Quantcast
Community Discussion: Blog by EdgyDude | Teh Bias: They Don’t Make’em Like They Used to AnymoreDestructoid
LIGHTS:  ON | OFF
surf dtoid with arrow keys

HOT GAMES
REVIEWS VIDEOS COMMUNITY FORUM SHOP

pc PS4 PS3 NEXT XBOX XBOX 360 WII U 3DS PS vita ANDROID APPLE

REMOVE ALL ADS?
Guaranteed contest entry?
A new video show?
Something else?

Vote in our membership poll

About
Player Profile
Follow me:
EdgyDude's sites
Badges
Following (29)  




Since the theme for this monthly musing was announced I’ve been thinking long and hard about the possible bias in gaming I could have (if any really, it's me we're talking about after all) and after excruciating effort I found a somewhat unexpected answer: the Wii, i know right? shocking! I’ll give you a few minutes to let the thought sink in… done? good, the thing is it was only after reading some interesting news, editorials and articles from both community members and editors I came to realize what is it that makes me so biased to that particular console: oldschool gaming values.

You see, as a guy that started gaming at the age of 6 with an Atari 2600 I’ve seen many changes come and go in the industry and while the majority have been technology related most of those were aimed at improving and add to the overall gaming experience and make better, more enjoyable and deep games, at least until this generation that is, from the cheap but faulty hardware of the X360 to Sony’s use of the PS3 to push the Bluray format with the consequence of a overblown price at the beginning of this gen most changes have been for the developers and hardware makers benefit at the expense of the consumer.

Multiplayer

We’re all aware by now of the “mediocre shoehorned multiplayer” syndrome even "AAA"games seem to suffer these days but the issue that seems to have passed unnoticed is the gradual vanishing of the local multiplayer option in favor of online multiplayer only (something that now seems will become standard to pay for), personally I find this unacceptable in more than one way, economically since now you need another console, copy of a game and internet connection for each player instead of an extra controller and in a technical way considering how much the “incredible processing power" of the HD twins is touted left and right by both fans, devs and hardware makers.


Not gonna happen

This is especially more obvious to someone that enjoyed dozens upon dozens of hours of Super Contra co-op and even more time than that on the Goldeneye multiplayer in crazy 4 player matches with his best friends two console generations ago (and that if things turn out well will get to do that all over again once more on the Wii).

Single Player Mode

Related to the previous point, a side effect of the unnecessarily excessive focus on multiplayer mode this gen has been the reduction of quality and length of the single player campaign in games, in the best case scenario this reduces or compromises the length and/or development, polish and quality of the main campaign, but in the worst case it completely crushes any good point the game could have had originally. In contrast the limited online support the Wii has compels most devs to choose focusing solely on main campaign mode. Ironically even with a solid single player campaign and the limited online support compared to X360/PS3 there are still instances where devs have made a real effort to balance the multiplayer component (offline or online)


Single Player mode done right

Online Capability

Now we come to the very defining feature of this generation (or in this post’s case the main problem), the ability of consoles to download content from the internet for various purposes such as upgrading it’s software to add features, buy/add new content to games, get patches to fix problems that went unnoticed during development and even offer a chance for smaller developer studios to display the results of their efforts in an equal ground to the big boys (shameless plug is shameless), all this aimed to enhance the gaming experience… or at least that was the intention, problem is this new feature in consoles has taken a generally negative twist in the various ways its used.

The system upgrades in the HD twins which are supposed to add or enhance features have turned into frequent, tedious, cumbersome chores (most likely due to poor coding) resulting in an extension of even 20 minutes from the insertion of a disc in the console and the start of the game, the increase of failure rates or even clumsily take away features instead of adding new ones, and while the Wii is certainly not exempt of this problem, it is also true that it is a far less common situation.

DLC began as an interesting idea to add value to a purchased game for additional fair price, and while it's true that some developers have followed that initiative it is much more common to see the concept twisted into a near rip-off situation where they shamelessly admit to removing content from full games to sell later as extras or charging for recycled content. I find it pretty ironic that what others consider a detrimental flaw or even an archaic design on the Wii is under my point of view a relief to my fears of buying a chopped game to be further nickel and dimed as a consumer later down the line.

