
|
|
|
As an owner of all three of the current generation this generation has to offer, I have obviously discovered that none of them are perfect or blatantly superior to the other. This is one installment of a three-part blog entry that discusses what, in my opinion, needs to be done to improve the three consoles of this video game generation. I’m only going to be covering the ‘big three’ in this; --Xbox 360 --Wii --PlayStation 3 The current era of handhelds will be left out of this discussion. I once again point out that these articles are my opinions based on experience with all three systems. Nintendo and I have been going through a rather weird relationship for the last few years. I was pretty much a die-hard Nintendo fan growing up and still claim that the SNES is the most successful gaming system of all time, and that die-hard Nintendo mentality lasted right through most of the Nintendo 64 generation. While I enjoyed all of my time with my N64 playing classics like Mario Kart, Jet Force Gemini, Ocarina of Time, Mario 64, and Super Smash Bros. (the N64 version is still the best)… I was starting to feel the pull away from Nintendo, and I wanted to see what all of this fuss was about in regards to the Sony Playstation. I eventually did grow dull of the standard Nintendo lineups and constantly wanted to play some PSX games with my friends, and then one specific game came along and my die-hard love for Nintendo was pretty much over from that point on. The Nintendo Gamecube was the second system I bought from the last generation. I bought it anticipating the release of Twilight Princess, along with knowing other games such as Metroid and Resident Evil 4 were on the way. In an ironic twist of fate I ended up buying my Nintendo Wii for… well, Twilight Princess. Thus my relationship with Nintendo can be described as unfulfilled anticipation. I eventually did get Twilight Princess and enjoyed the game (and I think its better than Mario Galaxy) but beyond that, I’ve had little to enjoy in regards to my Nintendo Wii. I don’t know if its just that I’ve grown out of the Nintendo target audience, or if their target audience shifted away from the likes of me, but I just cant comprehend why the Wii is just blowing away the likes of the Xbox 360 and the Playstation 3. Now I will definitely admit that the Nintendo has done some good things for the video game industry, however like the other two systems it does have things that I feel need improvement. --Software Despite having the largest install base of the three systems, it is hard to argue against the Wii having the weakest software library of the three current era systems. Most of the successful titles on the Wii right now are first party Nintendo titles like Metroid Prime 3 and Mario Galaxy while other successful titles are ports from titles built for the Gamecube like Resident Evil 4 and Twilight Princess (sorry, but Zelda in my opinion is just a refined port like RE4). Now while we get the occasional third party hit like No More Heroes and Madworld, there are about 4 Red Steels and one could argue that the Wii has as many quality titles since its launch as the PS3/360 has in a single year. For the record I have no problem with ‘casual’ games what so ever, it’s just that a bad or mediocre game is just a bad or mediocre game regardless of its target audience. Trying to convince someone otherwise is like trying to convince someone that a donkey is a Kentucky Derby racehorse. Nintendo will eventually get backlashed even by the casual gamer world if they don’t tighten up their standards and put out higher quality games, otherwise people are simply going to realize that there are a lot of identical mini game collections with waggle and that there aren’t a lot of reasons to invest further money into the system. Upon its introduction into the world, back when it was still called the Nintendo Revolution, a lot of people envisioned the Wii as being the ideal system for sports games and first person shooters alike, as well as having the standard Nintendo backbone titles as support. Nintendo, tighten up your quality requirements before allowing a game to come out onto your system. I speak for a lot of people when we’re sick of seeing so-so titles and half-assed ports on your system. --Hardware I know this really isn’t fair considering fixing this problem would require an overhaul of the system, and the Wii’s lacking in graphics was for the most part intentional, but the Wii needs to at least take a small step into the high definition age of graphics. Right now the Wii is basically an over clocked Xbox Original, and still lacks some of the functionality that system had, like a nice internal hard drive. A lot of gamers nowadays, especially ones who already own one of the other next generation systems, have high definition televisions and Wii titles simply look like ass in high-def (and since the system is basically an external DVD drive, wouldn’t DVD support be nice?). It’s because of this lacking in hardware that I really don’t classify the Wii as a ‘next gen’ system. In my opinion a next-gen system is a system that jumps to the next plateau in regards of console technology and graphics, and the Wii isn’t really fit the bill on either of those; games utilizing motion and ‘point-click’ setups have been in arcades for a long time, and like I said the hardware isn’t much better than an original Xbox. The other way I define ‘next gen’ is by using this analogy… when you build a new computer, do you buy new parts that are only a little bit better than your old computers parts? No because regardless of what you use your computer for you’re going to want a more powerful beefy new rig. --Online Play WiiFi sucks, plain and simple. The