Quantcast


Blizzard Store is now selling a new mount and a pet photo

UPDATE: Blizzard has responded to our request for comment.

The World of Warcraft arm of the Blizzard Store is no longer a place solely devoted to selling in-game virtual pets and adorable plush animals. As of this afternoon, it's a digital storefront that sells useful digital items for the MMO.

An update to the Blizzard Store ushered in the game's first for-cost mount, the Celestial Steed. It's a winged beast that is armored from its nose to back. Its most notable visual feature is its translucent skin, a kickback from being "freshly" born from a place Blizzard is calling the "Twisting Nether."

As fantastic as it looks, the new mount isn't an overpowered, end-all piece of content. It can only travel as fast as users' riding skill. The example in the Blizzard Store uses the mount's top speed (310% speed) and cautions that it can only travel that fast if "you have at least one other 310% mount."

So, yes, it's a functional in-game mount but as the description indicates, it's nothing you don't have. Speaking with me this afternoon via e-mail, Blizzard's Shon Damron called it a "purely cosmetic" mount and compared it to the mounts offered through the World of Warcraft Trading Card Game.

"As with the non-combat pets available in the online store (such as Lil’ KT or the Pandaren Monk) or the mounts available through the World of Warcraft Trading Card Game, the Celestial Steed is purely cosmetic. After the launch of the Pet Store, we received a lot of requests from the community to offer mounts as well; as with the pets, the Celestial Steed simply offers players a fun way to customize the look of their characters without detracting from the gameplay."

Making the Steed an addition that didn't usher in an advantage to purchasers was "critical" to Blizzard.

"It was critical that the Celestial Steed didn’t provide players with any gameplay advantages," Damron said. "With any of the paid services we offer, whether it’s Paid Name Changes, Race Changes, Character Re-Customizations, or offering pets and mounts in the Pet Store, our goal is to design the service in a way that’s not detrimental to the game and that doesn't detract from the gameplay experience for players who choose not to use the service.

"As with the other pets or mounts available through the World of Warcraft TCG, the Celestial Steed is entirely optional and intended to provide players another means to enjoy World of Warcraft."

There is a queue for the new, non-game-breaking mount. Tens of thousands of users are lined up and waiting for their purchase. As of just a few minutes ago, unofficial World of Warcraft Web site WoW.com reported that over 140,000 people are in the Store's queue and will be sitting without the Celestial Steed for, at least, around seven hours.

And the queue, as the Store states, "does not guarantee that you will have the opportunity to purchase an item," but Damron said there are no plans to limit The Celestial Steed.

The Celestial Steed flying mount is selling for $25.00 dollars and can be gifted to other players -- players who may not agree with what Blizzard is selling for a simple reason: one thing can lead to another. As one user on the official message board for the game puts it, "so … how long 'till they start selling gear … or gold even …"

"We have no plans to offer gold or gear to players in this fashion," Damron told me, speaking to his previous point of offering players fun customization, at a price, without comprimising the MMO.

The Steed was joined by another digital download this afternoon, a virtual pet by the name of Lil' XT. The pet's launch over the Store was easily overshadowed by the Celestial Mount because of its in-game functionality.

"Programmed with boundless energy and a child-like enthusiasm," the Store's description of the pet reads, "Lil' XT, the mini-Deconstructor, awaits adoption by a capable and adventurous parent." According to the store, the pet's "tantrums" are electric.

Lil' XT is selling for $10.00 and can be gifted as well.

Both items, once activated, can be used across any World of Warcraft accounts tied to a single North American license.

Source: Queue for Celestial Steed and Lil' XT is above 80,000 [WoW.com]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

38 comments | showing # 1 to 38
prev next

Adam's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:22
Adam
Well, so far Blizzard has avoided selling anything that affects gameplay. I figure the closes they'll ever get to selling gear is "Buy a skin that'll make any of your 2-handers look like an Arcanite Reaper"
GodofWar86's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:27
GodofWar86
I think they will sell a lot more vanity items. It only makes sense as it doesn't really alter the gaming experience but it allows them to make money.

I just hope they don't catch the DLC bug otherwise they will be selling game-altering weapons that make gameplay easier like most developers do now for single player games.
Max-'s Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:27
Max-
A friend purchased a celestial gryphon tonight and for the £17 it costs it's an underwhelmingly shit (and also smaller than expected) mount, and there's so many more meaningful ways of spending your money -- like giving it me! :D
dj-anon's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:27
dj-anon
As long as it doesn't affect gameplay.
Tubatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:32
Tubatic
Wow, $25? That's like selling Avatar clothes for that much, basically. Dang ridiculous.

