HANDY Although both have great points. The greatest problem is that games still put sex for the sake of having sex in their games. I do think it will get better. Take the Persona series for example. When you share a 'tender moment' with Yukari or Mitsuru, you had sex with them. But you had a long way before this moment. The sex scene from Heavy Rain is horrible, and no sane person would do it at that moment. The fact that someone had sex does not makes this someone mature. The same goes for games. The day developers stop shoehorning sex into games just to pretend they are mature, and start using sex as a natural event in the game, it is that games will be grow up.
HANDY Although both have great points. The greatest problem is that games still put sex for the sake of having sex in their games. I do think it will get better. Take the Persona series for example. When you share a 'tender moment' with Yukari or Mitsuru, you had sex with them. But you had a long way before this moment. The sex scene from Heavy Rain is horrible, and no sane person would do it at that moment. The fact that someone had sex does not makes this someone mature. The same goes for games. The day developers stop shoehorning sex into games just to pretend they are mature, and start using sex as a natural event in the game, it is that games will be grow up.
LAW
Sex is sex. Is there such a thing as graphic sex? It amazes me that the most natural thing in the world is look down upon. Like Law stated, sex has existed in every medium. Take a look at my name, why did I pick VenusInFurs? No, it's because of the cool song by The Velvet Underground, but for the novel of the same name; a story that's about a man who dreams of speaking to Venus about love, sex, fantasies, all while she wears furs.
Sex in games only shows one side of it: the child like curiosity of it. In other words, it's just about getting you hard, or showing you something hot. This is good and I support it to fullest, but maybe games can go further than some titillation. Maybe we can have a game that's like the Marques de Sades [1]120 Days of Sodom[/i]. Maybe we can have a game that examines sex and show how it can be use as a weapon.
Sex is something that we all do, and I've notice that people oppose to this in video games are naive in their thinking. What we need is more sex in games, actually, we need to see penetration in game. I need to see a dick going into a vagina to be fully satisfy with sex in games, then, and only then, is when we can finally stop talking about it.
Sex is something everyone enjoys, talks about, and dreams of. I'm tired of these pseud-intellectual gamers looking down on it just because they never had their dick sucked. It's not about being mature, it's about exploring new concepts. Every piece of art has use sex to its advantage, why can't games? Why can't we show individuals who want to fuck? Why can't we stop being children and admit: we like it. Not everything has to have meaning.
I raise my cock in defense to those against me!
"I like sex. I enjoy sex. Sex is something I'm interested in. I have it on my films for meaning and fun. Why are people so stuck up?"
- Gaspar Noe
Sex is sex. Is there such a thing as graphic sex? It amazes me that the most natural thing in the world is look down upon. Like Law stated, sex has existed in every medium. Take a look at my name, why did I pick VenusInFurs? No, it's because of the cool song by The Velvet Underground, but for the novel of the same name; a story that's about a man who dreams of speaking to Venus about love, sex, fantasies, all while she wears furs.
Sex in games only shows one side of it: the child like curiosity of it. In other words, it's just about getting you hard, or showing you something hot. This is good and I support it to fullest, but maybe games can go further than some titillation. Maybe we can have a game that's like the Marques de Sades [1]120 Days of Sodom[/i]. Maybe we can have a game that examines sex and show how it can be use as a weapon.
Sex is something that we all do, and I've notice that people oppose to this in video games are naive in their thinking. What we need is more sex in games, actually, we need to see penetration in game. I need to see a dick going into a vagina to be fully satisfy with sex in games, then, and only then, is when we can finally stop talking about it.
Sex is something everyone enjoys, talks about, and dreams of. I'm tired of these pseud-intellectual gamers looking down on it just because they never had their dick sucked. It's not about being mature, it's about exploring new concepts. Every piece of art has use sex to its advantage, why can't games? Why can't we show individuals who want to fuck? Why can't we stop being children and admit: we like it. Not everything has to have meaning.
I raise my cock in defense to those against me!
"I like sex. I enjoy sex. Sex is something I'm interested in. I have it on my films for meaning and fun. Why are people so stuck up?"
- Gaspar Noe
EDIT: I meant "It's not because of the cool song by the velvet underground." Also, I failed at the italics.
LAW
This is another close 50/50 one for me. Right now, sex in games is an embarrassment, but games can't limit themselves. Sure the sex is awkward right now, but shit..... it was when I started out too.