Playstation 2’s online setup was arguably better than what the Wii currently has and a revamp is in order. The Friend Codes need to go and a more centralized system needs to be put in place even if it’s a stripped down version of Xbox Live or PSN’s setup. I hope I’m also not the only person who has had problems in regards to lag and such while attempting to play online with the Wii, my experiences with Smash Brothers Brawl have been abysmal at best. The one good thing WiiFi has going for it is the automatic updates that happen with the system, although I will admit the first time I saw my Wii slowing fading in and out with a blue glow scared the crap out of me, probably because I’ve naturally associated a flashing console ring with very bad things. But I honestly don’t know if I can delve into details about Wii’s online system, because in all honesty the problem is the entire system as a whole and like I said the only good things about it are its store setup and its updates. Nintendo, if you’re going to utilize online gameplay take an example from your bigger brothers. --Peripherals Not the ridiculous remote attachments that make your remote pretend it’s a light gun or a tennis racket… no those things are just beyond silly, I’m talking about things such as the LAN adapter, nun chucks, and the classic controllers. The Wii comes with a single nun chuck, but beyond that all there of these items are sold complete separate when in my opinion some of the ‘peripheral’ items need a little bundling and refinement. For one the LAN adapter should simply be included with the system. The Wii is marketed towards your standard every day family and while most families have internet these days not too many of them have wi-fi, let alone know how to set up a secure wireless network. The lack of an Ethernet port on the Wii made me scratch my head, the required purchase of an adapter to use Ethernet made me punch my head (and it hurt). It’s like my complaint about the 360 not having wireless support, except totally backwards. Most games that aren’t a lightgun shooter or collection of mini games require a nun chuck for use. My complaint here is simple, nun chucks should be bundled in with Wiimotes and shouldn’t be two separate purchases. Coupled with this complaint, is that the Classic Controllers for the Wii require a standard controller in order to use them forcing you to have an annoying dongle sitting beside you as you game. The simple fix for this should be that Classic Controllers shouldn’t need wiimotes in order to be played, they should take a page from the Wavebirds and have the controller directly connect to the system. Buying four wiimotes and four classic controllers is simply too damn costly, and if Nintendo’s target audience really is the casual family then this is definitely not going to keep up for long. In essence for me the Wii is filling the shoes that my Gamecube left behind, it’s a system that is just under utilizing itself. Out of all of the things I’ve mentioned I’d most certainly want to see the software library improve the most, I’m not a Nintendo hater but I’m just a shitty game hater and I still have faith that Nintendo can bring itself back to the glory it had during its prime eras. But if Nintendo keeps on its current path then they are eventually going to get exposed and there will be backlash for both themselves and potentially the rest of the industry.
|
|
|
|
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
|
Comment with FacebookClick connect and comment instantly! |
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds |
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

Follow
RSS
Contact
What's up with Nintendo consistently not attracting a strong third party line-up?
In the case of the N64 and Gamcube, poor install base meant poor third party support. Today, shovelware and minigame compilations sell even better on the Wii than they did on the PS2 last gen.
This is why.
i figured it was cause carts scared devs off the N64, and the GC launched too late in the game. i suppose that ties into smaller install base though.
They would have overcome that if the install base was there. Look at the DS. While the cost is not as severe given modern technology, even a small DS cart costs factors more than a UMD to produce. Mind you, when a UMD has a production cost measured in cents this is not really an issue.
The shovelware on the Wii makes sense too.
But I guess I just don't understand the Gamecube. It came out the same year as the original Xbox, yet you saw many more titles come out for Xbox and PS2 only.
I'm sure Nintendo would love to attract popular third parties to the Wii, but most of us either don't have one or have let it sit dusty. What does that mean? Casual games top the charts every month so that's where the developers look.
I only found familiar Wii related grievance.
I like my Wii.
The majority doesn't want to deal with the complication and price that comes with having a hard drive in their console (hence the success of the 360 arcade model).
The majority doesn't think that "improvement" in graphics that the 360/PS3 went for is really an improvement.
The majority finds the Wii's software line up to be more compelling to that of the 360/PS3.
The majority thinks that the Wii's online set up and controllers are just fine.
The majority rules, my friend.
Also, the majority of your majority are an entire field of people who had never been involved in the gaming industry what so ever. So they simply are inflating numbers and do not properly reflect a good portion of people who transitioned from a previous console generation to the next. So in other words, the Wii is the steroids... the game industry is Baseball... and you are Alex Rodriguez.
