
|
|
|
|
WARNING: tl;dr - I wouldn't even bother reading this. no hilarious pictures of failed memes below
isten, I made a mistake. this isn't the same community I joined almost three years ago. I've been away for a while; things are done differently. It has little of that zesty horse cock flavor anymore. the blogs have been sanitized into something akin to the IGN forums. for "my horse and me." Fuck I even think someone gave Jim a proper shower. so when I posted the blog "brad nicholson sucks cocks" I was still the BHZ who rocketed his way to stardom amidst such classic blogs as http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/BahamutZero/will-user-blogs-be-the-end-of-destructoid--31910.phtml and http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/BahamutZero/i-make-poops-31967.phtml and http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/BahamutZero/fucking-lol-32999.phtml, because, after reading the travesty of the Tales of Vesperia review, well, I felt like Brad Nicholson sucked cocks. But then I realized my mistake: I had seriously undermined my argument by couching it in aggressive, emotional and vulgar terms, which allowed my valid and truthful statement of fact (see, garlic smell) to be rendered easily defeated as "trolling." And it seemed to be something the NEW destructoid didn't take kindly to. Well I don't take kindly to folks who don't take kindly, so let me explain a few thoughts in a clearly thought and rational manner. I will try not to raise my voice, and I will speak in short sentences so brad can understand. - Brad's review of tales of vesperia begins with a rant against the japanese rpg genre in general. And here you begin to realize why the whole video game review system is still completely and utterly without merit. Why would I want to read a review of japanese rpg from a person who admits they hate japanese rpgs? I wouldn't. And although he makes valid, albeit poorly phrased and cliche points about the genre, what is not understandable is why there isn't a dissenting opinion or possibly the opinion of someone who actually plays japanese rpgs. I, as a video game reviews reader, don't want to read all positive reviews, however I want to read opinions of gamers who are knowledgeable about the game's genre and have similar taste as I do. Well not everyone has similar taste, so what do you? You have more than one reviewer. I know this is attempted here on occasion, but two isn't enough. you need to have, I'd say, at least 3 or 4 opinions to give gamers the best idea of what they are getting. I KNOW the cliches of japanese rpgs. I don't care. I still enjoy them. I want to know, in the pantheon of japanese rpgs, or even among the tales games, how does this one stack up? which leads to the next point, - What do the numbers even mean? they mean nothing, because what are you comparing the games to when you rate them? do you rate them against every game ever made or all games within a genre? The best badminton game in the world might deserve a ten to focused badminton players, and might have the most flawlessly executed gameplay, but how could you ever even compare it to a half-life 2? It's insane. Games in general should really only be compared against other similar games, because otherwise it's like trying to compare your mom's special clam chowder to the most recent episode of Heroes. (9.4 / 7.76 respectively) - Brad, starting the review with a spit in the face of the genre of the game you're reviewing is generally not wise and tends to piss people off. I come to destructoid because generally the reviews have been of pretty good quality and the reviewers (in general) tend to have my tastes. More importantly they've been entertaining. - So here's where I actually started to get pissed off. Half of your review was stating the obvious. We're talking book report grade A classic horse manure filler paragraphs. I could have and did get 75% of the information from your review about Tales of Vesperia from the instruction manual and opening sequence. - Your lazy, cluttered and boring sentences put me to sleep, but I forced myself to read it. You know what's worse than being controversial? Being bland. - I could go on but it's not worth the effort. I mean, look at him. I bet he brings a guitar to parties. You know what? I didn't even like Tales of Vesperia that much. It was just the general lack of effort, the shitty attitude and whitewashing of one of my favorite places to just fuck around that's made me sad. To all of my friends and editors still left here this really wasn't intended to be a personal attack (well except brad) and I hope it isn't taken personally. yours truly, -BHZ PS. If you don't hear from me again Niero had me killed with some Miami connections, and I want you all to know it was totally worth it
|
|
|
|
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
|
Comment with FacebookClick connect and comment instantly! |
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds |
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

Follow
RSS
Contact
Stayed tooned for the answer tomorrow on Dragon Ball Zeeeeeeee!
Maybe you were gone for some of that?
But . . . well I dunno. Sometimes you need reviews by people that loves them some genre, and sometimes you need that outsider/hater perspective.