The worst part is that not even what could be a saving grace on it's own of this feature, game fix patches, has been done properly or without taking a turn for the worse. The "buggy game" ratio during this gen seems to have drastically spiked, even development studios once know for their fine attention to detail and QA seem to have traded their "quality comes first" mentality for "let's release as is and issue a patch to fix things later", in some cases MUCH later. While in all honesty i have found myself really wanting this feature on certain occasions on the Wii, on the other hand i've also found it very satisfying that developers taking the route of laziness have been forced to bite the bullet and face the music for their unprofessional conduct.

Conclusion

So am i biased to the Wii?, don't even doubt it, but still after all the previously exposed reasons what i find mind boggling is how it gets so much hate in contrast to other consoles mostly based on being underpowered in comparison, sure all consoles have in the past have taken flak at some point for some reason, but to me its incomprehensible that people that call themselves "core gamers" and that enjoyed the wonders delivered in consoles like the PS2, Gamecube, Xbox, PS1, Dreamcast, N64, Snes, Genesis, Nes and Atari 2600 can be so blindly critical to what could perhaps be the last console to offer a similar to it's predecesors, wholesome, pro-consumer gaming experience, why do i say this? because i'm also not deceiving myself and while i would like to believe that Nintendo's next home console will keep everything that made the Wii awesome in my eyes, i too have to face the possibility that Nintendo being just another company no different than the rest will embrace the new way of doing business and will design it's next home console to resemble or add features from the X360/PS3 architecture in order to appeal more to the old market. So while some of you keep shouting about the coolness of your 1080p definition, humongous harddrive size, online matches and DLC on your HD console of choice i'm gonna be over there playing with my Wii and having fun in the exact same way i've done for the last 20 something years, because this might be the last console i have the chance to do that before becoming a nagging old man reminiscing about the old days when games were about mad fun and not a popularity contest between companies that only care about raising their profit margins at the expense of their customers.


You know kids, when i was young i played the greatest game ever on the Wii, Skyward Sword, that was a real fun, long, awesome game, not like these 3 hour, 80$, 2048p, cookie cutter bloodfests with dumb stories they make nowadays



Is this blog awesome? Vote it up!




Those who have come:



Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.

Legacy Comments (will be imported soon)


Great article, those are actually quite a few reasons I like Wii the best!
If I can't say something nice....
...don't say anything at all?

Do I win a prize for completing that for you?
Great article!!
When I saw that four-player mockup of Bulletstorm I was like YEEEEESSSSS! And then when I realized you had made the whole thing up I was like NOOOOOOOOOO!

Dick.
@rexwolf2, Toadofsky: thanks :)

@sheppy:

"First off, MK must have done something right because all of the shitty MK clones disappeared "

"This was the one creepy culture missing from this franchise... Furries"

"Jesus fuck, really? That kind of response from my comment> Goddam gamers are getting even more pathetic by the day. By the goddam day."

All straight from your post history, ya might wanna lead by example first, just sayin'.

@LawofThermalDynamics: You win a "Visionary Award (Level 1)" for seeing lame post attempt through a layer of "holier than thou".
Really enjoyed this blog. One of the best I've read recently. Although I find myself agree with virtually everything you state, so I'm sure my glowing evaluation of it is an ironic example of bias itself.

Also, so glad to see LKS pictured above. What an enjoyable little gem.
Posting histories are fun, because they lack context. Without context, it's just a snippet, a freeze frame, and hardly damning evidence. Here, allow me to explain my quotes...

MK sucks, supposedly. And all the people claim it's horrible and stupid and it's never been anything but the gore. My point is MK is great, relevant, and if all it had was the gore, all the shitty MK Clones (Timekillers, Way of the Warrior, Kasumi Ninja, etc) wouldn't have disappeared since a vast majority of them "outgored" MK. I mean one even had a scottish warrior launching fireballs from under his kilt!

Furries comment on BlazBlue... ever hear of trolling an old friend from the 'stiq? Jack of No Trades, like myself, got tired of what the Joystiq community has become, and came here. I decided to give him a little crap. He didn't respond, thus I just let it go.

