Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by Fame Designer | Afford What Has Value To YouDestructoid
LIGHTS:  ON | OFF
surf dtoid with arrow keys

HOT GAMES
REVIEWS VIDEOS COMMUNITY FORUM SHOP

pc PS4 PS3 NEXT XBOX XBOX 360 WII U 3DS PS vita ANDROID APPLE

REMOVE ALL ADS?
Guaranteed contest entry?
A new video show?
Something else?

Vote in our membership poll

About
I've been working on developing video games for a few years now. I put up a blog on here to share what I hope will be sensible and interesting articles about game design. The "Fame Design" name came to me when I thought, "I want to be famous for only one thing: video games".

At the moment I'm developing new games in Flash. So I expect to share experiences in being an indie game developer. I often find myself wondering if I should be working in Flash, HTML5, XNA, or the iPhone/iPad SDK. Time will tell.
Player Profile
Follow me:
Fame Designer's sites
Badges
Following (60)  




I watched Jim Sterling’s video about piracy too.



Something had been bugging me though, well before Jim’s video. I’ve been reading plenty of articles and watching plenty of videos about it. I’m not saying that I know everything about this topic. But, in almost every conversation or speech I’ve heard, I haven’t heard the most realistic arguments. Usually on one side you have consumers who pay for their stuff and companies that are entitled to their sales. And on the other you have people who don’t mind using a torrent to share a file. Right now I’m uncomfortable on either side of the fence.

I do believe that piracy is wrong. I believe downloading a movie for free that is only sold in stores is a crime on some level, in that, it is theft. I’m even pretty sure that it is still theft if you already own it on DVD. If you want back-up copies – make copies of your actual DVD or something. And, well, don't share that copy.

I say this while listening to ‘Blonde on Blonde’ by Nada Surf streaming on YouTube. I feel like this is the same thing as downloading it via torrent file, but maybe not. Does YouTube make money from my clicking on the play button again? If so, do some of the proceeds go to Nada Surf? They must have consented to the music being on there for free. Maybe?



I think the last thing I downloaded through some torrent was the full Twin Peaks series. I didn’t have the money to buy it. I wanted to watch it after talking about it with my friends. I rarely take the plunge, but I wanted to watch it bad enough to take it – the plunge. I started making excuses for myself. Like: I know most of my friends steal things all the time – notably Adobe products, porn, music, and video games. Most of them have no sense of it being thievery. And I’m okay with that sometimes. I used to steal baseball cards when I was little, and I knew that was wrong back then. But this seems different somehow.

Another excuse in my head is: You can’t even hold the data in your hand. The Twin Peaks series fits into a couple of gigabytes, and is only taking up a fraction of your hard drive. It holds almost no weight. You get the experience without having to think about the work that went into building it. You delete it afterwards, not having to think about it. It’s like a streaming video that you let buffer all the way to the end. You watch The Usual Suspects, and then *poof* it’s gone.



It’s a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy. I can even tell you that I’m only kind-of sort-of a thief because what I’ve stolen is still enough in a grey area that I won’t get thrown in jail. Just think of it. Think of everyone, that has ever downloaded a file illegally, in jail. Ridiculous. It’s even goofy thinking that I would get fined 100,000 dollars or whatever it says on that FBI warning.

Recently, though, I have changed my stance on it. Maybe it’s because of the fact that I can pay for things I want now. Maybe it’s because I’m thinking of having a business myself. When I make my super cool video game, how will I sell it? Will it be pirated and distributed without my consent? Will people want to steal my game too? (A side note: It would be awesome to be in a place where I would be required to think about this stuff. Note to self: Make a video game.)



I’ve always known I was stealing. But now I’m not going to do it anymore, because I have this idea that I’m screwing the artists every time I steal something. I love David Lynch, Kyle MacLachlan, and Lara Flynn Boyle. I understand that if I pay for something off the shelves or on Amazon, that some of the money goes to other companies, but I’m hoping that most of the money goes to the artists. I wish them success. I want more money to go to them because I want to see more stuff like Twin Peaks. I want my money to go towards something that I value.

Look, I mean, I’m not sure how to sort out what is worth my money and what isn’t. That’s not the point. What I’m trying to add to the conversation here is that I feel like I am STILL screwing the artists as a consumer. If I buy a CD off the rack, some part of me still thinks that the band gets at least some money out of it. The problem is not that I’m fine with giving money to artist and publisher – I don’t have much to say about that. The problem is that CD’s, DVD’s, *.mp3’s, *.avi’s, and all sorts of different types of recorded data are so easily distributable and so easily copied.

If you were a car manufacturer, you could probably sell your cars without much fear of the average consumer totally and completely copying the car in every way perfectly to share with their friends. These companies, like KFC’s recipes, have trade secrets and they are protecting their products from being copied or illegally distributed. It is lawful to be able to patent something you invented and make money off of it, or like KFC hold trade secrets that are not given out to just anyone. So how does a music company do that? How does a band do it or an indie game developer?



