-Gamer since the age of 4
-Comic Book fan (Hellblazer/Kingdom Come/Blade/Dr. Strange)
*Final Fantasy X
*Star Wars: KotoR
*Star Wars: Battlefront
*Dragon Age Origins
*Monster Rancher 4
*Metal Gear Solid 4
*Final Fantasy Dissidia
*Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines
-MMOs + Multiplayer:
*The Secret World
I'm not only a video gamer, I enjoy many table top games. I used to be the only judge for Heroclix back in 2008, I play Magic: The Gathering, Pokemon, World of Darkness, D&D 3.5, Legion of Superheroes, The Authority, and I've dabbled in Pathfinder. Out of all of these things that I've played over the years, nothing brought more enjoyment to me than playing World of Darkness/Vampire the Masquerade. The darkness of it all and the freedom to explore the supernatural in more ways than I could count made me excited for every Thursday night. Around 2004, I remember seeing a review of Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines on TechTV and that intrigued me. I had heard about Redemption, but never got to play it due to the lack of stores that carried computer games at the time and for some reason, it was really expensive on ebay. I eventually got both and loved Bloodlines more than anything. Bloodlines is actually on my top 10 list of my favorite video games.
So, I sign on to steam about a week ago and see that there's this game called DARK. Always trying to keep up with what's going on with steam, I checked it out and watched the trailer. It made me curious due to the fact that the more I watched, the more it looked like Bloodlines, only updated. You can check out the trailer below:
DARK is about a newly turned vampire who has amnesia. He finds out that essentially he wasn't fully turned, so to ensure that he doesn't turn into a mindless ghoul, he's in search of his sire so he can drink his blood. The game mixes stealth with RPG elements and is brought to you by Realmforge and Kalypso.
The game boasts a ton of skills that you can use from stealth to take down your enemies. Everything from temporary invisibility to teleportation that can end in stealth kills. From my understanding, your skills use up certain amounts of blood, to which you will have to feed to regain it again which would be similar, obviously, to VtM:B. You can also make dialogue choices which is something else that Bloodlines has.
The game itself is 3D cel-shaded and despite it's dark atmosphere, has a lot of vibrancy with the lighting and colors. The characters look similar to the ones in bloodlines, even down to the sneak moves and walking form that the main character has that resembles my Gangrel character.
So, when it comes down to it, for as much as it reminds me of Bloodlines, I'm hoping they've done something that is completely different and fresh. I like the idea of the game and, from what I've seen, I like the way it looks. DARK has potential to be a great game and seems to have a great idea about vampire skills in a game like this. The high speed movement which is considered teleportation is something that movies and books have touched on for a long time When it comes down to it, it's one of those things that no one really knows until they play it. I've been wrong before when choosing games. We'll see about this one.
DARK comes out June 28th on Steam for $39.99 with guide (pre-order $33.99) and Xbox 360 on July 9th for $49.99 that also comes with a digital package that has the main theme, guide, digital wallpaper, etc.
This will probably be blasphemy to a lot of people, but I didn't care for AC 1. I was excited when it first came out, and, in fact, it was going to be the reason I eventually got a Playstation 3. Soon after the game came out, my best friend had just gotten an Xbox 360 from his girlfriend and he eagerly came down to my house, hooked it up, then we went to rent AC 1. We sat down and within 30 minutes, realized that, though you are a master assassin and can jump off of buildings, you cannot swim. This just made us laugh at the game because it made no sense. Our expectations were essentially that it would be Tenchu: Stealth Assassins (which is one of our all-time favorite games) on steroids. It obviously wasn't at all. Later on, I ended up getting a PS3 and bought the game to fully give it a try. To me, it was just the same stuff over and over again and it was boring. I spent more time running around and just sword fighting people.
Over the years, I've had reasons not to play the series, mainly due to my first experience which was also helped by the annoyance of a certain fanboy in college that talked constantly about it. When AC3 first came out and I saw the previews on television, however, I was intrigued and I thought to myself that it could be the game that gets me into the series. I'm a history nerd anyways and having early American history brought into it was something that I got almost giddy about. One big fantasy came to me as I watched the tv spot for the third time that I could recreate the scene in The Patriot where Mel Gibson butchers everyone with a tomahawk in the woods. I could only hope. I was still skeptical about buying the game, but figured that if it got down to $20, I'd give it a shot.
So imagine my curious eagerness when the E3 sale began on PS3 and Assassin's Creed was available to me for $19 and change. I browsed around the net, looking for what it was like and questioning people and, for the most part, got negative responses. That's perfect, because I really don't have the same taste in games as the majority, and if i do, it's because I like the games for different reasons. I ended up getting it and installed it. From the start, I was hooked. Haytham Kenway was a badass and seemed to be an interesting character to play as. Connor has even interested me as a main character. I started to question, however, why so many people seemed to hate this game with such passion. So I've compiled a list of reasons most people seemed to have in common for hating this game or considering it one of the worst in the series.
1. Connor's Personality Compared to Haytham Kenway, Connor seems to be a bit more stoic. Most people can't seem to get behind that type of personality for the role of a game's hero. I think the difference is important to the story, however, due to what Connor has dealt with. Not only is he exposed to a world that is completely different from the world that surrounded his village, but he's also learning things that men might take years upon years to learn, in a relatively short amount of time. Caution would be needed in his situation, not just from a Templar/Brotherhood standpoint, but also from a minority standpoint at that specific time in history especially. I think as gamers, we get so used to the quick-witted charismatic main character, that we forget, and in some cases, resent the fact that characters could be and should be different in leading roles. I have read where some have looked at Connor as being smug or arrogant, but I think if you look at his actions through the side-missions and throughout the main story, he's far from it. He's just different.
2. The Setting I think this is just a matter of opinion and, honestly to most gamers I've met, the era that the game center's itself around isn't of interest in any way. It's unfortunate really, because there was so much that went on in that time that changed the world. Again, it's just a matter of opinion. I did watch a video of a kid's top five reasons he didn't like the game at all and one was because he said he didn't care about American history because he was from the UK but he could get behind the history in the other games. This made me chuckle because American history at this time is Native/British/French history.
3. Gameplay I can only speak for the Playstation version. I don't know what it is like on Xbox or PC. I don't think the controls were confusing at all. I liked the fighting system and thought it was easy enough to get used to. I didn't feel like much changed as far as getting around goes. Jumping and running seemed to be the same as the other game I played. People seemed to have a problem out of the lock-picking but i thought that was fairly easy to get used to. Again, I'm not sure if Xbox and PC were worse. I have wondered how the Naval Battles would work on PC as far as controls. I had heard a lot about glitches with the gameplay and I hadn't really ran into any. If I had, they were probably minor as I didn't notice. I'm also use to glitches so my brain probably doesn't process much after I've played Saint's Row: The Third.
4. Story Again, I think honestly this is opinion. A lot of people said that the story lacked. I felt the same way about the first game, whereas others seemed to hold that one pretty high up on their lists. I did find this to be a common issue people had about the game, but it's one of those things where I'm not sure if it's because I didn't get into the series or because it's just the varying of interests, but people seemed to talk about story a lot. Their opinions would range from saying it just didn't interest them to calling people names for even saying they enjoyed it. I personally enjoy it.
Overall, despite some things I did raise an eyebrow at, I enjoyed the game and thought it was fun and had a good mix of action, stealth, and rpg. I'm actually thinking about getting Black Flag when it comes out