XT, if he has some functionality on him (quests? a build in store/repair shop?), that's pretty cool. I'm an engineer (oh yeah, also a hunter...) and THAT couldbe pretty cool, like the ethereal trader "pet" you could win from the trading card game.

I don't think they're going to ever do gear for pay... but this IS an activision Blizzard...
TheOldHouse's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:33
TheOldHouse
WOW talk about a ripoff!
MrBounce's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:40
MrBounce
As long as it's vanity items, who cares?
Drzog's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 18:41
Drzog
"As long as it's vanity items, who cares?"

People who care about the direction the videogame industry is taking that's who.
mackie junior's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 19:09
mackie junior
@Drzog

What's wrong with transactions for vanity items? Gameplay isn't affected; the items are basically just a badge saying "I'm willing to piss more money on this game than you", and I don't see a big problem with that. It's when real money buys a better character that this becomes an issue.

(Of course, I could be missing something; feel free to elaborate. I'm pretty interested in what people think about DLC of any form or gameplay consequence.)
LoftyTheMetroid's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 19:46
LoftyTheMetroid
I agree with Drzog. Even if it doesn't (initially) affect gameplay, these sorts of things damage the integrity of the medium.

It's like the ****ing hats in TF2. Games should be treated like individual works, not commercialized services or sources for revenue.

(DLC like a major WoW patch or a TF2 Class Update are fully justified, however.)
Schmo0zle's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 19:47
Schmo0zle
$25 is too much for an e-horse.
CapnCrunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 20:00
CapnCrunk
They're already charging $15 a month, it's pretty ridiculous. They're only doing it because people will buy it. I stopped playing about two months ago I never considered buying those vanity pets but plenty of people in my guild and on my server did.
Glenn Morris's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 20:04
Glenn Morris
Wow! Celestial Horses!? I was just thinking I needed more accessories after growing this vagina.
Krazian's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 20:57
Krazian
Jesus christ, they are making absolute bank off this. 140,000 people in the first day getting it, comes out to 3.5 million dollars. 3.5 million for a fucking vanity item that they made with their eyes closed. People are fucking ridiculous.
Xaeius's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 21:09
Xaeius
25 dollars may be to much for an in-game horse... but Blizzard is making 3.5 Million off it if there really is a queue of 140,000 people waiting for it...
Kim Fidler's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 21:27
Kim Fidler
At least you get the horse with the armor now.
Iron Dragon's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 21:45
Iron Dragon
What bothers me isn't blizzard charging $25. Though it's a bit of an asshole move they're completely sane in doing it from a business standpoint.

What really bothers me is the morons willing to throw out $25 for a single mount. That's half a new game. Is one crummy mount really equal to the amount of content you can find in another game?

Then again these are blizzard fans. They're insane to begin with.
DarkTravesty's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 21:54
DarkTravesty
@ iron dragon: i guess i'm a moron then dont look down on me because i have desposable income and you dont.
Spykron's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 22:28
Spykron
ok, people who are upset with this, think of it this way

games like magic the gathering or warhammer offer all kinds of premium items like play mats, special dice, custom figures, card sleeves, fancy counters etc...

these paid items are just like that.
jean2317's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 22:29
jean2317
Want.
LazyAza's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 22:30
LazyAza
@Iron Dragon

Theirs a big difference between a 'Blizzard Fan' and a World of Warcraft addict you know. You shouldn't label the two as one and the same.
Spykron's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 22:33
Spykron
@lazyaza

hell yea. i love WoW but it was starcraft that got me to love blizzard.

blizzard ftw.

and that happens forever.
Rabite's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 23:03
Rabite
Bethesada does this and people mock and bitch. Blizzard does it and people line up to buy it. I guess Beth just didn't charge enough for it.
brod's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 23:11
brod
I don't see what the big deal is. As a long time WoW player I'm not opposed to it. I won't be buying the items though.
Logo's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 23:13
Logo
I've heard an estimation that the horse has already made over $2mil (wow!)

I can't really blame Blizzard. They're free to charge how they want for their services.

I can't really blame players. They're free to vote with their wallets.

But seriously? Come on? Economics is really going to determine that a game with a revenue EXCEEDING the GDP of some countries ALSO gets to charge $25 for a downloadable horse and $10 for a pet?

Come on people, you're supposed to vote with your wallets. Don't give into this kind of crap.

The same applies to the $15 map pack, WoW TCG (kinda, I heard it's a good TCG at least), or day 1 on-cd paid DLC.
Logo's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 23:15
Logo
Oops, forgot part of my conclusion.

