
|
|
|
|
This is not meant to be inflammatory in any way, but rather incite discussion.
I’ve lived through both the nineties and the 2000s. I’ve seen the rise of CGI and 3D graphics for games. I’ve lived through the golden era of sci fi pc games and RPGs (Planescape: Torment, Deus Ex System Shock 2, bioshock, Fallout 2 and 3). I’ve also seen the rise in the mass use of the internet and the natural evolution of the system as both a information system and a pioneering form of non national communication networks and systems. Games, Film, computers and the Internet mark the beginning of a new era of civilization; The gradual building progression to massive, techno-cultural event known to science fiction authors, futurists, scientists, engineers and computer technicians as the singularity. By the logic of this theory, there will be a point in upcoming history in which major technological advancement will continuously speed up until a crux point, the singularity is encounters, in which technological, cultural and artisinal advancements will begin to increase at an infinitely exponential rate until human civilization will be unrecognizable to us and our preconceived notions of it. I believe such an event will occur within the next 10-15 years with the development of a few primary technologies; quantum computing, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, and conventional space-time movement subversion (CERN, Quantum tunneling and entanglement, instantaneous travel across the universe regardless of momentum and mass) I theorize that there have been smaller singularities over human history, signifying points of rapid development in art, technology and culture. Such examples of smaller singular events are the renaissance, the massive technological growth of the Chinese empire before its rapid decline, and most recently, the rapid development of audio-visual and broadcast media in the early 20th century. But as we make our final steps to the ultimate final singularity, which threatens or entreats the absolute reconstruction of human civilization and consciousness, a growing trend seems to have popped up since the new millennium. It disturbs me very much. And this growing trend is that people are fucking stupid! And they’re growing stupider every day.
Despite access to growing information networks and consistently evolving forms of informational access, people are becoming less informed and frequently more aggressive when defending the pathetic, half formed excuses. They act in a fashion similar to that of an arrogant genius when in actuality they are low intelligence morons. I make no effort to assert myself as being a intellectually superior being, but I have the benefit of saying that I am far more adaptive and inviting to the introduction of new ideas and concepts into my personal being. A few cultural points seem to pop up when in defending my development. These are conspiracy theories, social networking, and cultural backlash. Conspiracy theories, for many, are the basis for fanciful thinking and fiction. For a great deal of others, they represent a concealment of the truth in face of overwhelming counter evidence. These people believe Kennedy was assassinated by his government, the moon landing was faked, and the World Trade Center was destroyed by their own government to justify a war in the Middle East. These people will interpolate, interconnect and invent evidence as they see fit in order to confirm their devout and even insane claims of subterfuge and dishonesty. In the real world however, the marked stupidity of such people is clearly evident. Despite consistent and continuous proof by non-government experts (history channel, mythbusters, and the discovery channel respectively) countering every conspiracy theory listed above and then some, they doggedly refuse to accept a logical explanation. I contribute this to a form of evolved natural stupidity. Humans have been able to maintain themselves as the dominant species because of one primary aspect that most animals seem to lack; abstract thinking. While primates and dolphins seem to possess this skill as well, our ability far exceeds them. We win because we can perceive and recognize patterns and hypothesize about the future. We can also inference and preconceive concepts and ideas before we act upon them. It’s what has kept us alive during our development as a species and civilization and allowed us to flourish. Unfortunately, this comes with a downside. This is the persistence of pattern seeking behaviour in a time in our development where it’s mostly vestigial in use. Many are incapable of perceiving chaos and random, non-interconnected behaviour and thus, almost as if it were a defense mechanism, people instantly and doggedly stick to the largest web of events and behaviour possible and defend as if with their lives, despite clear and present lunacy in such hypotheses. It can best be interpreted as a bizarre neurological freak of natural selection. With regards to us, it is a specialization and evolution of desired taken to such a point in which it becomes detrimental to us as a species. Because of such rapid onset programming in people’s brains, its allowed for the persistence and perpetuation of incoherent webs of interconnection and meaning amongst massive groups of people. Through our primary communication systems, writing, imagery and speaking, these ideas persist and flourish amongst groups of people, entering, corrupting and spreading these logic webs/programs in a fashion similar to that of a virulent computer program. An example of such is religion and religious dogma and the problems they cause.
