Oh, I thought you were referencing the band Primus, then I thought I was referencing something only Primus fans really understood.
@Sonny Alderman At least you can hide her in garbage container, where she belongs!
@crackity jones I only found out there was a band called Primus years after strating to use this name hehe. I don't really know anything about them actually.
@crackity jones I only found out there was a band called Primus years after strating to use this name hehe. I don't really know anything about them actually.
Good review of a lame port. If I was going to buy a version of RE4 today, it would be the Wii version; my Wii could use the attention.
Funny Primus story: my best friend gave me a Primus CD for my birthday one year. He said he thought I would like it. After thirty seconds I wasn't sure if it was a brilliantly staged practical joke covered by layers of plausible deniability, or genuine good-natured idiocy. Either way, I still wanted to punch him in the mouth.
Funny Primus story: my best friend gave me a Primus CD for my birthday one year. He said he thought I would like it. After thirty seconds I wasn't sure if it was a brilliantly staged practical joke covered by layers of plausible deniability, or genuine good-natured idiocy. Either way, I still wanted to punch him in the mouth.
Hmmm, maybe I'm just being competitive here (as I reviewed it myself), but I can't help but feel like you scored the game a bit low. I feel like we have nearly the exact same opinion of the game (except I actually prefer the RE4 controls to the controls in RE50 yet you gave it a 6 and I gave it a 9.
It all boils down to this line "It pains me to have to give one of my favorite game a 3 stars but you should not see in that score any indication of the quality of the game itself." Personally, I didn't go that way, because I didn't think thi re-release was for people that don't already own the game. If you already own The Godfather (a hypothetically 10/10 movie) and it's suddenly available for download via Netflix or something, do you give the Netflix release a 6/10 just because it doesn't have any new or deleted scenes?
To me, the answer is no, which is why I still gave the game a 9/10. The fact that you might be able to find the Gamecube, or even the Wii version or the game for $20 or less did factor into my thinking somewhat, but what about people that don't have a Gamecube or a Wii? What if they've never played this game before? Do I want to scare them away from what could be the only version of one of the best games ever made?
That's why I gave it a 9/10. I'm not saying that you should have done the same, but I'm still curious as to why you went with a 6/10. Maybe it's better to ask what would you have given the original Gamecube release when it came out in 2005 for $50. Also a 6/10? 10/10/ Somewhere in between?
Anyway great review! Please keep writing them!
It all boils down to this line "It pains me to have to give one of my favorite game a 3 stars but you should not see in that score any indication of the quality of the game itself." Personally, I didn't go that way, because I didn't think thi re-release was for people that don't already own the game. If you already own The Godfather (a hypothetically 10/10 movie) and it's suddenly available for download via Netflix or something, do you give the Netflix release a 6/10 just because it doesn't have any new or deleted scenes?
To me, the answer is no, which is why I still gave the game a 9/10. The fact that you might be able to find the Gamecube, or even the Wii version or the game for $20 or less did factor into my thinking somewhat, but what about people that don't have a Gamecube or a Wii? What if they've never played this game before? Do I want to scare them away from what could be the only version of one of the best games ever made?
That's why I gave it a 9/10. I'm not saying that you should have done the same, but I'm still curious as to why you went with a 6/10. Maybe it's better to ask what would you have given the original Gamecube release when it came out in 2005 for $50. Also a 6/10? 10/10/ Somewhere in between?
Anyway great review! Please keep writing them!
@Jonathan Holmes
Hey thanks for the feedback! You made me realize that i should update the end somewhat as i originally posted this review on Giant Bomb. I always post my review on both site and usually stick to the 5 stars system of Giant Bomb.
Personally i hate actually scoring reviews but can understand the necessity for it. I feel that too many people go straight to the score and don't even bother reading the review itself and understand the reasons behind the score.
Based on a 5 point scale, i've always though of it this way:
1 points = Completely Garbage.
2 points = Had potentially but the design is either flawed and gets in the way of gameplay too many times or the game is crippled by game breaking bugs.
3 points = A good game for the fans but may be hard to recommend to newcomers.
4 points = Great game, solid entry in the genre and should please any fans.
5 points = The game represents the best in its particular genre. May not be without faults but when compared to any other similar titles it is simply better.
As for the game itself i would totally give it an 8 or 9 even today and back in 2005 that was absolutely a 10. Certainly my choice for game of the year back then.
In the end i chose to write this review with other HD re-release in mind. I feel that all the additional features these games offer have become what people have the right to expect from these HD collections. For example if Sony was to add a PS2 classics category to it's PS Store with PS2 games released as is with no additional content for 10$ this is where this game would belong because this is what it is, a classic, nothing more nothing less.
Maybe a solution right now could be to Score it twice hehe, since its not official and i'm not restricted to put out just one score!
Hey thanks for the feedback! You made me realize that i should update the end somewhat as i originally posted this review on Giant Bomb. I always post my review on both site and usually stick to the 5 stars system of Giant Bomb.
Personally i hate actually scoring reviews but can understand the necessity for it. I feel that too many people go straight to the score and don't even bother reading the review itself and understand the reasons behind the score.
Based on a 5 point scale, i've always though of it this way:
1 points = Completely Garbage.
2 points = Had potentially but the design is either flawed and gets in the way of gameplay too many times or the game is crippled by game breaking bugs.
3 points = A good game for the fans but may be hard to recommend to newcomers.
4 points = Great game, solid entry in the genre and should please any fans.
5 points = The game represents the best in its particular genre. May not be without faults but when compared to any other similar titles it is simply better.
As for the game itself i would totally give it an 8 or 9 even today and back in 2005 that was absolutely a 10. Certainly my choice for game of the year back then.
In the end i chose to write this review with other HD re-release in mind. I feel that all the additional features these games offer have become what people have the right to expect from these HD collections. For example if Sony was to add a PS2 classics category to it's PS Store with PS2 games released as is with no additional content for 10$ this is where this game would belong because this is what it is, a classic, nothing more nothing less.
Maybe a solution right now could be to Score it twice hehe, since its not official and i'm not restricted to put out just one score!

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

send message
follow
followers






