|
games anime | toys
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|

| get involved register or login post a blog post a forum enter a contest contribute a news tip suggest a feature be a guest editor |
support new member's guide login assistance tech support report abuse email our editors read our dev blog nuclear crisis? |
keep in touch RSS feed Myspace Flickr Game nights Meetup+play online |
seriously about Destructoid advertising terms of use privacy policy jobs at MM buy our crap |
our network Tomopop Japanator Despingation? |
||
|
||||||
living the dream since March 16, 2006 |
||||||
I'd love to see infinity ward do a FPS set in the C&C: Red Alert universe
The short answer is "money". A lot of gamers may be sick of the WW2 setting, but it sells. There's no getting around that.
I've got a feeling the arrangement with Treyarch and COD5 came before COD4 was released. Activision would have to be insanely fucking retarded otherwise to go back to COD3 and how shitty it did comparatively. Of course, it should've been obvious anyway what kind of gem COD4 was in development, so I have no sympathy for Activision's dumb move anyway.
Also, the only WW2 games I've ever enjoyed were COD1, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, and Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory. More WW2 games need occult conspiracies and the undead.
It's because WWII has a clear "good" side and a clear "bad" side. After that it all starts to get hazy and people don't believe that the wars were fought for a good reason. That's why WWII is always revisited. You're triumphing over evil whereas in other places it seems more of just killing a bunch of people that you shouldn't be killing in the first place.
I like real weapons in games, not big bulky alien guns. Guess that's why I've always liked FPS like COD and CS:S, and haven't loved games like Halo or Unreal as much.
In all honesty if the multiplayer game play is designed well and the game mechanics provide a balanced combat system, I'd play it no matter what war it was set in. Hell it doesn't even have to be a war, it could just hot headed little league dads going at it.
What GoS-CPT-Stewart said is correct though. The clear black and white nature of our historical perspective allows people to play without actually questioning what they are doing. There is also the historical war buff aspect, where people know the weapons that were used and such.
@F Whipple
That Warhammer FPS might interest you =/
the trailers look really good =D
I don't really care about setting - I'd just like to see more story-based stuff like Deus Ex and Half Life.
Or failing that, bring back the more tongue-in-cheek FPS games (anyone remember Redneck Rampage?)
But the Thompson is such a good gun.
i like COD4, VEGAS and stuff so much because the guns are so decent! WW2 guns generally suck ass, huge recoils, huge guns etc etc...
I like the modern day/near future FPS's best and there's loads of battlegrounds to display nowadays!
Am I the only one who want's more ww2 fps? Sure I feel I've played enough of operations overlord and market garden as well as many of the pivotol russian battles but there is still so much more to ww2. The pacific theatre has barely been touched apon and I'd really love to see some of the action on the kokoda track (myself being an Australian). There are also the earlier german campains like operation barbarossa, the invasions of france and poland and the battle of dunkirk.
So what I'm trying to say is there is still plenty of material and I probably won't ever be sick of ww2. In fact it annoys me when people insist that ww2 is overdone while they go back to play more of the same tolkienesque fantasy games.
@F Whipple: That would be freaking awesome.
@GoS-CPT-Stewart& youkilledmyguy: Contrary to what MASH tries to convey Korea is something most of the country got behind. Whether any war after that was fought with good reason shouldnt matter to an FPS Dev team. The fact that the wars where unpopular could provide some interesting story lines. That and who says the U.S.etc had to be the good guy?
@Aciesethon: I didn't want to mention this in the piece itself but I agree with what your saying. If you give me battles I've never seen and Make the stories interesting enough I would buy it. Still I would like to see other areas get some coverage as well so the genre doesn't become brutally stale.
I swear I'm not buying another WWII FPS. I've played WAY too many of them and successful games like CoD4, R6, GRAW, GoW have all shown you don't have to do WWII to have a good game.
I wish we saw more games like Freedom Fighter. Set in an alternate universe where Russia invades the US and you play as rebels. Dev's just need to get creative.
The historical perspective of good vs. evil is one I can agree on. Plus the WWII battles are so famous that everyone knows them. Not many people know shit about Korea or 'Nam.
@BigPopaGamer: I would love another Freedom Fighter type game that would rock.
I am a huge history nut so I have read a lot about both Nam and Korea. The battle and stories are just as epic as WWII and it's almost sad in a way that Developers won't take a chance with them because of them not being as well known as WWII.