They moved the critics screening to the week I'm at E3. I almost cancelled the entire trip. Fucking fuckers.
@Mr. Wilson: Take a look at the rest of the review. It's just as amazing to read. It's the single best review I've ever read on IGN.
@Cowzilla: THAT is a conflict of interests if I've ever heard of one, shit. Haha.
@Cowzilla: THAT is a conflict of interests if I've ever heard of one, shit. Haha.
gee... see a movie that will be in theaters everywhere for the next couple months, or go to one of the worlds premier gaming conventions.... Cowzilla... can I punch you?
@B-Radicate:
No offense intended, but shouldn't that opinion be held until after you actually see the movie?
No offense intended, but shouldn't that opinion be held until after you actually see the movie?
@Arttemis: The 5/5 wasn't my personal review of the movie (not that I doubt mine will differ much, if at all). That was the score IGN gave the movie so that if you didn't wanna follow the link and read the review yourself, which you apparently didn't (or else you would have seen that), you could know what score they actually gave the movie.
No offense intended.
No offense intended.
@B-Radicate: Erm, you misunderstood me. I was referring to your comment "it's the single best reivew I've read on IGN."
I knew that your blog was about IGN's review and I did skim through the pages.
I knew that your blog was about IGN's review and I did skim through the pages.
@Arttemis: Uh... saying that the review was the best written review I've ever read on IGN has NOTHING to do with the score at the end OR the movie itself. It's simply a really well thought out and pieced together article.
How does what I think of the movie have anything to do with my personal feelings about the review itself? By itself it's a much better written piece than most film reviews, period.
I'm still confused at what you meant by your comments.
How does what I think of the movie have anything to do with my personal feelings about the review itself? By itself it's a much better written piece than most film reviews, period.
I'm still confused at what you meant by your comments.
@B-Radicate: No need to be upset. I seriously meant no offense when I first said it, and still do!
I agree that the review is shockingly well written!
My thoughts were that, since you haven't seen the movie yet, perhaps you might not agree with every aspect of the review.
I wasn't trying to question the movie or your preconceptions about it!
The movie looks to be great, and even better than Christian Bale's first.
A review could rate my favorite movie 10/10 but I might still completely disagree with its reasonings... That was my point.
Again, no offense intended... =/
I agree that the review is shockingly well written!
My thoughts were that, since you haven't seen the movie yet, perhaps you might not agree with every aspect of the review.
I wasn't trying to question the movie or your preconceptions about it!
The movie looks to be great, and even better than Christian Bale's first.
A review could rate my favorite movie 10/10 but I might still completely disagree with its reasonings... That was my point.
Again, no offense intended... =/
If you were commenting on the writing style (and not the subject matter - since none of us have seen it yet), then completely ignore anything/everything I said.
It is well written!
It is well written!
@arttemis: Alright, yeah, what I meant was that the manner in which he covered the movie was just really great. I don't care about what he said, it could have been a review about Journey to the Center of the Earth and if it was as expertly crafted as this one I would have said the same thing. It was simply a very well written article.
I took no offense. No worries. I was just confused.
@corak: I get RS in the mail. I'll wait for it 'til then.
I took no offense. No worries. I was just confused.
@corak: I get RS in the mail. I'll wait for it 'til then.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

send message
follow
followers







