I was reading semi-monthly poster
bl4km4th's blog about playing PS3 in a movie theater, and the following tidbit caught my eye. Actually, it grabbed my eyeball and sanded down the lens with fine-grit sandpaper.
My Resistance disc had a blemish and wouldn't read and I think I might have actually made it worse by attempting to use refinishing spray and one of those hand crank disc scratch fixers. Who would have thought there was a science to it?
[slow-motion dive]
Nooooooooooooooo!![/slow-motion dive]. When I worked at GameStop, we sold those plastic hand-cranked disc resurfacers for use on scratched games -- I believe it was called the Disk Doctor. But good luck trying to trade in a game once you had resurfaced it with the Disk Doctor we sold you.
Anyway, bl4km4th's post got me thinking about one of the the things we don't hear much about in the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD format wars: durability.
After reading a fairly detailed
forum thread at the always-informative
AVS Forum, it seems that Blu-Ray has a thinner, harder coating on the disc than HD-DVD (.1mm and .6mm, respectively). This means that Blu-Ray is harder to scratch, but a scratch is more likely to hit the data layer and make the disc unreadable.
But the forum didn't come to any real conclusion, so I called eight Hollywood Video and Movie Gallery stores around the country to see if the rental locations had noticed any difference in disc durability.
Screw you, West Virginia.
Philadelphia, PA: Two very friendly clerks at each store; both said that they noticed no difference. Truly, the city of brotherly love.
Cleveland, OH: An unremarkable call to an unremarkable city. No difference.
Montgomery, AL: The clerk really, really, really wanted me to buy a PS3. Really. Apparently it also plays HD-DVD now; who knew? I had to change tactics and tell him I was buying a player for my parents, and they wouldn't know how to operate a PS3. He relented and reported no difference in disc durability. I shouted "Giant enemy crab!" and hung up.
Nashvile, TN: The clerk said that they had hybrid HD-DVD/DVD discs, with HD on one side and standard on the other. Although it seemed like more of a risk to her, the clerk reported no difference in defective rates.
Richmond, VA: Welcomtomovigalrywheryucnchewsfromovr43489mves. What?? Why do you hate vowels so much? No difference.
Chicago, IL: Sony must have pooped on Chicago. Both clerks at the two different stores said they had problems with Blu-Ray discs scratching, but not with HD-DVD. Somewhat surprising, but I balk at calling Chicago a liar.
Final Results:
HD-DVD: 2
Blu-Ray: 0
No Difference: 6
_________________________
WINRAR: HD-DVD!!!!!
Out of the 500 or so DVD's I've owned, I only scratched up two disks.
1. was in my backpack in college and teh spindle broke off and it came out of the case.
2. I dropped on a table's corner.
As far as the HD DVD combo discs, they do have a problem playing those back sometimes. The glue they use to bond the layers together has shown to separate after a few months, which can cause the disc to expand in width, which is just enough to cause laser read errors and some people got scratched discs as a result.
If I owned an HD DVD player, I would avoid combo versions of movies at all costs if it can be helped.
@bloodylip: They all had to say it, but the Richmond clerk was entirely unintelligible. She must have had a mouthful of novocaine.
@dvddesign: I'm with you. I'm a little obsessive with my media. But man, people would come in with garbage bags full of loose, scratched, filthy discs for trade at GameStop. Jibblies!
More memory=better
Blu-ray wins
but that wasn't what this was about. It was about durability, not memory capacity.
*runs off*
Besides I going for Digital download
Halo 3
Guitar Hero III
Richard Astley III
And HD-DVD doesn't have enough repetitive use of it's letters to make it familiar to people. It will be HDBDDBDVD.