I spoke with Knutaf about this. It is HARD to protect your data. Even if you lock up your game in a box tighter than an ATM machine and only distribute in arcades – you still run the risk of one security breach compromising your whole plan. The data only has to come from one place, and then it’s everywhere. For entertainers and bands, performances are easily recordable, as are the CD’s that are sold. It is hard to protect things that are so easily recordable. But I, for one, encourage artists to protect their data however they can. Yeah, protection in the form of DRM is annoying. But the idea is that if you buy a copy legit, you won’t have any problems. If you find something annoying about that – it is your choice not to buy it, just like anything else. Just like picking an apple without a bruise on it. Don’t want to miss out on the experience? Too bad – you either think it’s worth the price, or you don’t.

One thing I learned from my dad, something I’ll always remember him saying is, “If you want to make more than 250,000 dollars a year, there aren’t a whole lot of ways to do it without working your ass off.” Developing video games is like the new kind of rock star, but was being a rock star the new kind of gold rush? I’m sure there were things in between, but it’s clear to me that the whole problem here is greed.



People with lots of money to spend are spamming us with CD’s and DVD’s that are both easily produced, easy to put on the shelf, but also easily copied. The artists do all the heavy lifting, sell out, and are not wise to how much the producers are making. Again, if artist and producer are making a lot of money, then why complain? But if you find that people are copying your stuff and are wondering how much money you could have made from those people if they actually bought a copy of the CD, then it’s really the fault of the producers and the artists for trying to mass produce something that is so easily copied at home. The fault is not only on the pirates. Isn’t it clear to them that there will be pirates?

Using music sales as my example: I think that when studios record quality tracks to put on CD’s and on iTunes, it becomes the first mistake when trying to make an honest dollar off of their products. Some company can say, “Hey let us distribute your music. We’ll produce your music and market it. You’ll get a dollar for every CD you sell. Yeah, we are making most of the money here, but we are also very important because we are the ones that make your product a million seller. And, hey, your team still gets a million dollars. You have to spend money to make money.”

If I had a band, I would not expect millions of dollars for my insane awesome talent. I would expect to sell a good product, protect it, and distribute it in a way that didn’t give pirates the opportunity to record my music at all. The money would come from the work we did on tours. We might even hire some light security to stop people from bringing recording devices or video cameras into the performance. Kind of like what happened when I went to the Cirque du Soleil. Yeah!



So if you dupe it and sell as many as you can, you will never be able to protect your music… your product… your intellectual PROPERTY. If you do this, do not complain like Metallica that your music is being copied and distributed illegally. You have agreed to make it stupidly easy for people to do so. KFC wouldn’t put their recipes in someone’s desk somewhere to be easily seen or stolen. They probably have it in some vault somewhere. As an artist, if you aren’t willing to give the effort that most average people do to try and make their millions – then I don’t think you should complain if some producer makes millions of copies of your work onto CD’s. Unfortunately you don’t live in a world full of people that give a shit about your band making an extra buck, especially off of a 15 dollar CD.

It goes the same way for video games. As I understand it you will have some protection when you release on a platform like Steam, XBLA, or some other thing. I wonder how Minecraft did it… Minecraft has that subscription thing that must at least be pirated somewhat – but, holy shit is that guy making a lot of money. I’m guessing they have a low piracy to actual sale rate. World of Warcraft probably still makes a lot of money both from having an addictive game, but also – the game must be hard to pirate… or, hard enough so that the average user won’t stop paying monthly to do it.

Let it be the seller’s fault for selling it wrong for the lack of success. Let it be the fault of the artist for making shitty content. Let it be the consumers fault for not having enough money. Don’t let thieves be the guiding force behind your success.



Things are changing. The game I’m developing at work right now is going to be extra hard to pirate copies of, mostly because you need your own copy of our game and a server to go with it. It’s like World of Warcraft. An average user will not be able to succeed at making their own duped server on their own local machine - much easier to pay a monthly subscription. In the future I’m sure the protection of data will be much easier to accomplish.

But for now, let me suggest this: Stop listening to the artists and companies complain about what they didn’t get. And stop listening to pirates trying to make sense of what they are doing (stealing). Either way, the artists, producers, and pirates should not be able to get what they want without some old fashioned WORK.

Photo Photo Photo



Is this blog awesome? Vote it up!




Those who have come:



Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.