I also do fault Blizzard a little bit. Shame on them for having their cake (box fee), their other cake (subscription fees), then eating them both (paid content).
Spykron's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/15/2010 23:29
Spykron
@logo

yes, shame on them for having the talent to make wildly popular games. and shame on them for making money off it. >_>

oh and dont forget to shame the players who are willing to spend 15 a month on a huge source of entertainment.
Mabans's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 00:01
Mabans
It's $25 for an item every single one of your toons can have. Seems far to me.. BTW it's only a rip off if you feel your money being taken from you. Last time I check you don't need to buy it..
Electrium's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 00:05
Electrium
@ Bans - You realize $25 could buy you two months of subscription to the same game? Or hell, you could buy a couple of games on Steam for the same amount. The question is how much is too much for pixels...? I thought $2 was too much for something like that, but clearly you think $25 is a bargain.
Spykron's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 00:17
Spykron
@electrium

how much is too much for pixel? look at it like this.

why do people buy posters/art/wreathes and baskets etc to hang on their walls?
because it looks cool.

this really isnt any different.
Logo's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 00:28
Logo
Is it fair to complain when people pass over good games when they're on crazy sales? Do you ever say, "Hey man you totally need to buy Psychonauts on Steam it's only $5, you'd be stupid not to buy it!"? Do you get happy when things are priced crazy cheap even if no one else buys them? Essentially do you ever feel emotion when the supply and demand curves cause the price point for an item to be different than your perception of the value?

Chances are you have at least once done something like above. The point is this situation is no different than all the others. Many people, myself included, are really disappointed that the price point for such an item seems to be $25. I find it to be a grossly overpriced and it's disappointing that other people don't feel the same way to the point of voting with their wallets.

It's pretty BS to tell everyone that they're supposed to just shutup and enjoy the price whatever it is set at. That's a really anti-capitalism view when you're putting forth an otherwise pro-free market viewpoint.

Those of us who are disappointed are raising our voices to say so. This way other people make rethink how much they value such an item or a company will realize that a lower price point may net additional customers. Just like we raise our voices when something is a great deal we also raise our voices in protest when we feel that a company is charging too much.
Spykron's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 01:33
Spykron
@logo

you raise an interesting point with the supply and demand. these things are virtual, and basically have a limitless supply. so how do you go about figuring the price/value of something that is infinitely available?

i think the 25 dollar price tag is set not only because blizz knows ppl will pay it and they can make a fortune, but also to keep the mount somewhat unique. if it were free or only 5 dollars, everyone would have one.

with the higher price point, people can show off and feel special. similar to how the special mounts in game require and investment in time, this requires an investment in money. and time is money friends! (the goblins say that a lot, for those of you that don't play wow)
Rankcanine's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 02:18
Rankcanine
meh i dont see a problem with it as long as it doesnt effect gameplay. and plus 25$ is was too much for a mount. I'm happy with my lifetime subscrition to LOTRO never have to pay a subscription fee again .
Suigyoken's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 04:17
Suigyoken
Kotick is laying back in his office chair and smoking something nice right as he saw those queue numbers..
Kaspar's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 07:59
Kaspar
Actually, this mount isn't so worthless as Blizzard tries to make it seem.

It's Bound to Account nature means that you will never have to buy another mount to any of your characters again, and being a horse with wings, it's one of the few mounts that is just like a regular (albeit shiny) ground mount in the old world and non-flying zones, and a ground and flying mount in all places that allow flying. And that's some useful shit, because you dont have to stop to remount when you enter/exit these zones.
Hazurr's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/16/2010 17:18
Hazurr
25 Dollers!! NETHERS WILL BE TWISTED INDEED!!
Haylzorz's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/18/2010 13:28
Haylzorz
Oh geez I'm so bored with all the whinging that has been done about this mount :(
When I randomly visited the WoW website I was shocked to see they were selling a mount. But in a good way. I bought it. Because I'm one of those mount collector types. And I thought it was pretty. Simples. I love the BoA aspect as well. I love the cosmetic parts to WoW. I collect the pets too (even though I didn't buy Lil' XT.)

Oh but I guess I'm a girl so that makes it okay right?

-__-

But seriously, with all the boring ass threads that were made in the WoW europe forums, I'm sick to the back teeth of all the crap that has kicked off due to Blizz releasing a buyable mount.
Katya's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2011 04:53
Katya
And the queue, as the Store states, "does not guarantee that you will have the opportunity to purchase an item," but Damron said there are no plans to limit The Celestial Steed.
Best regards, Katya, CEO of blu ray burner, iscsiadm linux
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!