
|
|
|
The stoic soldier, with gun pointed down... walking away from a hazy wartorn backdrop. There are too many shooter games. North Americans are obsessed with their stupid FPS games. AAA games are all becoming FPS games. FPS games are all in shades of gray or brown... they're all about war... they're boring... they're all the same. FPS games are ruining gaming! I see these statements littered through the comments, and frankly, it pisses me off . Usually the person making the statement has not played a lot of FPS games and their only exposure to the shooter concept is aiming for the toilet bowl... and probably missing. Shooter games involve shooting... and that similarity extends through the genre in the same way that RPG games have quests, or that platformers involve moving, jumping, exploding or rolling from one platform to another, or that fighter games involve mashing some buttons to pull off combos. As with any genre, when one game become inordinately successful, others unfortunately seek to copy it. How many Mario clones are there out there? Why are many JRPG games all similar in some way to Final Fantasy? Why does Bayonetta seem like Dante with boobs? Why do Two Worlds 2, Divinity 2, Dragon Age and Fable all seem suspiciously similar to Oblivion? Yes, the incredible commercial success of the Call of Duty series has had an impact, but this has always happened in gaming. Ideas are often stolen and used as a genre of games grows, evolves and changes.
Sometimes we see the back of the stoic soldier... walking into a hazy, wartorn backdrop. First off, games like Portal, Borderlands, Half Life, Bioshock and Fallout 3 are all FPS games. They all involve shooting from the first person perspective. Secondly, even among the "typical" war based FPS games there are huge differences. I realize that people generally tend to have a problem with the second part... the war based "realistic" shooters, so I'll restrict myself to discussing those. Let's look at the single player element. FPS games tend to borrow from a variety of other genres which often makes them all a little different and keeps them interesting. Most tend to have a convoluted story of sort, and yes, the story is usually shitty and often involves Russians or some random terrorist group, not unlike the usual crappy RPG story line of save the Kingdom. Many even involve a quest structure, like Far Cry 2 where the game is very much like a WRPG with a main quest and optional side quests in a fairly open world. The only real difference between Far Cry 2 and Oblivion is that there are guns and jeeps in Far Cry 2 instead of horses and swords. Other FPS campaigns include racing elements, vehicle sequences, and boss battles. These are very similar to boss battles in other genres - a boss or mini-boss with special powers and you must figure out their weakness through trial and error. They require the same persistence and skill to defeat, although the boss isn't always a specific person - sometimes it's a large group, or a new class of enemy with a specific weapon, a stealth section to get through without being spotted, or sometimes it's a large creature or vehicle. Just like most RPG games, conquering a mini-boss or boss often unlocks a new skill or weapon or alternatively you are given a new weapon/power that must be used to defeat this boss. Many FPS games are based on real-world weaponry, but others like Halo, or Resistance: Fall of Man are based on incredibly fun and imaginative weapons - sniper rifles that can slow down time, bubble shields, or a gun that can shoot through walls. In some FPS games you are alone, in others like Rainbow Six you have a "party" or squad that you can control. In still others, like sections of Modern Warfare, you follow the lead of another character who gives you specific instructions, and in Battlefield: Bad Company you had a hilarious group of A.I. sidekicks that often made me laugh with their humour. My main point is that FPS single player games are NOT all the same. They are not even all in shades of grey and brown. While they tend towards a more realistic look, I think that the colors of Resistance 2 were closer to a Ratchet and Clank-ish colorful world, than the sepia tones of the first Resistance game. Far Cry 2's jungle areas were alive with bright greens and colorful flowers. While the single player campaign portions of most FPS games have quite a wide variety of styles, and lean more towards the "adventure" genre, many gamers tend to buy FPS games, not for the campaign, but more for the online portion. Again, these games may seem to be all the same to the view of a more casual outside viewpoint, but they simply aren't any more similar than the platforming in Mario when compared with Super Meat Boy.
