hot  /  reviews  /  videos  /  cblogs  /  qposts


N0Gil's blog

12:33 AM on 08.02.2014

The MMO itch

I was scrolling through my twitter the other day and I found a tweet that said FFXIV was now offering 14 day trials. I took a glance and now I feel like I should jump back into an MMO. I think my PS3 is a little tired, so I think switching to PC for a bit might help. Although I do have to think about why I quit in the first place. 

I haven't played a major M MO in a while, all my time has been spent on MOBAs. I think the reason is because every match in a MOBA is different, there's something to do and there's actually an end point. MMOs tend to go on forever, and the tedium can set in quickly. I never got to levels high enough to buy my characters a mount. 

The MMOs I used to play weren't that good anyway, they were all free Korean games with identical art styles and quest structures. For my next MMO, I'm considering getting a premium game. Not P2P like WOW or FFXIV, but F2P like Guild Wars 2. I want to avoid P2P coz I'm still studying and I need that money for other stuff, plus a subscription means having to commit yourself seriously to a game to get your money's worth. If either of the Final Fantasy MMOs were F2P, I'd get them in a heartbeat.

I'm a fantasy man, so Guild Wars 2 first came to mind. I know about Wildstar, but I'm not really a fan of sci-fi. I know that's a stupid reason, but that's just me. If any of you have played either, could you just give me a description of what either game is like? Like the gameplay and the scale of the world. Thanks a lot.   read

4:38 PM on 03.02.2014

Discussion: FFX-2

Wow, it's been a while since I wrote something.

Anyway, with the FFX HD Remaster only a few days away, I just wanna bring up the topic of X-2. X-2 was probably one of the biggest dividers in the community when it came out. So like it or not, it's getting packaged with the original X. 

The game's combat system is fun to play around with, it's deep and it does have a level of strategy to it. What's wrong with a FF game with a job system? The story structure is alright I guess, but come on that's the point of an RPG; you have to explore everything to find everything.

I guess the biggest gripe with everyone is the tone of the game's story. It's much lighter compared to the seriousness of X, and again what's wrong with that? It's the way the story goes, the big evil is gone and the world is celebrating. People are taking up there new freedom from the old government and living it up, particularly Yuna. 

Or as one of my friends puts it, the new 'slutty' Yuna.

Yuna didn't have much freedom when she was younger and this is probably the first time in her life that she has been able to do something for herself. And honestly, her X-2 clothes make her look pretty hot. She's also definitely a lot more stronger emotionally than she was in the game before, give her some credit for that. 

I'm writing pretty sloppy I know, but let me boil it down. I like X-2, story and everything. Lots of people are still in denial over it. Look, if you don't like it don't play it. It's been ten years already, GET. OVER. IT.   read

2:16 AM on 10.15.2013

The crossover that hopefully never happens

Some crossovers are done tastefully. Some are well done. With games like Smash Bros or Dissidia Final Fantasy taking a company's mascots and putting them in the same game, it's fun and induces nostalgic feelings in fans. But there can be a time when there is a crossover that doesn't sit right with you either out of general displeasure, or it doesn't mix well with the other game it is meeting.

With KHIII hopefully coming next year, we're all finally gonna get the next real game in the series after eight long years. But there might be one tiny snag along the way. 

Since Kingdom Hearts is a crossover between Disney and Square, both companies lend their mascots. But as we all know, Disney has managed to snag the rights to Star Wars and Marvel. You see where I'm getting at?

We may be seeing Star Wars or the Marvel Universe as new worlds in KHIII, and I don't like it one bit. Personally, there I have nothing against either franchises, but I think Disney is enough. To me, both franchises are too science-heavy to incorporate the magical universe of Kingdom Hearts. I know there are paranormal events in both franchises, but for the most part it's sci-fi. The TRON world from II and DDD were probably the limit.

I think my biggest gripe would be with the Marvel issue. I've discussed this with my friend and he sort of agrees. If we were to see a Marvel world, it would probably Spiderman. It sounds cool, but I don't think I'll be able to handle hearing the grinding, whiny voice of Drake Bell. I've seen some of his shows, and he's too much of a spaz case. And once again, that series has a bit more sci-fi than paranormal stuff so I don't think it'll fit well with KH.

I'm writing this on a blind rage right now, so excuse me for my sloppy writing. It's just that I think KH should only stick to the Disney stuff; and classical Disney, none of this modern day live action crap. No lightsaber Keyblades or teenage webslingers either. What drives this in is that the director of KH is actually contemplating of putting in those kinds of worlds. 

I honestly hope he doesn't. Thoughts?   read

4:24 AM on 07.11.2013

Console Multiplayer

Just another day venting my gaming opinions. What is your opinion on console multiplayer? I'm talking about the online ones, not local. Do you think in recent games like the latest Tomb Raider it's not necessary, or is there some merit to it being there at all?

