So let's start a discussion D-toid. I'm really curious as to what you guys think.
So, are games art? Or not?
I personally don't look back on the original Legend of Zelda and think how artsy it was. I look back fondly on it's
music as art, though. Which of course I firmly believe that music is art, and who would disagree?
So that begs the question, are games just 'craft'? Or do they truly transcend into the realms of art? Is art just completely subjective? Or...have video games just not been around long enough when compared to film and photography? In 50 years will we finally be at the point when a video game can be called art without a second thought?
I'm well aware that this is well-tread ground, but I think it's still a very valid discussion.
Thoughts?
I cannot think how something cannot become art. Even politics and being a lawyer.
I think because they stimulate the senses and promote a reaction, they are art. Fine art is a relative term, although one that I believe in because Green Day and Kid Rock exist, and I need a way to separate anything worthwhile from them. But I think some games have given me an experience (oh God! ahh! ahh!) that has been on par (to me) with some of the best cinema and graphic design and music.
Party on!
And tacos being sandwiches?! NEVER
Okay, I sound like Vulcan Raven on opium, so let me be a little more clear.
I think the way games are art are through their gameplay. Games like SotC, Portal and Braid provoke emotion not just because of their storyline but also because the way the gamer experiences them. Another way is through experiences that a game can provide that other mediums cannot. If Infinity Ward can display the tragedy of nuclear warfare through gameplay better than a movie can than more power to them. In summation, if videogames can provoke emotion with deep gameplay... then I don't see why it shouldn't be considered art.
from left: Richard juicy earrings Dreyfuss, Roy Scheider and Robert louis vuitton geant Shaw.