Black hearted lawyers, or strident protectors of the intellectual property? Which totally sounds like a really rad movie, only when I say rad, I actually mean full of suck.

Eh, whatever. I hope that it passes under their radar, as it looks like something I might actually, kind of, sort of, maybe consider caring about.

Thanks for the info, Sarge!

Define "we all", would you? Because it's news to me.

Seriously, people who are inclined to post shit like that ought to get hit by a bus and suffer a broken pelvis. I'd say no offense, but that would defeat the purpose of having wished bodily harm on you.

No, I kid. Though you do suck for being an insufferable asshole. See, being that this site lives on the propogation of news that other people have already reported, it's a little odd to for anybody to give this guy shit just because someone else posted something before him. Technically in a way he's just stepping in the foot-prints of the D-Toid editorial staff, which is to say that he did what they make their livelyhood doing, only he didn't know that he did it.

Next time you have the inclination to go "Old news is old!", just fight it would you?

That's how I roll. It's all about being a dick-hole from behind the anony...anyo....safety of the internet.

Really though, I'm having a really shitty day, which caused me to lose the ability that I usually have to keep quiet about stuff that bothers me.

That's not an excuse for it, but rather, an explaination. Does it suffice? No? Well shit.

I'd totally buy that if you didn't preface pointing it out with "Hate to break it to you but..."

Is there a rule somewhere that says that D-Toid is only allowed to have one C-Blog per news-item? It doesn't seem to me to be worth pointing out that it's already been done otherwise, though even then it would still come off like trolling.