
“
You mean you have to use your hands. That’s like a baby’s toy.” Marty McFly is told this in. 2015 by two kids after showing them how to play an 80’s light gun game. Back To the Future 2 may not be far off with their projection of technology or the attitudes of modern gamers. Microsoft already has filled YouTube with celebs playing with “Natal,” their newest baby, ready to stick it to the Wii.
What makes me curious is why the common Anti-Wii Loser is ready to embrace Natal like it’s the second Coming of Luke Skywalker ready to put the evil empire in its place. Let’s analyze why AWLs (we’ll call them) don’t like Wii in the first place. AWLs proclaim they hate the gimmicky nature of the Wii. It attracts causal gamers, and women—boo, can’t have that! they scare them!—to gaming.
Why exactly do you suppose Natal is being launched. You don’t suppose it because “Wii Sports” and “Wii Fit” sold like a Zillion units, and now Microsoft wants a piece of that action. So all those gimmicky games and casual gamers are just going to be coming to your hood. Better start loading up the welcome wagon, hard core gamers. They’ll be crowding up the air waves on those professional headsets y’all wear real soon.
Yes, Yes—The Wii has sub-standard graphics. If we’re not using every bit of the newest pixel shading technology a game can’t be fun, Of course. However, the games that haven’t been criticized as much, your “Mario Galaxies” and your “Twilight Princesses”, are known franchises that were easily fashioned to the Wii. I think it’s going to be awhile before Natal gives us an 30+ hour, in-depth, and graphically intense game that operates completely on air.
Now, don’t get me wrong. Innovation in video games is always exciting, but I think Natal is risky business. Actress, Felica Day said it best after her test run, “I can’t wait to throw a fireball like this.” Neither can I. Give me an awe survive horror game where I’m wrestling a zombie of my throat and snapping its neck with my bare hands and I’m there. However, It has more potential to spawn a billion “Block party 5” and “Cooking” games than it does to instantly take gaming to the next level. Gamers love to hate the industry that feeds them, and the Wii has been judge an unworthy whipping boy by the elite for a while now. AWLs want that big knock blow to make the Wii obsolete, but—call me a doubter, it may be wonderful and shut my mouth— but, I’m not holding my breath.
Seriously? I forgot that film. When I first saw it I was thinking how that was so stupid it was to think that we would be gaming without controllers. 2015 doesn't seem that far off now O_O
I still think we need some like of physical object during a game just so we realise it's there and it's real. Light guns are cool because we're actually feeling the push of the trigger and the rumble of the gun as we fire. Waving around aimlessly on the other hand is sort of stupid.
I don't like the wii, but I'm not opposed to it's existence. I think motion controls are stupid, don't have enough fidelity to replace the standard controller, and are limited to doing things in games that humans already know how to irl.
That said, Natal is even more idiotic than wii motion controls if it's used as they demonstrated, without a controller in hand.
Also, this proves that you don't need new hardware for natal.
I agree with both of you. Let's see they release a Samurai game, Wouldn't you feel like tool just pretending there's a sword in your hand. Or how about a shooter. You going to point you finger and go bang bang like we're six again. I don't know. I think removing the control is just a gimmick to one up the Wii. While I'm not a DIE HARD WII Defender or anything. I think motion controllers could have been tweaked with a little bit before we went "look Ma, no controller, I'm sooo Cool." who knows
What a great read. Thoroughly entertaining and well constructed. Thanks. :)
think I found a Natal promotional video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql-UZv3AS-E
Fanboys are so unbelievably stupid in my opinion. I think all three consoles have something they each offer that the others don't. It's alright to have your preferences but to completely swear off one of them and say its stupid and you do not like it is completely idiotic. If you're doing that, in the end, you're the loser.
I'm sure the Natal will be alright for some things. However, on the whole I feel like an actual controller is integral to the experience.
And Microsoft is most assuredly not going to have the same success as Nintendo just because they have the Natal...even though they're acting like it now. Celebrity endorsement will only go so far. It took developers a while to begin making quality games on the Wii regularly like it is now, and I think Natal will have its share of early shovelware or suffer the undersupported fate of the Six Axis.
Motion Control is great for some games, but if its forcibly shoe-horned to everything it's inevitably going to churn out a lot of crap amongst the gems that get it right. It will evolve over time but there's no sense forcing it. One only need go back to Saturn/PS1/N64 games to see the forced transition to 3D to see that.