I am the Everyday Legend, and I am a male, 30-year old, Florida native and videogame fan of the most epicurean order. I'm also the father of a very precocious two-year-old.
I got into gaming when I was 5, and my Aunt and Uncle had an NES that they had bought because they thought it was the coolest thing ever. As a matter of fact, they weren't too far off of the mark. I was introduced to Super Mario Bros. and Duck Hunt (naturally), and soon followed up with the very first Zelda. I remember the very first game I beat by myself - Megaman 2, in 1989. I was six at the time.
Shortly after that, I played Street Fighter II for the first time in a local skating rink and was hooked. Bad. Like, smack-habit bad.
I remember playing against the college kids that would come in there to hang out and chill - there was a lounge connected to the place that you had to be 18 to get in - and a lot of these guys used to come in and spend a ton of time and money on playing SFII. I learned how to play from these guys, and within a year, I had become just as good as they were. I was hanging out with people almost twice my age, and conversing with them on their level about a mutual passion - and that's where I've been ever since.
Videogames don't make up my entire life: I cook, I write, I sing, I have a full-time job and am still attending college for a degree in Computer Science. Nothing beats a good trip to a good bar where they serve good beer and have a good selection of good tunes. Also, chilled Junmai Ginjo (unfiltered) sake is the nectar of the gods, in case you weren't aware. Of course, those trips are very rare these days, because there is always another diaper to change, and leaving your kid at home in the crib is never an option if you want to be able to look at yourself in the mirror.
Oh, and I really, really love sushi. I can put away amounts of that stuff that some may label as borderline genocidal.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-R . A . N . T . . . . I . N . C . O . M . I . N . G-*-*-*-*-*-*-
So, there's been people bitching and complaining about community. People bitching and complaining about Dtoid losing focus. There's been forum threads, cblogs both constructive and destructive, people leaving in a huff, and all throughout, there's been two people trying to round up the community and place them in the spotlight, every single week.
There are a few of you who have really stuck around for the weekly feature we work on, and to you, I must admit that I cannot thank you enough. To those that have participated, I cannot thank you enough. To those who take the time to click the fap button and comment, I cannot thank you enough.
However, beyond that, I'm having a small crisis of conscience, and I hope that the community can help me resolve it. There's something bothering me. Seriously, it's getting at me in a fairly major way.
See, there's been lots of bitching and complaining. There's also been lots of discussion about what sucks, who sucks, what needs to change. Well, myself, I come from the Mahatma Ghandi school of "Be the change you wish to see in the world," hence why I started my project of Community Interviews (and came to find out that OpiumHertz had the same idea, so we joined forces). I wanted to make things better, so I've been trying as hard as I can to make something special that would not only give me an outlet, but also give back to the community here by showcasing one member per week, three weeks at a time. I wanted to get feedback on the process, start dialogs, get people talking about something other than "Dtoid Sucks," because I started to feel that same way, too. So, I decided to do something about it.
And thus far, the project has been warmly-received...but I would not call it a success. And that doesn't have to do with me. That doesn't even have to do with site staff. It doesn't have to do with ads. It doesn't have to do with Huge membership subscriptions.
I guess I just expected better from a community who claims to be so damn hungry for their own to shine. I expected a larger turnout from people here, and that's probably got a lot to do with my biased expectations - because I would have been glad to read this every week, myself. I'd have been glad to see more community-based, community-driven features made by our own.
Problem is, the vast majority of you don't seem to be that interested, and that makes me feel like this is all very pointless except to a golden minority.
So, I'm going to finish out my interview backlog / waiting list from the forums.
At that point, I'm going to begin making a call out to the front page. Instead of taking my ball and my teary eyes home in defeat, I've decided to to the exact opposite: I'm going to take my ball into your living room, and I'm going to suggest a game to play, and anyone who wants to play is more than welcome to join me. We will have fun, I guarantee it. Anyone who doesn't want to, well, you probably suck anyway. :D
I'm doubling down so hard on this that I might as well get a forum badge for it. And if you don't get that reference, well, you should probably take a look around some of the smaller nooks of this fine site we call Destructoid. Maybe you should start working on something to make this place better instead of setting fire to your room before you run away from home, or publicly threatening adblock to get that negative attention you desperately crave, or bitching about paid subs / downvotes / whatever Sarkeesian video is blowing up this week.
I answered the call. I stepped up. What the fuck are you gonna do?
