|
games anime | toys
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|

| get involved register or login post a blog post a forum enter a contest contribute a news tip suggest a feature be a guest editor |
support new member's guide login assistance tech support report abuse email our editors read our dev blog nuclear crisis? |
keep in touch RSS feed Myspace Flickr Game nights Meetup+play online |
seriously about Destructoid advertising terms of use privacy policy jobs at MM buy our crap |
our network Tomopop Japanator Despingation? |
||
|
||||||
living the dream since March 16, 2006 |
||||||
I agree Gears 2 is a great(far better than the lol random borefest that is Left 4 Dead). But the first game is not great. Gears of War 1 is totally average, it was only good because the 360 had no games at the time and the hype was ridiculous.
First of all, the game is amazing no doubt about it, from the visuals to the gameplay; everything is nearly perfect
Except for the multiplayer glitches that make it unplayable, am I right?
I like gears 2 a lot, but not mind-blowing imo.
I hated the berserkers in the original gears. I thought they were too hard.
It is totally ok for games to be hard. But if you make a shooter, only *shooting* should ever be hard. If you want to add some weird bullfighting boss fight that's fine, just don't make it so hard (and the fights so long) that I have to spend a ton of time getting through it.
Ditto General RAAM, who is an interesting boss, but not a good boss for a shooter.
Hey Welcome to D-toid, I haven't played any gears but both games look awesome and a whole lotta fun to play with friends.
youre right King
@king, yeah multiplayer was rather awful other than Horde mode.
@boatorious, in Gears 1 you had enemies that could kill you in one swipe: Berserkers, General RAAM, the Kryll, etc. I liked the challenges that were there, even if it's a shooter. But I guess it's just a matter of opinion.