Social networking is another piece in the growing evidence towards mankind’s stupidity. Primarily designed as a informational interconnection in the era of post-national internet communities, networks have devolved into cesspools of human idiocy and childish behaviour. People, because of anonymity on the Internet with sites such as this or networks such as facebook and twitter, lose their ability to act with basic social skills. They let their ID run free believing there to be no consequence for their actions due to the dissociative and disconnected nature of the internet. They build groups and communities of likeminded morons on such websites and social networks to persist in their own childish behaviour. Unfortunately this has larger scale ripple effect upon them and society. They begin to dissociate from their real life and seem to only exist on the internet. They become unable to properly interact with people outside their social network and when they do move within the real world, they begin to act as they do on the internet. Unfortunately the clustering effect of such destructive behavior has generated a whole population of people socially ineffective outside the limitations of the internet. They literally cannot function without facebook or myspace and they become unable to properly interact with real people.
To finally address my point is the idiocy of cultural backlash. As films, books, games and such form of entertainment grow in popularity, there is a vocal group of people who express hatred towards it for no reason other than the fact that it is popular. This is known as cultural backlash. The point of such patterns of behaviour is nonexistent. It instead stands as counteraction in a futile attempt to attain independence by rejecting conventional popular media. They then run to sites such as this and Kotaku and many others, spewing off half baked counter culture opinions to make themselves seem unique from what they believe is everybody else. Look, while I give credence to the belief that Twilight is poor, exploitative genre trash, I realize why people like it. I respect it, as much as I hate it, for its ability to garner such an audience. But the backlash against films such as Titanic and Slumdog Millionare is idiotic at best. These films are expertly made, confident dramas, which display excellent screenwriting and direction. However, the hatred for these films based on popularity makes no sense. While personal preference not matching up with the film resulting in someone not liking it is perfectly fine, having disdain simply because many people like it is idiotic at best. It is merely an excuse for foolish half-wits to use antisocial behaviour on a group with little consequence. They think, by avoiding popular opinion, they can make themselves more noticeable and unique to others. Such attempts at recognition is the desperate throes of a weak simple minded fool who wants more attention than their personality or intelligence should allow.
But such moronic behaviour has extended even further, leading to backlash before a film is even released. Such is the case with the upcoming film Avatar by James Cameron. Remarks that film looks like it will be shit and further general hatred make no sense. All right, while someone may not like something because they don’t like the art style or they are not interested in the story is fine. But disdain as well as broad generalized remarks when they have no basis in reality and can’t even be determined yet doesn’t make any sense. People displaying hatred for a film which has done nothing wrong yet as it has not even been released is the most idiotic thing ever conceived by a human being. It is essentially the judgment of something, with no proper understanding of its quality. It’s thoughtless hatred by groups of nasty self-serving morons who would go personally out of their way to discredit something because they can latch their lamprey like suckers on any handle of the hate wagon they can reach with their sad, limited intellect. This may seem like incessant ranting, but there is a specific point to my argument. Why is it that in the era of widespread knowledge and interactivity is people growing stupider, louder and less informed? The rise of fools across the world is a sad reminder that though many wonders await us in the future and the next decade, the world is filled with witless, low brow worms who slither in the dirt of their own ignorance, misery and hatred and do nothing to simply live and be happy for the sake of being happy. I wish the stupidity will end with the new decade and hopefully lead us to an age of intellect and honesty towards oneself and others in their. But I doubt that will happen any time soon.
|
|
|
|
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
|
Comment with FacebookClick connect and comment instantly! |
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds |
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

Follow
RSS
Contact
Nor do I feel they are needed. You're all big boys and girls and can read something without pictures can't you?
but when I start hearing moronic comments on why titanic sucks or how many friends somebody has on facebook in the middle of a biology class, I start seeing red. Do you know at my university, it's always a 20-30 minute weight on a computer. And while I'm writing an essay everyone around is on facebook or youtube. And people wonder why there is a 30-40 percent dropout rate.
Why is people growing stupider?
On a serious note, there's a very good reason people are already hating on it: it looks like ham handed crap. The guy is trying to convey a serious message, but he's doing it by using seriously lowbrow stereotypes and caricatures. Most people recognize that for the obvious condescension that it is. All while using his name as the selling point, not the work itself, probably because he knows it wouldn't sell on its own merits.
The same goes for Kathryn bigelow's other films. Near Dark looks like a shitty, John Carpenter rip off. And yet it's probably the best modern vampire movies ever made.
Strange Days, which was written by james cameron just so you know, is one of the best science fiction thrillers of the last 20 years. Yet from snippets and trailers it looks like a low brow take on sci fi noir with hammy cliched characters. And yet it is a brilliant meditation on change, loss, obsession unrequited love, addiction and motivation.
