Why do game developers make pockets but do not allow you to put anything in them? What is in those things anyway? More ammo? A cellphone? A sandwich? Who can say certainly not the developers. So many games have so many mystery pockets its mind boggling. I have more than three pockets so why can't I carry more stuff? Why only two guns and a couple grenades? I can hold at least six grenades, some semtex, three knives, a garotte (something games are sorely missing besides Hitman), a GPS, some marbles, my iPod, a yo-yo (also a garotte in a pinch), and maybe a Hot Pocket if I am feeling peckish.



The real question is why do game developers feel the need to add in modeling and texture for pockets and yet refuse to do anything with them. This also applies to accessories like knives or another pistol that seems to never be used. Or an ammo belt that is in plain sight but never used if you run out of ammo for your weapon. What is the purpose of that? Is it like the belt that Chewbacca wears? ( I am nearly convinced that is a belt of smokes he keeps on hand) Of course there is the reasoning of set dressing but come one now! Give us a break already. This is the next generation of games! Why is there no pocket physics!? I say this is an injustice! Sure Alone in the Dark did something similar to what I am asking for but they did it badly making you have to look through it while still being eaten which is always a bad thing. At least acknowledge the pockets existence! If my quasi military guy is wearing a vest with fifteen compartments and pockets all over it don't give me crap like a three item inventory max.



You are directly lying to me and everyone else that you don't have more space than that. If you aren't going to have more space then don't make a model with more pockets, simple as that. Stop confusing us developers and start giving us more shit to put in our pockets!

PS: Digital is a dumbhead