To appease my new friend BuckF1tches, here's a post you won't find on
PS3 Attitude... ;-)
Often times I find that I'm drawn to a particular story because I feel that, as a gamer, the balance of the story is wrong. It might be overly aggressive towards Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo and not give a balanced argument.
Of course because I am involved with a PS3 website, I tend to notice the anti-Sony stories first since they show up in my Google Alerts etc.
But I don't leap all over every story. Just the stories that really deserve a proper response.
And then along comes a commenter who says something like "trust a Sony fanboy to say that". They use it in the context of dismissing the entire counterpoint to the story by simply mentioning the word. After all, if you're a 'fanboy' then your opinion must count for nothing, right?
I'd like to think that by providing a proper, balanced viewpoint to a story it gives gamers the opportunity to think about things more broadly. I've said, time and time again, that lately with all the excellent games and announcement that have come around for all of the new platforms it is gamers in general that are winning. I've put my money on the PS3, but others have chosen to go elsewhere. And that is fine by me. Many of you have multiple platforms... I prefer to stick my investment in one place.
So - a call to all. Please stop saying the word 'fanboy' as if to simply dismiss the conversation. Think about what you're saying in response to a post or a story and then provide a balanced alternative viewpoint. Fanboyism is fine by me if that's what you like, but using the word fanboy instead of thinking of a proper response is just lazy and pointless.
And yes, I'm ready to ignore the obvious first comment to this post - I know it's coming.... go on, knock yourself out and say it! ;-)
had to do it
Proof: The second I see someone say "fanboy" in an argument, I start making fun of them.
I'm with the thought that it's like resorting to cursing madly to win an argument. It's the lowest form of argumentative skill to yell at someone until they can't yell back.
Wrote a post on fanboyism. Don't think anyone read it though. :(
Yeah, the fanboy argument can get old. Sometimes it needs to be said, though.
If someone says, "I can see why you feel that way, but I like this better", I don't consider them a fanboy.
If someone says, "SCREW YOU! THE 360 SUX AND SO DOES YUOR MOM AND I DID HER LAST NGIHT INT HE BUTT AND YOU DON"T KNOW ANYTHNIIGN CUZ YOU AERWE A STUPID MORON AND I HATE YOU!!", I consider them a fanboy.
Then there are those in the middle, but basically as long as they are reasonable and avoid verbal abuse I'm OK with just about anybody.
But thankfully I'm not the only one out here that wishes these people would simply go play in traffic; the latest article with responses (from these twits) about a joke review put up by Acetone, like a week ago, which was a decently funny review I might add.
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/weekend-web/bioshock-truthmedia-flames.php
I'm saying they don't use it as an argument winner, but as an argument 'invalidator' - as if by calling the writer a fanboy invalidates that person's point of view. Of course, calling someone a fanboy does not win any arguments, hence the title of the post...