Look at the terrible promotion for films such as Labyrinth, Dark Crystal, Outland, Children of Men, Inglourious Basterds, Moon and other brilliant genre films. They are utterly terrible because most marketing people don't realise how to market a film with what can be seen as limited appeal to a large audience. They rely too much on the directors history and money shots from the film to actually show their dramatic worth. While many people might be stupid in my opinion, you can lead them on with a stick and carrot to your film if the marketing is right. Why do you think a C grade film like transformers got so much bank, because they marketed to the films strengths and won out. But now everyone thinks that a movie has to be marketed like TF2, when they should learn that a film succeeds by showing it's strongest face, not it's flashiest.
You can counter this with the absolute success of district nine. A 30 million dollar science fiction film, set in a relatively unknown country to american and focuses on themes of Oppression and racism (see a pattern) and manages to sell despite everything against it. It went on to make some mad bank in the box office department.
The lessons, that can be gleaned from this is, don't judge a movie by it's preview material, don't make generalized assumptions when they could be unfounded and watch strange days, Hurt Locker, children of men, outland, Moon and near dark because they are absolutely awesome.
First of all, you have given me a raging nerd boner. If I am not mistaken, you are referencing the technological singularity; a point at which mankind (or any species, really) is capable of influencing its own evolution and intellectual growth through artificial means. While the ethics of such things are still questionable - since everyone knows that science cannot be allowed to be awesome, lest the universe be destroyed by irony - such an event is likely to at least begin within the next 3 decades, with the necessary scientific discoveries to facilitate such a developmental shift occurring within the next 2 decades.
On the less nerdy side of things, I believe this just about sums it up:
A person is smart; people are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it.
-Agent K, M.I.B.
Think about it. Thinking machines, Computers the size of your palm that make every computer on earth combined look like a commodore 64, Instantaneous trans universal travel, intelligence amongst the masses, true virtual reality, matter compiling, nanotechnology, videogames governed by an AI that creates random, dramatic stories that utterly unique. networks made from quantum entanglement so that not only is computer memory infinite but networking and file transfer is faster than light itself. Immortality, world peace, contact with other worlds and intelligent species, free planet wide education and healthcare. knowledge across the planet. Uncontrollable yet ethical freedom for every human on earth with no shackles of ignorance, religion, dogma, political beliefs or republicans and conservatives. It would be awesome.
Also, how is the Agent K quote less nerdy exactly. Not that it's any less nerdy of course. But still.
While we're on the subject, where do you get off projecting whatever associations you've made with other people uninterested in the movie directly onto me and anyone else that doesn't want to see it? Where did I claim to be making a final judgment on it? I said there's a reason people aren't responding to it.
But if you really want to play the "shut up and give it a chance" argument, exactly why should people be interested in it in the first place? Because it has a massive marketing campaign meant to bowl people over with the same stupid "go along with the crowd" mentality you claim to resent? Because it has shiny and colorful CGI IN FUCKING 3D? Because you were the one to say it deserves a chance?
Yeah, you're right that people shouldn't judge a book by it's cover. On the other hand James Cameron is a big enough director with enough control over his advertising that if there was something with more depth below the surface then maybe he shouldn't be hiding it from us.
I'm not just same random internet hater that wants to exaggerate my problems with the movie to the point of absurdity so I can have something to trash talk, even if I have been very negative about it.
I'm not criticizing your blog post as a whole and I think you do a pretty good job of defending you point. In fact I think I fapped before commenting. I'm just naturally drawn to the role of devil's advocate and I thought your anger at whatever forum assholes you've been reading outweighed the argument you were using the example to convey.
Oh and "This is not meant to be inflammatory in any way.."
Yea right.
People may stupid animals, and a lot of people do have better taste than most of the population(I hope to be considered one of those people). But the fact is that there is a point in considering that if a lot of people like something, then there must be something to it. If after you see it and you don't like it then fine, it is at least an informed opinion now.
Like I know someone who loves TF2, while I think it's an average action movie with an overblown budget. He loves it for the precise reason I don't. It's a flashy, bombastic, stupid movie that allows him to enjoy himself while escaping from an ever descending hellscape of a domestic situation.
Alternatively I love Knowing, Observe and Report, The Island and think Chronicles of Riddick director's cut is actually a pretty damn good movie. From reviews and trailers, and prerelease footage and reaction. These movies look like shitty genre exploitation pictures. But I went to see them regardless of public opinion and poor marketing because I felt the need to form my own opinion of them. I actually found these movies to be very intelligent sci fi pictures (yes I found Micheal Bay's the Island to be intelligent, a rarity for him to be sure). and thought all the counter popularity bullshit (all these films had strong movie goer response either critically or commercially except for Riddick) for these films in the reviews
But to rail on hatred based on half formed opinions from crappy trailers and a few poorly made tv spots? It's gut reaction stupidity that makes no sense.