I don't review games often, if at all - I apologize for the long intro, but this has to be said so that you can have a very specific frame of reference for this review. I'm going to get this out of the way right now:
SoulCalibur II is one of my favorite games of all time. Ever. Like, I have been playing videogames for twenty-eight of my thirty-one years, and out of all those experiences, out of all those systems and platforms, out of all the games I could possibly play, SoulCalibur II still stands as one of my absolute, near-and-dear, desert island, you-can-keep-your-(insert title here) games I have ever played. Period. Outside of genre. Outside of theme. Just as a game alone, it stands on high.
I've played each new installment as it came out, from Soul Edge in the arcade to SoulCalibur V, and everything in between. And sadly, nothing ever touched SCII in my eyes. Sure, there was better mission modes and content in SCIII, there was better character customization in IV and V, but to me, the core gameplay has never felt better and more tightly tuned than in SCII. I don't look at SoulCalibur games for extra content just like I don't eat a cheeseburger for the ketchup - the meat is the most important part, bar none. It makes the sandwich, so to speak. Everything else, like great vegetables, gourmet cheese, artisan bun...it all goes to waste if the meat sucks.
SCIII had no arcade playtest to precede it, so there were glaring gameplay problems and glitches in the mission mode (I've lost saves numerous times, to the point where I simply gave up). SCIV tried to take steps into being 3D Guilty Gear, with a focus on combos and instant-kill attacks. SCV added Street Fighter-style meter management into the mix. Everything past II seems to have lost more and more of the "core gameplay is the focal point" ethos, which is a shame, because nobody else was doing what SoulCalibur was doing in terms of gameplay, even ten years after the original SoulCalibur. Nobody copied their formula. Nobody did it better.
Imagine my joy when I heard that SoulCalibur II would get an HD re-release, the full home version of one of my all-time favorite games, complete with online play.
Imagine my sorrow when I see glaring problems and many, many missed opportunities that completely mar an otherwise competent port.
Now that you've read that, you know where I'm coming from, and hopefully my point of view can remain as objective as it possibly can be considering my abnormally high level of fandom for this very particular entry in the franchise.
SoulCalibur II HD Online is upon us. The gameplay itself hasn't changed from 2003, and that's a great thing. This is classic SoulCalibur, where awareness of your positioning, proper reactive defense and fake-out mindgames are the true keys to victory, with no meter management aside from your very own lifebar. Attacks are the same as they were, tactics are the soup du jour, and the controls might take some readjusting to get your sea legs back, but once you've acclimated, you'll find that it's the same game you loved way back when. And what's best is this - no more arguing about which guest character was better. Now you get to fight them to the death in order to settle the score for sure. Or, at least 2/3 of the score, since Link isn't in this game, while PS2's Heihachi (Tekken) and XB's Spawn are.
This brings up plenty of fanboy ire on news stories, social networks, comment sections and message boards. And truthfully, it's understandable. However, if Nintendo didn't want to release Link to other consoles via a licensing agreement, or Namco didn't want to support Wii U for whatever reasons, there should have been no reason why they couldn't have modified the character model, called him "Kiln" and called it a day. You'd have had your I-Can't-Believe-It's-Not-Link version of Link, and some people would have been made extraordinarily happy by this inclusion, because something always beats nothing, hands-down.
As a side note - the Japanese voice option has been removed. Not a dealbreaker, but sad, as I liked their dub far more than the ham-'n-cheeze English one.
With that said, this port is made from the PAL version of SCII, which has a few bugs and glitches in gameplay that allow for specific character infinites and a few nasty properties on certain moves that make for unblockable attacks, etc. Namco really screwed the proverbial pooch here, because using the NTSC version wouldn't have had these problems, but we're stuck with this version, and no casual player will have their experience shattered over these things. Only eagle-eyed vets and serious competitors will take note of these changes, but I feel that they are worth mentioning.
This version also brings the same modes as the 2003 home versions. Weapon Master is back, and needs to be played in order to unlock the characters, costumes and weapon sets, just as it used to. I have to applaud their decision to do this, as they could have done the standard Namco practice and easily offered a "Unlock It All" pack for an undisclosed sum as paid DLC. However, I can't shake the notion that this is the reason why they're charging $20 for this game instead of $15. I mean, sure, they did add an online component and upscaled the texture models, and there are two out of the three system-specific guest characters (one of which is licensed), but with the state of the online netcode, I'm not sure $20 is justified.
