|
games anime | toys
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|

| get involved register or login post a blog post a forum enter a contest contribute a news tip suggest a feature be a guest editor |
support new member's guide login assistance tech support report abuse email our editors read our dev blog nuclear crisis? |
keep in touch RSS feed Myspace Flickr Game nights Meetup+play online |
seriously about Destructoid advertising terms of use privacy policy jobs at MM buy our crap |
our network Tomopop Japanator Despingation? |
||
|
||||||
living the dream since March 16, 2006 |
||||||
His "friend" obtained his account info? So he shared his info with the supposed friend? Yeah, this is why you never share your info.
FUCK NO.
And by Fuck No, I mean that they are not worth anything at all.
Thank you very much.
If you start assigning real world value to equipment and gold in MMORPGs, You're going to get alot more people wanting to `cash out` that value.
This happens in Second Life where they actually have a real world value for money in that game. the result? People make businesses on there and don't actually play the game for more then a little bit. A time ratio of something like 6 to 1. Six hours making items to sell for every one hour playing the stupid game.
I wouldn't want to see MMOs drop into that sort of cesspool.
What something is worth is a matter of perspective.
The police are not doing their job, as property has been stolen and they are doing nothing about it.
There's no way you could place a set value on stolen virtual items, seeing that MMO economies fluctuate wildly. Your epic sword you got from months of raiding could become outdated at the next patch, or even to the level of vendor trash.
Wouldn't it be more practical to charge a crime for unauthorized login and vandalism, instead of placing an unpredictable monetary value on items?
SourGr8pes - I like the vandalism angle, but what if the 'friend' was found guilty and then sued by the original owner for destroying your property, i.e. suing for money damages. Plus, if you admit it is vandalism, a worthless object cannot be vandalized, or can it...
It's worth money but if the government agrees to that, then they're going to want a piece of the pie a.k.a taxes. I'll stick with the tried and true "don't give people your password you dumbfuck" method.
Virtual items only have monetary value if you can find someone stupid enough to pay you for them.
This is solved by a simple fact.
The TOS you agree to when you enter the game plainly states that the items and money have no real world value.
Any of this hits a court and that alone will get it thrown out.
I mean it doesn't matter if a person perceives value in something, or even if they are willing to part with cold hard cash for it. If you sign a contract agreeing that it has no value then it simply doesn't.
If the person who coded those 1s and 0s say it has no value beyond the subscription price then it doesn't.
I just came back to say your banner is awesome. Can't believe I overlooked that before.
Hmm, you're right about vandalizing an object that has no value... But what kind of crime can be charged for some kind of unauthorized login (which IMO would be akin to real life trespassing or breaking and entering).
If you don't set rules and laws for these kind of things, people are going to habitually do them and thumb their nose in the face of deceny.
If a person owns virtual property, and there is a ready market for that property, it would be tough to argue that there's no value. Value exists when people will pay for something.
Seth388 mentions the Terms of Service, and while I disagree with his analysis (contracts can have all sorts of terms, but if those terms are illegal or unconscionable, they're not binding), I think he raises a good point -- let's look at the ToS. If Mr. Luurs is merely a licensee of Blizzard's service, and has no claim to ownership of the virtual property, then he can't claim that his property rights were violated by the theft even if he could sell the in-game assets. Under the terms of the contract, he would be attempting to sell goods that don't belong to him, and Doc Brown would frown on that.
Smug Bastard, thats what you are.
No, we aren't worth anything.
Not even forty of them?
if you share your info online you deserve to get thowmped upon. the dumbass made that mistake, everything else is all his own fault. if he didn't share his info, he wouldn't be in this situation.
game. set. MATCH.
Hmm...idiot, he should have saved up another month's worth of virtual cash to buy a virtual alarm. Noobs are so gay.