Oh and there is a brief moment in one of the trailers where giovanni ribisi's cliched evil corporate character is seen alone, breaking down with guilt after making the decision to wipe out the Na'vi. Doesn't that seem to go against character conventions? Or the fact that cameron literally constructed a fictional ecosystem from scratch that so detailed that Weta has a model of most of an entire planet on a computer somewhere? Or the fact that there is past history of relocation and reeducation of the Na'vi which destroyed some of their cuture (they all speak english for a reason, not just to placate american audiences) and fueled tensions between the humans. Or the fact that Jake had a brother who died prior to the plot of the film and has to deal with that as well as defending a people from harm.
While something might look cliched and hackneyed on paper, might be a masterstroke in final form. Just because something has familiar elements doesn't mean it should immediately be written off as formulaic. In the end it's all about execution.
Look at GI JOE. It's literally the stupidest, most cliched film ever. And yet it is good because of the deft execution of the picture. While this is not indicative of the final quality of the upcoming film avatar, It should show you how little preconceived notions of a movie should matter when compared to the final executed product
But because someone mentioned that they disliked a movie they knew little about during class does not mean the world is going to hell. Back during classes hundreds of years ago there were still idiots saying things they knew nothing about.
It's great to know that you're smarter than most people though. Really.
Now here's the review:
Grateful: 0/11
Determined: 2/11
Narrow: 0/11
Sudden: 0/11
Stuck: 11/11
Society: 6/11
Your a fucking idiot, hpv. go crawl back in your fuckin cesspool where you belong.
The internet is perhaps one of the greatest things ever invented.
Too bad that 90% of the population is too stupid to use it properly. 90% of the population believes the first thing they read on the internet, 90% of them have no idea how to scan for relevant data, interpret it, analyse it critically in a logical manner or debate in a rational manner.
Thanks to the internet, any moron who can string together two sentences can post something, can get something published. Everyone from idiots who say "VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM" to idiots who bleat that "THE WORLD WAS CREATED BY A MAGICAL SKY BEING 6000 YEARS AGO" can put up a website and convince people who have no idea that, yes, on the internet, ANYONE CAN SAY ANYTHING REGARDLESS OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE ON THE SUBJECT OR THEIR INTELLIGENCE.
I know I sound a bit elitist, but I have a degree in biotechnology and I am in my second semester for my Master's and the sheer amount of rubbish I find on the internet, in regards to evolution, vaccines, and medicine, makes my head hurt. For example, a former porn star with no medical or scientific training whatsoever starts ranting on about how "vaccines made my child autistic", and she is taken seriously, despite the MOUNTAIN of rather technical information which proves her absolutely wrong. I don't have time to go into the debate, but if you read up on the debate (I suggest visiting pub-med, a source of biological and medical papers you can browse for free if you have an internet connection in a university), you would realise that this Jenny McCarthy is an uneducated buffoon who doesn't know ANYTHING about vaccines, immunology or autism, and yet feels free to run her yap off about things she barely comprehends.
Not only that, the internet has fanned ludicrous beliefs like "DUR BUSH CAUSED THE 9/11 ATTACKS" or "OBAMA IS FROM KENYA", all due to one simple fact:
AND THAT IS THAT 90% OF THE HUMAN POPULATION IS ABOUT AS INTELLIGENT AS POND SCUM AND WILL BELIEVE VIRTUALLY ANYTHING SO LONG AS IT IS TRENDY TO DO SO.
As usual, the 10% of the population that is educated and intelligent and rational, will just have to put up with the other 90% of the population. Scientists will just have to put up with the Jenny McCarthys of this world, will have to put up with PETA and Huckabee and Palin and all the other people who know nothing about anything yet think they have a right to question those who actually spent years of their lives learning about subjects in depth.
Thanks to the internet, every slack-jawed, one eyed, half-baked yokel drinking "moonshine" from "pa's-basement" gets to think that "Hey Ah'm a just as a smarty-pants as em' sciency folk! If Ah's says them dino-sar bones were planted in the ground by satan, well then it was! And's if ah say that dang ee-vo-lu-shun's a lie because my pa and the pastor said so, then it was! Ah ain't edu-mu-cated in anny-way but that don't mean they's better than me! Who's to say that science knows anything! The innernet told me they's all wrongs and that it's sum sorta con-spir-race-ey to destroy jaysus!"