Sometimes the soldier is even pointing his gun... against a hazy, wartorn backdrop! In general, FPS gamers are not attracted to these games because they are violent sociopaths who want to kill (well, maybe a few of us are), they are attracted to these games for the same reason that MMO's are so addictive - it's the social aspect. The game is continually changing depending on who is on your own team and who is on the opposing team. Clans form and people gather together to share a social evening of chatting and teabagging some opposing team. Like MMO's, FPS games also tend to incorporate the hook of "leveling up". There are new ranks, or guns, or classes to be unlocked. For the money spent on a game, FPS online games tend to offer value... hundreds of hours of value. Yes, most have similar modes. There is deathmatch, team deathmatch and then various objective based modes. No, on closer examination they are NOT even remotely the same. Some are team based games requiring team cooperation in order to win the match (MAG), others are squad based (Battlefield) and others are more individual, where players play mostly on their own for killstreaks and a high score (COD). Additionally there are co-op games like Left for Dead or Resistance 2 which are again similar to MMO's where members group up to take on a quest against A.I. Some FPS games are "twitch shooters" or reactive games that are extremely fast paced like Halo and other arena style shooters, while others are proactive - slower and more strategy based like SOCOM. There are even some FPS games where a high score is not at all based on kills, but can be based on points gained by reviving teammates and repairing team assets. Playing each of these differing game types within the FPS genre requires a substantial shift in how you play. Those used to getting high killstreaks in COD will often find themselves placing last in MAG games because they're not running with their squad getting objective points, revive points or repair points. Those used to using vehicles merely as a form of transportation in MAG will be reviled in Battlefield or Homefront where the use of vehicles is more key to decimating the opposing forces, and using a tank as a taxi to the front lines is a waste of a team asset. In Killzone, the choice of class is often key, not just to a team's win or loss, but also your personal points within a game. There are many variations of FPS games and they can't all be played in the same manner. In conclusion, before you ever type the words "FPS games are all the same" please don't make an idiot of yourself. There is a reason that FPS games are so popular, there is a reason that a lot of developers create new FPS games - the reason is because they are not all the same. The genre is growing and evolving. In addition to RPG and MMO elements, we are increasingly seeing RTS elements also entering into the category of FPS games. There is room for growth not only in gameplay, but also in social elements. There is a large variety of single player and multiplayer forms of FPS games, creating a vast genre. For fans of the genre there are nuances and substantial differences to the games. Yes, there are lots of sequels in the genre... but who can complain about FPS sequels while they're playing Final Fantasy XIII, Mega Man 9 or the most recent Pokemon, Mario or Madden game. Any genre looks somewhat the same at first glance, that's what makes them part of the same group, but if you think FPS games are "all the same"... then you either don't play them - or you're playing them wrong! ... or maybe you're just judging the book by it's cover, cause yeah, I'll agree that the box art on a lot of FPS games is pretty similar! LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
|
Comment with FacebookClick connect and comment instantly! |
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds |
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

Follow
RSS
Contact
So we're constantly seeing the same commercials, ads, previews, reviews, and articles about FPS games, creating the illusion that all FPS games are the same, when in reality, we have terms like Mario clone and Zelda clone.
Quite the conundrum really. I admit though, I feel a bit burned by the COD franchise, but I really shouldn't judge other shooters because of that.
This all coming from a fighting game fan which can just as easily be accused of everything above as well.
War never changes.
Id rather dudebro it up with my bros in an FPS than talk shop about JRPGs.
Fantastic Blog!
One trend I am hoping goes away for good and has already started is getting rid of the maximum number of guns you can carry with you and Im very happy to hear that Resistance 3 is leading the charge in that regard
@Andy... yeah, I guess the single soldier thing makes some sort of sense and I'm sure that there is a bit of a marketing thing in trying to create somewhat similar boxart to a well selling game.
@DimmJed... war never changes... and neither do RPG's or fighting games, etc. etc. :)
@Niero... they sell for a reason though and I think a lot of the reason is to do with being a social experience. Hollywood boxoffice hits are movies most people see because they're usually "fun" experiences. They may not be deep or have social impact, but when you go with a group of friends, the fun is the more important part. Same goes for FPS games - it's a social experience where people often gather with the same people each night to play a constantly varying game. The games may all sort of look the same, but the nuances are there - which is why some sell well... and others bomb.
@Dimmujed... I just got my Xbox this year, so I haven't played Shadowrun. :(
@Randombullseye... LOL! I'm not sure if you liked the blog or didn't read it and just wanted to say something nice! :)
@de5gravity... yeah, when I was doing the blog and looking for pictures I started to notice a trend! It was pretty funny when I was arguing that FPS games are not all the same - but I guess I can concede that the box art tends toward that sameness!
