Quantcast
Destructoid - SuicideFLip's Community Blog




About Me
Gamer Profile
3DS friend code:
Steam:
Battle:
PSN:
Mii:
Gamertag: SuicideFLip
Following ()
Missing features and reviewing dilemmas
SuicideFLip | 10:19 PM on 09.30.2008 5 comments


We're about to see two interesting game releases and reviews. Last week it was announced that Fable 2 would not be shipping with the long promised and much talked about online coop. This is one of the selling points that Peter Molyneux has been pushing hardest since it was announced. I haven't played the game, but listening to people talk about previewing it, it sounded like it was working fine in those builds. Even in the final disc product you will be able to see your friends floating around as orbs. You can chat and trade with them, just not play. I'm not a programer or anything, but that seems like a hop, skip and jump away from the coop working. Fortunately, they are saying it will be patched in during the first week after release if not sooner.

LittleBigPlanet, one of the main reasons I own a PS3, had a similar announcement. There will be no online coop Create mode out of the box. They are also joining the "patch it in later" bandwagon, although their time table is much more vague. It will come with the first major update. That could be a month, that could be six months, we don't know. To me, this feature is less important than Fable's missing piece. You can still create levels with four friends in the same room and play through levels online with four people. All of this requires you have three friends who have a PS3 too, which is a bigger problem.

The question this triggers is how will reviews go for these games? Lots of games receive additional content during their lifespans, see Burnout: Paradise for a prime example. I've heard talk before of rereviewing a game later on, after it has gained this content, since it would be a pretty different experience to play. The difference between the LBP/Fable 2 and Burnout is that the Burnout DLC wasn't imporant features promised for and cut from the original game. Burnout was complete when it shipped and has grown since to encourage you to keep the game and keep playing it, which seems to be working very well. Will reviewers cut these games some slack because they know the features are on the way? It is going to be a tricky situation to navigate. Good luck to you, game reviewers, I look forward to see how it goes.

Also, these games both come out on October 21. Coinsidence? Probably.[img][/img]



Is this post awesome? Vote it up!

0



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

5 comments | showing # 1 to 5
prev next

Scrixx's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/30/2008 23:27
Scrixx
Well I think reviewers can hold out one week for Fable 2, or just add a portion later on. I can't wait to get the game D:
IronPikeman's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/01/2008 01:04
IronPikeman
I'm pretty sure that the LBP co-op update will be within the first few weeks. It's popularity and amount of people playing will warrant an update, soon after it's release, for the inevitable glitches. Just about every new game gets an update a week or two after release.
Aurain's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/01/2008 03:13
Aurain
If they can patch the online co-op into Fable 2 within a week, they can ship it on the disk, if they pull their fingers out and actually do some work. No excuse for it really, and if Fable 2 gets savaged by reviewers for not having that feature in after being hyped up so much ( like it should ) then it's fully justified. If it has to be patched in, it's not originally part of the game, and can't be reviewed as such.
KaL YoshiKa's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/01/2008 03:41
KaL YoshiKa
Wow I didn't realise we were in the presence of a business guru in the form of Aurain. I'm sure with your expert leadership they'd be sure to get the game out months ahead of schedule bug free and with none of the team pulling 14 hour shifts for weeks on end.

Disks don't just get magically printed/shipped...a game isn't finished then immediately in stores. It can take a month or more to get it ready for official release. During that time they'll be working on the patch...so a week becomes about 2 months or so. If reviewers take marks off the game then so be it but they face the risk of their review becoming outdated within a week.
wardrox's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/01/2008 06:24
wardrox
It is a tough one, as I think you also need to take into account games like Castle Crashers which needed a patch to fix massive bugs. Though reviewers seem to have been very lenient on that one.

Reviews are there to help people thinking about buying the game. If it's not patched when it's reviewed, then it has to be reviewed as it was played, with a footnote adding that a patch is due.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!