Online play isn't necessarily bad in SCIIHDO, it's just not good. Matches are playable in the sense that you are able to play with other people online. That's it. The netcode simply isn't good enough to hang with the split-second timing required to execute Guard Impact parries, or shift stances with proper timing with Ivy, or even block Taki's rising B=>B (knife goes up into the face, knife goes down into the foot - good luck with guarding your foot in time). Even on top of this, joining online games is nothing short of a joke, and playing with friends is practically nonexistent. There's no lobby system at all, something that's a standard of all online fighting games. Here, you just search, and join. Once it's done, back to the main menu you go to repeat the process. Whatever "3-4-5" means as far as connection quality, it doesn't matter - I've had better, smoother matches of online checkers.
It's also worth noting that it's just one-on-one versus. No Team Battle. No online Tournament mode. Nothing like the legendary (and I mean LEGENDARY) Conquest mode from the arcade version of SCII. Just join, fight, and drop. Because of all these deficiencies, I can say for a fact that SoulCalibur II HD Online only carries the right to have the word "Online" in the title on sheer technicality alone, and the pieces currently in place are shameful for anything besides an internal test build. Project Soul should be ashamed of themselves for letting this out into the wild, and Namco should be mocked for putting it out with a smile on their face.
I feel like a little more deference should have been given to this re-release, especially for an inflated price point of twenty bucks. The graphics are nice, the gameplay is still solid (minus the few annoyances present due to picking the wrong damn version to port), and the original game is 95% intact (no Japanese voice option bugs me a bit). However, there's nothing new outside of the shinier coat of paint, and nothing extra added onto the original package to justify its asking price. It comes equipped with an online mode that functions without functioning well, and has none of the creature comforts of current fighting game offerings, like lobbies. It's the equivalent of saying that doors are optional in a house - front door, privacy doors, all of them. All optional.
(Yes, I know, it's SCV, but it expresses my disappointment perfectly.)
This leaves me with a very bittersweet feeling, one that I can't quite stomach. I can't honestly recommend this game to anyone, and it's the game I've been evangelizing for a decade. I finally understand what my father meant all those years ago when he looked at me after doing something terribly stupid and said: "Son, I'm not angry at you - I'm simply disappointed in you." That's the exact feeling I have for Namco Bandai at this present moment, because such a high-water mark for the franchise deserved so much better of a treatment than the one they gave. This is the videogame equivalent of a job done by a high school volleyball team car wash - half-hearted and content in the fact that they already have your money, leaving you driving away with something unfinished and full of obvious spots.
With zero hyperbole, I can honestly say that this is one of my saddest days as a videogame player. Nice job, Namco. I can only imagine how good this game might have been if it were given more care and attention, and I know there are lot more people than just myself waiting on patches to help the situation...but considering this is a re-release, I won't get my hopes up. Especially so after you've raised them with the mere announcement that one of my absolute favorite games was returning, better than ever before.
Next time, if there even is a next time, try actually focusing a little more on the "better" part.
What I need to know is this - who would be likely to come to a Dtoid community weekend event in Florida during the late spring into full-blown summer?
A few of us are trying to kick around ideas down in the forums (which you should totally join and discuss things just like this over there) and we need to know how many people would be interested in coming. We want to throw the best videogame party imaginable over the course of a weekend, and we really need to gauge interest in how many people would ABSOLUTELY, MOST DEFINITELY SHOW UP AND NOT BAIL OUT AT THE LAST MINUTE, among other things.
So, anyone in the area up for this? Everyone's invited, but you'll have to make the trip, so closer is better unless you've got the cash to do whatever you want, when you want - at which point, you should TOTALLY pay for this, anonymous rich Dtoid benefactor! Think of what good you'll do for the community!
NARP's used to be a really big thing here, and I think they need to make a comeback. A real-life meet and greet with your like-minded neighbors is never a bad idea, so comment, or better yet - join the actual conversation.
Now, this is worrisome on multiple levels - why on Earth would a game that just finished selling a BILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE in a mere seventy-two hours need further monetization? I don't care about what your server costs are, or the $250M dev budget that went into it, the game has already broken every record in every book that has ever been written, and still, they're planning to milk players by using real money to buy game money? I was always wondering why money was so goddamn scarce - now we might have found out why, and the reason is more than a little sinister considering what the game has already grossed in profit alone.
Secondarily, better cars, armor, guns, hangouts, they'll all be bought with this in-game currency, which means that the people who can afford to drop more real money into the game will have a distinct and unfair advantage, which will risk leaving people who are actually wanting to play the game outright in the cold against overwhelming opposition or far more powerful teams / elements simply because they could afford it in real life. This basically breaks the community before it even solidifies.
Also - if you kill a player in GTAO, and they drop money they purchased with real funds, and you collect that money, you're stealing their actual money. That's pretty heavy territory.
