
|
|
|
|
So this is more or less my nitpicky, fanboyish "review" of Watchmen which I just saw today. It's long. If you decide to read it, I thank you for your time.
There be spolers. OH yes. I warned you. The intro was amazing. Seriously, amazing. I was enthralled by the first minute of the movie. While I was sitting there watching the credits go by, for the first time, it finally sunk in: "Holy shit. They made the fucking "unfilmable" Watchmen movie." Then the Comedian scene occurred and I was floored. I really couldn't believe it. It was the comic in movie form. What everyone says is true: almost every single scene in the movie is perfectly recreated, panel for panel, from the comic. The movie expectedly leaves a few things out, like most comic-to-movie conversions usually do, but what they did leave out was not too important (I’ll get to that later). However there was other stuff they left in, which could have been removed and replaced with some other things, which makes me wonder when that kind of decision is made, do they compare it to other scenes? Or is it just a timing thing? I loved this movie. In fact, there were many times where the scenes were so visually arresting and loyal to the source material that it drove me to tears (the good kind of tears) from being just so fucking perfect. Of course, I was let down by a few things. I'll start off with the good points: A lot of the special effects/cgi were also very fun to watch: the glass castle Dr. Manhattan makes on Mars, flying around in Nite Owl's ship, the jailbreak scene, and all the fight scenes were great. There were also a lot of very gory, violent scenes. Sometimes the scenes were overly violent, like one of the first changes I noticed: Instead of Rorschach setting the first man he killed’s house on fire, and watching him burn alive while contemplating existence, what it means to be a masked hero, and deciding to take matters into his own hands, he instead cuts the guy's head open with a butcher's knife, like a watermelon. Other things I liked: Bubastis looks purrrrfect (but he is only shown at the end and is in like 4 scenes), all the costumes look amazing, a lot of the dialogue is taken directly from the book, and I really didn't mind the "new" ending as bad as I was expecting to. Let's see... what else? Oh yeah: Rorschach steals the show. Remember how awesome he was in the book? Remember how you couldn’t wait to get to the next page that had Rorschach in it? Yeah, he's pretty much still that awesome (but he was never shown eating sugar cubes. A minor detail? Perhaps.). I think I remember reading a review that said something along the lines of “Jackie Earle Haley was born on this Earth to play the role of Rorschach.” And I couldn’t agree more. His performance is that good. And you hardly ever see his face! Now onto the bad stuff: DR. MANHATTAN: Firstly, animation movements and more specifically, the mouth movements of CG on Dr. Manhattan: disappointing. Well not like Beowulf bad, but overall there were some definite uncanny valley moments. On the other hand, there are some other scenes where they did an amazing job with him. Totally convincing. That's to be expected, but I'm very sorry there were some scenes that turned out the way they did. I was happy they kept him nude for a good portion of the scenes he was in, but I’ve noticed a lot of immature comments (probably those who didn’t read the book) who don’t understand that he didn’t need clothing or much else, for that matter, to live. (Comparatively, though, they were very gracious to Doc’s member.) Dr. Manhattan talks very softly and slowly. He doesn’t have an echo in his voice or anything special like they do in the Motion Comic, he just sounds like a normal guy. Almost a little too normal...almost to the extent of sounding weak. I’m sure they made that decision for clarity’s sake, but it’s noticeable. And at times, his body movement seems like it's entirely in slow motion, which is something I'm not sure Zack did on purpose (since he's obsessed with slo-mo shots) or it was just poor, unconvincing CG. He’s also way too buff for his own good. I know Dr. Manhattan was definitely close to being a “perfect being,” but his physique is way too close to a bodybuilder, which at times is a bit unsettling, and in some scenes he comes across more akin to a big blue wrestler than a man who has no imperfections in his body structure. To this day, no one has ever been able to best Gollum for best CG actor. Who knows when that day will come. But it wasn't just the CG either: the actor who played Richard Nixon, while doing a perfect job matching mannerisms and voice, had an extremely unconvincing makeup job that stands out every time. If you can just keep telling yourself "ok, yeah that's Nixon, sure," it might not be so bad, but there were plenty of closeup shots of this actor in full makeup and it just. looked. bad. SILK SPECTRE: As most people have already pointed out, Malin Ackerman’s performance was underwhelming. There are some scenes that are just flat out, *poorly acted.