Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by RazorFist | Marvel vs. Capcom 3... and Why it BitesDestructoid
LIGHTS:  ON | OFF
surf dtoid with arrow keys

HOT GAMES
REVIEWS VIDEOS COMMUNITY FORUM SHOP

pc PS4 PS3 NEXT XBOX XBOX 360 WII U 3DS PS vita ANDROID APPLE

REMOVE ALL ADS?
Guaranteed contest entry?
A new video show?
Something else?

Vote in our membership poll

click to hide banner header
About
I'm a comic book artist/comedian/musician who has achieved a fair amount of recognition - and notoriety - with my online review show: The Rageaholic. My favorite video game of all time is Thief II: The Metal Age. You should play it.
Player Profile
Follow me:
RazorFist's sites
Badges
Following  


To preface the video review I made earlier this week, allow me to first state that I'm a big-time fighting game fan. Marvel vs. Capcom isn't one of my favorites, (a bit too much spam for my taste) but I can still sit down, turn my brain off, and have a good bit of fun with the first two Marvel / Capcom outings.

This review is not meant to troll - despite its admittedly pugnacious title - it's my honest opinions of a game that I feel is a quantifiable disappointment. So, without further delay, my video review of MVC3:



These issues aren't even the main concern: The new X Factor system compounds the already amateurish proceedings by, yet again, rewarding players that play poorly with devastating maneuvers. And the counter-argument is often made, "Yes, but the X Factor is only really useful when you have your meter charged up all the way!" Okay... so the more a player gets the ever-loving crap kicked out of them... the higher the reward? How does this in any way argue for the presence of the preposterously-broken X Factor system? It goes back to the point I make in the video about the Ultra Combo system from Street Fighter 4.

If Capcom had made Super Combos significantly more powerful than Ultras, I would have no problem with them at all. But, as the name readily suggests, the Ultra is the 'ultimate'. It can turn the tide of battle. The only problem is that you earn said Ultra Combos by playing poorly. The same principal is at play with the X Factor.

It's a shame that Capcom is such an insular, self-absorbed company that this game made it to release as-is, despite a vocal backlash against the X Factor. Perhaps that's why so many Capcom games have drawn my ire over the years. More than any other developer/publisher I can name... Capcom is the one who sees the dissent, acknowledges that it's there... and then tells their fans to shut up and buy the game anyways.

...and the fans do it! Like lemmings to the cliff, they head to their local retailer and drop 60 bucks for this embodiment of unyielding mediocrity. I've said my piece.

Until next time,
Godspeed!

-RazörFist



Is this blog awesome? Vote it up!




Those who have come:



Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.

Legacy Comments (will be imported soon)


Despite some decent humor here and there, that was a . . . fairly poor review, to be honest. You mentioned, like, a single game mechanic, then spent the rest of the time on Capcom business ethics, casual pandering and poor aesthetics - which DESERVE criticism, but they should be supplements, not the main body of criticism. The 3 paragraphs here are actually more informative than the entire review.

Regardless, I haven't played MvC3, but I'm not hearing good things at all. Even my ultra-casual friend who only plays MvC2 at the bread shop is disappointed at how dumbed-down everything feels.
Hence the reason it isn't entitled "My Marvel/Capcom 3 Review".

It's entitled "Marvel vs. Capcom 3... and Why it Bites." The business practices of Capcom, the art style, the game mechanics, the WHOLE PACKAGE informs what makes up MVC3's awfulness.
This lemming is playing as Haggar.

The end.

I actually like the X Factor system, since it means you have to stay on your toes right up until you've won. You can't play poorly in the latter half of the match, even with good character switching to keep everyone's health up because a good opponent can turn the match around on you.

The game is more about modifying your strategy as you go and taking all of the changing factors of the battle into consideration instead of focusing on a few cheap combos using the same four characters.

Yeah, it's not necessarily as complex as MVC2, but it's got a greater deal of variety and the gameplay is far more balanced... And I'll take good balance with decent complexity over shit balance and lots of complexity any day.
im playing the worlds smallest violin

its still fun brah
Play better. I beat X-Factor scrubs all the time.
Bad review. Not funny. Poorly argued.
Funny in some parts, but ultimately, a lot of your points fall flat. Particularly the one about the roster. You can't honestly tell me that Marvel vs. Capcom 2's roster was full of well-rounded, fleshed-out characters compared to its sequel. How many of those characters are clones or sprite dumps? Quite a number of them. In fact, I bet you removed the number of half-assed, under-developed characters in Marvel 2, you'd probably have equal to or less than the amount of characters in Marvel 3.

Sorry, but you were already losing me at the "Ultras are bad in SFIV" argument, and I stopped watching at the roster quip.
...so it makes sense to you for Ultras (which you can only get by playing poorly) to be twice as powerful as Supers (which you earn by playing properly)?

The word 'Apologist' comes to mind.
It makes sense that the game gives you a comeback tool so that there's a point to actually continue playing when you're down to your last pixel of life. They're difficult to land against solid players, and don't necessarily end a game outright. X-Factor accomplishes this goal also, but I think that MvC3's inclusion of a comeback tool has a lot more layers of strategy(such as activating while in guardstun to deliver a massive counterattack).

I understand that you come from a time of fighting games where only the utmost hardcore played them, but even the pros understand the value of these tools. They're amazing hype-generators at tournaments, and ultimately just make the entire experience that much more interesting to watch and play.
I take it you didn't watch the Final Round stream last night? The character diversity of the final eight was way more than the old MvC2 days, where every team was MSP.

And you probably missed the diversity of the X Factor usage too. Players were using it as a comeback tool, but they were also using it as a combo ender to ensure that they took out the point man.

It's become trendy to bash MvC3 because of X Factor and certain characters didn't make it in the roster. But even I'm surprised at how well it is balanced, and how hype matches the matches are. Last night's MvC3 stream had 18k viewers, and surprises with She-Hulk, Tron-Bonne's assists, and DAT ARM Nathan Spencer with an incredible comeback.

Anyways, MvC3 is fun. It has a lot more character diversity than MvC2, and the X Factor metagame (use it as an ender, or as a comeback tool) gives both players a trump card to use at will. I'm glad I bought it, and hopefully it'll be around as long as MvC2.

Back to Top
DLC   |   BEST Games of 2012   |   Best PC Games   |   Best PS3 Games   |   Best Xbox 360 Games   |   Best Wii U Games   |   Best 3DS Games




All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more