I guess it kinda depends on the genre it's being used in, FPs's being the most common. For action adventure games, I guess it could work, but it would have to be streamlined for it to be accessible to everyone. Assassin's Creed multiplayer would have to be one of the more outstanding action multiplayer modes. To be honest, I'm not that into multiplayer because I barely find any joy out of it (which is in my next bit).

The problem, I think, about multiplayer however is the lack of mercy that occurs when you jump into online arenas. I can barely walk two seconds without being stabbed, gutted or getting pumped full of lead. I'm really sorry if I sound like a whiny, newby baby here, but I'm writing what comes to mind. Multiplayer is fun, but it's hard to be excited about it if I'm not thrown a bone once in a while. 

Another problem is how multiplayer ties into trophies and achievments. As a trophy whore on PSN, I'm pretty crazy about wanting to get the platinum trophy on all my games. But when I need to get a trophy that needs me to rank up in multiplayer, it would probably take me triple the time it takes for me to finish a story campaign and therefore just forget about it. 

Thanks for putting up with my bitching. What are your thoughts? Necessary? Needlessly painful? Driving you crazy from not being able to get that last goddamn achievement/trophy? Feel free to share.   read

4:05 AM on 07.03.2013

Thoughts on Lightning Returns so far

Okay, let's try to be civil here. We all know SE is milking the hell out of a game no one wanted a sequel for, and it's ruffling more than a few feathers. If I have to give my honest opinion, I'm kinda over why this game is getting more focus than the other projects SE should be focusing on. 

I will admit that the game looks good, but I guess a single-party Final Fantasy is too much of a tradition jump to accept comfortably. And I guess another gripe is how I'm gonna spend another 40 or so hours pressing the same button over and over. 

I'm gonna get the game, but only to round out the story, and I'm hoping that there's a happy ending this time and that everyone doesn't die this time. FFXIII is definitely past it's use by date, and we can only hope it doesn't end with a sour taste in our mouths.

On the topic of this, you will probably know Lightning is gonna wear Cloud's outfit and use the Buster Sword as a special preorder. And I just found out Hope is gonna turn back into a kid in the game. Thoughts?   read

6:08 PM on 03.25.2013

HD Remasters

With the announcement of so many HD remasters lately, it's understandable that we are all excited to be able to play our favorite masterpieces from way over yonder. Kindom Hearts 1.5HD and FFX HD are definitely on my hot list this year. There is another way to look at this however.

I don't want to sound cynical, but it feels like these games are serving as ways to make sure we don't tear game companies apart for taking so long with projects that are sitting in purgatory right now (KH3, FFVersus XIII etc...). How much longer can companies keep holding us back with ports and remakes before they run out and eventually have to put out the games we've been waiting half a decade for?

I'm not saying I hate HD rereleases, they are a nice slice of nostalgia and handle as well as I remember them. But for companies that release old material instead of actually working on the stuff in development, how much more can we take it? Can we handle waiting this long, or will we turn our backs on the companies because of it?   read

11:58 PM on 11.22.2012

Gaming Fatigue

As much as I love gaming, I think I've hit the point where I should cool down a bit. For the last year, I've been playing at least 90 minutes a day every single day straight without stopping; even on days when I should be studying for university. I've been replaying old games and new ones, but I really need to consider how this is is affecting me.

I've been getting more tired lately, probably from burning off all my energy in my morning sessions. This has also led me to becoming easily bored from games I found interesting. Also, where I live, electricity bills are really high right now, so if I cut back a little they may not be so high.

My problem is that I play games to fill up time in my day. I have other things that kill as much time, but games are more stimulating than reading and I'm not exactly an exercise nut either. I'm on break from studying for now, but I don't want to spend every day playing games and tiring myself out.

Do you get tired from overplaying? What other things do you do instead of games?   read

6:03 AM on 10.05.2012

The Golden Age is turning Grey

I've been noticing something with game scores lately. I've been noticing some mediocre scores from games that are part of series that were groundbreaking when they first came out. Sometimes these scores are all over the place, coz I've been hearing some people say that Pokemon Black and White 2 is really boring but some say its fun. The same goes for RE6, is it really as bad as people are saying or are all the reviewers going through a really bad day?

Not just this year but the last few years as well. Skyward Sword, from what I've heard. has been called the best Zelda game but has divided fans on its layout and level structure. I enjoyed the game, but playing it through the second time made me consider the faults that were mentioned by people. Then of course there's FFXIII. As my first Final Fantasy, it was a good game, until the second time...
After hunting down the other main games, XIII basically throws the book out the window and creates this really strange departure from other games. If it were any other game it might have been forgiven, but as part of an influential series...