@Epic... a lot of the front page writers don't get paid... and frankly, if I'm gonna write for free then I would just as soon be a bit of a lazy writer and write in the c-blogs and not worry so much about that grammar, punctuation and writing stuff! :)
In terms of "FPS talk" though, I have to admit that very few if any websites seem to do proper reviews of FPS games. The infrastructure is just as important as the graphics or sound. The clan or group functions, the voice chat (team chat, squad chat), the server structure (matchmaking or server browser), the team balancing... sometimes these issues are touched on, but often don't really arise until after a game is out for a week or two. New FPS games almost need a "releaseview".. a review done after the game is out.
@zombieNinja... FPS games are changing... the co-op aspect is relatively new and games like Homefront changed up how vehicles are acquired/used. There are similarities, but the FPS genre is actually quite diverse and it's continuing to grow and evolve.
@mada7... it's difficult in modern warfare games to differentiate known weapons too much, which is why there are FPS games like Resistance which have some fantastically fun weapons! Increasingly they seem to be using perks/rank ups to allow people to customize/change their guns, though for the same of "realism" there will always be some restricitons.
In an industry where so much more could be done with games, FPS are the lowest form of games now.
The moronic fanbase isn't helping either.
This seems personal after being harrassed by idiot clerks, bro gamers and seeing good games
overtaken and sell badly to these FPS games.
And don't forget the horror FPS genre that is starting to getting bigger, with Metro 2033 and Amnesia: The Dark Descent... and the freaking head crab village part from Half life 2, god dammit i hated that part!
But that's just me, obviously. I do like FPS games, such as Borderlands and Team Fortress 2. I just don't care about the ones that deal exclusively with war, which happens to be a lot of them. War is one of my least favorite aspects of humanity, so I'm usually immediately turned off by the topic, and it's definitely not something that I would like to occupy my free time with, even if it's just a game.
Oh wow, another retro platformer. There's so much else to plunder from the 90's but indie devs go for the easily indentifiable nostalgia aspect, sold on post-modern irony. Cynically, its unprogressive and cheap. I don't think it helps that gaming blogs push these games like they were second comings, either (and giving a voice to some undeserving people in the process).
That said, yeah, I am a little tired of looking down the iron sights. I think it all went wrong when they simulated war, but stripped the tactics from it. There's some really game breaking when you're required to play soldier in a scripted event, but end up standing in all the wrong spots.
Once the tactics of SWAT3 & 4 and Rainbow Six 1-3 went out, in favour of "by the hand" cinematic setpieces, the genre hit a capitalist/creative dead end. Nothing wrong with creating set-pieces, but without the casual interest, you're up shit creek without a paddle. It is rather depressing how money is dominating design decisions nowadays on both ends of the spectrum.
Developers really need to make more games like Operation Flashpoint more prominent. The die-hards hate the Codemaster sequels, Dragon Rising and Red River, but they were decent introductions into a deeper approach to FPS gaming. Ubisoft seem to have the right idea with the Tom Clancy franchise, but they never live up to expectations.
Hell, I don't even think Half Life 2 really lived up to the original and its expansions, but that's a whole different story.
Also, the relatively new guy Coincidental Irony needs to read this. I'm starting to think he has a vendetta against shooters.
You say that all the "Zelda clones", RGP's, etc. are similar as well. That is true. But how many Zelda clones have come out recently? I can think of one that's going to be released in just a while, but that happens to be an actual Zelda game.
If you compare that too FPS's (and you may narrow it down to war-based shooters) there is simply a lot more coming out around the same time. That causes me, and probably others too, to respond "What, again!?"
I remember just a couple of years ago. Modern Warfare came out, and was followed up by World at War and Modern Warfare 2. I literally missed any and all coverage of World at War, because before I realized that it was out MW2 was already well on it's way. Compare that to the wait between Zelda games, and I think it's easy to understand why people get tired of shooters, but not RPGs or other games.
But I admit that I am biased, because I don't really have any interest in such games to begin with. I'm with bbain on this one. The overly serious war-based shooter I'll pass by without a second thought. Shooters I liked were Team Fortress, Portal (which I wouldn't count as pure FPS, but you seem to, so there you go :P), Painkiller and others that don't take themselves so seriously. Those are the ones that, to me, stand out from the crowd and manage to grab my interest. Others...not so much.