This is another close 50/50 one for me. Right now, sex in games is an embarrassment, but games can't limit themselves. Sure the sex is awkward right now, but shit..... it was when I started out too.
What do you mean I can't vote for Handy...This is rigged!!! > : (
I'm actually surprised to see how similar our arguments are and that the little differences ultimately put us on opposite sides.
Great argument Handy.
Loser gives the other a hand-job....hehehe I was re-reading old interviews. Remember yours? That was great.
I'm actually surprised to see how similar our arguments are and that the little differences ultimately put us on opposite sides.
Great argument Handy.
Loser gives the other a hand-job....hehehe I was re-reading old interviews. Remember yours? That was great.
LAW...Another tough one. But this time I'm going to suck it up and remember to vote because dammit, this topic is important to me. Sex is a very important aspect of life, and I feel that all crucial walks of life can and should be incorporated well into video games.
Also Bus, thanks for including this:
you voting should be based on the strength of the arguments set out by the contenders. Though your opinion may go some way towards forming your decision, do try to be as impartial as you can muster.
The how to's of voting are sometimes complicated in matters as personal as these.
you voting should be based on the strength of the arguments set out by the contenders. Though your opinion may go some way towards forming your decision, do try to be as impartial as you can muster.
The how to's of voting are sometimes complicated in matters as personal as these.
Handy
I wouldn't mind sex in videogames if it weren't for 4 things. Most games that feature sex put it as a selling point. That's just stupid. Usually they make you feel awkward, which is annoying, and you just end up wanting to skip it. Then they turn super-controversial, and I hear about it on Fox News 50 times a day, with asshole people whining about how videogames are crack. However, forth and mainly, I haven't ever felt that any videogame has provided sex as something that needed to be into the game, as if the story would have fallen apart. Simply saying that person a and person b had sex is enough, I haven't found a game that needs to show me the actual sex taking place.
Basically, if I wanted to see people having sex, I'd go to a porn site.
I wouldn't mind sex in videogames if it weren't for 4 things. Most games that feature sex put it as a selling point. That's just stupid. Usually they make you feel awkward, which is annoying, and you just end up wanting to skip it. Then they turn super-controversial, and I hear about it on Fox News 50 times a day, with asshole people whining about how videogames are crack. However, forth and mainly, I haven't ever felt that any videogame has provided sex as something that needed to be into the game, as if the story would have fallen apart. Simply saying that person a and person b had sex is enough, I haven't found a game that needs to show me the actual sex taking place.
Basically, if I wanted to see people having sex, I'd go to a porn site.
LAW
"sex exists in all forms of entertainment, be it literature, film, and music" If sex can play a positive role in those forms of media than why the hell not in video games?
"sex exists in all forms of entertainment, be it literature, film, and music" If sex can play a positive role in those forms of media than why the hell not in video games?
HANDY
I agree with Handy for the moment, but would willingly change my opinion as soon as the medium can thoughtfully and compellingly address sex instead of making it as shallowly mechanical as a button press during a quick-time event. Sex is much too sticky and dense of a thing to arbitrarily throw into a narrative; video game or otherwise.
Erogenous action and love aren't the same thing. Philosophically speaking, there are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_words_for_love. The one in question here, Eros, only represents a small part of the spectrum, and unless it is motivated by at least one of the other four, in my opinion it is the most banal and pathetic kind of love.
Go ahead and call me a prude. I am one, and then some, but you cannot deny that feeling more than an urge to screw something or someone is a good feeling. Remove affectation, friendship, and unconditional love from romance, and what do you get? I'm pretty sure that it isn't more than a stone's skip away from rape, as disgusting as that sound.
That's I can't take sex that often in video games. Without developing empathy for the characters involved, the act is shameless and ugly. I mean, even most pornography has the good taste to make the people involved not just physically attractive, but also simple enough to identify with and sometimes like. The same cannot usually said for video games.
Even though I am coming at this from my own perspective, it is [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love]hardly the only one[/url, let alone the most valid. Love is multifaceted, and refracts its luminance in a plethora of ways. In life and art, we should see hope and virtue in the kind that comes from the sun, and not a neon glare.
@Venus: The nine minute, single-shot, rape scene in Irreversible was so skin-scrawlingly disturbing and forceful, that I don't think I really want to know what Noe thinks about, or, more importantly, wants to share with me in regard to sex.
