|
games anime | toys
|
![]() |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|

| get involved register or login post a blog post a forum enter a contest contribute a news tip suggest a feature be a guest editor |
support new member's guide login assistance tech support report abuse email our editors read our dev blog nuclear crisis? |
keep in touch RSS feed Myspace Flickr Game nights Meetup+play online |
seriously about Destructoid advertising terms of use privacy policy jobs at MM buy our crap |
our network Tomopop Japanator Despingation? |
||
|
||||||
living the dream since March 16, 2006 |
||||||
Oh, be quiet and go buy a Wii.
True. I've played flash games better than some current gen titles.
I have a Wii, but it's basically only used by my son. I'm pretty much solely locked into PC games.
And THINKFREEMIND, I'm with you there. It's bizarre how much money and artistic talent goes into a game, and the godawful gameplay that comes out. What are they spending this 30 mil on exactly?
Amen, brother. I always forget about Stalker, and how awesome it was.
Stalker was developed in the Ukraine, and everyone knows that Eastern Europeans are genetically superior when it comes to coding.
Exactly, lots of money isn't needed for making great games, just look at Eternity's Child... oh.... wait...
Anyone else have fond memories of the Thief series? I can't imagine those cost too much money to make. Well, the first two.
Stardock are a perfect example here. They realise the likely numbers of the their and don't go over budget trying to please them. The most recent result was Sins of a Solar Empire, which sold like hotcakes, with no DRM or anti-piracy bullshit or anything.
@thinkfreemind
I agree with you as well. The first thing I look at a game is its art direction, and I have to say, alot of flash games I find on Newgrounds look better than some super HD titles you'll find on the market. Often, they're more fun to play too. Money shouldn't be pouerd into games, rather, creativity and thought.
ATLUS is the absolute prove of your rightness...
they always sell about 90% of their copies, so I guess they make loads of money :-)
"Money shouldn't be pouerd into games, rather, creativity and thought."
Perfect quote. Somewhere along the line someone decided that money = good game. It doesn't. There are so many examples proving this (see above, thanks guys!)
I'd rather play a game designed with creativity, courage, and just the balls-out bravado that smaller companies have. Take note, EA/Bungie/Whatever. I haven't bought your games in four years, and I don't plan to start again.
I agree, but you need to realise how well crysis went down... people aim for that, and many 'expect' that. Graphics run this business to a point, as well as 'blockbusters'. Seems like your complaining about something that has very little to do with you.
Sure, I loved NFS Underground 1&2, they were different, then EA got all horny for boy racers. I don't give a shit-pro street, easily the worst title in the series, sold/sells well, and what? I just spend my mopney elsewhere.
Put your money where your mouth is, so to say.
Crysis did awful, especially considering the cost of the game. Didn't it sell like 87,000 in it's first two months? People like graphics, sure, but it won't sell a game. Halo has some pretty mediocre graphics, and it sells like hotcakes.
And I do put my money where my mouth is -- I haven't bought an EA game in years. Actually, 7 (I have NHL 2002 somewhere).