Ssssshhh, this is the internet; you're supposed to be angry like everyone else. Not have your own opinion!!!
I'm glad you enjoyed it. I saw like a 38% on Metacritic the other night and it scared me. I thought bring the contents of the graphic novel to the big screen would be damned near impossible, but after reading this it sounds like it worked out. I can't wait until tomorrow night!
Besides the characters, I thought the novel was complete shit. Well I take that back. I thought everything was spiffy until the shitty anti-climatic ending. So I have high hopes for this movie.
wow, sadistic. i guess your entitled to your opinion, but that ones just wrong :)
good review, i'm stoked for this one.
good review, i'm stoked for this one.
Most of the bad reviews I've read hated his hardcore loyalty to the graphic novel and basically didn't like Zack Snyder as a director. If you don't like his style your not going to like this and a lot of people seem to have a stick shoved up their ass when it comes to him.
I am definitely seeing this movie on opening day tomorrow. Some of my friends and myself were going to go tonight at midnight, but I'm too old for midnight showings now.
Thanks for the review! :-)
Thanks for the review! :-)
@MRSADISTIC: You can't be serious. Besides the characters? That's what the novel was about. Spaghetti is shit without sauce, too.
Anti-climactic ending? I won't spoil it for the rest of you, but the ending is far, far, far from anti-climactic. It's possibly one of the most grandiose plots in the history of fiction. Sorry, I have to call you out on this one.
Anti-climactic ending? I won't spoil it for the rest of you, but the ending is far, far, far from anti-climactic. It's possibly one of the most grandiose plots in the history of fiction. Sorry, I have to call you out on this one.
I am really looking forward to this movie although I worry about Zach Synder's story changes because I think that his story changes (or additions) in 300, such as the stupid wife subplot and his pathetic attempt to draw a comparison between Sparta and America, really damaged my ability to enjoy the film.
Thanks for the review, I'm pretty stoked to see it this weekend.
@ Diverse
Well, why don't you read it and form your own opinion?
@ Diverse
Well, why don't you read it and form your own opinion?
I have yet to see the flick, but I agree that the negative reviews I've seen have all brought up Snyder's style, specifically the "speed up/slow down" thing. It worked in 300, I don't see why it wouldn't work here, but I'll be seeing for myself this weekend.
And every review I've seen, good and bad, has brought up how terrible Malin Akerman is, which is a shame... Rorshach and the Comedian were always my favorites though, and they seem spot-on so that's awesome...
And every review I've seen, good and bad, has brought up how terrible Malin Akerman is, which is a shame... Rorshach and the Comedian were always my favorites though, and they seem spot-on so that's awesome...
@Zombieplatypus, I cannot speak for Watchmen since I have not seen it yet but what really annoyed me about the speed up/slow down trick is simply that too often in 300, the scene that the trick is being used on simply is not that exciting or interesting without the trick. In sports game broadcasts (though I admit I don't really watch sports), a slow-mo replay is shown for really good plays or cool moments. Too much of the action scenes in 300 that the speed tricks were applied to simply were not that exciting and as a result it seems like the speed adjustment is only being used to trick me into thinking that I am watching something cooler than it actually is.
Well, I've only seen 300 once (way back when it openend) because overall I wasn't a fan of the flick, but the speed/slow thing wasn't one of the reasons why. I do think it worked well there, which is odd because normally I've hated that slow-down gimmick in every movie that isn't The Matrix.
To your point about it being misused on uninteresting scenes, I can see your point that slowing down something like a guy throwing a spear doesn't make a guy throwing a spear any cooler to watch. But there's not too many big fights in the Watchmen comic, so if the technique's use is relegated to those fights in the film it shouldn't be an issue. Like, I'm looking forward to Rorschach vs. the cops in Moloch's pad and that slow/fast style will probably make for a more enjoyable scene than something like the now-standard "shaky" cam, y'know what I mean?
