male option in Tomb Raider you oppressive fuckwads...... That's the level of stupid this is getting to. I'm really having to question quite where some people are coming from. Should I be offended that in Portal 1 and 2, Primal, Mirrors Edge, Beyond Good and Evil and Tomb Raider games that I didn't get the option to play Larry Croft? What the hell has got into people recently where somehow every game must let you play as some exact copy of you? In any number of books is the main character just like you? We're at at stage where people are legitimately complaining that Dragon Age Inquisition was offensive because there weren't enough exclusively gay characters.
Thats the romance chart for Dragon Age Inquisition for those who care. We're at a stage where people are offended, by a game daring to actually target a gay audience. A game by a gay developer with an almost exclusively gay cast is being condemned as homophobic because it's not the right kind of gay. At some point we've got to stop this madness and understand that while representation in video games should be worked on it's a Macro scale problem not some issues that can be solved by constantly yelling at developers for not adhering to some quotas. People should be allowed to make the characters they want be it ones that look like Bratz Dolls or be it white guys with beards or what ever they want to.
This idea of constantly needing to push games to appeal to a broader and broader audience forgetting entirely about the idea of demographics is what will slowly kill the games industry. Or trying to merely appeal to some perceived "new Gamers" who certain people seem so intent on telling everyone would play games it's just you know things make them feel excluded like having to learn to play and use an controller, or games not meeting some arbitrary quotas.
What's funny is very few people will realise Evolve did make changes to its Default "showcase" line up to attempt to show better representation at least in marketing just take a look at the original trailer.
Since then they've switched out the Trapper and moved him from being the default and in his place put a different Trapper.
I think it's time for a very serious debate about quite what purpose the games media should have. If it's really about chastising developers to fail to meet some arbitrary quota that even puts the Bechdel test to shame in terms of how arbitrary it is. My Ex Boyfriend the Space Tryant is sexist because it features almost an entirely male cast, if we're going to be playing this game. It's also a "Gay adventure game" aimed at gay men. If people would rather keep talking about how games oppress people and are so exclusionary then I'll happily oblige and stop writing about neat and interesting little indie games and write more pieces like this one or my previous one saying how I am Bread is oppressive for promoting a glutonormative agenda.
So is this really what people want from the games media all the time ?