When it was revealed that Diablo III would require a permanent connection to Battle.net, some people became furious. Blizzard has argued that there are valid gameplay reasons for the requirement, but to many PC gamers, it's yet more crappy DRM. Blizzard is surprised by the reaction.
"Internally I don't think [DRM] ever actually came up when we talked about how we want connections to operate," VP Robert Bridenbecker told MTV. "Things that came up were always around the feature-set, the sanctity of the actual game systems like your characters. You're guaranteeing that there are no hacks, no dupes ... the whole copy protection, piracy thing, that's not really entering into why we want to do it.
"... If there's a compelling reason for you to have that online connectivity that enhances the gameplay, that doesn't suck. That's awesome."
Bridenbecker reminded fans of Diablo II, where they needed a separate online character, and reaffirmed how Diablo III would eliminate that problem. He also promised that the game wouldn't turn out to be like Facebook, where the online connectivity demanded all sorts of social nonsense.
In the case of this game, I'd say Blizzard makes good and fair points. It's better than Ubisoft's "f*ck 'em" approach.
Get more destructoid: We're indie-run, blogging for the love of it, and our site will always be free. Optionally, you can support us and get: (1) Faster pages from our cloud server (3) Wide(r)screen (3) No big ads on Dtoid, Japanator, Tomopop, or Flixist (4) Auto contest entries, and (5) Dibs on betas & downloads. Try it out
Unsavory comments? Please report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our moderators, and flag the user (we will ban users dishing bad karma). Can't see comments? Apps like Avast or browser extensions can cause it. You can fix it by adding *.disqus.com to your whitelists.