I never understood this concept. The idea of creating a definition for a group of people purely based on their hobby. I don't call myself a movie-goer, or a TV enthusiast, or a book reader. So why are games so exclusive to this trend in entertainment? When you think about it, it is a very negative term. Turning an entire medium into a clique. Considering the gaming industry is trying it's best to sever ties with this notion that gamers are teenage sociopaths who would rather spend time popping heads online with other teenage sociopaths, the term "gamer" isn't very appealing to the hundreds of thousands of people who don't fit that description.
The video game business is opening up to newer markets, and however that makes you feel, it's happening. There's no use fighting it and renouncing companies or games on a message board. So maybe we should start helping the industry to drop their negative title and abandon the "gamer" title. I don't call myself a gamer. I never really thought about it before. I usually just tell people I play games if they ask. That doesn't mean I won't correct them if they call me a gamer. That would be like someone correcting me for misusing some sub-genre of music. I'm sure several other people wouldn't call me a gamer too if they saw the games I played, which is part of the problem. It seems that each "gamer" defines the term differently depending on what games you've played. It's a pretty unattractive trait that would probably put me off games if I didn't play them. No one likes being forced to do things as they are being introduced to something. If you told me I don't like good movies, then told me to watch several picks of your favourites, I'd probably tell you to fuck off and let me watch my so-called crappy movies.
Why do we need to define ourselves by a hobby anyway? Fair enough, some people take it more seriously than others, and that's great. There are people who do the same for movies and books and music, but they don't use a word to define themselves. At most they might describe themselves as an enthusiast, which I think sounds much better for both parties. It doesn't put off the average joe who plays games a few times a week for an hour or two, and it gives the serious person a sense of importance thanks to their title. I suppose this blog is rather pointless, since the term will never die. Hopefully it will one day. It doesn't help the industry, and it doesn't really help people who play games. Maybe if they are talking to someone else who likes them as much as they do, but even then it makes them look elitist to everyone else. Like they are part of a secret club.
OK I'm done ranting now. Back to Rapture. Oh yeah, brought back the NIN banner now Randy is out of action ;_;
|
Because Hot-Topic says it's cool?
I am now a Gamer. Now I've gotta buy a Zelda shirt to go with my new Weezer CD.
That said, I think it's "TV viewers".
Here's the thing. Everyone under the sun fits under one label or another, from specific terms like gamer or audiophile, down to stuff as simple as "bald guy" or "hot chick." It's just how things are; welcome to sociology 101. People who play lots of games or at least devote a bit of their personality to their hobby are gamers. You're posting on a gamer website, you too are a gamer.
You're right when you say that the medium is opening to more people but that doesn't make those people gamers. I wouldn't call the soccer mom who buys a Wii *SOLELY* for Wii Sports a gamer.
The industry isn't trying to sever ties with gaming culture, that would be suicide. Yes, we're seeing more "casual games" and more of a focus on the mainstream. That's just business.
This isn't a secret club, if people want to start gaming, awesome. I'll help them pick out a console and some games to start playing.
As far as the term being negative, dude, should we coin the term "self-hating gamer?" I'm proud to call myself a gamer. I don't know anyone personally who thinks it's a bad thing. That's what separates negative terms from positive terms. Would you want to call yourself a racist or a homophobe even if it were true?
Perhaps for you, you consider gaming only as a hobby, and therefore dont feel right using that term. Personally, I pride myself on being a "gamer", like deadgopher. Videogames go much farther in my eyes than just something I like to do for fun. The jokes I make, the people I associate with, and the way I look at life are largely shaped by gaming, and as such, I feel it is much more than just a hobby.
I am a gamer, and damn proud.
HOWEVER, I do agree that the negative connotations by the term "gamer" are totally not warranted....not only by non-gamers to us, but within our own community. There is no problem with people associating strongly with games, which much of the general public understands. On the same token, there is nothing wrong with a person's choice of games that they love (Jim Sterling can love the hell out of Dynasty Warriors, and there is nothing wrong with that). And thats something that many gamers themselves need to remember.
Finally, as far as there being an bit of elitism to the term "gamer"...I think there is....but thats also a part of being human. Every group has a tint of elitism to it. Whether is hardcore sports fans, people who are way into outdoors activites, or musicians. We should just try to make a conscious effort as "gaming enthusiasts" to try not and overdo it :P
Thats my counter-rant! Great job on the blog though :D
Relax. Don't get so worked up, man.
*shrug*
I wasn't saying the industry is severing ties with gaming culture, because yes that would be suicide. I meant they want to branch out from the stereotype of what people who play games are. Might have worded that badly.
@Tac Tix
OK I see what you mean. Don't get me wrong, I play games a lot. But I don't consider myself that into gaming culture, so maybe I'm on the fence about the whole subject. I can see where you're coming from though, and yes there are a lot of gamers who are passionate about it without being forward about games.
You took my answer.
I do think that the "gamer" label is meant for the traditional core-gamers though. Casual game consumers are just called 'cattle'... ;)
...or your mom
~ Dynamic Sheep
Yeah I don't consider myself a gamer just because I play games ... but I do consider myself a unique and beautiful snowflake.
LOL
..They're called fingers...but have you ever seen them "fing"?
There's nothing wrong with being labeled gamer simply because you/I/we play games. The problem I see is that people are still ignorant about games and still consider "gamers" to be losers who sit at home all day and have no lives.
Labeling people by their hobby is quite natural imo. It helps people identify you and people's interests often tell you more about the person than say a photo would. Bundling people into cliques happens everywhere but the real problem is people's perception of those cliques which is a reflection of society. If you play games you should be proud to admit to being a gamer and show society that their preconceptions of a gamer are in fact ignorant and inaccurate.
You forgot about Surfer, Skater etc. It's not about hobbies, it's about a lifestyle. You don't call people who occasionally play games a gamer. And watching TV is not really a lifestyle.
"the term will never die. Hopefully it will one day. It doesn't help the industry, and it doesn't really help people who play games."
This blog doesn't help either.