Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by Nathsies | David Cage doesn't know what a game isDestructoid
David Cage doesn't know what a game is - Destructoid

DestructoidJapanatorTomopopFlixist





click to hide banner header
About
I'm Nathan Hardisty, an author, ex-editorial writer for Platformnation.com, ex-games writer at Screenjabber. I now write for a variety of sites on the internet while still updating both my DTOID blog and my regular blog, which can be found below.

I am currently writing for Flixist.com

Also I'm incredibly pretentious about video-games so beware. I might just hipsterblow your minds.

I can be reached at:

nathan.hardisty@gmail.com

twitter.com/nathardisty
Player Profile
PSN ID:GIVEMEURBANANAHS
Steam ID:http://steamcommunity.com/id/bananahs/
Follow me:
Twitter:@Nathardisty
Google+:Link
Reddit:Nathsies
Nathsies's sites
Badges
Following (2)  




No this isn't a Heavy Rain bashing article. Well...

This article just went up on Kotaku: http://kotaku.com/#!5775640/a-plea-for-games-to-grow-up

Basically David Cage (Heavy Rain) giving a 'grow up' talk, most of it impromptu. It's really inspiring to see someone so invested in the video-games industry who still believes that he's made a positive change. He hasn't, if anything he's lowered the bar in ever way. Case in point, the handsome Jim Sterling's article here at Destructoid: http://www.destructoid.com/why-heavy-rain-proves-ebert-right-165034.phtml

"If Heavy Rain is truly the pinnacle of videogame narrative, then I fear our standards are horrifically low. Sending out the message to publishers that this is what we consider an artistic triumph is terrible. Games can do and have done better than this, but we've now set the bar incredibly low. The high praise for Heavy Rain has effectively sent the message that game writers don't have to try and create a tight, cohesive story. All they need to do is clumsily copy a bunch of classic movies with less than half the care and attention to detail in order to trick people into thinking their game is mature. The overall message seems to be this -- what would be unacceptable in a movie is okay for a videogame, because gamers are fucking stupid."

Here's the comment I posted over at Kotaku, in response to a certain quote from his talk that made me quite angry:

"David Cage: Game designers think that players can project themselves onto empty shell characters. "I think this is a huge mistake."

Calling Bullshit.

- Half-Life 2
- Bioshock
- Portal
- Shadow of the Colossus
- New Vegas
- Call of Duty 4
- Far Cry 2
- Mass Effects

You wanna know what makes all of those such powerful and evocative games? There's no middle-man, no story centred around a character - only around the player. Not specifically centred like he is numero uno, but they are player funded experiences. They are not built around characters with specific personalities and emotions and relationships already invented. This was a flaw with Heavy Rain, aside from the poorly written sequences.

What I'm talking about: Destructoid article

I'm more worried the speech got such a large applause because it's an outright design flaw to go against an interactive medium. Interaction means putting the player in control, not controlling the player.

Sick and tired of all this worship of this design flaw with the likes of Red Dead Redemption with that ending and Fallout 3 doing it with the Dad relationship being the main motivation throughout the game. A character I've known only for twenty minutes is now the only character I should care about in the story.

What a horrible, horrible thing to say. The blank slate is the ultimate in character development, not of emotional and cinematic exploration, but within the player. People often say going into the army develops character, I say going into any one of the video-games above develops players. Their life, their views, their political allegiance, their thinking, their morals and who they are as a person. We shouldn't be playing characters, playing as players, we should be in the moment and not disconnected with reality.

The power of video-games is of doing things that humans are incapable of ever experiencing. War scenarios, climbing a fifty foot colossus in the name of love and curiosity, of deciding the fate of an entire species between brainwashing and extinction. People who can't walk can find themselves in first-person shooters, exploring the human mind and its atrocities in an underwater city. Discovering humanity and realising that they themselves may become more human (has happened, saw this myself).

The power of video-games is not to squander in the old ways of 'cinematic gameplay'. It's not to copy films completely and just build our experiences around characters who have no relation to us. We can distance ourselves from them and it can be sometimes powerful (Red Dead Redemption for example) but it isn't as powerful as that first-person narrative. Not a first-person shooter per say, which is the ultimate in immersion, but a narrative constructed with 'I' instead of 'Marston', 'Me' instead of 'Ethan Mars'.

David Cage, you sir have shown that video-games can do something more than just shooting and killing; but you haven't taken the right steps when it comes to player empathy. I admire you, but I don't admire your way of designing narrative. I'm not saying it should always be a player driven one, as there's always money and Michael Bay in Call of Duty (Black Ops, I mean, that atomic bomb sequence in COD4 was so powerful because your character didn't scream or shout or whimper - it was all you).

Please, please change your mind - for the good of mankind and for this artistic medium standing on the edge of legitimization. I don't want to play with people, I don't want to be controlled, I want to be in the moment. I want to interact. If our 'artistic medium' is driven by the old ways of perspective then that would be a tragedy. We are a medium of interactivity, not of visuals or observation.

I've been ranting. Too much?

EDIT: Rest of his comments are fine, what a lot of people have been saying though, still agree with them. Just find the whole 'blank slates suck' argument to be completely redundant when you're dealing with a medium that is designed to let people be in the moment. Not 'feel the character' or 'become the character' but to literally be within that experience without any middle-man passing on messages."

Another comment about the same quote:

"David Cage: Game designers think that players can project themselves onto empty shell characters. "I think this is a huge mistake."

I agree. Nothing more to say on this."

And another

"David Cage: Game designers think that players can project themselves onto empty shell characters. "I think this is a huge mistake.""

Damn straight. I dont buy these silent characters who you are supposed to feel like. If anything, the constant dialogue happening in front of Gordon Freeman (and things Alyx openly tells you) it just throws me off and just seems awkward. The only plausible reason for having a silent character is if said character has no one to talk to. Period."

Was I the only one who played Half-Life 2? As in, did what Valve designed and basically let me go beyond 'feeling' Gordon Freeman (haha) and becoming the character. In fact, beyond just becoming the player character but literally projecting myself into my avatar's body. Half-Life 2 is a monumental design achievement and I feel a little bit frightened when people think it's 'awkward' when Valve takes years to design conversations so they don't feel like they're being talked at the player or with the player character. Name me one scene where Valve wants the player to feel like they have zero control over the scene through dialogue.

Obviously, dialogue choices work well in some circumstance but in a linear shooter that prides itself in immersion, a player character would disrupt that rush and connection with the world. It what gives it such a breathtakingly amazing atmosphere. It's the same with the original Dead Space and Dead Space 2, the original is a damn lot more creepy and atmospheric compared to the second as there's cutscenes goddamn everywhere.

This is something I'll be addressing in the second volume of Up, Down, Left, Right but I just wanted to bring it up for now as it made me very angry that the 'blank slate sucks' argument is actually said to be valid. That David Cage's talk got a massive applause and all the Kotaku commentersare agreeing with him. It's a dangerous thing to be saying that an interactive medium should have less interaction.
Photo



Is this blog awesome? Vote it up!




Those who have come:



Comments not appearing? Anti-virus apps like Avast or some browser extensions can cause this.
Easy fix: Add   [*].disqus.com   to your software's white list. Tada! Happy comments time again.

Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.


Back to Top




All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more