
|
|
|
I just finished Dead Rising tonight. Actually, I finished the story about two weeks ago, but I got the final achievement tonight. After I wrapped the playthrough and finally took one of the best zombie games I've ever played out of my 360, I checked up on what Kotaku had posted today and found this little gem: Dead Rising could soon be in hot water over the game's similarity to George Romero's Dawn of the Dead, essential viewing for any zombie fan. It seems the copyright holders are finally deciding that they don't like that Capcom copied their "zombies in a mall premise" and are likely getting ready to file a lawsuit. I can not overstate how retarded any potential lawsuit would be. It's not like Capcom was ever claiming this game was related to Romero's classic, and the game even bears a disclaimer stating it's not related to it in any form. Capcom never actively marketed it as a worthy successor to the movie, so claiming that it's a knockoff made just for a quick buck would be irresponsible. That means the only thing that the MKR Group can stand on is that both the game and the movie have the same premise of zombies in a mall, with survivors hanging out in the security room. Sure, it's undeniable that the setting is exactly the same. But as anyone who has played the game will agree, the tone of the game is completely different than the movie. In Dawn of the Dead, the few survivors act with extreme caution in anything they do and try to avoid conflict as much as possible. Dead Rising, in contrast, allows the player to take great pleasure in killing as many zombies as they can with whatever weapons they can find, running about with reckless abandon as you take no permanent penalty for having a zombie chew on your shoulder. Futhermore, while Dawn of the Dead is a social commentary on consumerism in America, Dead Rising's plot is more concerned with an international view of America as an resource-consuming entity, mixed with ridicule for common American stereotypes. (The game's psychopaths, or bosses, include a goth pyromaniac, a corrupt cop, a shell-shocked Vietnam veteran, a redneck, and a trio of snipers who brag about their rights granted by the Second Amendment.) Needless to say, the MKR Group doesn't have a leg to stand on. There's no way to copyright a premise or setting. If there were, then we'd (thankfully) have a lot fewer WWII games and movies.
|
|
|
|
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
|
Comment with FacebookClick connect and comment instantly! |
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds |
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

Follow
RSS
Contact
Madness.
Dead Rising was the very reason I purchased a 360, and it clearly takes influence from Romero's Dawn of the Dead film.
There's a big difference between being influenced by something you love (Romero's work) and ripping a work off for your own ends.
I doubt George Romero would bother with this, because if I'm correct, around the same time Capcom shoowed/announce Dead Rising at E3, there was an actually Romero branded zombie game showed or available, which I think may have appeared on PC.
I think George Romero is aware of Resident Evil and Dead Rising, as they are the biggest thing to happen to the zombie genre in many years. He's also aware that some of Capcom's staff, especially Shinji Mikami are fans of his work.
I'd be very surprised if this ever went to court, as thanks to Capcom, zombies are en vogue again, which in turn kickstarted the zombie hollywood films we now enjoy.
I wonder if I'll get sued....
Dead Rising has also been out for a few years now. There was another game called George Romero's City of the Dead that was due to be released in March 06 after appearing at E3 05', but the game was canned, when Hip Interactive folded.
What's more interesting is that Dead Rising came out August 06'four months after City of the Dead was due for release. Because MKR Group couldn't get City of the Dead (and potentially earn money from it), they and New Line are now focussing on Dead Rising, ignoring the fact its influenced by Romero's work (something Romero is aware of), like RE before it and not a rip off.
I do think its very possible, that this lawsuit is also being tapped by someone with no knowledge of games. Good research would shut their case down.
Capcom have been dealing with zombies since RE in 96, which predates the 2004 Dawn of the Dead, with other following RE games having multiple settings. Its no surprise that they build on RE with (previous attempt being DMC) and Dead Rising. If there was no disclaimer on the DR box, New Line and MKR would have a case.
While I agree that they don't have a case, I don't see how Dead Rising is a spinoff of Resident Evil. Similar to how Dead Rising and Dawn of the Dead only share a setting, all that Dead Rising and Resident Evil share is the inclusion of zombies. While Resident Evil has always focused on survival horror and scaring you, Dead Rising has more of a free-world, playground feel to it, giving you a completely different playing experience. That, and the fact that the nature of the zombies, the portrayal of characters, and a lighter color palette show that Dead Rising is its own entity, separate from its more established zombie brother.
"The following story is fictional and does not depict any actual person or event."
Now with that in mind, Law and order has taken the events
and have basically replayed them on their show, for example, The Anna Nicole incident and the Britney Spears incident.
You are probably saying right now: "Wait a minute! But, those are events, not someone else's idea. Yeah, that is true, but keeping in mind the law... as long as that disclaimer is up there is nothing to worry about. They can just go to court and use the word "coincidence" and they'll be out in 10 minutes.
The game is great though. My roomate has been playing it non-sop for the past 2 weeks and lemme tell ya, I can't get enough of it (sarcasm)
Oh well...
What I meant was Dead Rising was an experiment for Capcom, to see what else they could do with zombies beyond RE popularity and high sales abroad. And yes. DR is very light hearted compare to RE, which was intended by Kenji Inafune.
I've thought of another problem. Capcom are a japanese company and DR was created outside of the U.S, therefore surely the U.S courts can't legislate on a product created off its shores. They might be able to stop sale of the game in the U.S or get money, but where the idea of the game and its use came about is very jaded territory, more so because Capcom like and admit influence of Romero's work.
The warning on the cover was a very smart move by Capcom, and it may yet save them from this bs suit. Perhaps that old passive (DotD) vs interactive (DR) arguement can also play in Capcom's favour.
xbl gamer tag=Bayushi Slick
thanks!
Off topic: How was Rez HD? All I ever see you playing is Dead Rising. You must really like that game, huh?