[It's time for another Monthly Musing -- the monthly community blog theme that provides readers with a chance to get their articles and discussions printed on the frontpage. -- CTZ]
As to the carving of one’s own narrative within the confines of a specified gamespace, I would have to say RPGs are the best -- or the worst -- at allowing this kind of decision making as lead by the player. Then there are games like Sim City and The Sims that require the player to create his or her world in order for a world to exist at all.
What I’m going to offer, however, is both technically not a game as such and one of the most seemingly reviled pieces of data on Dtoid: PlayStation Home.
Don’t hate me yet -- I promise to give more fruitful ammunition shortly. What surprises me about the hate directed at
Home from members of this site is the vehemence with which it is hurled, and it makes me question whether said members are simply bored by the virtual human pornography on display -- obscenity at its best, the sheer nakedness of anonymity -- or if they were trafficked by one of the many he-girls wandering about in a humiliating realization of gullibility.
For those who may have misconceptions, let me explain something: it’s a virtual chat room beefed up with décor, costumes, and minigames. That’s all, and that’s enough, though I know the plans for
Home extend to total immersion in gamespace and beyond. With game-launching capabilities finally arriving, there’s something to be said about visiting your favorite game’s virtual space, interacting with a piece of that world, chatting with other users to form a troupe and zap straight to the game from there. It’s also fun to have the game extended into minigames with unlockable prizes, even if they are “only” for your
Home avatar.
I’ve read some mighty flaming on
Home’s avatar system, which I don’t fully comprehend. The controls are varied and diverse, and I got my avatar so damn close in resemblance with my SELF-self that I consistently alter hair styles due to the overall creepiness of watching “myself” wander around, with the added bonus of some of the best damn female ass programming I’ve ever seen. If you guys can’t bother two shits about the rest of
Home, you have to give the programmers props for that. Make a female avatar, throw on the jeans, activate a “Salsa,” and BEHOLD—EPIC SEAMING.
But I digress.
Then there’s the “why the hell would you spend real money on fake shit for your avatar” that I always hear, which is without merit whatsoever if you have ever at any time purchased DLC for your game. That’s what
Home items are -- DLC -- be it in the forms of avatar clothing, personal spaces, picture frames, etc. It further adds to the customization of
Home for each user, as each user authors his and her own characters, personas, spaces, and personalities for virtual interaction.
People can “be” whomever they choose on
Home, which is one of its inherent problems and bonuses. Its fantasyland of gendery, prettier-than-possible or uglier-as-hell-on-purpose populous make for quite a spectacle. I occasionally assume the role of a naïve, lonely Russian émigré named Katja, all in the name of fucking with perverts who just can’t resist, “You are American mens yes? You like of me to dancing?” Most female avatars on
Home are apparently assumed by males, yet somehow -- even when I’m dressed AS a male avatar -- the creeps hunt me down. Whatever. Easy to avoid. Easy to mute, block, report, and done.
For the most part, however, I’m myself in my creepy mevatar wandering around either talking to the numerous friends I’ve discovered through
Home, talking to strangers (a habit), playing mini-games, or discovering just how poorly my photography translates to the deep shadows that linger in many of
Home’s personal spaces.
As a natural voyeur and semi-professional eavesdropper, I wanted into PlayStation
Home when I first read about it a year ago, but couldn’t get my hands on a PS3 until January. I quickly found (as was expected) that the median age was half my own and the average user had the intelligence level to spell curse words correctly enough to be censored, but little beyond. Yet I did find that there were the rare, interesting, intelligent individuals worth the bother, the harassment, virtual molestation, and sporadic dance competitions that force everyone to do the Running Man.
There are also the unique and highly devoted communities that have sprung from within
Home itself, the Homelings, to name one. I’ve never seen such an intensely organized, interesting, strange, completely fucking awesome group of people spawn from any game or film or television show in my life. No, not even the Trekkies, as they suffered from a lack of technology that is what led to the Homelings creation in the first place. There are other groups; there are some stupid, junior-highish cliques; there are people who sign onto
Home for the sole purpose of trying to fuck with people and get them pissed off. If you fall for any of the crap, it’s more yourself than
Home you should be reflecting upon.
Home is, in essence, the ultimate space for user authorship -- more than
The Sims, more than RPGs -- it is, quite literally, what you make of it, and if you go in expecting shite, there’s plenty to be found. If you go in curious, open-minded to interacting with strangers in a virtual world, expect the crap but be on the lookout for those few people who remind you humanity may not be completely doomed -- then you might actually find something of value, of entertainment, and a place you can have a hand in creating just as much as those brilliant, derrière-entranced encoders.
Entertaining read, though!
Your online ass is beautiful by the way. Congratulations!
All of my online asses have been mediocre at best.
I haven't personally had the chance to taste Home, but I really see nothing wrong with it. I can understand that people don't like paying for extra shit online, but seriously, just don't buy anything. The only people I can see buying extra clothes and hairstyles or whatever else you can buy would be the people that enjoy home and don't mind spending the extra money to enhance their "Home". Get it?
The way I see it, Home is certainly a more complete experience that the 360's Wii-rip-off Avatars and the Wii's Avatars. They crafted a world around their gimmick, and I say more power to them. Also, the ass-physics/rendering is fucking amazing and I like Home for that sole purpose. I could see myself sitting around Home for hours trying to find the best ass.
...and nice ass.
I had to bypass 2 security gates to to access Home on my PSN account.
That being said, I'll stick to DnD.
Ass rendering sounds nice, but you can't beat the imagination.
