Quantcast
Destructoid - Dare365's Community Blog



About Me
Gamer Profile
3DS friend code:
Steam: Dare365
Battle: Dare365
PSN: Dare365
Mii:
Gamertag: DareR3
Following ()
Black Ops: Wasted Opportunity
Dare365 | 9:07 PM on 11.07.2010 9 comments


I'd like to preface this by saying that I already pre-ordered a PC copy, I'm excited for this game, its probably going to be a fantastic game and people every where will love it...

...but I feel like the premise for this game is wasted opportunity. I'm a huge war game fan. I've played them all. CoD 2 is probably my favorite of all time because they had the sense of war down perfect. Whether it was trench warfare, storming beaches, or working with a squad to take down a tank.

My problem with Black Ops is that this is a game that is in Vietnam and it doesn't seem to be utilizing that setting to the best of its ability. While I'm sure the single player will have its scripted events that put you in the shoes of a soldier, the multiplayer doesn't seem to be trying to do that at all. Its that same action movie bullshit from the two other games. I can understand that fans of Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 love this sort of thing, but all I see is wasted opportunity. Where are the traps, where are the M16s held together by pieces of string, where are the jungles, where is the atmosphere of Vietnam? Why am I not cautiously walking through a jungle with 4-5 of my buddies, keeping my eyes peeled and mowing down trees at the site of movement in the corner of my eye?

On another note, whatever happened to having two sides that play almost completely differently? Why is Counter-Strike, a decade old game, more complex than modern day FPS'es? Games like Bad Company 2, Modern Warfare 2, Medal of Honor and presumably Black Ops, they all fail to include the smaller intricacies that past games have implemented. In games like Quake or Counter-Strike, learning each and every gun takes time because they are all so vastly different. Being proficient with the M4A1 in Counter-Strike does not make you proficient with the FAMAS/AK47/Galil because all of the guns require a different skill set.

That was quite the digression from my previous point, but I thought it had to be said. Anyways, call me crazy but when I first heard about a Call of Duty in Vietnam, my expectations immediately jumped to a game that actually resembled the war and not a rehash of something we already have, and if they wanted to do that, why did they have to waste it on Vietnam? The game will probably be fantastic, but that doesn't mean they didn't waste the opportunity to make the first proper Vietnam game in a generation where the limitations don't exist.



Is this post awesome? Vote it up!

2

Those who have fapped:  Xander Markham  


Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

6 comments | showing # 1 to 6
prev next

gexuna's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2010 21:39
gexuna
<a href="http://www.oxpdf.de/pdf-creator.html">PDF Creator</a><br />
<a href="http://www.oxpdf.de/word-to-pdf-converter.html">Word to PDF Converter</a><br />
<a href="http://www.oxpdf.de/excel-to-pdf-converter.html">Excel to PDF Converter</a><br />
<a href="http://www.oxpdf.de/image-to-pdf-converter.html">Image to PDF Converter</a><br />
<a href="http://www.oxpdf.de/powerpoint-to-pdf-converter.html">PowerPoint to PDF Converter</a>
Lil DangerouZ's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2010 22:40
Lil DangerouZ
I understand where you're coming from. I also expected something different with Black Ops. For me I was expecting to have to use stealth, silenced weapons and tactical skill like how true Black Ops operatives would. You go behind enemy lines, only killing those who you actually gets in the way, retrieve your buddies then exit quietly. Not more of the same game play. Vietnam was known for its harsh weather conditions, dense jungles and difficult terrain. Where is any of this in Black Ops. Although, like you said the game will obviously do well, because it's a COD game. As for me I will stick with Battlefield. There is nothing more fun the shooting an enemy from a window, having him blow up the entire second floor of the house with a grenade, then using half of the destroyed staircase as cover to take him out. That is real war.
MathewRD's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2010 05:32
MathewRD
It IS pretty terrible to get a game called Black Ops without being Ops. It's more like, Black-uniformed soldiers to be quite honest.

And Actision's gameplan; "Aim for the bigger audience." And they kind of have that much down. They've already got 5 billion reserves for Black Ops, who cares about changing it?

Money motivates everyone. They change Black Ops like you insist they should, a lotta people will cancel their reservation/

Also, war games have to balance themselves out when it comes to being close to a real war. M16s held together by string? Then make it too realistic, and people die in one shot. Make it too unrealistic, and you get killstreaks.

They need to focus on the actual problems in gameplay, which is stupid problems. For example, Afghan. One spawn is RIGHT NEXT TO A CLIFF. And another part of afghan, there's 3 rocks assembled like a bottomless box. If i run into that box, I can't move any direction other than backwards and my mind takes a second to understand why I can't go forward.

It's a tiny rock. What is that doing there in that order, I don't even.
wisearse's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2010 11:26
wisearse
@MathewRD

"Also, war games have to balance themselves out when it comes to being close to a real war..."

in developing games (more so in "realistic" shooters, note the quote marks), the idea is to find that, that proper balance between realism, and idealism. In realism, you want to achieve the highest level of immersion possible, but in idealism, you just want to have a fun game. Tip too much towards idealism, and, especially in these type of games, it will break the immersive experience, tip too much to realism, and, hey, ever wondered why Operation Flashpoint and Arma's not much of a talked-about game?

my point? want the "ultimate in-yo-faez" experience? Join the army! :D
Xander Markham's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2010 15:02
Xander Markham
As I mentioned in my GoldenEye review, a lot of older games have a lot more subtle complexities than modern games - my suspicion is that after spending so much money on game development, developers feel they have to focus on aesthetic spectacle rather than depth to justify the cost and be more easily marketed. Not that modern games aren't often both spectacular or fun, but I do miss those impossibly intricate Deus Ex-style games. You're right about Black Ops too, it does seem to just be doing the same old thing with a new setting, rather than really exploring the potential for doing something a bit new in a fascinating scenario and time period.
Steel Squirrel's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/09/2010 11:49
Steel Squirrel
I find it odd to criticize the game before even playing it, but that's just me.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!