I agree with Handy for the moment, but would willingly change my opinion as soon as the medium can thoughtfully and compellingly address sex instead of making it as shallowly mechanical as a button press during a quick-time event. Sex is much too sticky and dense of a thing to arbitrarily throw into a narrative; video game or otherwise.
Erogenous action and love aren't the same thing. Philosophically speaking, there are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_words_for_love. The one in question here, Eros, only represents a small part of the spectrum, and unless it is motivated by at least one of the other four, in my opinion it is the most banal and pathetic kind of love.
Go ahead and call me a prude. I am one, and then some, but you cannot deny that feeling more than an urge to screw something or someone is a good feeling. Remove affectation, friendship, and unconditional love from romance, and what do you get? I'm pretty sure that it isn't more than a stone's skip away from rape, as disgusting as that sound.
That's I can't take sex that often in video games. Without developing empathy for the characters involved, the act is shameless and ugly. I mean, even most pornography has the good taste to make the people involved not just physically attractive, but also simple enough to identify with and sometimes like. The same cannot usually said for video games.
Even though I am coming at this from my own perspective, it is [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love]hardly the only one[/url, let alone the most valid. Love is multifaceted, and refracts its luminance in a plethora of ways. In life and art, we should see hope and virtue in the kind that comes from the sun, and not a neon glare.
@Venus: The nine minute, single-shot, rape scene in Irreversible was so skin-scrawlingly disturbing and forceful, that I don't think I really want to know what Noe thinks about, or, more importantly, wants to share with me in regard to sex.
The text for that URL was suppose to read 'four kinds of love' instead of just the address, but I fail at BBcode, so it is what it is.
@nipple
Im at the Moma responding to you here, so um sorry if I misspell something, or I dont make sense. Ihate usibg my phone.
If gaspar noe disturbed you with that scene, then my friend, he.accomplished his goal.
Why cant.we have.sex just.for.sex. Be real, man. Bad sex scens.are not uncomfortable, just silly.
Im sorry, but.your a prude. Are you sexually satisfied? Ive notice people who have this stance are.
Im at the Moma responding to you here, so um sorry if I misspell something, or I dont make sense. Ihate usibg my phone.
If gaspar noe disturbed you with that scene, then my friend, he.accomplished his goal.
Why cant.we have.sex just.for.sex. Be real, man. Bad sex scens.are not uncomfortable, just silly.
Im sorry, but.your a prude. Are you sexually satisfied? Ive notice people who have this stance are.
@False: Which is why we need to expand the definition of sex. Sex isn't and shouldn't be the mechanical pressing of a button. It should encompass a wider range of emotions and actions both positive and negative.
LAW
Handy doesn't address the actual proposition. I agree, sex scenes, by and large, are unnecessary, at least for the time being. However sex as a subject would be foolish to ignore.
I would like to participate in one of these sometime.
Handy doesn't address the actual proposition. I agree, sex scenes, by and large, are unnecessary, at least for the time being. However sex as a subject would be foolish to ignore.
I would like to participate in one of these sometime.
LAW
I still don't even get why this is such an issue, if even cartoons like Regular Show geared for kids can get away with sexual undertones (DUDETIME anyone?), but something like Mass Effect geared towards adults gets all this flak. And yes I understand the whole, "think of the children" spiel, and that's a parental issue. Let's do it right and maturely so this thing can end!
Two things: Ibuki, Tina, and Kasumi's titties in my face does not equate to sex. And sex in Mass Effect is nothing more than 10 gamer score.
I still don't even get why this is such an issue, if even cartoons like Regular Show geared for kids can get away with sexual undertones (DUDETIME anyone?), but something like Mass Effect geared towards adults gets all this flak. And yes I understand the whole, "think of the children" spiel, and that's a parental issue. Let's do it right and maturely so this thing can end!
Two things: Ibuki, Tina, and Kasumi's titties in my face does not equate to sex. And sex in Mass Effect is nothing more than 10 gamer score.
HANDY
We aren't talking about meaningful relationships or love here, we're talking about things like penetration and orgasm - neither of which have any place in video games, in my opinion.
We aren't talking about meaningful relationships or love here, we're talking about things like penetration and orgasm - neither of which have any place in video games, in my opinion.
@Venus: I regret the majority of sexual encounters that I have been in, and that includes some that I wasn't a willing participant in. Watching someone get raped on film, whether it is an act or not, isn't my idea of entertainment. I have been there, and I don't want to empathize because it is painful enough to know how something feels without being brutally subjected to feeling it all over again.