I think that the biggest problem with Home that many people (including myself have) is that Home is set up as a very loose social environment with little ability for large groups to use it. The clubs have too small a membership roster and with Home having various "instances" it's very difficult for people to ensure they get together in the same instance. The people from Dtoid for example could not really get together in once space and launch a game. It's just not conveniently set up for gaming groups... but more for the solo adventurer. I also think that gaming needs to be more of a focus in Home. The gaming environments tend to end up being little more than another bar-like environment that encourage bar-like behavior.
... still, it's been awhile... I'll have to wander in and check it out again at some point! :)
@ Elsa: How large a group are you trying to launch?? Clubs can carry I believe 40 or so people, and if you've never seen a mass Homeling demonstration, go to Youtube.com and check out the Nosdrugis videos. Suddenly witnessing 30 Homelings appear in Central Plaza out of nowhere to either Rollcall, wash humans, or kick Hamsters into oblivion is pretty stunning.
Ahem...
@ Everyone: I'm not attempting to convert anyone to Home usage, and if you hate it you hate it, but I slayed some major pubescent ass in poker last night. DOWN, BITCHEZ!
My main problem with Home is that you have to pay for things which should be free. My first example is the Human vs. Hamster dance off. This was a Home event. One would think the Hamster suits would be free seeing as this is a community event. But no, the suits are $2. This brought a rather unfair advantage since a lot of people in home don't want to spend real money on virtual clothing. If the suits were free, I would have participated myself by dressing as a hamster because I wanted a damn viking hat instead of the stupid aviator helmet.
My second example is the clubs. You have to pay $5 to make your own club. That's kind of stupid. Paying for the ability to make your own club is like telling a FPS or MMO fan that they need to pay to make their own clans. Sure, you get your own extra space for the club. But it's nothing great that's even worth the $5. There would be a lot more clubs if the option of making them was free.
@ Lenore
You would probably slay my ass in poker as well since I suck at it. Would still play it though and would play you. Now play me in a game of chess, and things might be a little different.
My first example is the Human vs. Hamster dance off. This was a Home event. One would think the Hamster suits would be free seeing as this is a community event.
Every time there's a new Home area, I'll reinstall it and go back to it, only to delete it again every 10 minutes. After reading that above statement, I don't think I ever want to go back!
@Lenore
Nice write up! I think you would enjoy Second Life more, though: it allows more freedoms.
There is plenty of free content to be won/found on it anyways.
I also really dig the new Reaper Shock minigame and get to write off all gaming-related transactions on my taxes.
Home still has a long way to go, but it's getting there.
And Corak, I like the bowling, dammit. :P
Hellz yeah.
There are obviously a lot of perverts, and if you go on the US version (no offence) most guys and girls are all chatting each other up. I saw that straight away. On the EU version all the "women" tend to get sick of this and just walk away.
'Tis funny to be a woman though and see them flock :P
Congratulations on the promoted blog.
I tried Home during the beta and it didn't stimulate any interest. I was genuinely excited when it was announced (like, 3 years ago), but when it finally came out I remember thinking: "This is it?".
I'd probably like it a whole lot more if they made game launching abilities for some of the games that I happen to own. I mean, then Home could be like an advance on the game lobby where you have a your virtual selves walking around, talking, and such before you're dropped into a match.
Your paragraph on the Homelings was especially exciting!
Indeed, Home is what one makes of it, and when one is a Homeling, Home is what the Many make of it.
Boredom sets in to the boring mind.
My "mevatar" looks similar to me but none of the hair styles or colours match which throws it off a bit.
The DLC bit was a little off, I'd say. When you buy DLC for a game, you normally receive missions, a bit of story, some new this and that. Buying clothes is, seemingly, just spending to make tiny changes...which is why if there are any more paid DLCs for any game that are JUST skin swaps, the Pope will cry.
Thing is, the club house and group was made way back when people didn't have the chance to hate Home yet. It was made, and people joined, but now there isn't really much action in it(at least, there wasn't when I finally left the group for it's inactivity).
Oh yes, and I kill in Poker, we should play. =D
Indeed the Homelings have 14 clubhouses to date.
@Haizeus
Not sure exactly how Sony would "fix" the voice chat issue, as the root of the problem lies with the users. During the closed beta there was open voice chat... anywhere, anytime... but abrasive users were (and still are) rampant. Suppose they could impliment an invite based voice chat. That may work.
Go ahead... try and blame the stoopid keyboard for your typing deficiencies.
Proper ass physics only adds weight to my assertion that HOME is actually PRISON. Combine heavy censorship, menial tasks, and avatars that all (read ALL) avatars look like convicted felons, and you get a world that seems all too small and closed in.
I will paypal somebody $5 if they can make a PS HOME avatar that doesn't look like a criminal.
i cant explain it
im glad you wrote something about this... i enjoy home for what it is (free) and can do alot more with them then i can with my "mii's" or any console based avatars really... i just dont see why not i guess would be my closing statement to all this
Load up your paypal account. There are many Homelings who do not only NOT look like a criminal, but do not even look human.
@Lenore Coffee
Forgot to mention (and this may not be relevent at all at this point), but the Nosdrugis YouTube channel you speak of is actually NosTheHomeling.
I have fun piddling around on Home and chatting it up with folks. Maybe we'll bump into each other sometime.
@adultswim810: I didn't like your reply much. Instead of attempting to write a paragraph with any intelligent or grammatical value, instead, you chose to string a bunch of words together into an unintelligible diatribe about black men and gang rape(?) You get a 0/10.
I guess the 'hardcore' demographic feels like they have to hate it on principle, true it's silly and mostly pointless, but it doesn't ruin anything so why all the hate? Guess I'll need a PS3 so I can find out someday.
Cool...
nike dunks