Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by Sir Legendhead | Morality (or the lack thereof)Destructoid
LIGHTS:  ON | OFF
surf dtoid with arrow keys

HOT GAMES
REVIEWS VIDEOS COMMUNITY FORUM SHOP

pc PS4 PS3 NEXT XBOX XBOX 360 WII U 3DS PS vita ANDROID APPLE

REMOVE ALL ADS?
Guaranteed contest entry?
A new video show?
Something else?

Vote in our membership poll

click to hide banner header
About
I don't want you to have my personal information, internet! You keep calling me at strange hours of the night and asking me to go out with you!

Player Profile
Xbox LIVE:lingeredshade
Follow me:
Sir Legendhead's sites
Badges
Following (14)  


I don't always care about the morality of my decisions but it is nice to see them reflected in certain games.

Take New Vegas, for example. I didn't find myself helping the NCR promote democracy because it was "the right thing to do". I did it because I liked democracy just as much as they did. Helping an alpha male warlord like Caesar take over didn't line up with my preferences. Plus Howard Hughes (or whatever his name was, I forget) had all those cool robots. Of course they wound up under the control of Yes Man soon thereafter but...anyway.



I think you see my point. Morality doesn't necessarily have to be a factor in the decision making process. As a matter of fact, it would be completely fair to say that some of us do shit almost purely for the lulz.

To be completely honest, I have to admit that my way of thinking isn't necessarily dependent on traditional concepts of good and/or evil. Sometimes I like to maim bad guys simply because fuck bad guys, that's why. On the other hand, becoming the bad guy is...well, it's just kind of boring, really. Why go after civilians, for example? There's no sport in it. They can't fight back and it's not like you get points for them. Taking over the world? Ha! Why would any sane man want to be cursed with such a responsibility? The surest way to make yourself a slave to everyone, is to let them think of you as their master. After that they'll blame you for every shortcoming their lives may have, be they real or imagined.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, the more I think about it, the more I realize that I simply enjoy playing the good guy. Not out of a sense of responsiblity or honor, but because it's more fun that way. Plus I'm less than forty-eight hours away from opening up Arkham City and I'm thinking, would it really add anything to the experience to be able to play Batman as "evil"? What would he do then, carjack people? HA! He can basically fly already. So why bother? And who's to say that he's not evil already? Doesn't he operate from mostly selfish motivations to begin with?

Think about it. Let's say you're Tommy Vercetti, and you've already won what you wanted from Vice City. The nicest cars, the biggest mansion, any woman you meet. What then? Would you just sit back and wallow in the decadence of it all? You'd eventually get bored, you know...then one night, you might find yourself thinking.

About how you miss the challenge of the good old days, when you had to fight to survive on the street. Next thing you know, you're out there in highly modified body armor beating the raw shit out of dangerous criminals simply because you can. Just for the thrill of it all, the "lulz" as they say.

And really...that's not such a bad thing, now is it.

Photo Photo



Is this blog awesome? Vote it up!




Those who have come:



Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.

Legacy Comments (will be imported soon)


Nice point of view on Batman. He IS a troubled individual, but I doubt he do what he do for the lulz, but to put his conscience to rest. Being all powerful is boring and I completely agree that you would get bored fast.

I am usually the good guy in games because I am a good person in real life and I can't put myself to do something evil in games for the lulz.
Spot on about new vegas i posted something vagely similar yesterday but i think you have streamlined it a lot better. i could have been a total asshole and helped Caesar enslave Nevada and reap the rewards. But thats just not me it wouldnt sit properly with my views and beliefs.

Although i have no problem blowing up a bus full of Nuns in GTA with a heat seaking Missle. Why? for the lulz GTA doesnt punish you for being a dick, infact it rewards you with points and and extra cash.
I too sided with the NCR... reflective of real life I guess. In "order vs anarchy" I tend to side with order because anarchy is no fun... there's really no challenge to it.
> i would fap this but i don't know how

It's okay Monti! All you have to do is think happy thoughts and BELIEVE!



Also everybody else, I love you guys too. Sorry for the lack of personalized responses but I just kind of understand Monti in a special way.

NO HOMO

<3
Did my drunken shenanigans inspire this? If so I am proud.

wittypicture.jpeg
@ Rev

Well, they didn't inspire the underlying point of view as much as the publishing of it as a C-blog. As far as what got me started seeing life this way in general, pfff...that could turn into a book, easily. It's just a matter of taking the time to do it and then getting it out there.

And going back a bit...

@ ManWithNoName

Yeah, it is a bit facetious to say he does it for the lulz, but it struck as whimsical too. You know, internet humor and all that.

I definitely think heroes should be examined for the self-serving aspect of their motives though. In Batman's case, he has his own issues to deal with and takes the rest of the city with him. He does good but at the same time he's the reason guys like the Joker come out of the woodwork. It's a double-edged sword, really.

@ Xeon

Actually I started typing this up as a comment for your blog, then I kept going with it and decided, well, I haven't used the publish button in a while myself...then everything I meant to say there wound up here. I did fap yours though. :)

@ Elsa

I don't know, with me it depends on the degrees in between. Absolute order can be just as horrifying and soul-crushing as absolute anarchy. In the case of New Vegas, I have to say that after getting all four endings, Mr. House had the best approach in hindsight. The guy had his own personality quirks but he seemed to understand and care for his city more than anyone else did.
Also, I guess Monti got banned. Crap. I liked that guy. Just in case anybody's wondering, the Peter Pan thing actually had context after he commented the other night...:(

Back to Top
DLC   |   BEST Games of 2012   |   Best PC Games   |   Best PS3 Games   |   Best Xbox 360 Games   |   Best Wii U Games   |   Best 3DS Games




All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more