I’m not mad about FPS games but I’d never write them all off, that would be incredibly close minded. The core mechanics don’t really do much for me, I’ve got no interest in RAGE and I’m going to pass on Battlefield and MW3, but I can’t wait for Bioshock Infinite, basically if it does anything besides just shooting people I’m game.
That said, I still wish we could more original backdrops to most FPS games rather than just WAR/Post Apocalyptic setting. I want more stuff like XII and Red Steel 2.
I understand what these shooters are doing to innovate in gameplay, but it takes a concerned effort on the player to bring them to that point. Booting up a copy of MW3/BF3/SOCOM won't give players an immediate sense of differentiation. They are like onions. You just keep peeling and there always is new onion to find until you've peeled it and the next onion comes for you to start peeling.
Now I don't lump all shooters in together as the same because that's asinine. These developers create vastly different product that's noticeable even in the way your character walks and shoots. However, people seem to shed military shooters like Madden players do. New gimmicks seem to propel people to the new iteration and the last is forgotten.
This is something we only see in these select few genres and I think it rubs people the wrong way. Fighting fans may shed their game of choice, but if Street Fighter 2 HD Remix, Marvel vs Capcom 2 and other games in the genre have proved, there is always a special place for people to keep coming back to said game.
I can only say that of 2 games in the FPS world. Counter-Strike and Team Fortress 2 (and that's mostly Valves masterful manipulation of it). That's it. FPS war games seem to replace themselves without a look back. They are a hot then not industry and it's very healthy as it's consumer base is always able to gravitate to something new. However, I might lump them all together as one big blur of shooter.
It's almost the exact opposite of the original shooters like Space Invaders and the like. Gradius today will still be remembered with great inflection. You can't really say that with many of the FPS games now. Though now that I look at it, everybody lumps shmups together in the same way.
These games aren't a huge part of me, so I'm not able to gauge the games well. This is just an outsiders opinion. I think the all shooters are the same mentality might be more of a conditioned response from the love em and leave em attitude of many within the genre.
I see it as when people claim that there are no good, traditional Wii games: in reality there are loads, but when all people see on the shelves is shovelware and mini-game collections (and most of what is covered in the press is downports or spin-offs), I can understand how it feels like there's nothing else, even when that's far from the case.
Bang on. The UI of an FPS can make or break it. I've been bagging on BF3 for a bit now and a large potion of the bile is because of the games terrible UI. Its too difficult to change settings, teams, gear, get in squads with friends, ect. It is a real deal breaker, and it is a point that should be focused on more in reviews.
Incidentally, I've wanted to see post-launch reviews for awhile now. Like a month after an FPS, MMO, or even a fighting game has been release. Just a little update on the game, how the community is going, balance issues, sever issues, ect. Granted, I can understand why most outlets wouldn't bother. Why waste time/money on a point of interest review on a game that isn't super-hot anymore? It would make for a great C-Blog series though.
I dislike shooters because they're really nothing special. Shoot the other guy or die.
Like Jonathan Holmes said, they're lacking imagination where there's a lot can be had
in gaming. And for some insane reason its popular. Everyone is playing them.
People who aren't gamers are into them. And as a result, we have a generation of gamers weaned
on FPS and that's all they'll ever play. They won't care about a new and innovative title,
just the next regurgitated release of COD or whatever.
This kills me as a gamer because it will become the standard and creativity will be sidelined
All for that blockbuster gaming dollar.
Handy and bbain already said what I would have said. I'll just add that the Metroid Prime series, Half-Life 2, and Red Steel 2 are some of my favorites. Also I played a ton of the co-op Halo 1 & 2 campaign. I've never been one for death-match (because I suck), but I'm always up for a game of local co-op in story mode.
Sissors... yeah, a LOT of great single player games in the genre. I have a weakness for the co-op campaign of the first Resistance game because of the awesome fun weapons... especially the sapper which shoots toxic bubbles... I used to love leading enemies to a bubble trap!
