For the past six or so months, I've been waiting for Mistwalker's epic Lost Odyssey to be released. After playing Blue Dragon, I was very disappointed. I expected Blue Dragon to be the must have RPG for the 360. Being skeptical, I waited for reviews of Lost Odyssey in order to form a more rounded opinion.
I couldn't have made a worse decision.
When I read the IGN, GameSpot, and 1up reviews of Lost Odyssey, I began to notice a trend. What's happening to game journalism? It seems that when Spore was announced, and Portal came out, a magic spell was cast on the entire gaming press, making them innovation whores. Lost Odyssey was receiving mediocre grades because it's traditional, regardless of it's well written story.
Lost Odyssey is a fine game, and doesn't take risks for a good reason. Most JRPGs in the past few years that have tried to take risk were fun, but forgettable, with the exception of Final Fantasy XII, which is a change for the series but not 100% innovative. People need to understand that JRPGs are traditional by default, and that's what gave the genre it's name. The genre is heavily story based, and it keeps their gameplay intact for hardcore fans.
GameSpot, IGN and 1up, Final Fantasy VII was a great game in your opinion, wasn't it? You flourished it with near perfect grades, even though every RPG from eras before it shared the same gameplay. What happened now? Portal changed your life, and mine too, but it's unnecessary to make every game different. That will only dry out ideas, and curse the industry for the rest of its days.
|
I'm considering buying Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 but when I look at the current videos it looks EXACTLY the same as the first Vegas. Including the graphics (sub-par at this point in the 360's life cycle, imo). However, Vegas was one of my favorite shooters EVER. My roommate and I played it up until The Orange Box came out. We both loved it, even the shitty co-op (which has apparently been revised in the new installment).
So, what am I to do? Accept the fact there's another game in a series I inherently adore that may simply be "more of the same" or pass and possibly forgo playing another thrilling FPS experience (that may or may not actually be able to tear me away from CoD4)? Does it matter? SHOULD it matter?
It's odd I love CoD4 so much because it's CLEARLY less innovative than even the original Vegas was. The lack of a cover system is abysmal, but it's still tons of fun based almost purely on the intense story, dynamic online play, and riveting graphics. None of those said aspects are innovative, either. Odd.
LO is a really decent game(from what I've seen) the only fault I could throw at it is I prefer RTC in my RPGs and strangely I hated FF7....
[url=http://www.uncov.com/assets/2007/9/16/picard-facepalm.jpeg[/img][/url]