Noe is thought provoking to outsiders. To victims, he is just exploitive.
Noe is thought provoking to outsiders. To victims, he is just exploitive.
LAW
I guess both bring up the same problem, most videogames use sex in an awkward and sometimes even forced manner. But that really doesn't mean we should shy away from it. Even if it's only for entertainment value, afterall aren't videogames a form of entertainment?
@Venus
look up a movie called A Serbian film. I dare you to read the plot synopsis on wikipedia and not be disturbed.
I guess both bring up the same problem, most videogames use sex in an awkward and sometimes even forced manner. But that really doesn't mean we should shy away from it. Even if it's only for entertainment value, afterall aren't videogames a form of entertainment?
@Venus
look up a movie called A Serbian film. I dare you to read the plot synopsis on wikipedia and not be disturbed.
This is a tough one.
It would be easy to recite the proposition and vote according to my instinctive inclination. It would also be pointless and contrary to the nature of debate. I already know which way I lean; what matters is which leaning has the greater argument.
Handy's argument seems more than competant. However, I'm puzzled whether it holds water if we are to properly scrutonize the proposition. He admits at the end that his entire argument can be superceded by a high quality game.
Law's argument, on the other hand, understands a very particular perspective of sex that is completely and utterly seperable from the subject while deriving his premise on the assumption that sex is necessary to convey this or that emotion. VenusInFurs inadvertantly highlighted a discrepancy in Law's argument... something about holding a single-minded assumption on how sex affects us... but I can't quite verbalize it just yet.
I need to think about it more before I can make a decision.
It would be easy to recite the proposition and vote according to my instinctive inclination. It would also be pointless and contrary to the nature of debate. I already know which way I lean; what matters is which leaning has the greater argument.
Handy's argument seems more than competant. However, I'm puzzled whether it holds water if we are to properly scrutonize the proposition. He admits at the end that his entire argument can be superceded by a high quality game.
Law's argument, on the other hand, understands a very particular perspective of sex that is completely and utterly seperable from the subject while deriving his premise on the assumption that sex is necessary to convey this or that emotion. VenusInFurs inadvertantly highlighted a discrepancy in Law's argument... something about holding a single-minded assumption on how sex affects us... but I can't quite verbalize it just yet.
I need to think about it more before I can make a decision.
Byronic brings something up which I shied away from in my vote. Both seem to be giving the same argument, "you either do it right or don't it at all". I felt it was impossible to side with one of them when both had that same underlining message. I just picked Law because he truly seemed to try to argue that sex can have a positive affect on games. I'm sorry, but handy seems to contradict himself when he admits that Catherine could change his mind.
LAW Video games, as well as being awesomely good fun, can serve to reflect human nature, be that in a positive or negative aspect. Sex is a very general word that merely denoted the act, not the meaning behind it and making love can be as important a story device as rape when used maturely and with care. Sex is a part of human nature and I think it has an important part to play in video games.
My only issue with sex in games is how awkward they can be when they're badly animated, think Dragon Age: Origins. It was just cringe worthy but I still enjoyed its inclusion because it felt like a natural progression of the touching relationship of my character.
However, both sides have been represented fantastically, really good arguments from Handy aswell.
My only issue with sex in games is how awkward they can be when they're badly animated, think Dragon Age: Origins. It was just cringe worthy but I still enjoyed its inclusion because it felt like a natural progression of the touching relationship of my character.
However, both sides have been represented fantastically, really good arguments from Handy aswell.
@ intercept
Wha? But that’s exactly what I said.
@ Law
Low blow Law, low blow.
Heh heh, blow.
I’m glad such mature people like us are having this debate.
@ Byronic
I’d be more than happy if Catherine changed my mind on the subject. Far be it from me to tell developers to stop experimenting or trying new things. I just think there’s a microscopic amount of developers out there who fit into the cross section of having the balls to attempt it and the chops to pull it off.
@ everyone
Even my gut reaction was “Of course games should have sex!” but after I digested the topic for a while this is how I felt. Just to reiterate, I’m not against sex being in games as an event or subject matter, but having to watch, or worse, play the physical act itself, just doesn’t belong to me.
Wha? But that’s exactly what I said.
@ Law
Low blow Law, low blow.
Heh heh, blow.
I’m glad such mature people like us are having this debate.
@ Byronic
I’d be more than happy if Catherine changed my mind on the subject. Far be it from me to tell developers to stop experimenting or trying new things. I just think there’s a microscopic amount of developers out there who fit into the cross section of having the balls to attempt it and the chops to pull it off.