@Coincidental Irony... if you think FPS games are "shoot the other guy or die" then you're most definitely playing them wrong. I've gotten MVP status in MAG (top 3 in a platoon of 128 players) without a single kill - mostly repairing and reviviing teammates. In Homefront I loved getting spotter points with my little parrot helicopter bot. In Warhawk (a third person shooter) I loved sneaking past the enemy and taking the objective for huge points - without killing anyone. In many shooter games, killing the other players is an option and there are often strategic alternatives. You're the type of person I wrote this for... you don't seem to have played a lot of recent FPS games... or you're simply playing them wrong if you're playing them all the same. Simply put, you look silly when you say that "FPS games are all the same" and you look uneducated - as a gamer.
@Ramm... awesome slow clap gif!!!
@Wrenchfarm... post launch reviews... yeah, I would love to see more of these and the c-blogs may well be the place to do them.
@Tubatic.. COD really did get a lot of stuff right. I'm not personally a fan of the online play, but they did make it easy to either just jump into a game or alternatively play a game with a group of friends. The infrasture was basic, but very solid. I wish more games had copied that aspect rather than the actual gameplay aspects!
@Red... LMAO!! Red Faction did it FIRST!!! (and he's even got the arm pump thing going on!)
@zozmal... it's good to get away from any genre after awhile. I tend to play a WRPG game on the side of whatever shooter game I might be playing and after playing Two Worlds 2, then Fallout: New Vegas and now Divinity 2 - really, it's pretty clear that most any genre has it's strong similarities!
@Xander... yeah, it's the over generalizations. Right now there is a lot of copying of COD's esthetics, but that's still confined to only a small number of games, but unfortunately they are the ones that get all the press and hype.
@manasteel... FPS war games do tend to have fairly short lives, but that's mostly the marketing... there are still people that play the earlier games and in fact some people still prefer to play some of the earlier COD games for online play rather than the newest iteration. MAG is over 2 years old now and I still play it, and Warhawk must be over 4 years old now and people definitely still play Warhawk. I tend to think of shmups as being pretty much all the same, but that's because I don't play them much... which goes to my argument that for fans of a genre there are differences that they can see because they play the games. The same holds true for FPS games.
@Wolfy-Boey... yeah, there are actually some really great single player FPS games - the fallout series and Borderlands being two of my favorites because of the mix of FPS and RPG elements. The COD campaigns are also quite good.. with various gaming elements mixed in. I think that the Resistance series with it's alternative history/sci fi background was a fun game to play for the campaigns.
@Handy... Bioshock Infinite... YES! I'm also super anticipating Starhawk which is a third person shooter, but the RTS elements have me quite excited!
@Shadeof light... there are a fair number of them and only a handful seem to get a ton of hype - and they are all similar (COD/Battlefield in particular) but the genre is popular for a reason... mostly that people get their money's worth for a game (hundreds of hours as opposed to a 10 hour game) and the social aspect is also a big draw. If a game... any game... can build up a solid online community, people will often stay with the game because of the people. Maybe this is the lesson more developers should take from the success of FPS games. Two worlds 2 did have a fun online element and it could have built up a really solid community, but it was under-realized and still a bit of a tacked on affair.
@Master Snake... yeah, he is one of those annoying "FPS games are all the same" people... but as I noted, he just looks uneducated when he says that.
@Stevil... yeah, the retro platformer thing seems over done to me too, but then again I've never been a fan of platformers. From the outside looking in, any genre does often seem like they are "all the same". In regards to war games... I think that Starhawk with the RTS elements looks like it will be strongly tactical. Mag is also that way but the unfortunate thing about both games is that they have a fairly high learning curve. I think that for single player FPS games, the MMO/RPG leanings may eventually take it in a new and different direction - one I would be excited to see.
@bbain... the subject of war is unfortunately fraught with so many political ramifications that it has to be watered down to fantasy scenarios involving russians or terrorists. It's a shame that deeper issues can't be examined in games, but a game where we played as any opposing view to the current government propoganda would likely never see the light of day. Just as with movies, "good" war based plots are hard to pull off, but it would eventually be nice to see someone try.
@Henriquegds... excellent point!! Yeah, the horror FPS genre is another whole subset... and an exciting and fun one!
@Coincidental Irony ... again... good games?... like Bioshock or Portal or Borderlands?
@mada... I too tend to prefer games that slide away from the "realism" aspect and incorporate a little more of the "fun" aspect. Resistance was a start and hopefully more games will come along to build on that basis.
@Red... Oh noes!! Fist pump has been done! LOL!