I don't know if this is true or not. I don't know if this is how it will actually work. But all I can say is this: if it is the case, Rockstar done fucked up. BAD. And people need to flip their shit over it if this is true, because they already became the most successful videogame publisher of all time, and those sales are still climbing. There's no motherfucking reason to do this to customers who shelled out that much money.
You give me a free iOS app, it's fun, you want to drop $5 on it, that's one thing - that's their entire profit margin. Applying this ethos to games that cost $60 or more, however...that's just fucking deplorable. I pray to every god in the book that this ain't the case, because this sets a bad example for the rest of the industry. For a game that makes a billion dollars in gross sales in less than half a motherfucking week to sell in-game money piecemeal for real-world cash like a game that cost a hundred-thousandth of the money to develop, that's just flat-out wrong.
See, here's my logical quandary: attach rates don't mean shit unless it's a first party-title on their platform. You're not looking for attach rates in third-party development and publishing, just pure sales. Attach rates aren't an indicator of success at all, because you can hit a 50% attach rate on a hundred consoles and fail miserably, as opposed to only hitting a 10% attach rate on ten thousand consoles and it being a much greater success story.
You make a game. In this argumentative case, it's SoulCalibur II HD Edition.
You have the choice of selling it on three consoles:
You can do the port work for the 360, with a seventy-five million install base. You can do another port for the PS3, with the same install base of seventy-five million. You can do a third with the Wii U, which only has a current install base of around six million. Now, true to the title of this blog post, let's crunch some numbers and see what we get when we take a closer look at gross hypothetical numbers.
Let's say that the third is a wild success, and one quarter of those system owners buy it. That's a 25% attach rate. Now, let's say that the consoles with the larger install bases sell one tenth (10%) on the 360, and one twelfth (12%) on the PS3.
That means that the game is selling more than twice as well on the Wii U than it is on the other two systems, and one out of every four system owners is picking up this game. This also assumes that over 10 percent of all console owners will buy this game, and while it's incredibly unrealistic to assume this would be the case, for the sake of scenario let's go with it and see what we come up with.
Wii U: One million, five hundred thousand copies.
360: Seven million, five hundred thousand copies.
PS3: Nine million copies.
That's eighteen million copies in total. That is insane success for a digital title, especially for a ten-year old fighting game given a facelift and online play.
But the question remains: will one quarter of all Wii U owners actually buy this game? Digitally? I highly doubt it (and I also doubt the success rate on the other two consoles as well), so skew those numbers to a more realistic and less generous level of success. Let's assume that the Wii U has the largest take yet again, and the other two consoles are getting the crap beaten out of them in terms of that all-powerful "attach rate."
Let's set the bar here:
Wii U @ 13%: Seven hundred and eighty thousand copies sold.
360 @ 5%: Three million, seven hundred and fifty thousand copies sold.
PS3 @ 7%: Five million, two hundred and fifty thousand copies sold.
So, let's add up the total of the PS3 and 360, and compare that to the Wii U, since both of their attach rates by themselves don't crack double-digits, and when combined don't equal the Wii U's singular take.
Nine million copies sold. Versus 780,000. That's not even one tenth, and those are still incredible, fantastic, wildly successful numbers to be posting. So, please understand that when this game drops, it's probably not going to sell nine million copies off the bat. It will probably sell a fifth of that.
And you can go ahead and apply the "fifth of that" rule to the Wii U version, as well. Considering the development costs to make that happen, what soft of profit margin do you think there is to be made on such an expenditure?
Be honest, now. Don't let your love for a manufacturer tint your perspective.
Why go through the work of coding and working with old assets to make a product that may not be worth the expenditure? I mean, sure, if the other two are done and you can just work on it to complete the set, then yeah, why not? But looking at the sheer numbers makes for a pretty compelling argument to do the exact opposite. If the Wii U had a ten-to-fifteen million unit install base, I could see this being a thing. But as of now, there's simply not enough there to warrant splitting attention span away from the other two system versions, considering that there's a vastly larger amount of money to be made by just focusing on those two platforms.
Attach rates mean absolutely nothing at all when the install bases are this disparate. And they're not going to help anyone but the system manufacturers, which while it can indirectly help third-party publishers, it's not a requirement for them to move systems. This ain't difficult math to do, and I hope this has shone some light on what the software sales business actually looks at from a third-party point-of-view. Please take a cue from me and do the math yourself sometime.
Also, if you can find a better source to use than VGChartz, I'd really appreciate it if you'd fill me in on that. I'm at a loss for the internet being good to me like that.