I guess game developers are trying to reinvent their games, but is it a bad thing if a game violates their traditions or sticks too close to it? Can we call a games series too old if we've been either getting the same thing for years or if it's not the same game we fell in love with from the beginning?   read

5:55 AM on 08.17.2012

The Collector's itch

Ah, collector's editions; when die hard fans want a little something extra when a disc in a cheap $1 case isn't enough. I find myself writing this swinging between wanting and not wanting to buy a collector's edition. After you've paid the extra cash and drooled all over the lore books and art cards, the next thing you do is shove it into the back of the closet and forget about it. This is the feeling I get when I buy special editions, I buy, drool and then go 'meh'.

I've bought a few special editions and avoided a few, but now I'm really busting myself about whether it's worth it or not. I saw this problem when I bought the special edition of FFXIII-2. The price was a bit higher than the standard, but I guess I was being deluded by my fanboy ideas. When I got home, I just ogled the art book and listened to the CD, and done! Now all the stuff is still in the box and gathering dust on my bookshelf.

There are also times when I resist the urge to buy a special edition then regret it later. This happened to me when I ogled a special edition of SCV. I'm a fan of the series (but this one was honestly a bit of a let-down), but I held back on getting it because the box was massive. The worst part of this was that it was at rock-bottom prices in the cheap shops. Sure it was artbooks and soundtracks again, but I think it was the price that was calling out to me (this is not making sense, is it?).

Anyway, is a special edition worth all the clutter and extra cash? Will you enjoy it instead of sticking it in the closet? Right now I'm ogling a particular edition of AC3, which I just realized seems more exciting than anything else because it DOESN'T have an artbook. Just getting something off my chest, enjoy your lives parked in front of blindness-inducing screens.   read

3:59 AM on 08.05.2012

Are we living in the past?

If you've played as long as I have, you'll become attached to a few game series. Sometimes when I play games from this generation, I become bored real fast. Don't get me wrong, these games are spectacular and real good-looking, but sometimes when I need something simple I hop onto PSN and get something from the PS1 era. And thanks to the miracle of HD collections, I'm replaying my most beloved adventures before they came to a screeching halt.

I've come to love being able to relive these moments, from finding every little thing in Jak and Daxter (on my first run as well!), to finding the Thievius Racconus in the first Sly game. There's just some satisfaction out of blowing up a giant Precursor robot that you don't get from sticking your hidden blade into that Cesare moron (That's still a very good game though). There has been a downside to this. Playing through Jak games again, I'm surprised how short they are (the first was what 10 hours?). I could have sworn they took a bit longer without doing all the side quests right? Also they are a lot harder than I remember; fight Mz. Ruy in Sly Cooper after not doing so in a while and you'll know what I'm talking about. But I guess what counts is that these games are fun.

Between a compressed play time and level of challenge, I think what made these games fun is that they managed to place mini games and minor challenges every now and then to break the pace of run, jump and smash. Some games in my library tend to bank on one formula, which may be the reason I find them so boring; otherwise they're just too easy.

Speaking of difficulty...
My first Final Fantasy was, ironically, XIII. First-time around, it was alright; the fighting was fast, the story offered some twists. Second-time around, everything just crawled and crawled before it picked up momentum. Now FFVIII; the black sheep I've so heard many times. Sure it's system was a little screwy, but the challenge in it was what I found the game to be interesting. Comparing both games, and having played both games more than once, XIII was on auto-pilot through and through, but VIII had a broader depth of strategy in using the abilities (and who doesn't love the dance scene?).

To wrap up, I'm not saying that I hate this generation's games, it's just that when game series move on they either try to reinvent the book or throw it out the window. I'm not much of a fan of spectacular eyesores or revolutionary battle systems, I'm more into being able feel a sense of depth and challenge in a game instead of being wooed by the graphics (did that make sense?).   read

5:49 PM on 08.03.2012

The Western and Eastern RPG

What do you think is the difference between a JRPG and one from the West? I think JRPGs have these giant worlds where the story has your head going in circles to try and make sense of it all. Western RPG's seem able to compress everything into bite-sized piece and still make everything make sense.

Gameplay-wise, JRPG's seem to focus on just adjusting your gear and what abilities you use; like the Matera system from FFVII. Western RPGs seem to take a more sophisticated approach, where you not only select your gear and abilities, but also how you use them. Also, JRPGs start off with the world around you being really limited, where all you have to do is get one place to the next before it finall opens up and you are free to explore. Western RPGs on the other hand have the whole world open to you from the start, so you can start a story quest in one place, then take your time with sidequests and exploration before moving on with the story (Elder Scrolls?).

I'm not sure if what I've written makes sense, but feel free to comment if you can understand it.   read

Back to Top

We follow moms on   Facebook  and   Twitter
  Light Theme      Dark Theme
Pssst. Konami Code + Enter!
You may remix stuff our site under creative commons w/@
- Destructoid means family. Living the dream, since 2006 -