The third is DEFINITELY without context. Let me clue you in. This was a Kinect vs Move thing. I stated of the two, Move has more interest from me because it's looking like it's targetting both casuals and cores, a crime we often accuse Wii of not doing. The reaction was, well, ignorant. It was essentially two people calling me an idiot and another going on a rant as if I just said Nintendo Wii was the worst console ever and has been known to rape dogs. My response was actually a reaction. A reaction that was at the blatant overreaction from retarded little console warriors.

But fine, if you want to be a twat about the whole thing, allow me to respond to your article. It's loaded with selective cynicism, common among gamers nowadays and one of the leading problems I see with gamers in general. Nobody is willing to just say, "I enjoy this game" anymore. They have to find validation from others, sales to back their opinions, references to other games to explain why they enjoy it, simply put, nobody thinks for themselves anymore. We've all become a generation of parrots mimmicking others thoughts and more importantly, incapable of simply sitting down and enjoying a game. We've become invested in which companies have sold out, which ones are staying true indie, and which ones represent who we are as a person that makes us unique while ignoring the fact that at least 500,000 more people, by proxy of owning said game, is just as unique as you in the same fashion. We've become the snobby record store employees of the digital age. And this article reeks of that.

For example, if the article was simply why you prefer the Wii with what is on there, that is one thing. But it's loaded with links to other peoples opinions repeated as though evidence, or more importantly, as argumentative support for your own opinion when it should, at it's core, just be your own opinion. The fact that you love the Wii is not even presented as a positive. Instead you love the Wii because PS360 suck, a point you make consistently throughout the whole affair. You cannot validate you love of a system without shitting on another and that, frankly, is where I feel the article fails. Which is why I made my overly obvious comment, "If you can't say something nice..."
Fair enough, i admit i did just a take a quick look at your post history for those but given your very original and epic wall of text answer you didn't do much better.

Funny, that you say that "Nobody is willing to just say, 'I enjoy this game' anymore.", cuz the reason i come here is precisely because one can just say whatever they think, love or feel, good or bad (within reason, trolls don't apply) about a game, system or concept without the avalanche of "YOU SUCK, THAT'S DUMB!" comments you see on other sites.

As for your complaints about the article all i can say is something i've come to learn and accept through my experiences in life:

You can't please everyone and if you manage to do it you probably won't be pleased with yourself.

I wrote this article the way i wanted it because it's my article, my particular bias and my particular style and opinions, the reason i tend to include links into my writing is:

a)As example or reference to a more detailed wording of to the idea i'm trying to express, not seeking validation.
b)because in my personal experience there's always someone that'll show up saying "BS that never happened" which ends up prompting me to search a link to show i'm not making stuff up, oh the irony that this time it's someone bitching about including them.

Again, if that bothers you i'm sorry, that's my way of doing things, if it annoys you that's your problem and while you're perfectly free to add your 2 cents, i'd expect someone that claims i'm acting like a "snobbish record store employee" to do better than that little bit of holier than thou one-liner you placed up there.

As for the "PS360 Suck" part, did you expect me to just talk about the changes without mentioning how they manifest in the other two?, am i supposed to hold back my opinion as to not hurt your opinion/feelings or the console's? should i perhaps have mentioned the changes and show a console under a shadow so as not to let it be know which one it was? Sorry, not gonna happen, good or bad it's what i want to say, i'll say and won't hold back, if i'm wrong i'm 99% sure someone that can disprove me will show up cuz that's also part of the reason i like it here, people that can actually offer valid, level headed, non-pseudo trollish reasons ALONG with clever sarcasm like Xzyliac, Magnalon and Qraze have done before to me, not just basic 13yo snide and name calling(hell even failblogs get incredibly better thought out sarcasm than what you offered) when that has happened i've accepted it and learned that i'm not always right, this time though it's not one of those, at least not by you.
And now, we're back to our regular program

@mrandydixon: LOL, guess i'm gonna have to start including some disclaimers in those.

@ctrain: well it's a "Teh Bias" article, so i guess it's ok this one time, and yeah LKS is very enjoyable in what little i have played so far (got sidetracked by Harry Hatsworth and the Puzzle Adventure on the DS, i'll get back to LKS soon, hopefully).

Back to Top
DLC   |   BEST Games of 2012   |   Best PC Games   |   Best PS3 Games   |   Best Xbox 360 Games   |   Best Wii U Games   |   Best 3DS Games




All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more