@ everyone
Even my gut reaction was “Of course games should have sex!” but after I digested the topic for a while this is how I felt. Just to reiterate, I’m not against sex being in games as an event or subject matter, but having to watch, or worse, play the physical act itself, just doesn’t belong to me.
@Handy: Yeah...I think the reason why this topic is divisive is because it's so open to interpretation. It doesn't even sound like you and I are debating on the same thing.
Also...we're the epitome of maturity....ha...sex...Tee Hee
Also...we're the epitome of maturity....ha...sex...Tee Hee
Handy
Handy was actually talking about sex. My interpretation of the question is if the ACT of having sex can play a positive role in games and Law did not address that.
Handy was actually talking about sex. My interpretation of the question is if the ACT of having sex can play a positive role in games and Law did not address that.
LAW
Sorry Handy but Silent Hill 2 pretty much kills your argument. The subject of sex is far more reaching than just the act on screen and the ways of displaying loving relationships beyond showing that. You make an excellent argument against that particular facet and certainly some games do it wrong; that isn't to say that other games don't explore the subject's other areas or use it in meaningful ways.
God of War uses the sex scene to represent (as it tells you) Kratos' frustration and his attempt to satiate the void left in his life since his wife died by conquering strumpets, with little success. It's great character development, keeping with the whole macho thing Kratos has going on while developing him as a tragic character. Maybe the later games abused that and threw in sex scenes for the "Kratos so manly, you like boobies" shit but that's a different story.
You can't relegate the dark psychological side of sexual repression (among other things), feelings of primal lust or the many other reasons people have sex for (like...fun!) to a simple kiss on the cheek or cuddling on the couch. Less uncanny valley would be nice though.
@false
Honestly, rather than quoting some 1960's Christian "interpretation" of the Ancient Greek types of love, go read some Ancient Greek philosophy! For eros in particular, you couldn't go wrong with Plato's Symposium.
Sorry Handy but Silent Hill 2 pretty much kills your argument. The subject of sex is far more reaching than just the act on screen and the ways of displaying loving relationships beyond showing that. You make an excellent argument against that particular facet and certainly some games do it wrong; that isn't to say that other games don't explore the subject's other areas or use it in meaningful ways.
God of War uses the sex scene to represent (as it tells you) Kratos' frustration and his attempt to satiate the void left in his life since his wife died by conquering strumpets, with little success. It's great character development, keeping with the whole macho thing Kratos has going on while developing him as a tragic character. Maybe the later games abused that and threw in sex scenes for the "Kratos so manly, you like boobies" shit but that's a different story.
You can't relegate the dark psychological side of sexual repression (among other things), feelings of primal lust or the many other reasons people have sex for (like...fun!) to a simple kiss on the cheek or cuddling on the couch. Less uncanny valley would be nice though.
@false
Honestly, rather than quoting some 1960's Christian "interpretation" of the Ancient Greek types of love, go read some Ancient Greek philosophy! For eros in particular, you couldn't go wrong with Plato's Symposium.
HANDY
I think there's a time and a place where sex can be an effective narrative tool in video games but we aren't there yet. Maybe its the way we tell a story in games or the technological limits, I don't know. But whatever it is, sex in video games is cheesy and scrutinized and doesn't contribute to the game. Right now, its just sex, there's no love, there's no emotional weight to it and I think it does nothing to make a game something more than just mindless fun. Maybe down the road sex can contribute something to a game more than just gamerscore (as someone said above) and a Fox news story but for now, it isn't and it doesn't.
I think there's a time and a place where sex can be an effective narrative tool in video games but we aren't there yet. Maybe its the way we tell a story in games or the technological limits, I don't know. But whatever it is, sex in video games is cheesy and scrutinized and doesn't contribute to the game. Right now, its just sex, there's no love, there's no emotional weight to it and I think it does nothing to make a game something more than just mindless fun. Maybe down the road sex can contribute something to a game more than just gamerscore (as someone said above) and a Fox news story but for now, it isn't and it doesn't.
HANDY
As always both sides have great arguments, however right now in games, we are not quite there to include sex. As mentioned above, it just comes off cheesy and just in the game so it can say "LOOK AT ME!! I'm so MATURE" instead of helping advance the story and build a bond between the characters. Sure one day we might get there but as of right now, sex isn't used to best potential and should be left out.
