Quantcast
Destructoid - MkShiranui's Community Blog




About Me
banned -- ctz
Gamer Profile
3DS friend code:
Steam: MkShiranui
Battle:
PSN:
Mii:
Gamertag:
Following (9)
BulletMagnet
CblogRecaps
Electrium
Handy
KingSigy
Macarratti
Tony Ponce
Trebz
Tubatic
Nothing is Sacred: Turn it Down You Freaks!
MkShiranui | 7:13 AM on 10.27.2009 17 comments


In the running for what is possibly the last of this month’s Musings, I thought I’d explore one of my favorite aspects of video games: the audio. It’s possibly the least targeted aspect of games because graphics are usually the first thing to take hits. But like all components of the industry, it needs review.

I’ve been gaming long enough to remember when all soundtracks were actually MIDI files. These file types are virtually never used anymore, except in what is somewhat sarcastically called “chiptune” soundtracks. Now why is that? The MIDI file type is actually dependent on the sound card’s driver, which has undergone far less radical changes than video drivers and related hardware. Integrated sound processors, still standard use on even many gaming PCs, will run the files. So the argument “it doesn’t work anymore” is invalid.

Are we complaining about sound quality? Well, yes, there is a SLIGHT difference in depth between MIDI and the MP3 format, but I fail to notice any critical shortcomings. The soundtracks of games are nothing new; in fact, many of them sound suspiciously identical after a while. They tend to either be orchestral (based heavily on string and wind instruments) or electronica/dance (a catchall category for anything difficult to replicate IRL). Both are fully contained by the MIDI format, which is far more versatile than people give it credit for. It is capable of replicating most soundtracks perfectly.

The format’s primary problem is its inability to play on a large number of channels at once. That’s possibly why it was abandoned in favor of the MP3 format, which records the full frequency/amplitude of the sound. The MP3 format can record a discordant mixture of a million different sounds and still sound cohesive. For the truly epic soundtracks we’ve come to expect, MP3 is sadly the only option. For anything less than that, including all flash games, most shmups and fighters, and “repetitive” tracks like intro themes, the “quality” isn’t a critical factor.



And now, for something completely different.

Just how much of our limited funds are we expected to spend listening to these things? The earlier-gen consoles were configured for stereo sound, and the Wii still is. So since when is surround sound considered the only way to go? I saw a site user’s gaming setup a few weeks ago, and while I admire the effort he put into it, I can’t understand why he needed the full 5.1 configuration. Sound coming from behind you? Since all the attention is focused on the events in front of you, why is it necessary?

I’ve met a few FPS players who claim that surround sound allows them to detect opponents in any direction, thus giving them an advantage. I honestly don’t know how to take that. The human auditory setup works by registering the apparent distance to a source from both ears, thus limiting the location to a point on a circle. In most cases, where action takes place on a 2D plane, that condenses to two points. One of those points is in front of you, where you can see it. In nearly all cases you can replace surround sound by following the old mantra: if you can’t see it, turn around. Relying on 5.1 for something that simple seems unnecessary and, to be honest, a bit lazy.

When I purchased my PC a few months back, the suggested setup my parents proposed had a discrete sound card. I politely turned it down and replaced it with a Razor headset, because honestly I consider sound depth more important than sound variety. Besides, at top volume, surround sound all tends to blur together, as anyone who frequents theaters will tell you.



Now, one last final note on audio. I don’t get it why we have to pay for audio tracks, or why they’re often limited to hard-copy, region-specific formats. It seems like the developers are trying to gouge us over something that they provide free the rest of the time. I mean, why include a “jukebox” or audio gallery with the game and then charge us to listen to it elsewhere? This is one case where “piracy” of audio, what with soundtracks making it onto YouTube, isn’t something I have a problem with. Heck, I’ve copied the MP3 files from PC games to disk so I could listen to them anytime.

I could be wrong about this, but most people won’t buy a whole soundtrack unless they like about everything on it, and this more than likely means they’ve played the game. So the developers aren’t losing anything by making these files available free of charge. Get with the program, people.

Wow … did I just write all that? This is probably the most disjointed Monthly Musing to date. To sum up in eight words: Only fools pay for same old, same old. So shoot the receiver and play/make the damn game. No one’s really shouting, but I’m still going deaf with the nonsense.



Attached photos:

Photo Photo

Is this post awesome? Vote it up!

6

Those who have fapped:  Eaten by a Grue  


Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

10 comments | showing # 1 to 10
prev next

Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2009 10:26
Elsa
I do think that the soundtrack for games should be provided on the disk... especially when blu-ray has so much space that is rarely utilized, though I guess in some cases it's licensing issues.

Interesting thoughts. :)
Mike Moran's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2009 13:47
Mike Moran
It's an interesting point. Not one that necessarily has a legal solution, but still.
Naim Master's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2009 16:42
Naim Master
Well, sadly this isn't a blog I can comment on, I play most games with the sound off... (hate me)
Anonymouse's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2009 17:19
Anonymouse
FUCK YES soundtracks should be included.

Also, add me as a friend NOW.
Anonymouse's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2009 17:29
Anonymouse
You're so cool mk.

Can i b on ur lst nao?
Eaten by a Grue's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2009 18:50
Eaten by a Grue
Nice. Good point. I have to disagree with you on surround sound, but not because ti helps me, because it sounds cool. Also, the only soundtrack I've ever even considered buying was Metal Gear Solid (which I did buy), and only because when I make videos, I want something epic in the background.

But the one reason I liked Ubisoft's XIII so much is because though it was just a shooter, it had an amazing jazz soundtrack. I wish more games used jazz.
Naim Master's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2009 19:06
Naim Master
LMAO, high five, Anonymouse!

*prepares for a high five*
FatherChesz's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/29/2009 14:35
FatherChesz
I totally agree on the soundtrack. A lot of it is licensing issues, especially if there are multiple artists. I have to say, however, surround sound definitely adds to your gaming experience. And yes, it most definitely helps in an FPS, where milliseconds make a difference between life and death. But there is no experience like a movie or game playing in DTS with 5 (or more!) finely tuned speakers with a subwoofer pouring out the bass. Both Uncharted games are fine examples of surround sound, and hell, even Rock Band delivers some subtle effects, like the crowd singing along with the song out of the side and rear speakers. I actually thought there were people outside my old apartment singing along with me on several occasions.
KingSigy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 17:50
KingSigy
I tend to enjoy 5.1 Gaming. I understand your point about everything blurring together at loud volumes, but there is a difference between something seemingly sounding like it is behind you and something discreetly sounding like it is behind you.

In my room, though, I do not have a 5.1 setup. I did used to have a 7.1 system, but it finally kicked the bucket after 5 years of use. Regardless, my setup downstairs is mostly for movies with the PS3 and Wii just happening to be on the TV.

Another thing I will mention is that I much rather prefer discrete speakers versus a television's setup. This has less to do with surround and more to do with clarity. When you relegate sound to crappy TV speakers that only really have one channel, you end up losing a lot of bass and depth to the audio. Getting a 5.1 receiver helps that, but you could only hook up 2 speakers.
snoogans775's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/18/2010 01:53
snoogans775
what do you mean by the human ear understanding sound on a 2D plane? We live our entire lives experiencing sound from every direction, and 5.1 is a method for manipulating our sense of hearing in an extremely convincing and realistic way. Try playing an FPS with the stereo signal reversed and try to function.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!