I'll bet there's a bunch of people that wrote reviews the way you wanted to see them. Metacritic has a bunch, right?
Again, I dunno. It just seems like a helluva lot of weight to put on one site, to write reviews that cater specifically to you every single time.
And, I guess, maybe you've forgotten how ridiculously defensive this community is? Did you miss the Luc Bernard thing? dude basically got stormed, not solely because he put out a busted app, but because he called out Destructoid's integrity/professionalism/je ne sais qua in a dickish sort of way.
I take it your pissed, which is all good. But, this is the hornet's nest you're poking, man. Welcome to it, again.
I find if I go away, as with any community, I end up on the outside. I come back expecting all the faces I assumed would be here replaced. Even though the turnover is huge, when you're embedded within the community, days become weeks and so it never seems to be moving that fast, but it is.
Things are continuing as normal :)
As for suggesting we have 3 - 4 people on a review, that's not even nearly practical. Not many of us are able to write full-time, and since review copies are limited, good luck finding more than a small percent of staff who are buying on launch day AND want to drop a review. The very fact that we even DO multi-man reviews is more than most sites.
Finally, it will probably upset you to know that I intend to use Nicholson for more reviews in the future.
I get your point. I wouldn't want Topher reviewing a first person shooter, but if he did I wouldn't go about it in the way you did.
And before someone asks me, "why so serious," shut the fuck up.
Also, the more we move away from looking like 4chan the better. Seriously, that place is pathetic and awful.
I suggest listening to Podtoid 20. Things change, but some things are etched in ether for all of time.
Must supply beast and location, sir. Must supply beast and location.
I get what you're saying, but saying "also, cocks" and calling an editor at a site a "cock" is two very different things. Plenty of people on the net disagree about things, but the personal insults need to go away.
If BHZ had a point he could have written a constructive blog address his concerns, but what he chose to do was write a blog insulting a person who contributes to this site in a big way.
the word "cock" is censored. No matter how you use it. i mean I understand why its censored, but still....
I review this blog a 6.4/10.
I may or may not agree with what you're saying but I can appreciate your opinion and applaud you for actually having the balls to do what others would want to do but are afraid to
INNERNET DRAMA IS SERIOUS BIDNESS!
I thought that line was awesome.
The site's been going this direction for a while. Sucks that I missed out on the "kind words" you had for Brad #2 last night. My advice is to lurk the IRC and check out the community spin off sites that have popped up (like Negative Gamer or Media Whore Network) for a taste of what's left of "the good ol' days".
@Vexed:
Destructoid was never like 4chan... sure there were memes, and trolling occurred, but it never got too out of hand (the way it does at 4chan) because there was accountability. In summation: "Why so serious?"
That's why if I want a review of a game, I go to the fans AND the reviews. Fanservice reviews are great and all, but there's a certain respect I carry for critics if they're willing to overstep their boundaries to prove a point.
But as bahamut stressed, why have reviewers review games for genres they don't like? I'd never read a review written by me about a Madden game because I think football is brain poison. But if I were seeking out the review of someone who knows sports games, I'd definitely go to Samit for that.
It's about recognizing the benefits of the editors you have. Don't give JRPGs to Brad.
Jim. If you're so adamant that Brad's the one to do this task, let him review the next Dynasty Warriors game on his own.
@ Bahamut
GOD I hate those motherfuckers that bring guitars to parties. I especially hate the ones that bring a classical guitar and start playing Metallica... o_O
That is the best analogy I've ever heard.
And, @alex - Complaining about the entire webiste channel, and saying its bad simply because of 2 boards is like saying Destructoid is garbage because Summa and Wiisucks where here.
Don't pigeonhole the entire site because you don't like /b/
Don't draw comparisons between any portion of this site and 4chan.
You people may float over here from fapping over your sauces and memes, but you leave your twisted shit over at NextLust if you don't mind.
I don't go to /b/ anyway, I check out /v/ sometimes, but I'm mostly lurking in /toy/ mostly for my custom work.
again, YOU are pigeonholing an entire site because of one part.
"Also cocks" -- funny.
"Brad Nicholson sucks cocks, is fisting X girl, etc." -- not funny, and also an unwarranted personal attack against my staff because you didn't like his game review? C'mon.
Know the difference. Useful life skill.
take that as you may.