As always both sides have great arguments, however right now in games, we are not quite there to include sex. As mentioned above, it just comes off cheesy and just in the game so it can say "LOOK AT ME!! I'm so MATURE" instead of helping advance the story and build a bond between the characters. Sure one day we might get there but as of right now, sex isn't used to best potential and should be left out.
Law
A great read from both fronts yet even though such a potentially incredibly complex act such as sex is portrayed mostly as a cheap afterthought, it won't reach it's narrative potential by sitting this one out. By removing the act we'll likely keep it taboo and immature. Hopefully time will weed out those who make it an awkward immersion ruining cut scene and the medium can utilize it as powerfully as film and literature have.
A great read from both fronts yet even though such a potentially incredibly complex act such as sex is portrayed mostly as a cheap afterthought, it won't reach it's narrative potential by sitting this one out. By removing the act we'll likely keep it taboo and immature. Hopefully time will weed out those who make it an awkward immersion ruining cut scene and the medium can utilize it as powerfully as film and literature have.
I'm a bit torn in this debate. While I think the current state of sexual interactions in video games is fairly juvenile and pointless, I understand the necessity to explore it so that it will become better. Still, I feel that it really does have no ultimate purpose other than to serve some kind of storytelling point.
Since the majority of video games really haven't hit any kind of gratifying level narrative wise, I guess I'll side with Handy on this.
Sex may be natural and etc, but it really does nothing for games.
Since the majority of video games really haven't hit any kind of gratifying level narrative wise, I guess I'll side with Handy on this.
Sex may be natural and etc, but it really does nothing for games.
LAW
I think that sex in video game is perfectly acceptable and can very much add more positive outcomes in them. Silent Hill 2 is probably the greatest example of it being used well, so I'm glad it came up. But even without using Silent Hill 2 as an example, sex in general is something that all humans have to deal with in one way or another in their lifetime, and that's always something that can lend to a great narrative if used well.
I think that sex in video game is perfectly acceptable and can very much add more positive outcomes in them. Silent Hill 2 is probably the greatest example of it being used well, so I'm glad it came up. But even without using Silent Hill 2 as an example, sex in general is something that all humans have to deal with in one way or another in their lifetime, and that's always something that can lend to a great narrative if used well.
@ Falsnipple
My ex-girlfriend was molested as a child and once told me, "I don't care if I don't ever have sex again." Your comment implies that, but I'm not going to put words into your mouth. As seen in the comments, we all think differently. I have more of a liberal view towards sex. This whole "sex is disgusting without love" is, in my opinion, wrong. For example, last week I had sex with a classmate, we're friends, but nothing close. Her and I knew what we were getting into and we had a blast of a time! I understand that sex is not for everyone, and I understand that sex without love is disgusting to others, but that's your perception to the subject. You, and many others, state your opinions as facts, and judge people who do take sex less seriously.
Sex is important in my life, and to many others. Explain to me why is it bad if video games show two adults agreeing to have sex without any romantic inclusion. Am I a bad person because I slept with someone I don't love?
Sex is a beautiful and scary thing: It can disturb you and scar you for life, or it can bring you joy, happiness, and comfort. You, my friend, happen to have some bad experience, hence, your stance on the subject, but if you never had those experience, I'm sure your opinion would change.
Also, Gaspar Noe is an artist, and he was trying to convey the feeling of a women getting raped to his audience. You felt disturbed by it? Then good! That was exactly what he was trying to convey; it's not suppose to be comfortable, or nice.
@ KingSigy
"While I think the current state of sexual interactions in video games is fairly juvenile and pointless"
Please, explain to me how video games sex is juvenile. How does an adult handle sex? Please, enlighten me, because I think I'm doing it all wrong.
@ My fellow Dtoid members
My friends, today I visited The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), and to my surprise the majority of artwork displayed were of sex. Some were passionate and others were perverse. My friend and I were disgusted and fascinated by the whole thing. Video games can show sex if they want to; causal, or romantic. Why? Because it reflects real life. We live in a world where people love to have sex without any romantic connection and others who can't imagine doing that act without someone they love. I think what we need is a happy medium of the two. You think sex with someone you don't love is wrong, then good for you. I don't agree, but I will -never- present my beliefs as facts.
I wish I took more pics.
Damn, I wish I was the one debating!