Thanks all for the comments!
OR
An 'obviously western culture' mother dressed in frumpy clothing scowling with her hands on her hips with a skeptical frown on here face.
You're right about the social aspect though - I love playing Team Fortress 2 or Black Ops (especially Zombies) with my high school friends.
And this is without even getting into stories and preference in that.
@Elsa
I loved using the Parrot in Homefront, my favorite thing to do was get enough kp for parrot and uav, then go around detecting and annoying people. I was kicked of a game once "for hacking" because I kept spotting three snipers looking out of a window that never bothered to look above them.
Uneducated? I think not. I have been playing more classic and vintage games in addition to
modern games, so i really have to disagree with you there. You probably
saying that because FPS shooters are your favorite genre.
I find it unappealing and bland. Even Japan, the mecca for gaming has not
embraced FPS and for good reason. It isn't allowing the developers to be creative
and imaginative with the genre.
Jonathan Holmes recently made a blog about how he doesn't like the FPS genre.
Would you call him an uneducated and silly gamer?
It's fine that you don't like the genre... I don't like classic or vintage games. I'm 49 years old and played many of those those games when they were new and I just don't have a desire to re-play them again. In another 10 or 20 years COD: Modern Warfare will likely be regarded as a classic game. I still likely won't re-play the game.
I have no issue with you not liking the genre, we all dislike particular genres - it's that you infer that the genre itself is bad in some way and that the people who like the genre aren't "real" gamers. We are lucky to live in a time where there are so many genres and so many games that we are all lucky enough to find something we can like. It's not uneducated to dislike a genre, but it IS uneducated to infer someone who does like the genre is not a gamer.
(and in regard to Japanese gamers, they just recently are discovering FPS games. We often play with them on MAG where there are a couple of big Japanese clans and many of them are very, very good! It's still something a bit new for them, but give it a few years and if you get up very early in the morning and log on to an FPS game, you'll likely find more and more Japanese gamers there.)
@Knivy... wonderfully said! So many great games you mentioned (and Homefront had so many great ideas... the parrot was indeed totally awesome!)
@naveenwf... playing with friends really does make a game so much more fun. For me, most of my love of FPS games comes from the social aspect of meeting people and finding a great group of friends to play with.
@Kaggen... yeah, I laughed like hell when I started seeing all the similarities in the cover art! :)
@monkey... LOL! I vote for the mom cover!
I find it funny that you criticize the FPS "moronic fanbase" for focusing their attention on the MWs and BFs and ignoring other games, when you're doing the same by judging the entire genre just based on the popular ones.
I can see where FPS detractors might have a case when looking solely at the setting these games takes place and between who the fight is happening, but yeah, there is just some much variety among shooters now that you can easily find one to match your tastes no matter the gamer. Developers do need to have more confidence to try and make their games stand out a bit more but I'm totally fine with the games I'm playing right now. Also, first person shooters have been found to [ur=http://www.parentcentral.ca/parent/familyhealth/article/933710--violent-videogames-may-boost-brain-power-say-researchers]boost brain activity (among several other benefits)[/url] more than any other type of video game, including those brain training games that people were eating up, so suck it haters!! :P
And I never realized how similar the boxarts were! That's hilarious!!
Man, it's been awhile since I've BBCode-failed haha!!
If you take a look at a game like prey 2 and even the syndicate trailer, it sort of makes you realize how far the fps has come, due to first person melee games, and THE first person platformer. I recommend everyone give prey 2 a look.
I never considered myself a big fps fan, but the genre is doing great things right now, so what if i'm not crazy into battlefield or cod(though i think i could enjoy battlefield if i gave it a shot), when do you ever like every game in a genre?
@Fr33Kye... yeah, there are lots of really great games in the genre... the modern military shooter really makes up only a very small number of the games and there are so many other different and great games out there (I too really enjoy the Bioshock series and can't wait for Infinite!)
The most simplistic game is "pow pow I got you first, so now you lie down and die really good." You don't need gripping narrative or emotional ressonance for that to work, the whole point that kids have been playing the same game for 5,000 years means it is DAMN GOOD game play. That is why it works for video games too. Strip away what we THINK we need for a fps shooter to what it REALLY needs and you find it is pure & simple: A system that says, "Who got who first, and how cool can you play dead"...repeat ad-nuasuium.