* And I’m not usually noticing things like that when I watch movies. She also has almost no backstory at all, and neither did Nite Owl. So maybe them both having non-existent backstories is why they got together? >_> You never see the scene where she throws her drink in the Comedian’s face, you never see the scene where she goes into the den and breaks the snow globe while her parents are bickering. She doesn’t even smoke. In fact, the only people who smoke are the Comedian and Big Figure! Like, do you still think “oh we shan’t be showing bad smoking habits to the kiddies,” when you have people taking butchers knives to people’s heads? Gimme a break. The movie is rated R, fucking give me a goddamn rated R movie. Don’t peddle to me like I’m immature. Silk Spectre was nothing more than a pretty face. She didn’t even need to be in the movie because she hardly served any purpose other than being a pretty face. She didn’t even seem convincing enough to Dr. Manhattan on Mars. All he did was look at her and realize, “You exist the way you are purely based on random chance, and that’s pretty close to being a miracle. Ok, I’ll give Earth another go.” When she realized the Comedian was daddy dearest, I felt nothing. Not because it wasn’t tragic, but because the movie never set us up to the improbability that he was her father. And they never even touched on his scar deforming his face so that he looked like he was perpetually sneering (like the Joker). They almost downplayed the scar/face deformation. And that, my friends, is tragic...almost to the point of being, dare I say it, a joke. VEIDT/OZYMANDIAS: The moment I saw the actor chosen for this character I questioned it. And I think in the end I was right. The actor was too skinny, too weak, and completely awful and impassionate to take on the role of Veidt. He did not portray the character well at all. And he looks like an 18-year old boy. There are some parts with him that are just flat out boring to watch. His dialogue is just completely uncompelling and flat out boring. He isn’t nearly as sinister as he is in the book, and he doesn’t come off as “the world’s smartest man” either. He isn’t the kind of guy that you just love to hate him because he’s so damn smart and clever, and way in the back of your mind you admire him and almost pity him for being so selfless and selfish at the same time. Yeah, this guy is none of those things. Sorry Zack, you lost me on Adrian. Oh right, they introduced Hollis Mason just to have that 1 conversation with Dan, and then we NEVER SEE HIM EVER AGAIN. Guess we'll have to wait for the Director's Cut DVD, eh Zack? Like I said before, scene for scene, the movie pretty much follows the timing and plot of the comic to a T. Right down to the little drip of ketchup that falls on the New Frontiersman guy's smiley face shirt at the end. This movie was made for fans, by a fan. It was a fan-made movie, and it really, truly tries its damn hardest to be respectful to its original source. Watchmen should have been, at the very least, a 2-part movie. At the most, an awesome mini-series. But it’s not. And here we are, and there’s nothing to be done about it. In the end, should Watchmen never have been made into a film? Probably, but at least it was still pretty damn fun and entertaining way to kill 2.5 hours.
|
|
|
|
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
|
Comment with FacebookClick connect and comment instantly! |
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds |
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

Follow
RSS
Contact
Also, blue cocks
Dr. Manhattan had way too much penis and I've heard that in the book he starts out fully clothed and slowly evolves more into the naked super guy. That would have made more sense to me and would have made him a more interesting character to me.
Rorschach on the other hand was awesome. I was so excited every time the story came back to him. I'm not sure if it was the actor playing him (I think he did an awesome job) or just the character himself but hot damn I loved every scene with him in it. It was funny seeing him constantly have to pick his hat back up each time he got knocked down by Ozymandias at the end.
All in all, it felt like there was too much being packed into one movie and it was just dragged on for way too long. There were things I wanted to know more about (Nite Owl and Silk Spectre back story anyone?) and other things I just didn't care about (the sex scene... oh god the sex scene).
Matthew Goode though...Yeeesh. Absolutely no stage presence whatsoever.
Two of my friends that had never read the graphic novel tagged along to the movie and really enjoyed it, though I had to explain a couple things afterwards.
There were scenes where I kept telling myself, "Oh right, the reason this is happening is because one time, blah blah blah happened." I was justifying the lack of explaination due to my previous knowledge of the storylines in the book and was mentally filling in the blank spots. It's unforutnate that it had to happen that way.
And yes, Doc Man gradually loses his clothing (which they could have easily handled in flashbacks) over time, which in the book is more akin to being a metaphor for him losing his humanity (once he's all naked in the end it's gone).
Maybe it was an excuse to show big blue cock, maybe not...
I know. It's retarded.