To your point about it being misused on uninteresting scenes, I can see your point that slowing down something like a guy throwing a spear doesn't make a guy throwing a spear any cooler to watch. But there's not too many big fights in the Watchmen comic, so if the technique's use is relegated to those fights in the film it shouldn't be an issue. Like, I'm looking forward to Rorschach vs. the cops in Moloch's pad and that slow/fast style will probably make for a more enjoyable scene than something like the now-standard "shaky" cam, y'know what I mean?
Give this review a pulltzer already.
How did you like the ending though? I've heard some mixed reactions to it, but most of it seems to come from people who haven't seen it yet and who are mostly afraid it will be too different from the comic.
How did you like the ending though? I've heard some mixed reactions to it, but most of it seems to come from people who haven't seen it yet and who are mostly afraid it will be too different from the comic.
I reread the comic last year and the ending is not that different. I don't want to spoil anything, but for me the change was minimal and actually made the movie work better as a movie.
Thanks for this well written review. My wife and I are going to see this on Saturday. I was initially concerned about Snyder since I did not like what he did with 300 but this sounds like the real deal. Honestly, why are there so few good comic book movies? The script and storyboards are done. There's rarely any reason to add or take anything away.
I'm glad to hear that he was able to squeeze SO MUCH material from the graphic novel into the movie without half-assing the story or making the movie feel bloated. Sounds great to me.
What, in particular, is so bad about this Malin Akerman? Just a bad actress, or she doesn't fit the part, or what?
As long as the Comedian is his usual badass self, things should be fine.
What, in particular, is so bad about this Malin Akerman? Just a bad actress, or she doesn't fit the part, or what?
As long as the Comedian is his usual badass self, things should be fine.
I don't suppose you could shed some light on the new ending for us? I'm seeing it tomorrow, and I'm still a little curious as to what exactly the ending will entail.
Great review, though. It definitely seems like this is a movie purely for fans of the novel, but honestly, that doesn't bother me one bit. Not every movie has to do a Slumdog Millionaire and reach out to every possible demographic, after all.
Great review, though. It definitely seems like this is a movie purely for fans of the novel, but honestly, that doesn't bother me one bit. Not every movie has to do a Slumdog Millionaire and reach out to every possible demographic, after all.
@ Sharpless
My pants are unzipped. All I need is Anthony's face and we've got a party.
Oh, and don't forget the rubber gimp suit!
My pants are unzipped. All I need is Anthony's face and we've got a party.
Oh, and don't forget the rubber gimp suit!
I saw it yesterday and I have to agree. It's a great movie with brilliant visuals and a perfect soundtrack.
I'm anxoiusly awaiting Saturday night when I get to see this. From what I've read on it people seem to like it. Its not the best thing ever put to film but for what the comic entailed Snyder did it very well. I've heard he had to take out some scenes that I thought were key to the story.
Spoilers follow!!!
From what I've read: The part where Hollis Mason, I believe, was brutally murdered by that street gang was cut. A pivotal scene to show just how crazy people were getting. Laurie and her trying to quit smoking only to go back to it when shit went down isn't in there. Not a big thing but it makes her more relateable and flawed as a character. The last chapter with cell after cell of dead, bloodied bodies isn't in there either. In fact the whole scene where Manhattan and Laurie land in Times Square and see the mess isn't in there either. Basically because of 911, I get it, but I guess you can't show bloody bodies strewn around New York even if it is set in 1985.
I'm really looking forward to see how this flows as a movie. I've heard it has great eye candy, but that overall it could leave you leaving the theatre sort of...meh.
Spoilers follow!!!
From what I've read: The part where Hollis Mason, I believe, was brutally murdered by that street gang was cut. A pivotal scene to show just how crazy people were getting. Laurie and her trying to quit smoking only to go back to it when shit went down isn't in there. Not a big thing but it makes her more relateable and flawed as a character. The last chapter with cell after cell of dead, bloodied bodies isn't in there either. In fact the whole scene where Manhattan and Laurie land in Times Square and see the mess isn't in there either. Basically because of 911, I get it, but I guess you can't show bloody bodies strewn around New York even if it is set in 1985.
I'm really looking forward to see how this flows as a movie. I've heard it has great eye candy, but that overall it could leave you leaving the theatre sort of...meh.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow


send message
follow
followers