Thankfully you dont run dtoid, or dtoid would be Joystiq.
Brawl has been a lag-ridden affair!
Mario Kart works well online... Although friend codes are so licey!
Wake up Nintendo... Fix these damn problems, quick!
The majority still see something in britany spears, the majority can't tell a good game from a bad one, the majority called the ps2 a dvd player during the first year of its life and said it never had a chance.That casual majority doesn't have a damn clue
The Wii could produce something great( I loved Metroid prime 3), but as long as the junk sells millions no one will ever find the justification to build such a game.
BUT I do think you were trying to bring up a valid point so sephirothx calling holmes a fanboy is a little over the line.
Concerning your opinion on what "next-gen" is, all it means is the generation following the previous one. Typically, this is associated with beefed-up specs, but that's simply what we've come to expect. The fact is that when a company releases the next iteration of hardware, it is entering the next generation regardless of what the hardware provides. There is no opinion.
As for the software, the Wii's lineup doesn't swing towards what we would call traditional gaming, true. Part of the blame lies with Nintendo's new strategy of these non-games, people who've never played before or lapsed gamers or whatever. But that's just concerning Nintendo's own efforts. The Wii was preceded by two generations of third-party disfavor. Who wouldn't think that Sony's newest console would run away with the majority of the market share this time as well? With the 360's head start giving it much-needed exposure and with its hardware sharing a lot in common with the PS3 hardware, companies placed all their efforts on those two machines believing that they would command the market. These companies thought that Nintendo would be sitting at the kid's table yet again.
After two years, we know what happened. The Wii succeeded and is tracking to be the best-selling hardware of all time with the fastest-selling software library of all time. Third parties weren't prepared for that. The only company I recall ever offering serious support for the Wii right out the gate was Ubisoft, but seriously? Aside from Red Steel and Rayman Raving Rabbids, their entire offering consisted of extremely shoddy ports. Now that the ball is in Nintendo's court, companies like EA are trying to play catch up.
Even if a number of companies wanted to start pushing their wares on the Wii right now, it would take several years to see the fruits of their labor. Even at that, moving from high-def development to Wii development is not like flicking a light switch. These companies have become heavily invested in high-def development to the point that it may not be fiscally responsible to almost literally start from zero. I'm not talking about scrapping all the HD projects, I'm talking about simply making a little room for Wii software. These companies may simply not be able to invest heavily in the Wii this late in the game.
I think that this is a good thing for smaller developers whose titles may not be given a second look on the HD machines. From the beginning, I've felt like the Wii would be more welcome to smaller up-and-comers as opposed to balls-to-the-wall Hollywood epics. We've seen success stories already with games like de Blob, Boom Blox, and No More Heroes. Sure, they may not be million-sellers, but do they really have to be?
Finally, the "flood" of low-quality shovelware is only a problem for shovelware developers. The cream-of-the-crop can sell just fine regardless of the environment. Sure, a small number of minigame compilations are in the best-sellers list, but for every one of them there are twenty that die out the gate. There shouldn't be any worry.
I like my wii, well i did the last time i played(like 4 months ago...)
And Holmes is right about the majority, even though its really early in the game like BLACK NEXUS said, the sales are too high and it happened so quickly that this isnt gonna play out like we think it will.
So my comment was over the line, but Holmes saying my thoughts would put Nintendo back to 3rd grade arent?
@ Megastryke
'Next Generation' is an opinionated term, there can be differentiated visions of what people classify as 'next gen'. For example we dont consider the PS2 slim to be the next gen system from Sony... its just another PS2. Thats my view of the Wii, its not really the next generation but it feels (in my opinion) more like a sidestep.
Besides, why are we even still using "next gen"? It's "current gen" now. "Next gen" is the PS4, Xbox 3, and Wii 2.
The shitty thing about Nintendo is they haven't had third party support since the N64. I quickly figured this out, and the answer is obvious: If you want more than a handful of good games, do not ONLY own a Nintendo system, they won't give them to you. There's nothing wrong with owning a Nintendo fun box and playing the 6-10 AMAZING first party titles they give you a year; it would just suck to not play the other 50 that it's competitors offer.
I personally thought the Gamecube had the worst gaming selection in the history of the industry out of all consoles that "didn't fail". Even then I'd lump the Dreamcast in and contend it had a better lineup.
As a previous blog of mine states, I love the Wii; but it has it's problems. By no means should it be the only console you own; you're missing out.