Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by SmileyBarry | UPDATED: Why Diablo III's online-only requirement is worse than online-only DRMDestructoid
LIGHTS:  ON | OFF
surf dtoid with arrow keys

HOT GAMES
REVIEWS VIDEOS COMMUNITY FORUM SHOP

pc PS4 PS3 NEXT XBOX XBOX 360 WII U 3DS PS vita ANDROID APPLE

REMOVE ALL ADS?
Guaranteed contest entry?
A new video show?
Something else?

Vote in our membership poll

About
A programming geek and gamer from Israel, and Dtoid newbie. I was introduced to Destructoid Europe and immediately joined during Eurogamer Expo 2011. (You can find the post about it all on this cblog!) I'm a big fan of PC gaming, but sometimes I play on my PS3. Rarely.

This is my Dtoid Community Blog, but my main blog is at smileybarry.com. I post everything there and cross-post some stuff here.
Player Profile
Follow me:
SmileyBarry's sites
Badges
Following (16)  


UPDATE: Due to the request of Vitruvius Otoko in the comments, I've looked for a reliable source to all this and found a post by Blizzard Entertainment themselves. Here it is:

In addition to all the other benefits that we believe ultimately come from having everyone online such as an active, centralized community, a popular arena system, accessible character storage, etc. etc. Diablo III is built on a client/server architecture, which means not all the data for the game or mechanics reside on the client (your computer).

This is not too unlike World of Warcraft where the world itself, the art, the sounds, etc. are on your machine, but all of the NPC’s and enemies are controlled by the server. Diablo III doesn’t function in all of the exact same ways, but things like monster randomization, dungeon randomization, item drops, the outcomes of combat, among others, are all handled and verified by the client talking to the server, and vice versa.

We’ve learned a lot from this type of architecture from World of Warcraft, and the added security and oversight it provides. It allows a great deal of control over the game at all times for all players, so if we know there’s an issue or bug we can usually address it right then and there through a live hotfix. Hotfixes can’t be used for everything, we’re still going to have client patches, but we’re definitely looking forward to being able to deliver a consistently high quality experience to all players simultaneously through processes like hotfixes.

In addition there are some pretty intense security concerns. While there’s never a fool proof solution to stopping hack and cheats, we’ve found that a strict client/server architecture is a huge barrier for their development and use.

Ultimately we made the decision to make the game client/server based because of the security and quality it can provide to those playing, and as a bonus it reinforces a lot of our ideals for a thriving online community.

Source: A post by Bashiok, a Blizzard employee, on the Battle.NET forums.

Diablo III requires a permanent internet connection to play. However, what it doesn't tell you is that the requirement is not just forced -- it is actually required.

Diablo III servers don't just keep a constant connection with your computer, they do the number crunching. They calculate damage, AI, loot, actions, the whole thing. You are playing one-user multiplayer, not single-player. Unlike previous Diablo games, your computer does nothing but create the scene. Sure, sometimes it compensates for missing data and lag -- just as any online game does-- but just like World of Warcraft, you are playing on a server no matter what.

This is more than digital rights management. You are sold an incomplete product. Blizzard market Diablo III is an RPG with online features, implying offline is possible and not the main focus. This is false. Instead, you are buying a MMORPG in which you are playing alone. When Blizzard pull the plug on Diablo III servers, you will have a digital or physical paperweight. (You might question that statement considering Diablo II servers are still up. But that is directed at such products in general, which are only usable as long as the developer or publisher feels like it.)

Unlike Ubisoft's Online Services Platform, your games are non-functional if you don't maintain a connection. If your connection is flaky or if the server is far away, you will experience game issues: rubberbanding, lag, errors and maybe even discarded actions -- in situations of extreme network congestion your "click" may not register in time or register at all. This is one example of it. (And this is another)

One example of discarded actions prevalent in online gaming is Minecraft multiplayer. If you own a network card made by Atheros or Realtek, you cannot play Survival Multiplayer. Despite efforts made by Mojang to cut back on traffic, Minecraft sends an immense amount of data back and forth that these brand cards simply can't cope with. The result is lag, changes that aren't seen until later and sometimes even having the server undo your actions because your network card didn't send the actions to the server on time. The server thus determined your actions to be impossible and reverted them.

That's why Diablo III's online-only requirement is a real requirement and not just DRM, and why it is actually worse than online-only DRM. I'd have less of a problem with it if Blizzard didn't market the game for what it's not: a single-player RPG with online features, but instead marketed it as a multi-player RPG with a one-user option.



Is this blog awesome? Vote it up!





Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.

Legacy Comments (will be imported soon)


Hate to be the one who says this, but may I ask where did the source of this information came from?

Because if it's proven to be true (God forbid it), there is no justification to playing Diablo III anymore; no matter how good the game is, I wouldn't want to buy an incomplete product.
Diablo 3 doesn't have an offline, single player option. That's terrible...

BUT.

Diablo is famous for being multiplayer. Who played Diablo 2 solo? If you wanted to play the game with any multiplayer aspect at all, you had to use Battle.Net. If you didn't have internet back in the year 2000, you couldn't access your online characters. The Battle.Net system functions identically to how it did for that last decade.

When you wanted to play solo on your characters on Diablo 2, you had to create a solo game. There's nothing new here. I agree that it's terrible that you can't play solo at all, but I've never enjoyed playing Diablo games without multiplayer.
I found a post by Blizzard themselves detailing this. I've added it to the post now.

Back to Top
DLC   |   BEST Games of 2012   |   Best PC Games   |   Best PS3 Games   |   Best Xbox 360 Games   |   Best Wii U Games   |   Best 3DS Games




All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more