Thanks
Brad for getting me riled. :)
I think I might be only half-way to my destination of a moment of clarity; as, right this second, my thoughts are more muddled and confused than John Bobbit’s were when he woke up to a bleeding crotch.
Now that Rock Band 2 (less than a year from the original release) has been announced, I have a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach that makes me spout off trite analogies.
It makes me wonder what videogames are as a whole? What have they become? Did they, only recently, lose the fun and gain the greed? Have they always been this way and am I just too entranced by my passion for them to see past their bullshit?
It’s frustrating, not because I’m compulsive and want every game coming down the pipe, but because Devs these days make me feel so…used. So dirty and cheap. So…Jessica Alba. I’m no longer a fan, or a gamer, but an economic number.
EA really knows how to milk a franchise; just look at the 93 new sports games we have coming out this year…and next year…and the year after that. But alas, with every new year, the same people stand in line to pick up their newest addition to their Madden library. For what? New rosters that can just as easily be downloaded? A nice, neat, new cover?
EA, however, is not the only offender. Even my beloved Konami and Capcom series’ are being given away to repetition. Castlevania is becoming more of the same, with little to no innovation or expansion from the last game and MegaMan now has more randomly strewn about words in the title than a dictionary can hold (see: Mega Man Star Force 2 Zerker X Saurian)(yes…that’s a real fucking game).
It seems that innovative and unique games aren’t finding the appreciation they deserve, or even once had. Recent games like; Brutal Legend (where the fuck are you?) or Boom Blox (a low seller??) are being overshadowed by recycled, casual fluff like Guitar Hero: Aerosmith (yes, another one)- which is being set-up to rival the second coming of the Messiah. For some reason, I find myself looking forward to Too Human (as bad and as cookie cutter as it may be) just for the fact that they're trying to make something worth our time.
Back in the day, before the idea-well was dry, adventure games were adventurous, shooters hadn’t been done to death and overall (and dare I say it), videogames were fun.
Gaming becomes more and more accessible with every third party piece of trash released. Geek is chic now, and even Grandma is getting in on some of the action.
But as a gamer, I just feel out of place in my own world…like we are being overlooked for the new hip crowd and thought of as nothing more than moronic sheep who will BUY anything. My faith for the reclamation of what we once enjoyed so much is lost with each passing swing of Grandma’s Wii bowling arm.
(# 0) on 07/01/2008 12:14
Most gamers are nothing more than moronic sheep who will buy anything. There I said it.
The easy solution is to put your words to action and buy games that exhibit new ideas and direction, or simple yet intuitive gameplay/ideas, and forget the rest and take up reading or something creative as a hobby. And no, enhanced rosters or new characters isn't new ideas and direction. Anyone can skin a character model or get the rights to a character. All it takes is $$$.
This pandering that developers are doing now (shaved head emo characters, Coldplay, Rock band 12, Guitar Hero 83 Heroes of RnB) is hurting everything, and should NOT be supported.
(# 1) on 07/01/2008 12:22
Buy Brutal Legend on day one.
(# 2) on 07/01/2008 12:30
Amen. Us "hardcore" gamers are a minority
(# 3) on 07/01/2008 12:40
(# 4) on 07/01/2008 12:49
Ugh, When did gaming get so fucking elitist? I got a tip for you: If you hate games so much stop playing them.
(# 5) on 07/01/2008 12:52
(# 6) on 07/01/2008 13:12
I'd say take it a step further actually.. And try your hand at making your own game like I did. If you want any guides, help or tips on this just PM me, and we'll go from thar!
You might find A) you are the next Shiggy Miyamoto.. or B) it is too hard to worry about.. Either way I GUARANTEE* it will allow you to play the kind of game you've really wanted to play.. Or, at least you'll see video games in a whole new kinda light.
*My guarantees are only valid in a certain state .. of mind. ;o)
(# 7) on 07/01/2008 13:34
(# 8) on 07/01/2008 13:41
I agree with what you say actually. As much as you may not realize it, you kindof support Rock's point: "don't play the shitty games", which I dont. I try to find the originality with everything, and try to find the fun. If you knew me you'd find that I'm not a very cynical person.
Gaming always WAS pretty elitist in the past. People were ostracized for being the "Nerdy Geeky" kids, but now that the casual storm rolled in, we're getting ostracized by our own circle. I dont hate gaming and I'm not condemning anyone with my post, I'm just pointing out that with the onslaught of new schlock getting pumped out every week, good games are being overshadowed of their deserving limelight. Rock Band was a great idea; why do we need another so soon? Madden was a great idea; why do we need another every year? Mutant League Football was a great idea; Why dont we have another?
MY point is, why does gaming have to be represented and marketed by Guitar Hero or Grand Theft Auto when it should be represented by something like Beyond Good and Evil or Shadow of the Collossus? It's looking past and leaving behind the original audience for quick cash. Why buy a fake gold watch when you can buy a rolex for the same price? You raise a good point, though.
(# 9) on 07/01/2008 13:43
You're absolutely right and I totally agree with you. Including new people isn't a bad thing at all.
But, why not look at it like this. "If we can get grandma into Wii Bowling, maybe we can get her into Halo!"
That should be the big picture. Not: "If we can get grandma into Wii Bowling, maybe we can get her into...Wii Bowling 2!"
(# 10) on 07/01/2008 13:48
I'm not doubting making games is hard work. No doubt in my mind, sir. I tried to make a Flash game back in multimedia class and failed miserably.
Anybody who actually MAKES a game has the passion to do so, which I really admire. But why not use these immense talents and creatvitiy by making something fresh, new and exciting without over-looking the foundation of the audience?
(# 11) on 07/01/2008 13:53
How is gaming "represented" by those specific franchises? They're just the most popular franchises at the moment. You could easily say that gaming was "represented" by Bioshock a few months back, a game that wasn't a typical mainstream shooter and generally adored by critics. (And only slammed by snot-nosed snarky bloggers who thought they were clever by pointing out the major similarities to System Shock 2.)
Also, I don't know what circles you were involved with, but when I was a kid me and my gamer friends would be ecstatic to find new gamers because it was more people we could actually relate and identify with. We didn't care what games they played. That's not exactly what I'd call elitist.
(# 12) on 07/01/2008 13:54
Because the people who have the creativity and passion rarely get to decide what games to actually make.
(# 13) on 07/01/2008 13:55
Sort of like Rainbow Six, and now Rock Band. =[ So sad.
(# 14) on 07/01/2008 14:47
(# 15) on 07/01/2008 21:35