Legacy Comments (will be imported soon)


Was that a Thunderstone nod or just a random google image search?
A little rambling, Fame, but you touched on one point that matters to me. I don't pirate things because I want my money to fund development of more rad stuff from the developers who made it. That's why I also endeavor to buy games new when I can.
In my adult life with enhanced morals I am more acutely aware of the consequences of piracy and how that affects people. So in that spirit I try to give money where appropriate and honor those who deserve the recognition.
... what Knutaf said! :)
@shepppy: It was 4:00 in the morning. I rambled without images. Then I quickly read over my ramblings and thought of words and phrases every few paragraphs and google image searched it.

Thief, Twin Peaks, Usual Suspects poof it's gone, Jim Carrey dupe it, Justice, Greed, Metallica mad, paladin angel.

And I like that song from Johnny Cash and I embedded it for almost no reason other than that. Maybe that explains it. :)

@Knutaf: Thanks for talking with me about it. Gave me a lot to think about.

@Occams electric toothbrush: Money is like a higher level version of that honor and recognition. I like the idea of money when it is given as, say, a special tip to a Hooters waitress that gives a boy turning 21 an innocent but memorable and entertaining time of his coming of age party, dancing around with hula hoops while serving beer and wings in some spectacular fashion.

@Elsa: I often agree with Knutaf. Knutaf is very agreeable.
That's a shame since the image is of the Chalice hero class in Thunderstone.
@sheppy: I'll check it out.
Fame: You're very smart. I don't agree with you most of the time but you think about things in dept, giving this site a pulse for me lol.

I would love to talk about this issue with you somehow. lol
What knutaf and Occam said. (Also, what Elsa said, but only because she said "...what knutaf said", so I kind of HAVE to agree with her just by default.)
Marcus still downloads shows and movies. I've become too lazy that and I have money. He recently downloaded the entirety of Arrested Development, watched it all then deleted it. He loved the show so much after watching it that he went out and bought the DVDs. So I guess sometimes it can lead to real purchases.

I think our excuse which is a good one even if it's still stealing is the complete and utter lack of selection in this are. Marcus' world would not be as culturally fulfilled with the likes art house Criterion films if he hadn't downloaded some of them just because the selection is so fucking sparce here. I know for a fact he'd have and has purchased quite abit of what's become available. Still it's piracy and that's our thin justification for it.
@chrisbradshaw: I think that people that try to be as in depth with our opinions as we are sometimes come off as pretentious. I don't think either of us really think we are better or smarter than other people or really care about that - but I know that I get a bit of a gut reaction to hearing debates about piracy and nothing on the fact that people purely aren't working for what they possess. garethxxgod makes a good point, and shorter than my long winded blog. There 'is' a thin justification for why we all pirate things. I don't think anyone should be going to jail, for sure. But I think technology has to get to a point where we actually can draw a line of when we should be fined or jailed, and when we shouldn't be. I have not researched where that line is. But I do know the age of consent in Washington State like the back of my hand...

If you check your private message inbox I'll leave my email address soon. Also, if that doesn't work I'll leave something in your youTube account - the one with all the videos.

@mrandydixon: What you said... *head esplode*

@garethxxgod: Look above, I said something about your comment. I think that I might have been able to say just what you did and leave it at that. The only other thing is this: "How can businesses expect to make money copying data CD's when we can do it at home for a fraction of the price?" Simple as that. Companies are doing something that used to be important, and they complain about the fact that it's a new world now. As a customer that has had a CD-R and a hard drive for most of his life, I say - fuck CD's - where's my content? Who owns that shit? I will pay them 10 bucks for content, just fucking put it online. That's iTunes for me for now and maybe a 10 dollar donation to Radiohead every once in a while. I know that other people still think it's easier to still pirate stuff, but concerning people that want to buy legit products - iTunes is kind of a start. I wish single tracks of music didn't have to be all on one platform like iTunes though. Seems like apple is making a killing hoarding music and taking a percentage of profits. I wish that money could still go straight to the artists.
Good blog man. One of the only blogs/comments about this whole thing that was actually thought out and lacks rage-induced stupidity. Thanks for being intelligent. :P
@Knutaf makes a point I agree with.
"I’ve been reading plenty of articles and watching plenty of videos about it. I’m not saying that I know everything about this topic."

Would you say these are your conclusions... from countless experiments?
@Grimstar: Thanks Grimstar.

@LawofThermalDynamics: Which one? The one where I ramble?

@Byronic man: Also, books that I read. Man... this is my life... and this is Piracy.
It's baffling to me how people listen to music via Youtube instead of any audio only stream. Mind you the telecom service in Canada is pretty much a laughing stock, so I might be a little biased.
Also Youtube gets away with it like it does because copyright holders can make a claim to get videos taken down really fast, and videos that use copyrighted material are supposed to link to a place to purchase it. So at least it's advertising for the copyright holders.

Back to Top
DLC   |   BEST Games of 2012   |   Best PC Games   |   Best PS3 Games   |   Best Xbox 360 Games   |   Best Wii U Games   |   Best 3DS Games




All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more