My ex-girlfriend was molested as a child and once told me, "I don't care if I don't ever have sex again." Your comment implies that, but I'm not going to put words into your mouth. As seen in the comments, we all think differently. I have more of a liberal view towards sex. This whole "sex is disgusting without love" is, in my opinion, wrong. For example, last week I had sex with a classmate, we're friends, but nothing close. Her and I knew what we were getting into and we had a blast of a time! I understand that sex is not for everyone, and I understand that sex without love is disgusting to others, but that's your perception to the subject. You, and many others, state your opinions as facts, and judge people who do take sex less seriously.
Sex is important in my life, and to many others. Explain to me why is it bad if video games show two adults agreeing to have sex without any romantic inclusion. Am I a bad person because I slept with someone I don't love?
Sex is a beautiful and scary thing: It can disturb you and scar you for life, or it can bring you joy, happiness, and comfort. You, my friend, happen to have some bad experience, hence, your stance on the subject, but if you never had those experience, I'm sure your opinion would change.
Also, Gaspar Noe is an artist, and he was trying to convey the feeling of a women getting raped to his audience. You felt disturbed by it? Then good! That was exactly what he was trying to convey; it's not suppose to be comfortable, or nice.
@ KingSigy
"While I think the current state of sexual interactions in video games is fairly juvenile and pointless"
Please, explain to me how video games sex is juvenile. How does an adult handle sex? Please, enlighten me, because I think I'm doing it all wrong.
@ My fellow Dtoid members
My friends, today I visited The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), and to my surprise the majority of artwork displayed were of sex. Some were passionate and others were perverse. My friend and I were disgusted and fascinated by the whole thing. Video games can show sex if they want to; causal, or romantic. Why? Because it reflects real life. We live in a world where people love to have sex without any romantic connection and others who can't imagine doing that act without someone they love. I think what we need is a happy medium of the two. You think sex with someone you don't love is wrong, then good for you. I don't agree, but I will -never- present my beliefs as facts.
I wish I took more pics.
Damn, I wish I was the one debating!
i go with handy, sex is something that can enhance a story in a way but really, you don't need to see it or mention it. a story doesn't need sex to be great. if you want sex go about it privatly.
@ Nipple
"mean, even most pornography has the good taste to make the people involved not just physically attractive, but also simple enough to identify with and sometimes like"
Is this a joke? What type of porn do you watch? The porn I watch goes straight to the sex, and I love it!
"mean, even most pornography has the good taste to make the people involved not just physically attractive, but also simple enough to identify with and sometimes like"
Is this a joke? What type of porn do you watch? The porn I watch goes straight to the sex, and I love it!
@venuslnfurs
sex is wonderful, but is its sole existance is for our enjoyment. there is a purpose behind sex. my view in this is, yah sex can be a tool to enhance a story but you don't need it, you also have to realize that adults are not the only gamers. i'll end in this, what ever is pleasurable is not always good, and what is good should not be taken lightly. thats just my view, take it as you wish.
sex is wonderful, but is its sole existance is for our enjoyment. there is a purpose behind sex. my view in this is, yah sex can be a tool to enhance a story but you don't need it, you also have to realize that adults are not the only gamers. i'll end in this, what ever is pleasurable is not always good, and what is good should not be taken lightly. thats just my view, take it as you wish.
@VenusInFurs
You say many other people here are only projecting their opinions as facts but that's exactly what you're doing with your anecdotal argument. Saying to falsenipple "you only feel this way as an accumulation of your experiences" is ridiculous as the very same line can be used in turn as a counter of everything you have said.
Other than that, your comment above reveals a vital assumption in your argument that I believe renders it somewhat less credible: you claim tht video games ought to include sex as they see fit as it is a subject that reflects real life, but is reflecting real life the most important quality of a video game. Mundanity is a large part of real life, too; that's not to say constructing an ode to the mundane is an intrinsically good thing for a game to do. It can be achieved with superb profundity (Every Day The Same Dream) or as a painstaking failure of banal sequences (Heavy Rain) - what determines this is the ability of the game designer, not the intrinsic worth of the subject, so to follow a line of argument dependant on the intrinsic worth of a subject because it is a subject reflected in real life is to count on flawed logic.
You say many other people here are only projecting their opinions as facts but that's exactly what you're doing with your anecdotal argument. Saying to falsenipple "you only feel this way as an accumulation of your experiences" is ridiculous as the very same line can be used in turn as a counter of everything you have said.
