Comment with Facebook
Click connect and comment instantly!
|
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds
|
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!
and I know for a fact that you can not beat the game in one time cycle, there is a lot to do in the game, and besides every time you finish a dungeon it takes you back to the beginning. I won't say it was better then OoT, but it came pretty close in my book.
I like them equally because they both offer something different to the Zelda universe. Where OOT focused on bringing the main plot of Zelda to the N64, Majoras Mask brought a story from a different direction. That of the people in the Zelda universe.
Each game had its own mechanics, item design and pacing. But each offered an awesome narrative, great gameplay and unique pacing that only served, in my opinion, to compliment each game.
I cannot compare these games because they are too different, even though toting platform based gameplay with equippable items and simple puzzles, the execution was so different that they warrent being reviewed on their own and not in comparison.
IMO anywho.
Both games are worth playing and owning.
Much like how GTA 3 and Vice City get debated to death, so will Ocarina and Majoras Mask. I liked Majoras Mask a lot. They did a different story for Zelda and it was apreciated. However the major thing for the arguement: Ocarina has more dungeons BY FAR compared to the four main dungeons in Majoras Mask. I counted out almost a dozen from Ocarina, but just four in Majoras Mask. I will agree that the storyline and characters were more developed, but some masks you had to get were frustrating to find. Not that the big goron sword wasn't, it was just quicker. The dungeon design was great (except that damn water temple) the story moved you from point A to point B, and its just so darn memorable. Everything had this really cool adventure "I'm saving the world" kind of vibe. Majoras Mask lets you know that the world will end in 72 hours and that you have to play those same three days over and over. It strayed from the formula and tried something different. It wasn't Hyrule, it was a bizzare mirror world full of people who needed you to do fetch quests. You could turn into monsters, but overall it didn't have as much impact as the original. Majoras Mask was the last game I got for the N64, which I had shelved for almost a year. It brought me back to the system for a final game. Whenever I want to play N64, Ocarina of Time and Majoras Mask are both what I usually gravitate to. In summary great games or greatest games?
Another thought to consider: Ocarina was before gamefaqs or message boards and this series of tubes we call internet made it everywhere. It was the last game I can remember having discussions about with friends. Also worth pointing out is in that year a few other classic games came out, and Ocarina of Time is generally agreed upon to be one of the games of the year. Just to illustrate my point here are a few games released that year: Resident Evil 2. Metal Gear Solid. Fallout 2. Rainbow Six. Pokemans Red & Blue. Tekken 3. Brood War.
A picture of a kitten to break up the paragraphs:
Clockwork hit it perfectly: You really feel like you've done something in Ocarina.[b] Majoras Mask just feels like a good repeat on the formula with some gimmicks thrown in. The three day thing is easy to deal with. Play the song of time backwards to slow time passing. One big plus Majoras Mask has is that you can re-fight bosses. In Ocarina, you can't unless you replay the game from start to finish. Compare to older Zeldas where you fight a gauntlet of bosses with all your weapons at the end. Also cocks. One major argument for Majorsas Mask over Ocarina: No water temple. Yeah, there is a water level, but I'm sure everybody knows about [b]THE water temple. You miss one key or use it in the wrong place and you're screwed until you hunt around for where you need to go. Its easy to beat with practice, but the fun of Zelda is waiting a few months or years to forget where everything is and going back to replay them.
I'll check back on this tomorrow. Just to make this fair, everyone needs to play both or have played both back during release to fully appreciate them.
Keep in mind, both games are great. Just opinion and personal preference will decide which is the better. I think you can tell by my back and fourth which I prefer. Honestly though, the one I replay more is the SNES Zelda. Link To The Past in my opinion is the best of the series. I love the other ones, but the retro goggles - they do everything. Link To The Past is the definitive Zelda video game in MY opinion.
First SNES game I ever owned, bought with the first console I ever owned and the first game I ever completed. Starting about 6 years ago, I've played through the entire game at least once every year. It's such an -awesome- game.
Best regards, Natali, CEO of listen to music and
free online music