Humanity has ALWAYS been chok-a-block STUFFED with superstitious, ignorant hillbillies. Remember all those witch burnings in the UK? Or when the church adamantly claimed that the Sun Orbited The Earth? Or when the best way to prove guilt or innocence was to make the suspect jam their fist into a fire (The Logic of the "trial" when something like this: "Hey, if he's innocent the Lord will protect him and he won't be burned, but if he's guilty he will be burned!". Needlessly to say, not many were found innocent). Our civilisation, our scientific knowledge which made all of modern technology possible, was the work of a few which went on to help the many. It wasn't (and couldn't be) a solo effort on the part of scientists/engineers - we needed farmers to grow food and we needed soldiers to protect our lands, and whatnot, but without a doubt the people who have contributed the most to our species, have been the scientists. We gave the world vaccines, rid the world of smallpox and polio. We gave the world satellites and television and power plants and electric motors and mobile phones (that's cell phones to you americans). We invented the alloys and the plastics and the microwave ovens and WE perfected the surgical procedures and circuit boards and computer chips and it was US who invented the jet engine and the aeroplane and the radio and almost EVERYTHING around you.
And what thanks to scientists get? A kick in the face by unintelligent yokels who wouldn't know a proton from a neutron, or a piece of DNA from a piece of RNA. We get talked down to by IDIOTS who know NOTHING about physics or chemistry or biology, we get lectured by simpletons who think just because they can mix Mentos and Diet Coke together that makes them a chemist!
Scientists and engineers BUILT THIS WORLD. And we get no thanks. Strangely enough, those who have benefited the most from our research (the so-called "first" world nations) seem the most eager to tear us down.
No respect I tell ya, we get no respect at all.
As a biotech major, korolev, here's something that will make you absolutely want to kill somebody.
A woman in my anthropology and paleoarcheology class was adamant that one of the genetic base pairs was dextrose. FUCKING DEXTROSE!!! My fucking god, how do these people come up with this shit sometimes.
"Why is it that in the era of widespread knowledge and interactivity is people growing stupider, louder and less informed?"... a good question, but I think that there are better informed people around and this may be more of a cultural issue... maybe the question is why do we celebrate and reward stupidity in our current culture??
I think maybe that TV was a greater catalyst than the internet... shows like Jerry Springer and then the reality shows that sprung up that made 10 minute stars of incredibly stupid people. This now extends to the internet where stupid people get far more attention than genuninely thoughful, intelligent or well informed people. Paris Hilton... I mean c'mon! Why is she a "celebrity", why is she famous. Our current culture is in love with stupid....
/rant
Great blog!
But back to the RPG thing for a bit. Just because you control a character (I have to think that's what you mean by "self-controlled" [do note the proper use of a hyphen in the future, moron] since it doesn't really mean anything) and it (the game, in case you're lost) has a narrative does not mean that it is an RPG. Note that a narrative is by definition a progression and that "narrative progression" also doesn't mean anything, idiot.
Furthermore, and it's obviously cruel to pile on a simpleton such as yourself but I'm a pretty bad guy, it's "you're" (a contraction of "you" and "are"), not "your" (the possessive [that means "belonging too" since you're clearly too stupid to know anything] form of "you"), you fucking moron.
Now why don't you crawl back to your first grade classroom since you are in serious need of an education. If you study hard enough perhaps you'll even learn enough grammar to make your writing readable, though that won't help with making your "ideas" any more interesting or worthwhile.
I would also like to point out that a moron and a simpleton are two different things to many people, including myself. A moron, to many, is an individual with limited knowledge, despite a possible capacity for it, who makes decision with a total lack or rationality or logic. A simpleton is someone who simply lacks intelligence. While in purest sense (in other words, from a dictionary), these two words have the same definition, you preclude the fact that modern language allows for common vernacular to assign multiple definitions to words that are essentially synonyms. This is done in order to more increase the complexity of the english language, which is relatively simple by comparison to other middle eastern, asian and latin based languages, to allow more meaning into our comments and statements.
Oh and I think it somewhat unfair to call someone with an IQ of 159 a simpleton. Since you seem strangely obsessed with proper word usage and definition, I feel that such an error must be corrected.
But since you probably won't read this article I's sum it up in a few sentences so you can spit and shout and scream at me, all the while totally failing to see that you're doing so on an website, totally disconnected from the real world and of no actual consequence to you or your seemingly fragile emotional state.
Man, you are a real asshole, aren't you? How about this; How about you fuck off and stop wasting my time or anyone else's. You're a pathetic loser and a troll.