Other than that, your comment above reveals a vital assumption in your argument that I believe renders it somewhat less credible: you claim tht video games ought to include sex as they see fit as it is a subject that reflects real life, but is reflecting real life the most important quality of a video game. Mundanity is a large part of real life, too; that's not to say constructing an ode to the mundane is an intrinsically good thing for a game to do. It can be achieved with superb profundity (Every Day The Same Dream) or as a painstaking failure of banal sequences (Heavy Rain) - what determines this is the ability of the game designer, not the intrinsic worth of the subject, so to follow a line of argument dependant on the intrinsic worth of a subject because it is a subject reflected in real life is to count on flawed logic.
HANDY
I would like to think myself a devotee of tasteful entertainment. Two horribly rendered lumps of flesh awkwardly see-sawing each other in a video game is definitely not something that sits well on the palate.
I would like to think myself a devotee of tasteful entertainment. Two horribly rendered lumps of flesh awkwardly see-sawing each other in a video game is definitely not something that sits well on the palate.
@Venus
I haven't, sounds very interesting, I'll be sure to check it out.
I really don't think you watch A Serbian Film though, it just sounds fucking sick, in a bad way. Seriously, the director is being prosecuted for it, that's how horrific it is.
I haven't, sounds very interesting, I'll be sure to check it out.
I really don't think you watch A Serbian Film though, it just sounds fucking sick, in a bad way. Seriously, the director is being prosecuted for it, that's how horrific it is.
@Venus: I didn't present anything as fact. Philosophy of any kind is subjective. Just because you don't like it, and I am not being particularly open-minded to someone who calls trolling people with sexual violence art, doesn't mean that you have carte blanche to call me arrogant. You're being arrogant here and regardless of just how liberal you think you are.
Seriously, you don't like my opinion. I don't like yours. That about sums all of this up, and willfully posting things that are meant to incite me multiple times when I have responded just once to a comment of yours is more than impulsive. I'm sorry that you have to go to those lengths, but forgive me if I don't want to be forced into feeling thing that I have already felt, have no urge to feel again, and are generally caused by something unwholesome or negative.
It might be expressive, but I could repeatedly tell you to fuck yourself, and that would also be expressive. It's not just the expression that matters. It's the content. If the content doesn't matter or you're willing to accept it because you pretentious enough to assume that there is merit in it, then good for you. I mean there has to be someone who is content with interacting with sociopaths and the things that they do in their spare time.
Seriously, you don't like my opinion. I don't like yours. That about sums all of this up, and willfully posting things that are meant to incite me multiple times when I have responded just once to a comment of yours is more than impulsive. I'm sorry that you have to go to those lengths, but forgive me if I don't want to be forced into feeling thing that I have already felt, have no urge to feel again, and are generally caused by something unwholesome or negative.
It might be expressive, but I could repeatedly tell you to fuck yourself, and that would also be expressive. It's not just the expression that matters. It's the content. If the content doesn't matter or you're willing to accept it because you pretentious enough to assume that there is merit in it, then good for you. I mean there has to be someone who is content with interacting with sociopaths and the things that they do in their spare time.
@ Boey
Dude, I'm watching the film as I type this in glorious HD. So far there's been a badly shot sex scene. The girl is hot though.
Dude, I'm watching the film as I type this in glorious HD. So far there's been a badly shot sex scene. The girl is hot though.
@ Falsenipple
I was about to let everything go and shake hands until that ridiculous last sentence of yours. It's funny, I had this same exact conversation with some user over at The Escapist. Everything you stated I heard plenty of times before, hey, you can believe what you want, but to call me pretentious is highly ironic coming from you. Like I said to the users over at The Escapist: It's not my fault you had a bad experience.
I think we should just drop this argument. We have different opinions: I'm never going to understand your ridiculous stance on the subject, and your never going to understand mine. We should just move on.
Also, nice expletives; an act I didn't do to you.
I was about to let everything go and shake hands until that ridiculous last sentence of yours. It's funny, I had this same exact conversation with some user over at The Escapist. Everything you stated I heard plenty of times before, hey, you can believe what you want, but to call me pretentious is highly ironic coming from you. Like I said to the users over at The Escapist: It's not my fault you had a bad experience.
I think we should just drop this argument. We have different opinions: I'm never going to understand your ridiculous stance on the subject, and your never going to understand mine. We should just move on.
Also, nice expletives; an act I didn't do to you.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

send message
follow
followers
CaptainBus
Batthink













